Revealing The Truth About the Democratic Party

Page 1

Revealing The Truth About the Democratic Party By frantz November 18, 2011

I have done extensive research on the subject because at one point, I was a Democrat. A few years ago, I was confronted with a fact that I knew to be false but after an investigation into the point, it turned out to be true. It was that Martin Luther King was a Republican. This of course forced me to extend my research into other areas. What else could this Political Science Major be unaware of? The Truth became stranger than fiction. The list is quite long so here we go. President Kennedy had little intention of enacting a Comprehensive Civil Rights Law during his 2 years in office. Tensions in society were running so high due to the riots and such that by the 1963 State of the Union address he had no other choice but to enact some kind of Law. Mind you, for the previous 100 years, it had only been the Republican Party who had supported any Civil Rights


Legislations (I was not aware of these facts until I was 35 years old); 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery and Servitude Forever 100% Republican Support 23% Democratic Support 14th Amendment Slaves can Become Citizens 94% Republican Support 0% Democratic Support

15th Amendment Right to Vote 100% Republican Support 0% Democratic Support

CRA 1866

Enacted by the Republican Party

Equal Rights

CRA 1871

Enacted by the Republican Party

Anti-KKK

CRA 1875

Anti-Discrimination

99% Republican Support 0% Democratic Support

———–It took another 82 years until the next Civil Rights Act——— ———–The Democratic Party blocked every attempt to equalize citizens of color—– CRA 1957

Enacted by the Eisenhower (R) Administration


Then Senator Kennedy Voted against this Bill Filibustered by Democrats CRA 1960

Enacted by the Eisenhower (R) Administration

The final version was watered down by then Senator LBJ Filibustered by the Democrats CRA 1964

Anti-Discrimination

82% Republican Support 63% Democratic Support

CRA 1965

Voting Rights

87% Republican Support 75% Democratic Support

I do not want the “government” to treat me any differently than any other citizen. Therefore, I consider equality of opportunity and equal voting rights to be the summation of Civil Rights in America. If anything extra is afforded me or anyone else merely due to the color of their skin, I consider that to be an entitlement and patronizing. Given my above statement, the Democratic Party, even if you sectionalize them by North and South, has never outvoted the Republican Party in any Civil Rights Law…Ever. The actual numbers play out like this; Lifetime Republican Party support for Equal Rights for all Citizens:

94%

Lifetime Democratic Party Support for Equal rights for all Citizens:

35%

Now to the point of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This was a proposal that the Republican Party, during the Eisenhower Administration attempted to put forth but alas, their efforts resulted in the first Civil Rights Law in the previous 82 years…The Civil Rights Act of 1957 formed a Commission on Civil Rights. The Plan of the Commission was to eventually enact the very Comprehensive Law of 1964. Remember, this was the Bill that Senator JFK voted against, for political aspirations I’m sure. JFK had his Justice department write the original Bill in early 1963. The first version passed the House but stalled in the Senate. Everett McKinley Dirksen (R), the minority leader in the Senate took it upon


himself to REWRITE the entire Bill. It took him 1 weekend and he had 2 helpers, 1 Democrat and another Republican. The final version of the 1964 Civil Rights Act was written by a Republican which means that since the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, every Civil Rights Law was written by a Republican with more Republican support than Democratic Party Support. Due to Dirksen’s tenacity, a cloture vote was successful and the Senate passed the Bill. It then passed the Houses and became Law. Some notes about its passage; Robert Byrd (D) filibustered the Bill…the longest filibuster in American History William Fulbright (D) voted against the Bill. He was Bill Clinton’s mentor. Al Gore Sr. (D) voted against the Bill Speaking to two Governors on Air Force One, then President LB Johnson was quoted saying, “”I’ll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” according Ronald Kessler’s Book in relation to the Law. So now let’s explore the Dixicrats. This has always been misrepresented. I wrote about it in my book, and I also made a video of it. Here is the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdJsPsU55PM The big question is, did the South really turn “Red” after the CRA of 1964? Well, I researched that also and found the following conclusions. Presidential Elections (covering “The Solid South”) The 11 Former Confederate States Year

Blue States

Red States

1964

6

1968

6 (Segregationist Wallace took 5)

5

1972

Landslide

1976

Landslide

5


1980

Landslide

1984

Landslide

1988

Landslide

1992

4

7

1996

4

7

2000

0

11

2004

0

11

2008

3

8

At least in Presidential elections, the Solid South wasn’t so “solid” until at least the year 2000 or 36 years after the CRA of 1964. Now let’s take a look at the Governorships. Governorships since 1964 (The 11 former “Confederate States”) State

Blue

Red

Georgia

7

2

39 years

Mississippi

8

2

28 years

Alabama

9

3

23 years

Louisiana

6

4

16 years

Texas South Carolina Arkansas North Carolina

5 5 9 7

4 5 3 2

Years until a “Red” Gov. was elected

15 years 11 years 9 years 9 years

Tennessee

5

4

7 years

Virginia

7

5

6 years

Florida

7

5

3 years

Total

75

39

That’s almost 2 to 1 Blue over Red. I looked at the facts and not the rhetoric. The facts point to a different conclusion all together. The South did not become “Solid Red” after the CRA of 1964.


After finding out that both Martin Luther King Sr. and Jr. were Republicans, I tend to deal only in facts and not with what I’ve been told. Last Points My former party, The Democratic Party says that they are for the “minority”. In this case, I’ll just say “blacks”. I believe in neither black nor minority but I defer to their thinking for this discussion. If that’s the case, then how could the following piece of history have been erased? Ninety-nine percent of the country does not know the name Hiram Rhodes Revels. Here is his story and why the Democrats are not for “black” people. At the end of the Civil War, Jefferson Davis, the President of the Confederacy, was captured and subsequently imprisoned for 2 years. Prior to this time period, Mr. Davis was a Senator from the State of Mississippi. In 1870, the State of Mississippi filled the vacant post of Mr. Davis with one Hiram Rhodes Revels. The curious fact behind this exchange is that now Senator Hiram Rhodes Revels did not only replace the President of the Confederacy, but he was also the First Black Senator in U.S. History…and virtually nobody knows his name. One last point to explain this lack of universal knowledge…Jefferson Davis, The President of the Confederacy was a Democrat and his replacement, Senator Hiram Rhodes Revels, was a Republican. Democratic leadership today will never share that history with their constituents of which I once was. That led me to believe that the Democratic Party is more interested in my vote than the Truth. It gets bit deeper. 13 former slaves became members of Congress between 1870 and 1901. We as a nation killed our own citizens in a Civil War to FREE 4 Million slaves. 13 of those freed slaves became members of the U.S. Congress and the history books are silent to this fact. 640,000 Americans died in that war and the result was transformational yet, this groundbreaking and profound history is never taught in “left” leaning schools because it does not serve their agenda. All 13 of the former slaves were Republicans. I


had to sift through the Library of Congress to reveal the following information…here it is for you in a video; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5O2IVfz8a0 My belief is that the Party’s did not change. The tactics changed. They went from Pro-Slavery to ProSegregation to Pro-Entitlement, all of which results in nothing beneficial for the prosperity of an individual and is considered by many of my ilk, “Plantation Politics”. All I want is the Truth and to be treated as an equal, no more and no less; as an equal. I do not need the Democratic Party telling me that I’m “black” or that I’m a minority who needs their assistance. I am not a color. I am Frantz Kebreau, an American Citizen. For the Democratic Party, it has always been about “Control” over Freedom. Keeping the Truth from it’s constituents in order to maintain control over them is not what I want from my “Party” Revealing the Truth About the Democratic Party…On Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UObEdF_uhaw Frantz Kebreau CEO, Stolen History Author of Stolen History www.Stolenhistory.com www.Frantzkebreau.com If you would like more information, please take a look at the “Stolen History” Book and Audio versions at the link below. http://frantzkebreau.mybigcommerce.com/index.php “The Truth Shall Set You Free!!” The KKK was the Terrorist Wing of the Democratic Party Bet they Didn’t Teach You That In School VIDEO BELOW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZ1t7SUuAAs Democrats and their Roots to Racism and the KKK VIDEO BELOW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpezudbbZMA The Truth Comes Out...The KKK Was Founded By The Democratic Party VIDEO BELOW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfEW4MFoU5o Racist Voicemail Left by KKK on Democratic Party Phone VIDEO BELOW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8S5ksEaRrkw

INFOWARS.COM BECAUSE THERE'S A WAR ON FOR YOUR MIND


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.