The Rocky Mountain Goat - Mar. 2 - 8.0

Page 1

McBride by-election

2

Seniors revolt over taxes

3

Mayor defends travel claim decision

6

Win for Valemount-McBride PeeWees 8 Valemount girls head to Provincials 10 PM42164515

Thursday, March 2, 2017 Volume 8 Issue 8

$1.75

($1.67+GST) ($1.24 when you subscribe)

Caribou infraction: sledders charged 3

Meek-Olson family recovering in wake of tragic fire

The Meek-Olson family is back in town and recovering after the tragic fire that claimed the life of 16-month-old Dominic Meek and left Clint and Landon Meek with bad burns. Above: Landon plays at Centennial Park with his mother Allison Olson and sister Samara Olson-Smith. See P2 / EVAN MATTHEWS

Resort boundary extension comments ‘hugely premature’: Village staff by EVAN MATTHEWS It would seem Valemount Mayor Jeannette Townsend is playing her comments fast and loose regarding the Village’s potential boundary extension to encompass the proposed Valemount Glacier Destinations resort. Last week, Mayor Townsend told 250 News that the Village has confirmed its decision to extend its boundary to the proposed VGD ski resort saying, “It will be a satellite boundary expansion.” Village CAO Adam Davey says to assume Valemount’s VGD boundary will be a satellite boundary expansion is “hugely premature.” “We are not expanding the boundary. We’re exploring the steps required

to do so,” Davey said of where things sit currently. In a response to the Goat’s questions, Davey says the Mayor was basing her comments on a 2004 study that looked at the Village expanding its boundaries to encompass the then-proposed Canoe Mountain Gondola resort project. That study analyzed the governance structure, potential growth, financial analysis, etc., according to the Village. The study suggested that a satellite inclusion of the Canoe Mountain Gondola base area would be beneficial for the Village (satellite meaning the resort area would not connect geographically to the rest of the Village). The Canoe Mountain Gondola never happened and the study was shelved. In January, the Village drafted a letter

to the Province seeking support to look at the boundary extension process to the proposed VGD resort site, which is located in the regional district on Crown land. The Village has not received a response to its request as yet. If the Province gives its support, the Village would then apply for grants to fund the study and a Request for Proposals could be issued in May or June 2017, Davey says, adding it’s possible the study could be completed by January 2018. The goal of the study is to identify the pros and cons to different boundary options, such as new tax revenue from the resort versus the cost of supplying new services like water and sewer to the resort base. “We want to make sure our homework is

Listings on P15!

Prince George done,” Davey said. Section 20 of the Local Government Act describes the requirements for applying for a municipal boundary extension from the Province. If and when the boundary extension study is done, Council would be provided with results, consult with the public, and then make a decision, according to Village staff. The Village cannot extend the boundary simply by Council resolution – it would require either an assent vote, otherwise known as a referendum, by current Village residents, or the Village could gain electoral approval through “an alternative approval process” prior to asking the Minister to consider a boundary extension. Cont’d on 14


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.