1.800. 973. 1177
CAREER COUNSELOR’S CORNER
Ready, Set, Specialize? [Cary Griffith] Should you specialize your legal practice? We offer some pros and cons to narrowing your practice to one particular field of the law and some tips on how best to go about it.
Lawyers trying to decide whether to special-
For instance, “do I want to spend all my time
cialize have literally hundreds of areas from
ize face a challenging dilemma. For starters,
working on DWI cases, or should I accept
which to choose. And within specialization,
deciding to specialize implies narrowing your
anything that comes through the door?” But
the trend is toward finer and finer segmenta-
point of interest to a potentially fatal degree.
dig a little deeper and the question becomes
tions of the practice.
The annals of burnt out attorneys are rife
more complex. For many, the question
with stories of those who became experts,
involves potential financial gain and standard
Over the last 25 years plenty of lawyers have
then became pigeon-holed, then bored, tired,
of living. For others, it is a matter of personal
specialized in medical malpractice, securi-
and finally saw no other way out than to leave
preference. And for still others, the decision
ties law, bankruptcy, or criminal defense.
the practice.
to specialize is influenced by the community
But today an increasing number of lawyers
in which they practice, or the legal organiza-
are starting to drill down into those subject
tion of which they’re a part.
areas, offering their clients know-how and
And yet many agree with Mike Wilens, President of West Group, one of the largest legal
particular expertise in OBGYN malpractice,
publishers in the world. When asked what
In large part, all of the preceding dictates
Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, consumer
he thought about the lawyer of the future,
how a lawyer will respond to the question:
debt restructuring, or white collar criminal
he said, “if you don’t have a unique value
to specialize, or not to specialize? In some
defense-to name only a few.
proposition, you’ll be in a dog fight. General
instances, the answer will be quick and con-
practitioners get their lunch eaten by spe-
scious; in others, the myriad vagaries of time
In part these increased specializations are
cialists. General practitioners are in trouble.”
and the marketplace will lead the attorney-
a result of the need to differentiate yourself
possibly over a number of years-to a thriving
in the legal marketplace. To reiterate Mike
particularized practice. And still others may
Wilens, “general practitioners get their lunch
resist the temptation or push toward special-
eaten by specialists.” However, company
ization altogether.
needs and, in response, the legal market-
And yet others disagree. “My practice has always been a general trial
place are also leading many attorneys into an
practice,” comments Brian O’Neill, one of The Case for Specialization
increasingly specialized practice.
from copyright cases to criminal cases to
When asked what advice he would give to
“I thought I was going to have an interesting
patent cases to environmental cases to busi-
young lawyers, Montana Supreme Court Jus-
career in products liability and mass tort,”
ness cases. I do both plaintiff’s and defen-
tice James C. Nelson said, “if I had it to do
comments Jan Conlin, a partner with Robins,
dant’s work-about half and half. And I have
over again, I’d …. specialize. It’s hard to do in
Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi. But in 1990 her firm
resisted the move to specialize.”
a small rural state, but the law is becoming
received a large patent infringement case
so complex that in most areas, you’d be well
and she was recruited to work on it.
America’s leading trial attorneys. “I’m not a specialist in anything. I try any kind of case
Most analysts think O’Neill is in a growing
served to pick an area you enjoy and learn
minority of lawyers with general legal prac-
everything you can about it and specialize in
Ms. Conlin explains that in recent years many
tices. But he is not alone.
it.”
companies have gone from looking at their
What’s Involved
Many lawyers agree with Nelson’s perspec-
standpoint to saying that if I have technol-
tive. Over the last 50 years, the world’s
ogy in that portfolio that I could license or
On the surface, deciding to specialize your
increased complexity has spawned increased
otherwise seek recovery on, that’s something
law practice involves a very simple question.
legal specialization. Lawyers deciding to spe-
I need to do because that’s an important
patent portfolios “purely from a defensive
PAGE 1
continued on back