1.800. 973. 1177
CAREER CORNER
Surviving a Bad Performance Review, Part I [by Jamie Barnes] Many lawyers and professional legal staff prefer to think of themselves as in business for themselves, merely using a group to provide office space, support services, and occasional camaraderie.
This assumed sense of personal indepen-
the performance-review process, you’re not
tions, and are team players. How does one
dence undergoes a rude awakening when a
alone. Such ‘heart-to-heart’ talks trouble
evaluate all that?
senior partner calls you into his or her office
everybody. What you need is a survival strat-
to detail for you, without your asking, how
egy to deal with performance appraisals.
Let’s deal first with the emotions that
you are perceived. Some of the thoughts that
Otherwise they can drive you nuts.
surface any time you receive a performance appraisal. Unless these emotions are well
may go through your head at a time like this Then there is this alarming news: According
understood and contained by you at the start,
to Ellen Wayne of the New York Law Journal,
a rational discussion of the performance ap-
“Just who the hell is (s)he to be judging me?”
“Evaluations have taken on an importance
praisal as an institutional tool--and how you
“All that negative stuff has been coming from
they never had before. Associates are not
can successfully deal with it--cannot take
X, who has been talking behind my back. I
only judged on the basis of their work skills
place.
knew I couldn’t trust him/her.” “(S)he acted
and performance targets but now have the
as if (s)he thought I was pretty cool. Now the
added anxiety that termination could be the
truth comes out!” “I feel dirty. I am neither as
result of a less than glowing review.” Rest
good or as bad as they say.” “Why is all this
assured that as law firms continue to be
Nothing is more threatening to one’s invio-
ancient stuff being drudged up and thrown in
operated more like businesses (as opposed
lable sense of self and its importance than to
my face?”
to being run like private men’s clubs), the
have a relative stranger sit down and dissect
performance appraisal becomes an impor-
you both professionally and personally. First
Recognize yourself in any of this? Had
tant tool for weeding people out, as well as
of all, the mere fact of delivering the apprais-
similar feelings? They are normal. By un-
identifying top performers at all levels, from
al solidifies that person’s superior rank. This
derstanding anyone’s normal self-centered
associates to paralegals to legal secretaries.
relative stranger also is acting summarily as
are:
and defensive reaction to being judged, and
Reason Versus The Emotional Self
judge and jury, dispassionately (hopefully)
realizing that your feelings are automatically
Most of us would agree that some sort of
enumerating your strengths, faults, suc-
programmed to respond self-protectively in
evaluation system is needed for everyone.
cesses, and failures and summarizing all this
such situations, you have won half the battle;
The problem is how to construct a system
with either a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down”
because with understanding can come a
certifiably free of bias. This may be impos-
that leaves you either euphoric, confused, or
modicum of control.
sible: evaluation systems are constructed by
devastated. Even when an appraisal is flat-
humans, and humans are fallible. Fur-
tering, there remains an uncomfortable edge
You can’t avoid professional criticism. You
thermore, it is difficult if not impossible to
to the process. You may wonder why you feel
may have strong opinions as to the innate
categorize and quantify the qualities that
so uneasy and perhaps even embarrassed.
fairness of the appraisal process. You may
identify perfection in professions such as the
Such a reaction is driven by your knowledge
be unfairly damaged and have documents to
law, meaning billable hours alone do not tell
that no one can know you as you do; nor can
prove it. You may be thinking that you’re be-
the tale. For associates there is something
anyone else understand what you were going
ing criticized for stuff that happened months
called “partner potential” which remains
through when you wrote X, did Y, or said Z.
ago and is no longer relevant. Regardless,
both on the appraiser’s mind and on yours.
the criticism hurts and remains potentially
Paralegals may also be evaluated based on
To further muddy the waters, performance
lethal as long as it sits in some partner’s
billable hours, but they and legal secretaries
reviews can often be subjective. They can
drawer already signed off on by other
are also being evaluated on how well they
reflect group consensus or be driven by
partners. Well, if you’ve ever felt abused by
support a partner, carry out support func-
personal spite and used to settle personal
PAGE 1
continued on back