Douglas County Newsletter August 2013

Page 1

D OUGLAS C OUNTY , N EVADA

N EWS Y OU C AN U SE V OLUME 3, I SSUE 10

R EDEVELOPMENT K EY

TO

A UGUST , 2013

I MPROVING T AHOE E NVIRONMENT

B Y S TEVE M OKROHISKY , D OUGLAS C OUNTY M ANAGER

The future of Lake Tahoe’s natural and built environment, as well as how best to protect its pristine waters has been debated at length. The conclusion of thousands of residents, visitors, businesses, environmentalists, scientists and local governments who participated in the Tahoe Regional Plan Update is that the status quo is unacceptable and the need to improve the environment, economy and community through redevelopment is imperative. On September 25th, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Governing Board will consider approval of Douglas County’s local area plan for the south shore of Lake Tahoe. The new area plan was created through years of extensive public engagement and encourages environmental redevelopment of existing buildings. Leading the way as the first entity to propose a new local area plan, Douglas County has appropriately been held to the highest standard of environmental review and has welcomed the opportunity to answer questions and engage in thoughtful dialogue about how to ensure the best local plan for the future of Lake Tahoe.

Most future projects at Lake Tahoe will be redevelopment of existing infrastructure, not new development. Pictured here is a photo overlooking the South Shore and the beautiful blue Lake Tahoe.

has been invested in environmental improvements at Lake Tahoe since 1997, including over 31 water quality projects in Douglas County. Eighteen percent of Lake Tahoe’s shoreline resides in Douglas Despite broad public support and clear data detailing the environmental benefits County, but only three percent of the fine of the new plan, a representative from the sediment material that degrades the clarity of the Lake originates in Douglas CounSierra Club stated recently that “local governments can’t be trusted to hold the ty – the least amount of runoff of any jurisdiction in the Tahoe Basin. line on development.” Unfortunately, inflammatory statements like this ignore Douglas County businesses and residents the facts and offer no solutions to improve have some of the highest Best Managethe environment. In the interest of ment Practice compliance rates in the thoughtful public debate, let us consider Tahoe Basin. Beyond Lake Tahoe, Dougthe facts. las County has protected over 15,000 Douglas County, its businesses and resi- acres in the Carson Valley and seeks to protect an additional 15,000 acres as part dents have a strong record of environmental stewardship. Nearly $1.7 billion of its federal lands bill. There is no bistate regulatory agency requiring us to

protect the environment in the Carson Valley, but rather our local residents and local government choose environmental stewardship as the right thing to do for future generations. Most future projects at Lake Tahoe will be redevelopment of existing infrastructure, not new development. There is very little available private land to build on at Lake Tahoe, as only 16 percent of the land is in private ownership, only eight residential building allocations are allowed this year and only 36,250 square feet is available for new commercial projects in Douglas County. Lodging industry experts often remind us that we don’t (Continued Pg. 2)


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.