Issue Five Lakota Proposal Coverage

Page 1

$1.2 MILLION IN PRESCHOOL

$1.9 MILLION IN ELEMENTARY

$1.6 MILLION IN JUNIOR HIGH

$2.7 MILLION IN HIGH SCHOOL

$9$3.5 MILLION CUTS MILLION IN ADMINISTRATION

$10.9 MILLION IN CUTS Starting with the proposed preschool cuts in January and ending with the propose administrative cuts in March, the Lakota Local School District must cut $9 million to reduce the spending deficit and avoid running out of money by fiscal year 2014. Spark takes an in-depth look at the administration’s proposed reductions and changes. As of press time, the Lakota Board of Education is scheduled to vote on the proposals on March 12. photos ellen fleetwood, devon lakes, kenzie walters and sierra whitlock

A

proposal is just that—a proposal. It has not been enacted and it can be amended or changed. On March 12, the Lakota Board of Education will vote on the administration’s proposals that have been introduced to it and the community since the beginning of February, potentially ushering in a new era of for the District. How the Board votes on the proposals will determine the direction of Lakota for years to come, as each proposal includes changes with widespread effects from consolidating the preschool program into a federal Head Start program, to cutting specials at the elementary schools to once a week, to shortening the day at the secondary level. These potential changes have sparked fierce dialogue throughout Lakota in neighborhood streets, kitchen tables and classrooms as each person has different ideas on how best to achieve $9 million in reductions. “There will be impact and changes and things people don’t like [when the Board votes],” Board president Ben Dibble said. “[Cuts] will give us a balanced budget in our next fiscal year, which is important to the community and to the Board. The administration is doing its best to find those reductions and make as small impact as possible” Although $9 million dollars is a tremendous amount of money for Lakota, Treasurer Jenni Logan said that $9 million in cuts would keep Lakota out of deficit spending next year, as long as revenues do not decrease any further. Lakota will not need a levy to avoid a cash deficit. “By eliminating the spending deficit [with cuts], we are eliminating falling off a cliff,” Logan said. “A future levy would be there to create the district that we want.” If the proposals are passed, it may amount to the loss of many teaching positions throughout the district. Personnel costs account for 77 percent of Lakota’s budget, so the largest reductions need to be made in that area. Teaching positions can also be referred to as full-timeemployees (FTE), which means that an FTE teaches the entire school day. Some proposals call for uneven numbers of teachers to reduced, which means that that much of an FTE will be reduced. Lakota Educator Association president Sharon Mays explained

that teachers who are let go from the district in this tough time will be reduced, not fired. “They’ll be riffed, in the private sector it’s called being laid off, and in our contract it is a Reduction in Force,” Mays said. “The difference as opposed to being fired is that they aren’t doing anything wrong” Mays also established that teachers will be riffed according to seniority and licensure. She predicts that there could be a lot of shuffling of teaching positions as teachers with higher seniority are moved around to fill places in other buildings because teachers are certified to teach multiple grades, like kindergarten through eighth grade. Lakota’s superintendent Karen Mantia has been leading the creation of these proposals by examining the budget line-by-line, taking a costto-benefits approach to cuts. She is confident that Lakota can maintain a quality education in the face of financial strife. “I hope that people keep the faith,” she said. “We have awesome teachers, great courses. I hope that people stay with us because we are going to deliver. We have people that want to do the right thing for Lakota and that hasn’t changed at all.” If the proposals are implemented as they appear now, Lakota will not be the same district it was five or 10 years ago. Reductions, however, are necessary as revenue from the state continues to fall and the community fails to pass levies. Without cuts, Lakota could fall under state control. Liberty Junior School health teacher of 35 years Gina Seifert will retire after this school year. She looks back on her time in the District with pride and she believes that levies continue to fail not because people do not support education, but because families are trying to survive. “This district has always been a melting pot experience of different ethnic and economic levels. People came here for that and they were successful. [School funding is not working and] its’ always going to be this way. It’s not going to change it gets worse and worse every year until they change the way schools are funded. I’m fearful where we’re going be five years from now. Hopefully ten years from now, we’ll be better for it, going in a different direction.” –Rachel Podnar

lakotaeastspark.com | Spark | 9


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Issue Five Lakota Proposal Coverage by Lakota East Spark - Issuu