Liberty Newspost Feb-01-10

Page 1

E-reader News Edition

Live Coverage – 2010 Budget By Reuters Staff (Front Row Washington) Submitted at 2/1/2010 5:26:27 AM

News quiz: the Sunday papers (World news and comment from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk) Submitted at 2/1/2010 7:18:10 AM

Apart from confident predictions that Andy Murray was striding towards the UK's first tennis Grand Slam title in 74 years, what else was in the Sunday papers?

IPad Hands-On Review (Little Green Footballs) Submitted at 1/31/2010 12:37:21 PM

TidBITS has an interesting overview of the features of Apple’s new iPad device: Handson Impressions of the iPad.

31/01/10 - 01/02/10

http://www.LibertyNewspost.com

Did we forget about love? | Jonathan Bartley By Jonathan Bartley (World news and comment from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk)

Love, of course, is supposed to be central to Christian doctrine. And by love I don't mean vague sentimentality, but a genuine Submitted at 2/1/2010 7:19:55 AM willingness to treat others with It's difficult for some to equal regard, dignity, concern acknowledge, but secularists and respect – something that have shown the church how to be both religionist and secularist more Christian over the equality should be able to agree on. bill The question: Does faith When I was growing up, we trump equality? used to sing a song in our church Love gets a bad press. It sounds based on words that Jesus is too 1960s to be considered any recorded as using in John's political use. It's a term of abuse gospel: "They will know we are against liberals. It's privatised by C h r i s t i a n s b y o u r l o v e " . fundamentalists. But it could be Nowadays, as far as their public the key to both making sense of, profile goes, "they" seem more and providing a way forward in likely to know Christians by the apparent stand-off in which their ability to negotiate opt-outs, some amongst the religious and win rights to discriminate. claim that they need to have their But it also highlights how doctrines protected in law. churches, in demanding that a Some churches would like to small, selective collection of c l a i m t h a t r e l i g i o n ' s v e r y their ideas take priority, are banishment from public life is at a c t u a l l y d e n y i n g w h a t i s s t a k e . B u t t h i s i s t o supposed to be at the heart of misunderstand what is going on. their faith. The fact that the question "does Churches should be able to faith trump equality" is posed at determine their own beliefs. But a l l i s a s y m p t o m o f t h e when they approach government underlying problem. It is the law to ask for them to be enshrined of love that should trump them in law, no one should naively both – or at least be their assume that this is the whole fulfilment. theological picture. Christians

should be challenged instead to demonstrate how exactly that squares with the other tenets of their faith. How do they reconcile what they are demanding with such ideas as inclusion, equality, service, grace, and honesty, which are all supposed to stem from it? In the case of the equality bill they clearly can't. Such an approach may not sit well with some secularists. You can't fight fire with fire, or mumbo jumbo with more gobbledegook, some will undoubtedly argue. But whilst it may stick in the throats of some to acknowledge it openly, secularists have shown the church how to be more Christian over the equality bill. They have championed the rights of, predominantly Christian people, who want to work for religious organisations and churches, but will find themselves further excluded if the amended bill becomes law. In a strange way they have shown how to love their enemies – albeit with a mix of motives. They have also shown that common ground might be found

around the L-word. Hopeless romanticism without substance? Love certainly needs defining and pinning down. St Paul, the architect of so much Christian doctrine, had quite a few things to say on the subject in his first letter to the church at Corinth. He laid out pretty clearly what he thought true love did, and didn't look like. It's kind, it's trusting, it's truthful, it doesn't defend its own interests, and it always protects, he said. Such things should be the guiding criteria in finding a way forward to the happy state we all desire to inhabit. And if the demands on both sides were subjected to such ideas, whether you call them "secular" or "religious", we'd be most of the way there. • Religion • Christianity • Law • Equality Jonathan Bartley guardian.co.uk© Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions| More Feeds


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.