Bourne Area Group Newsletter September 2023

Page 1

Bourne Area Group Newsletter

September 2023

Rewilding

Rewilding is a highly topical, often misunderstood, and sometimes controversial subject. It seems that everything can be rewilded these days – from your garden to yourself. But what does it really mean, how does it differ from other terms such as ecosystem restoration and how does the current emphasis on rewilding sit with the ‘traditional’ management of many Trust reserves?

The Knepp estate in Sussex is the poster child of the rewilding movement. There, the owners turned their 1400ha Sussex estate back to nature (and natural processes) using free-roaming cattle, ponies and pigs as analogues for the aurochs and wild boar lost from our landscape. The results for wildlife, such as nightingales, turtle doves and purple emperor butterflies, have been striking and the site is now immensely popular to visit.

We are now fortunate to have a rewilding site on the edge of the Bourne area – at Boothby Wildlands, a former arable farm of >600ha which will be allowed to revert to natural vegetation. It will be exciting to see how this site develops over the years and, by courtesy of Boothby Wildlands, we are fortunate to have a field visit planned there for mid-September (see events). We will continue a rewilding theme over the winter programme with a talk from the project in the spring for those who weren’t able to make the field visit.

But what is rewilding? Everyone seems to have an opinion, the term is interpreted variably and even national treasures like Monty Don can fall foul of orthodoxy when he claimed that gardens couldn’t be rewilded A definition has been proposed for the Scottish government and their commissioned report is worth reading. Their definition includes the following: ‘Rewilding means enabling nature's recovery….. it differs from other approaches in seeking to enable natural processes which eventually require relatively little management by humans’

It suggests that rewilding is just one part of the family or spectrum of approaches to nature management, but rewilding has a stronger emphasis on restoring ecosystem functioning and achieving natural processes free of human intervention. IUCN has its own definition and set of principles. Ecosystem restoration is a not dissimilar approach but accepts more human intervention and is, perhaps, more focused on a desired end state (rather than letting nature dictate the outcome).

Clearly, in a crowded Britain (especially lowland England), it is hardly possible to leave sites entirely to nature and some human intervention will always be required. Two things stand out to me as being key principles for rewilding and both relate to scale. I think that to work, re-wilding has to be on a large, ideally landscape, scale and there should also be a guarantee of longevity, it cannot be done on a short tenure. That is why I agree with Monty Don that wildlife gardening isn’t rewilding proper, gardens are too small and the tenure of nature-friendly gardeners typically too short. Of course, you can call what you do in your garden anything you want – but what is wrong with just referring to ‘wildlife gardening’ or ‘nature-friendly gardening’? All the same practices apply.

Rewilding has its critics too. Farmer might instinctively push back against seeing land taken out of food production (even though much agricultural land doesn’t only produce food). And even if some food continues to be produced from rewilded areas, overall production is usually lower. This missing food needs to come from somewhere. If we end up ‘offshoring’ this food production so that more forest is cleared in, say, the Amazon to provide it, then rewilding will not have had a net benefit for nature. The alternative approach is to look for increased or intensified production from land already farmed (whether in the UK or elsewhere). And restored ecosystems provide other ‘non-food’ benefits – such as carbon sequestration, water management and human enjoyment.

Where does this recent focus on rewilding leave all our traditional management for nature conservation?? If we were to ‘rewild’ all our reserves in Britain we would lose a lot of our biodiversity. Our chalk downlands, hay meadows, coppice woodlands and more have all co-evolved with human land management practices, lose those and we lose what made them special in the first place. Rewilding, I think, provides greatest benefits when it uses land that is not currently of high value for nature conservation (or for farming either). And, together with ecosystem restoration, it can help, the UK to achieve global targets for ecosystem restoration and ‘30x30’ (30% of land and waters conserved for nature by 2030) in the Montreal-Kunming Global Biodiversity Framework In other words, it adds to the overall ‘estate’ or capital of nature in the country.

I like rewilding (even though I prefer ecosystem restoration as a term), it offers us exciting chances to support the recovery of species and restoration of ecosystems at larger scales and to see dynamics we might not have anticipated; I hope we see more areas across the country. But, to mix metaphors, whilst rewilding might be the new kid on the block it is not the only show in town; all the approaches to nature conservation practised over the decades continue to have their place, it is not a choice of one or the other.

Communicating with members – a BAG WhatsApp group

We have commented before on the issue of how we best communicate with local members, noting that this newsletter and our programme of events are now only available on the Trust website.

To help alert members to when an event is due or when there is something new to see on the website, we are trialling a WhatsApp broadcast group. This allows us to send messages to anyone who has decided to join the group but still protects people’s personal data (your telephone number) from being seen by others. So, it is pretty much a one-way form of communication but you will be able to ask questions of the administrators. If you want to be part of this group, please let one of the Committee know, either at an indoor event or by sending a message to Amanda Jenkins (07903 028607) or me (Vin Fleming 07968729169).

Of course, we also have our Facebook page (which is here) and where we will continue to post information about events etc. And don’t forget to look on the Bourne Area Group pages on the Trust website – where you’re reading this presumably!

Deeping Lakes Open Day

Our open day in early June was a great success with almost 170 adults & c50 children visiting the Deeping Lakes reserve. On the day we raised over £500 for the Lincs Wildlife Trust, sold out of cakes and other refreshments & saw 52 bird species (plus orchids, dragonflies & butterflies). A big thanks to all the volunteers and visitors who made the day such a good one.

Winter programme

We are hoping to run an indoor programme this winter. We are currently putting together a programme of speakers and we will post talks on our events page once they are confirmed. We will also post these on Facebook and on our WhatsApp group.

[VF]

Around the Reserves

This article was written in July, it was high summer, and high time for an up-date!

Over the past few months at DEEPING LAKES and DOLE WOOD we have been removing plastic tree shelters. The spiral guards are very useful for establishing hedge plants, and the taller tubes for other trees. Over time they do degrade, the spiral guards become brittle and break, but just seem to produce ever smaller fragments. The tubes seem to last for ever, we have some that are 25 years old – and look as good as new! The photo opposite shows some of the tubes bundled together at Dole Wood awaiting disposal. Unfortunately, there seems to be no easy way to recycle them, so they ended up in the skip. These tubes were ‘only’ 15 years old, and long past the time when they had any benefit to the trees.

Of course, keeping the paths clear takes up quite a lot of time on all of our reserves, and it is getting close to taking the hay at Deeping Lakes.

Also, at Dole Wood, or to be accurate, the meadow next to the wood, we have replaced the seat. Installed in April 2009 it had served us well, but was showing its age! The cost of the new seat was generously donated by the family of Mick Gibson, who passed away last year. Mick was a valued member of ‘our’ band of volunteers, and planted many of the trees now growing in the meadow.

Out with the old . . .

and

in with the new! (and, jolly good it looks too!)

On the subject of generous donations - We had a donation of 20 tonnes of crushed limestone at Deeping Lakes for repairs to the track. Lord Gainsborough, who often visits the reserve, took pity on us working on the track back in April and kindly offered to help us. Repairing the track is a never-ending job, which we all love/hate to do! During the summer (and while the track is dry) it isn’t too bad to keep on top of the job. During the winter, or when we have standing water on the track, the pot-holes soon appear and seem to get deeper by the minute. One good thing about using limestone is that it binds together – “very cementitious,” as Mick Gibson would say (who knew a lot about such things).

Looking ahead, at Dole Wood we will be trying to block off the many new paths that have appeared, mostly since the COVID/lock-down orders were in operation. The path around the perimeter of the wood is much wider than it used to be – and I guess we can put up with that. Why people seem to want to wander all over is a mystery, but the ground flora, and particularly the bluebells are suffering. There is the fear that as fast as we block some paths others will appear – but we think we should at least attempt to reduce the damage.

(DV)

More or less?

Our paper newsletters usually consisted of four pages of A4, sometimes with a separate programme of events. The ‘new’ electronic newsletters can have as many pages as ‘we’ choose. We can, of course use colour photographs for the first time, and can include video clips.

We produced three newsletters a year, to be distributed with the ‘Lapwings’ mailing. We could have more (or fewer) newsletters, and could publish them whenever we want.

‘We’ needs to be more than just the current ‘editorial team.’ If you wish to contribute content for the newsletters then our Facebook page is probably the best way.

Banovallum House Manor House Street

Horncastle, LN9 5HF Info@lincstrust.o.uk

The Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust is a registered charity. Charity number:- 218895

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.