Elizaveta Kunina Portfolio 2020

academic and professional works

2015 - 2020

politecnico di milano | markhi

ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO

ELIZAVETA KUNINA

4

INDEX 2

elizaveta kunina

CURRICULUM VITAE

.04

NEAVITA RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX

.08

APARTMENT IN MOSCOW

.14

PUBLIC SPACES IN MILAN

.20

RETHINKING PIAZZALE LUGANO

.32

ART CLUSTER

.38

SCULPTURE MUSEUM

.44

INSTALLATION

.48

ART + MODELS

.56

professional and academic works

3

EDUCATION 2017 - 2020

2012 - 2017

Double Degree - Laurea Magistrale (MSc) Politecnico di Milano + Moscow Architectural Institute in Architecture and Urban Design Double Degree Program / Erasmus+ Scholarship Bachelor of Architecture Moscow Architectural Institute (MARKHI) Faculty of residential buildings

WORK EXPERIENCE sep 2019 - apr 2020

Zanetti Design Architettura / Milan, Italy intern architect Participated in the preliminary phase of design and construction processes on projects of various scales Assisted with clients, produced technical drawings Design work using BIM methods in Revit Layouts, collages, 3D models and sketches

sep 2014 - sep 2017

TREUGOLNIK Architecture / Moscow, Russia junior architect Participated in all phases of design and construction processes on residential and interior projects Produced technical drawings, schedules, budgets, specifications, furniture details, layouts, collages, concepts and 3D models Design work using BIM methods in Archicad Design proposal presentations for clients Site supervision assistance Architecture survey

2013 - present

freelance architecture and design work in Moscow, Russia Entrance hall interior design for a residential building in Moscow for Donstroy developers (2014) Interior design for small scale projects Graphic design

APTITUDES software

4

Archicad, Revit, Photoshop, Indesign, Illustrator, Rhinoceros, Sketchup, Autocad, QGIS, Lumion, Microsoft Office

languages

Russian (native), English (fluent), Italian (upper intermediate), French (intermediate)

key competences

Teamwork, communication, creative thinking, problem solving, curiosity, BIM methods, hand model building, hand drawing, painting, graphic design, analysis, research, drafting by hand, collages, ink relief shading

ELIZAVETA KUNINA Living in 3 countries has broadened my horizons as an architect and designer. Russia, England and Italy all have influenced my design strategies and outlook on life. I think that we must look at architecture as a multidisciplinary artform, learn something new every day and take inspiration from everything that surrounds us. from Moscow, Russia currently in Milan, Italy liza.kunina@outlook.com

+39 (392) 530-94-64

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

italiano

2020

Publication of a research paper about the organization of public spaces in a scientific journal - Architecture and Modern Information Technologies (MARKHI)

2019

Publication of reciprocal structure installation in ICGG 2018 Proceedings of the 18th Internation Conference on Geometry and Graphics

2018

The physical representation of a reciprocal structure was exhibited in the patio of Politecnico di Milano for 1 month with Alexandre Marguerie and Gleb Mikhnovets

2018

BIM oriented parametric design course in Revit + Dynamo at Politecnico di Milano

2017

Bachelor thesis project was chosen to participate in an exhibition of the best thesis projects of the year (MARKHI)

2016

Competition: functional improvement and redevelopment of river bank in Ufa city in Russia, finalists (top 20) with Gleb Mikhnovets

2015

Student competition of architecture ideas: “Urban environment as a space for living”, 2nd place in the “Upper levels” nomination (MARKHI)

2015

Took part in volunteer restoration works of 18th century Sukhanovo manor house in Russia

2014

Ink relief technique facade work was chosen to participate in exhibition of best student works of the year (MARKHI)

2014

Work was chosen to participate in exhibition of best student paintings of the year (MARKHI) 5

PROFESSIONA WORK 6

elizaveta kunina

AL professional and academic works

7

8

elizaveta kunina

/ 01. NEAVITA RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX Preliminary project / Internship Zanetti Design Architettura Team: Agata Borecka, Elena Belkova, Simona Montesi and Francisco Nabor Location: St. Gingolph, Switzerland / 2020 Key responsibilities: helping to create the concept, modeling in Revit, working on the preliminary drawings with the team and putting together presentations for the client.

The complex will have views of both lake LĂŠman and mountains bordering St Gingolph on the other side. The project is not only a residential complex, but a new attraction point for the town.

Apart from apartments for the new residents, it will contain a kindergarten, a gym, a restaurant, utilities and public spaces for

residents and their visitors. The terrain on the plot was quite steep, so one of the main challenges was working with it to create a comfortable space, so that the architecture becomes part of the surrounding terrain. As a result the buildings of the complex are both integrated into the terrain and are placed so that all the residents can have a view of the surrounding nature. The terrain also allowed to create a public square and an intimate garden for the kindergarten. The complex is also sustainable, with solar panels installed on the roofs.

professional and academic works

9

exterior views

10

elizaveta kunina

professional and academic works

11

courtyard view

EE FF

CC

A4 2.02 D

4314

2448

284

A4-2.03 D

Complexe Logements Protégés "Neavita"

2

St. Gingolph - Suisse

A4-2.03 D

AA 1

A4 2.01 D

W E L L LI V I N G S A A3-2.02 D -

Architecte:

1604

2753

197

1629

SWISSROC Building Intelligence

Design:

T2

B4

T3

73.50 m²

62.91 m²

ZDA

75.21 m²

T1

D

+0.38

Maître d'Ouvrage: 1502 1525

Avenue Rosemont, 8, 1208 Genève, Suisse Tel. +41 22 552 30 12 email: sc@design-property.ch

150 334

D

1

A3-2.01 -

WELL LIVING SA

200

A4 2.02

2737

D

Zanetti Design Architettura

Via P. Tamburini, 6 20123 - Milano, Italia Tel.+39 02 48519960 / 48026866 email: zanettidesign@zanettidesign.it

DD

2647

A4 2.01

1090

3447

73.50 m²

1557

T4

79.88 m²

BB

Chemin Frank-Thomas 32, 1208, Genève, Suisse Tel. +41 22 552 30 10 email: bi@swissroc.com

267

200

+0.38

T2

1162

131

73.50 m²

DD A4 2.02

D .01 A3-2

00

705

BB D

A4 2.01

3

186

-0.40

Place

1657

19 5

-3.09

Ja

1

1090 1625

in rd

+0.00

T10 m² .5 73

2750

16 07

15 83 10 90

C

B27 m² .7 53 292

20 0

173

175

53.77 m²

B1

B2

53.77 m²

53.77 m²

+0.

00

38

Projet:

SWR_STG.20

Description: PROJET DEFINITIF

Titre du dessin:

1090

21

2750

140

12 55

10 90

53.77 m²

19 80

B1

53.78 m²

1090

53.77 m²

1354

B1

B2

Note:

1090

263

B2

B

.29 3 m²

N

B39 m² .2 53

B

.77 2 m²

53

D Unités de logement par étage 4 appartements deux pièces: 3 appartements trois pièces:1

275

3339

200

18 56

B

.77 1 m²

53

Plan premier étage

16 0

UP

+0.

38

304

25 96

+0.38

2.02

D

Date: 11/05/2020

Échelle:

1:200

D

32

2.01

FF 1

A4-2.03 D

4699

EE 1

Plan premier étage

Collaborateur: Arch. Simona Montesi

5

61 6

2 A3-2.03 D

A4-2.03 D

A4

AA

A4

CC 1

C Unités de logement par étage 6 appartements deux pièces: 6

B17 m² .7 53

B

19 80

53

B Unités de logement par étage 3 appartements deux pièces: 3

3

305

29 3

2635

1476 1090

D

- D A3-2.03

200

30

Unités de logement par étage 20 appartements deux pièces [ B ]: 13 appartements trois pièces [ T ]: 7 B1/2/3/4 = variantes appartements deux pièces T1/2/3/4 = variantes appartements trois pièces A Unités de logement par étage 7 appartements deux pièces: 1 appartements trois pièces:6

73.50 m²

22 8

335

D

2

1076

T1

+0.

A3-2.02 D

925

1670

221

1774

A

ground floor plan

12

elizaveta kunina

Ficher: 2020-03-18_SWR-STG.20_St.Gingolph_ALL - Central

Dessin:

A2-2.11 D

kindergarten interior

FF

St. Gingolph - Suisse EE

A4 2.02 D

CC

Complexe Logements P

A4-2.03 D

2

A4-2.03 D

AA 1

A4 2.01 D

W E L L LI V I N G S A3-2.02 D -

4332

Architecte:

2454

284

1604

2754

197

1628

SWISSROC Building Int

+3.18

200

Chemin Frank-Thomas 1208, Genève, Suisse Tel. +41 22 552 30 10 email: bi@swissroc.co

T2

B4

T3

73.50 m²

62.91 m²

T4

75.21 m²

T1

73.50 m²

79.88 m²

Design:

3307

1090 1490

ZDA

D

BB A4 2.01

D

+3.18

Maître d'Ouvrage: 200

1327

1510 1525

WELL LIVING SA

Avenue Rosemont, 8, 1208 Genève, Suisse Tel. +41 22 552 30 1 email: sc@design-prop

A3-2.01

D

1502

T2 m²

1774

A

DD A4 2.02

BB

D

D .01 A3-2

1614

73.50

A4 2.01

Unités de logement pa appartements deux piè appartements trois piè

D

2

A3-2.02 D -

3

B1/2/3/4 = variantes deux pièc T1/2/3/4 = variantes a trois pièce A Unités de logement pa appartements deux piè appartements trois piè

T1

73.50 m² 19 5

1090

1

D

- D A3-2.03

2

2750

T10 m² .5

B Unités de logement pa appartements deux piè

C Unités de logement pa appartements deux piè

B17 m² .7 53

B

18 56

53 B1 .77 m²

C

B27 m²

.7 53 292

B39 m² .2 53

173

B2

624

B1

53.77 m²

53.77 m²

18

2950 2950

Projet:

Description: PROJET DEFINITIF

Titre du dessin:

5 45

Plan deuxième étage

445 +3.

18

SWR_STG

3

D .41 A3-3

311

1090

20 09

2720

+3.

12 55

10 90

53.77 m²

1090

B2

B1

53.77 m²

53.77 m²

699

21 80

B2

53.77 m²

Note:

1091

B1

1355

164

263

53 B3 .29 m²

N

275

3520

3339

5 3 B2 .77 m²

19 80

D Unités de logement pa appartements deux piè appartements trois piè

200

19 80

15 8 10 90 4

73

3

305

29 3

2635

1476 1090

A3-3.13 D

30

186

22 8

335

20 0

424

51 8

D 2.02

A4

3901

20 0

Collaborateur: Arch. Simona Montesi

D

3520

2.01

AA

Date: 11/05/2020

181

458

CC 1

+3.18

3901

A4

FF 1

EE 1

Plan deuxième étage

A4-2.03 D

200

2

Ficher:

A3-2.03 D

2020-03-18_SWR-STG.20_S

Dessin:

A4-2.03 D

1

Zanetti Design

Via P. Tamburini, 6 20123 - Milano, Italia Tel.+39 02 48519960 email: zanettidesign@z

2737

A4 2.02

2647

DD

+3.18

A2-2.21

1st floor plan

professional and academic works

13

14

elizaveta kunina

/ 02. APARTMENT IN STROGINO, MOSCOW Executive project Treugolnik Architecture Studio Team: Lana Kulishenko, Maxim Sulayeman Location: Moscow, Russia / 2016 - 2017

Key responsibilities: drafting plans, technical drawings, interior elevations, finishing schedules, budget plans, concept design, furniture details, specifications, schedules, construction support, presentations for the clients, planning and surveying the site.

The project is situated in a more residential area of Moscow, it is a flat for a bigger family. Our team thought of a concept that goes well with the aesthetic taste of the client, making the interior livable, high-end and cozy. We restructured a lot the plan to

accommodate better the needs of a growing family. The design combines both classic and modern elements. The total floor area of the flat was 165 sq. m. We have worked on this project from the preliminary to the construction phase. For the construction phase we detailed thoroughly all the elements and materials of the flat, including custom-made furniture and fittings. We have also designed custom mosaic patterns and tiling systems. We have also chosen smaller details, such the linen and bedding, for a more cohesive concept.

professional and academic works

15

ПОДБОР ТЕКСТИЛЯ И ПРЕДМЕТОВ ДЕКОРА ДЛЯ ЧАСТНОГО ИНТЕРЬЕРА КВАРТИРЫ В СТРОГИНО main floor plan

16

elizaveta kunina

professional and academic works

17

ACADEMIC WORKS

18

elizaveta kunina

professional and academic works

19

/ 03. STRATEGIES AND DESIGN OF PUBLIC SPACES IN MILAN Individual project / research together with Gleb Micnovic Politecnico di Milano + MARKHI / MSc thesis Professors: Alessandro de Magistris and Yurij Safronov Location: Bovisa, Milan, Italy / 2020 We’ve developed theoretical methodologies for the design of modern public spaces that we implemented in both Moscow and Milan. Unlike Moscow, Milan has always prioritized public spaces and urban squares as an important part of the urban fabric, which it typical for most European cities. The historical center of Milan has a big concentration of public squares as does the outer city center. But on the other hand, the periphery lacks public spaces.

Part of the reason for this is that industries have moved further and further from the city center during

20

the course of the 20th century, leaving fractured urban areas behind. We chose to focus on the Bovisa district which is an exindustrial area. The area has gone through a slow transformation mirroring the general industrial development of Milan. Around 12 000 students commute from other areas to Politecnico, the campuses have a lack of student housing. The chosen sites, which are bordered by the railway and Via Bovisasca, could be a connection point between two campuses and offer public spaces and mixed use student housing.

elizaveta kunina

professional and academic works

21

axonometric view of the Bovisa train station

22

elizaveta kunina

ground level of the public space

professional and academic works

23

longitudinal facade

pedestrian accessibilty of the roof

second-level public space

pedestrian accessibilty of the ground floor

multi-level platforms

commercial spaces

amphitheater

greenery as an element of the urban space

pedestrian accessibilty of the ground floor

longitudinal section

24

elizaveta kunina

Four separate projects were developed in one new urban scheme of multi-functional student housing surrounding the Bovisa train station. This was based on principles of forming public spaces that we discovered in our analysis. All of the projects use a combination of spatial typologies that were deduced from the analysis of modern public spaces from around the world. In this project a few different methods

were combined It is an exploration on how a bigger public space would work, that is multi-functional and an active connection point for the area. It is a public space and a connection transport hub, organizing better the pedestrian and car flow in front of the Bovisa train station, adding shops and other public functions to attract more people to the area. The area in front of the station becomes a multilevel public space.

side facade

professional and academic works

25

facades

26

elizaveta kunina

This project, in the south of the urban plan, has a multilevel public space inside a courtyard, using 3 different spatial typologies.

This was in part an experiment on the intimacy of a public space, how that would work in a modern interpretation of a building with a courtyard. The public space goes from the most public at the ground floor, to the most private on the last floors, integrated with shops and co-living spaces.

The public space on the second level can be used by both residents and visitors.

rooftop view professional and academic works

27

axonometric view of project 4

pedestrian accessibilty of the ground floor

28

second-level courtyard

greenery as an element of the urban space

elizaveta kunina

pedestrian accessibilty of the roof

2nd floor plan

3rd floor plan

0

5

professional and academic works

20m

29

axonometric view of project 2

pedestrian accessibilty of the ground floor

30

canopies

greenery as an element of an urban space

elizaveta kunina

courtyard

axonometric view of project 3

multi-level platforms

amphitheater

pedestrian accessibilty of the ground floor

professional and academic works

pedestrian ramp

31

32

elizaveta kunina

/ 04. RETHINKING PIAZZALE LUGANO Group work with Gleb Micnovic and Praveen Dhurvas Politecnico di Milano / Thematic studio Professors: Camillo Magni and Emanuela Bartolini Location: Bovisa, Milan, Italy / 2018 The site is on the border of two contrasting parts of the city: the more dense residential area to the north of the site and an open industrial area to the south. It is right next to a ring road with a lot of traffic, so pollution and noise were something to reduce. Right now, the site is an open parking lot and serves no other function.

Our goals were to connect the two contrasting areas of the city, to create a quality public and residential space. First we designed a sunken down plaza, it created a public space, that’s more sheltered from pollution and noise, also added green buffer zones to further combat those problems. There is

also an underground connection between the plaza and the small park to the south of the site, with commercial and public spaces and the parking is now practically all underground. Then, in the corner of the plaza we designed a tower, with the first three floors dedicated to public functions, such as cafes, co-working spaces and a public library. This was done so that more people would be attracted to this space, while raising up the residential part of the building from the traffic. As the third part of our design strategy we cut the building at a 60-degree angle to minimize the loss of sunlight for the surrounding buildings.

professional and academic works

33

-1 floor plan

1st floor plan

9th floor plan

34

elizaveta kunina

facades

professional and academic works

35

90 mm VAPOR BARRIER

ROOF WINDOW

UNDERLAYMENT

20 mm PLASTER 100 mm INSULATION

+32.05 100 mm INSULATION

INSULATED GLAZED DOOR

STEEL TILES

UNDERLAYMENT DRAINAGE SYSTEM

+28.60 GAP PROVIDED FOR CAVITY VENTILATION

R/C COLUMN 600x200

WINDLOAD AND BEARING APPLICATION (INTERMITTENT) HEATING

+25.150

DRILLED ANCHOR

3450

LIMESTONE TILES 25 mm BEARING APPLICATION 50 mm INSULATION 100 mm ISOLATION CONCRETE BLOCKS 200 mm PLASTER 20 mm

INSULATED GLAZING STEEL HANDRAILS

TIMBER PLANKS 20 mm TIMBER PLANKS 40 mm ISOLATION REINFORCED CONCRETE 250 mm PLASTER 20 mm

330

20 250 40 20

+21.70 STEEL PROFILE

exterior wall section

36

elizaveta kunina

exterior perspective views

By using 3 methods – subtraction, extrusion and a cutting plane, we created the interesting and minimalistic shape of our tower.

The new cutting plane, in a way, created a new facade, which would be an excellent place for solar panels to make the building more sustainable. We emphasized the cutting plane by having it be covered with copper sheets, while the other facades are made out of lighter mineral plates. The contrast of these materials mirrors the contrast between the different

areas surrounding the site. The used materials work well with the neighboring buildings, as well as the height of the tower, which makes the tower a monument, but at the same time isn’t too high.

This makes the building and the surrounding public space a connection point. The residential part of the tower – with apartments for different kinds of families and residents, finish up with double and triple height studios and apartments. The public space is both for residents and visitors.

professional and academic works

37

38

elizaveta kunina

/ 05. ART CLUSTER AND RESIDENCE IN KALININGRAD Individual work Moscow Architectural Institute / Bachelor thesis Professors: Yurij Safronov and Yulia Lobastova Location: Kaliningrad, Russia / 2017 In Kaliningrad at the moment there is not a single large museum of fine arts, there are no art clusters, despite the fact that the city is rich in cultural heritage. The complex is conceived as a point of attraction not only for the residents of Kaliningrad, but also for artists and students from other countries.

The design site is located next to the historic Kronprinz barracks, and it was decided to design an art school, while emphasizing the importance of architectural monuments that were lost in the modern chaotic development of the city. The form of the complex is closely interconnected with

the town-planning aspect of the territory and also completes the frontal composition of the Litovskiy Val Street. The complex consists of three volumes, two of which are connected by a single multifunctional roof. It is possible to walk from this most extreme point along the system of steps, platforms and ramps to the observation deck, which is located at +42.000. There is also a panoramic elevator and an external staircase that allows you to immediately get to the site from the street. The height of the building is observed so as to fit delicately next to the monuments of architecture.

professional and academic works

39

street view

In the volume that is closest to the barracks, there are exhibition spaces, then workshops, training classes, lecture halls. The library is located in a separate volume.

In more detail in the layouts a volume was developed in the south of the plot in which the residential sections of variable number of floors are located. Also in this volume there are twoglazed exhibition space with an art cafe and a block with office space and co-working. The southern part of the complex consists of

40

residential sections of the middle class, an exhibition space with an art cafe and open-plan offices.

The ground floor is a permeable urban space, with commercial premises, cafes, offices, recreation areas for residents of sections, for employees and for students from the art school. Employees of the offices of creative professions, residents, visitors of the complex, and students of the art school all interact directly with each other on the roof space, which creates the atmosphere of an art community.

elizaveta kunina

section

professional and academic works

41

ground floor plan

42

elizaveta kunina

1st floor plan

professional and academic works

43

/ 06. SCULPTURE MUSEUM ON TRUBNAYA STREET Individual work Moscow Architectural Institute / Bachelor coursework Professors: Boris Shabunin and Galina Lebedeva Location: Moscow, Russia / 2015 The project site is located next to Tsvetnoy Boulevard in Moscow, part of one the most historical parts of the city. The Museum of Sculpture is both a park and a building, the line between interior and exterior spaces is blurred. It is a permeable urban environment and an art object. The glass form of the main volume is light, weightless and does not suppress the surrounding historical buildings with a larger scale. The glass prism is located perpendicular to Tsvetnoy Boulevard, a beautiful view opens from the interior levels of the museum. The park

44

is meant to functionally continue Tsetnoy boulevard into the more quiet business and residential area surrounding the project. In a way, the main volume of the project becomes a perpendicular axis for a very important public space for Moscow. The garden below the museum’s main volume is very regular in nature, mirroring the plan of the existing plot and further accentuating the main volumes strong geometrical shape. The project was greatly inspired by the constructivist heritage of Moscow, with a new vision, bold shapes and an idealistic outlook.

elizaveta kunina

professional and academic works

45

The sculptures further blur the line between the exterior and interior of the project. Sculptures from different areas and cultures are meant to be displayed together, to represent the new postsoviet mood of Moscow as a new international and cosmopolitan hub. The two volumes connecting the glass rectangular prism to the ground house all of the secondary but important functions of the museum and represent a

hyperbolic view of some typical industrial brick buildings of the city. The main weightless volume, supported by a square truss system, has a capability to house objects that are not only sculptures in the coloquial sense, but art pieces such as installations. The park near the museum would transform this quite empty plot into a new public space, which could attract visitors from the nearby boulevard, that want a more intimate atmosphere.

main facade

46

elizaveta kunina

interior view

professional and academic works

47

Reciprocal structure with paper tubes

Gleb Mikhnovets, Alexandre Marguerie, Elizaveta Kunina 48

elizaveta kunina

/ 07. A RECIPROCAL STRUCTURE INSTALLATION Group work with Alexandre Marguerie and Gleb Mikhnovets Politecnico di Milano / MSc coursework Professor: Marco Hemmerling Location: Milan, Italy / 2017 This project is based on a selfsupporting, reciprocal system, which is derived from the iso-curve mesh of a tessellated shell. The idea of an expanded node generates the possibility of fairly simple connections of linear elements. The nodes are defined as a number of bar-elements meeting at or near one point within the system. This system allowed for experimenting with relatively simple materials such as cardboard tubes and cable binders. Variations of two parabolic functions were used to generate an elliptical paraboloid for a large scale model, which as a result was made into a physical prototype,

which was exhibited in the patio of Politecnico di Milano. The reciprocal structure was generated on the given surface out of lines, using the “Reciprocal� component in Grasshopper. The geometry can be generated on any geometrical mesh shape. Each tube that was generated was numbered and the connection points for the assembly were marked on them, by defining the distance of the connection from the edge of each tube. Using these instructions a large-scale physical model was assembled out of cardboard tubes connected with cable binders. * Published in ICGG 2018

professional and academic works

49

50

elizaveta kunina

We’ve started the design from what is usually one of the final steps - we chose the construction materials first. We wanted a prefabricated recyclable material, which can be found in sufficient quantities with a low cost. In the end we chose carton tubes, which is a prefabricated material and can be found in large quantities for free.

Then we started to think of ways to connect them and decided to use a Reciprocal structure. We were inspired by how tent-like structures

carton tubes

were constructed in many different cultures. There were several ways of how to make the connections: cutting tubes and gluing them together, using rubber bands or robes, using plastic types and several others. We chose plastic cable binders because it was easy to fix them manually and they provide a minimally destructive way of assembly. We created a script in Grasshopper to find the best form by manipulating two equation graphs.

cable binders

We chose paper tubes.

We chose plastic cable ties, because it’s easy to fix them manually

It is a prefabricated material and can be found in large quantities for free

and they provide a minimally destructive way of assembly

There are several ways of how to make junctions: cutting tubes and gluing them togeth professional and academic works

51

52

elizaveta kunina

building the physical model

It didn’t take a very long time so assemble the physical model because the script provided information about where the tubes should be tied together in detail. The script took into account gravity, line-line collisions, length of the tubes, position of connections and length of the connections.

Marking the numbers of the tubes helped greatly the assembly of the structure. In the end the result was quite similar to the computer generated model, which meant that our script in Grasshopper worked quite well and was realistic when it came to the physical representation.

professional and academic works

53

MODELS + AR 54

elizaveta kunina

RT

professional and academic works

55

sketches of the bachelor thesis

56

elizaveta kunina

physical model of the bachelor thesis

professional and academic works

57

sketches, 2020

58

elizaveta kunina

professional and academic works

59

painting, 2016 exhibited as one of the best student paintings of the year

60

elizaveta kunina

elizaveta kunina liza.kunina@outlook.com +39 (392) 530-94-64

professional and academic works

61