LK
LORRIN KLINE
SELECTED WORKS
the ANCHOR
As a part of the 2019 ULI Hines Student Competition students were asked to redevelop downtown Cincinnati. Our submission the ANCHOR, is a catalytic development, captivating the pockets of industry momentum throughout the region. By creating a mixed use, pedestrian friendly, and transportation-oriented development, the ANCHOR creates an inclusive plan to nourish the riverfront within proximity to the economic engines of Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky. The ANCHOR not only bridges the riverfront to downtown but binds the region. Utilizing its strategic location, the ANCHOR embeds itself as a hub to the streetcar extension to Northern Kentucky, establishes the regional rail line, and connects downtown Cincinnati. The ANCHOR serves as a critical base for industries that endorse start-upinnovation, creativeness, and wellness on a regional scale.
2
the HIVE
the REEL
the Oasis
This project was recoginized and placed in the Top Four of the 2018 ULI Hines Student Competition.
3
A User Centered Design Application in Eye Tracking Technologies: Children’s Perceptions Within the Built Environment These images show the reaction to a finned facade vs. a blank one. This test was used to show that people ignore blank facade. Since the participants kept there gaze towards the center section, it was made true the would be able to navigate to the entrance of the building without the addition of signage.
This set of images show how people react to people. In this case we see every participants gaze was focused on the people in the image rather than any architectural element within the image. This set was shown to see why there would be no more people placed in any of the renderings to gauge a better focus on the architectural elements themselves.
From the tests of the last set of images I wanted to understand what would happen if your start to embed the idea of “face� into an architectural element, The participants immediately reacted to the face structure, and continued to gaze at that point, whereas their gaze wandered throughout the other image.
I also learned that contrast is another element that can focus ones visual attention. In this study, I wanted to start to understand ones reaction to a biophilic environment. In this instance I noticed more people drawn to the images with more plants in them. This image helped me to test more instances of how people began to gauge reactions between indoor and outdoor natural environments.
4
This thesis will begin to use eye tracking as a study which designers undergo the design process seeking a child’s perception of the built environment to make design decisions as well as becoming more involved throughout the process. The research will question whether implementing eye tracking studies into the design process helps understand whether testing its user aids to create better design for them or falls short. These studies help to better understand user percetions of the built environment through principals of visual attention within subconcious viewing.
5
the FUSE
Students were asked to research the developing site in Toronto, Canada and create a new master plan of what the city needs. As a group we came to the conclusion that because of the large developing areas that are surrounding the site we needed to create a center where all of these instances merge. The FUSE was created as a hub to link the three distinct areas together through transportation. We were asked to document the phasing process and the cost effectiveness of how our idea would be incorporated into the community. As well as taking a look at what types of sustainability strategies could be implemented.
6
IEW
AV E
FUSE EAS
KEY 1
UPSCALE RESTAURANT
2
FUSE HALL
3
MARKET HALL
4
the BOND ESPLANADE
5
GREEN FLOOD BUFFER
7
OUTDOOR AMPHITHEATER
8
BUSINESS INCUBATOR
11 9 12
9
RE-VITALIZED OLD EASTERN AVE BRIDGE
10
LANDSCAPED GREENERY
11
PUBLIC ROOFTOP
12
RESIDENTIAL TOWER
P
C O R KTOW N COMMONS
13 20
BIKE // SKATES RENTAL
16
SKATING // ICE RINK
6
17
FOOD TRUCK PARKING
18
STREETCAR STOP
19
the FUSE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
20
UNDERGROUND PARKING ENTRANCE
14
8
7
15
16
19
W AY
15
5
4
K Y PA R
SMALL-SCALE OFFICES
VA L L E
RELIEF LINE SUBWAY STOP
17
18
3
1
DON
13 14
RIVER
GAMING ZONES
N A VE
10
DON
6
TER
BRO
A DV
THE
AR T H
BOU
AC K
S TA
T IO
N
AV
26
R
TTR
IEW
This project recived an honorable mention int the ULI Hines Student Competition in 2017.
B
ION ACT ER
U
N
IN T 189100
PROD
FUSE
EAS
R SMA
E
ABORATION
DV
LL
A RO
O
IO CT
C
2
7
INTERPHASE
Students were asked to research the development of spawning conditions of cellular growth molecules. Then create an outdoor installation that responds to these conditions. As a class we decided to add a programmatic element of a pop up library with seating to add restraints within the spawning cells. Each cell became a joint where the rods in the installation would connect too. As the cells got larger this would be represented in the installation by more than one rod being placed to the same point. We ran another growth simulation to place the single panels, 3D panels, and bookshelf locations within the structure. The installation was exhibited as a pop up library for two weeks in the center of University of Cincinnati’s main campus green. A few libraries from the area donated books to the pop up for students to borrow.
8
Panneling variations include a flat hexagon, a hexagon shape that is three dimentionally pronounced, and a three dimmentional space that is found reptitive within the structure which became the book sheleves.
Front of Interphase Structure
Back of Interphase Structure
9
13
12
CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY 11
1. Footer
36’’ x 12’’ Cast Concrete Footings with three #5 Horizontal reinforcements with 1 ½” clearance from edge
2. External Wall Below Grade 8’’x16’’x12’’ CMU inner wythe with #5 Vertical Reinforcements 1 ½” clearance from edge Vapor Barrier 8’’x8’’x8’’ CMU outer wythe with transparent waterproof coating
10
3. Ground Floor 4” thick c¬ompacted sand Vapor Barrier 4”thick cast concrete slab on grade with wire mesh reinforcements with 4’’ spacing 4. External Wall at Grade 12’’ Cast Concrete Wall with #3 horizontal reinforcement equally spaced and #5 vertical reinforcement at 16’’ OC. 5. External Cavity Wall Above Grade 8”x16”x12” inner wythe with #5 Vertical reinforcements ½” clearance from edge and horizontal reinforcements spaced 16’’ OC. Vapor Barrier 2’’ Thick rigid insulation 8’’x8’’x4’’ CMU Outer wythe with transparent waterproof coating 6. External Glass Block Window at Stairs 12’’x12’’x4’’ glass block wall with horizontal joint reinforcement at alternating courses at 16’’ OC.
9 6
7. Glass Block Window 8”x8”x4” glass block with horizontal join reinforcement alternating courses at 16’’ on center 8. First Floor
7
2’’X10” joists sloped at 16” on Center equally spaced ¾” plywood subfloor Ceramic Tile on mortar board 2”x4” joists at 16” on Center
9. Second Floor 2’’x8’’ rafters 16” on center equally spaced 2” thick rigid insulation between rafters 5/8” plywood sheathing ¾” thick gypsum board 2”x4” joists sloped at 16” on center with Butt insulation in between 5/8 Gypsum Board 10. Stairs
Site Cast Concrete stairs with 10” tread and 7” rise and an 8” thick standing slab with ten #5 reinforcements equally spaced in both directions with ¾”clearance from bottom
11. Main Structure Roof 2”x8” Rafters sloped at 16” on center 2” thick rigid insulation between rafters 5/8” thick plywood sheathing 2”x4” framing running 16 on center with batt insulation between Built up roof membrane 12. Cavity Wall 8”x16”x8” CMU inner wythe with vertical reinforcements and horizontal reinforcements alternating courses 2” thick rigid insulation 8”x8”x4” CMU outer wythe with transparent waterproof coating and horizontal reinforcements 16” OC. Flashing 13. Roof over Stair 4”x4” joists sloped at 24” on center 2”x10” rafters at 24” on center 5/8” Plywood sheathing Built up roof membrane
10
2
1
3
4
8
1: Foundation
1. Pile & Pile Cap 2. Grade Beam Foundation on pile caps w/ 5/8 horizontal rebar 3. Drainage Mat 4. Rubberized Asphalt Membrane 5. Vapor Retarder 6. 6-1/2” Poured in Place Concrete Slab
2: Ground Floor/Exterior 1. 2” topping slab with broom finish 2. 1” ridigid insluation 3. Drainage composite 4. Protection sheet 5. Hot rubererized asphaltic membrane 6. 2-1/2’’ concrete topping slab 7. 2’’ composite metal decking 8. Exitsting steel structure W-R14 9. MC13x31.8 galvinized steel
6
7
4 5
3: Garage Door 1. Over head door and track 2. neoprene gasket head 3. HSS 6x6x12 4: Main Floor/Exterior 1. 2” topping slab with broom finish 2. 1” ridigid insluation 3. Drainage composite 4. Protection sheet 5. Hot rubererized asphaltic membrane 6. 2-1/2’’ concrete topping slab 7. 2’’ composite metal decking 8. Exitsting steel structure W-R14 9. MC13x31.8 galvinized steel
2
5: Main Floor/Interior 1. Carpet Floor Finish 2. 2“ topping slab 3. vapor barrier 4. 3” R-19 ridigid insluation 5. 2’’ metal decking 6. 2-1/2“concrete topping 7. Existing steel frame structure 5
3
6: Main Floor Curtain Wall 1. 5-1/2” Curtain wall system 2. 6” wide vertiacal aluminum fin at exterior 3. Prefinished meatal flashing 7: Main Floor Column 1. Stiffners at column 2. Birdwire at all exposed steel beam and purlins 3. Exposed steel 8: Roof
1. Steel Structure exposed 2. 2x6 pressure treated nailers 3. Tounge and grove wood decking 4. 1/4” Underlayment board 5. Vapor barrier 6. R-21 Ridigid insluation 7. Overlayment board
8. Single ply PVC membrane
1
11
LK
THANK YOU