League of Southeastern Credit Unions & Affiliates
Director’s Resource League of Southeastern Credit Unions
|
April 2013 | Vol. 3, Issue No. 1
President’s Message It has been a busy first quarter in our two states. At the end of the quarter, the LSCU & Affiliates sent all of our member credit unions a 10-percent dues rebate. This is the first time that either state has been offered a dues rebate by the League. The checks were mailed at the end of March. You should have received yours by now. The dues rebate was made possible because of the good year the League and LEVERAGE, the League Service Corporation, had in 2012. When a credit union purchases a product through LEVERAGE, it has a direct correlation to the level and quality of services that we can provide to our members. The long-term sustainability of the League is clearly dependent on a strong and profitable LEVERAGE. Thank you for your affiliation with the League. Also during the quarter, we held our annual federal and state governmental affairs conferences (GAC). Turnout for the CUNA GAC was great with 147 Alabama and Florida credit union officials traveling to Washington, D.C. Participation for our State GACs in Montgomery and Tallahassee were below what we had hoped. It’s very important for credit unions to be engaged in our federal and state advocacy efforts if we want to move a proactive legislative and regulatory agenda forward. I also invite you to our Annual Convention and Exposition (AC&E), June 12-15, in Orlando. We have worked hard to put together an agenda that has many director’s education sessions, including a Director’s Roundtable. On page three we have provided some of the education sessions available this year. I hope you and the rest of your colleagues will join us in June.
Improving Board Decision-Making John Oesch, a senior lecturer and faculty at large at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Business, recently spoke at a CUES Symposium telling attendees that many boards take positions too early in the decision-making process and that it inhibits them from taking advantage of the expertise of everyone at the table. For example, if the board chair says what they think should be done, it may be intimidating for another director to say they disagree. Similarly, if the chair asks for each director to say what they think, and the first six to speak take a similar position, it may be difficult for the seventh director to go against the other six. He says that boards need wisdom on the table to help draw it out of those that have it. Oesch listed five steps to leading change in board decision-making: 1. Create criteria. Find out what is in the best interest of the organization, rather than having individual directors take sides (also known as positions). 2. Share information. Get all the experience at the table on the table. Ask for additional information as well.Generate three to five feasible, beneficial alternatives. Try not to eliminate good ones early on to keep things over-simple. (continued on page 2)
Save the Date BSA Training May 24, 2013 Tuesday Birmingham, AL Click here for more information CU Philosophy in Action Workshop May 14-15, 2013 Tuesday-Wednesday Birmingham, AL Click here for more information Annual Convention & Exposition June 12-14, 2013 Wednesday-Friday Orlando, FL Click here for more information