Journal of Piysiology (1993), 462, pp. 161-173 With 6 figures Printed in Great Britain
161
EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE AND VELOCITY OF STRETCHING ON STRESS RELAXATION OF CONTRACTING FROG MUSCLE FIBRES BY G. A. CAVAGNA From the Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Universita' di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
(Received 7 February 1992) SUMMARY
1. Active muscle resists stretch with a tension greater than it can develop at constant length, but at the end of lengthening the extra tension disappears, at first rapidly and then more slowly. 2. This unexplained trend of muscle stress relaxation was studied at two different temperatures (4 and 14 째C) and after ramp stretches of different velocity (0 2-2-2 fibre lengths s-1) on frog muscle fibres near slack length. 3. The velocity of the fast fall in tension increases with temperature much more than that of the slow fall. In addition, the amplitude of the fast fall in tension increases with the velocity of stretching whereas that of the slow fall decreases. 4. It is hypothesized that some of the energy absorbed by the muscle during stretching is used to raise the chemical energy level of the cross-bridges, and this energy transfer occurs during and after stretching.
INTRODUCTION
Active muscles are as commonly stretched in vivo as they shorten. For example, during constant speed, level terrestrial locomotion the mechanical energy absorbed by active muscles when they are stretched during each step is about equal to that delivered when they shorten (Cavagna, Komarek & Mazzoleni, 1971). Muscles make good use of the mechanical energy absorbed during stretching since they are able to perform more work during subsequent shortening (Cavagna, Dusman & Margaria, 1968). This increase in work is due in part to elastic energy stored during stretching, and in part to an enhancement of the contractile machinery. If a short time interval is left between stretching and shortening, as may happen in vivo, some of the stored elastic energy is lost due to the tension decay (stress relaxation), but the extra work done by the contractile component may even increase beyond the level attained without time interval (Cavagna, Mazzanti, Heglund & Citterio, 1986). Muscle stress relaxation has been described by several authors, but its mechanism remains unclear; possibilities include the detachment of differently strained cross-bridges (Cavagna & Citterio, 1974), the action of two populations of cross-bridges, one with fast kinetics and the other with slow (Colomo, Lombardi, Menchetti & Piazzesi, 1989), or the recoil of visco-elastic elements (Edman, Elzinga & Noble, 1981; Morgan, MS 1100