Architecture and Design Portfolio for Luke Laverty

Page 1

LUKE LAVERTY Architecture and Design Portfolio


LUKE LAVERTY, LEED AP BD+C, WELL AP, RA #951035 (MA, USA) +1 262.707.0997 (US) | +44 07541.146845 (UK) luke.laverty@gmail.com


PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Boston, MA and London, UK (October 2021 – Present): Architect, Associate Science studio: Project architect and lab designer of multiple projects. Started and run firmwide lab design group, aiming to improve lab knowledge sharing and raise level of design across all offices.

NBBJ

Boston, MA (February 2017 – October 2021): Architect Big Science studio: Focusing on the performance of sciences spaces and the people within them, ranging from an internal study of fume hood diversity factors to a School of Engineering master plan. Co-creator of Kaleidoscope, an early design tool to bring Life Cycle Assessments early into design workflow.

PAYETTE

Boston, MA (February 2015 – February 2017): Arch III Science and Technology studio: Job captain and designer for multiple laboratory projects. Assistant director of the Perkins+Will Human Experience Lab: first acting member of then over 100, first research project’s Principal Investigator, and manager of office champions.

PERKINS+WILL

Madison, WI (Summer 2008 & June 2012 – January 2015): Architectural Intern II Science and Technology studio: Pushing scientific workplace design and sustainability through all stages of the architectural process for national laboratories and major pharmaceuticals.

FLAD ARCHITECTS

Washington, DC (March – September 2011): Architectural Intern High-end Class A+ corporate interior architecture.

LEHMAN SMITH MCLEISH

EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI

(2009 – 2012)

Master of Architecture: Professional Degree with Thesis Award for Distinguished Research (2005 – 2009) Bachelor of Science in Architectural Studies Minor: Structural Engineering Summa Cum Laude with Commencement Honors, Honors Degree with Thesis, High Honors in the Major

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MILWAUKEE


Exterior View of the entry with welcoming amenity pavilion and efficient machine lab module building beyond

Rendering by Hansinok


SCIENCE PARK GATEWAY BUILDING NBBJ - 2023 - 1 month duration competition entry Simultaneously bold gateway, sensitive to context and views, and economic flexible incubator lab in two moves: landscape-integrated sloping green roof over shared amenity pavilion and efficient lab module machine behind. SITE: Southampton, UK

Driven by two potentially opposite motivations from the Science Park (for a bold gateway design and to be concealed from view at the campus entry to allow area residents to see grass and an adjacent historic garden wall), this design proposal achieves both. On an idyllic plot with walking paths and small building scale throughout, a highly-efficient maximized lettable area block is set behind a campus entry tree line, and a sloping berm conceals a parking lot and evolves into a green roof over a timber-structured collaboration pavilion as a magnet for the incubator tenants. Lab modules were developed baseed on an existing successful incubator building with added flexibility and reduced cost: simply two lab and/or office modules sizes with focused infrastructure that can be connected as needed. STRATEGY:

Lead designer and creator of design concept, lab planner, coordinated design concept with MEP engineer and landscape architect, and managed team to produce deliverables for competition submission. RESPONSIBILITIES:

Darius Umrigar (PIC), Ingo Braun (Design Principal), Ali Cininas, Anu Sabherwal, Ariel Abarquez TEAM:

Science park landscape concept diagram

Fira Landscape Architecture

W

Potential Link to The Club

View

Connection

Walled Garden Drop off

Connection

CP

E

Creche

View


Dedicated high efficient, cost effective lab-enabled block: - Uninterrupted lettable modules - Modules can accommodate lab and office space

Green roof over amenity space pavilion

Shared amenity pavilion in affordable structure outside lab enabled block. Size subject to developing brief: - Arrival space - Meeting rooms - Cafe - Conference facilites

3300

3300

1500

CORE AND SHELL ONLY

3300

SLIDING DOOR FOR EFFICIENT LAYOUT FURNITURE WALL FOR FLEXIBILITY AND COST

OPEN SPACE FOR CASEWORK OR EQUIPMENT FOR FLEXIBILITY AND COST

3300

1500

6000

4500

10500 8100

10700

7000

7000

CORE AND SHELL ONLY

TYPICAL INDUSTRY FLEXIBLE LAB MODULE

6600 3200

7000

3200

1500

6400 3500

2450

3500

PROPOSED REVISED SINGLE MODULE: 3.3m x 7.0m 23 m2 | 250 sf

1500

7000 3500

PROPOSED REVISED DOUBLE MODULE: 6.6m x 10.5m 69.5 m2 | 750 sf

3850

EXISTING SCIENCE CENTRE DOUBLE MODULE: 6.4m x 10.7m 68 m2 | 735 sf

7000

PREVIOUS BUILDING DOUBLE MODULE: 7.0m x 7.0m 35 m2 | 375 sf

Revit, Illustrator

2850

PREVIOUS BUILDING SINGLE MODULE: 3.5m x 7.0m 24.5 m2 | 265 sf

Program Stacking Diagram

Lab Module Study

Revit


1

4

3

2

2 1

Concept diagram: conceal the building from view at the campus entry and reveal a bold dynamic design as one enters

3 Aerial View: landscape integration site strategy SketchUp, Enscape

4

Exterior View sequence as one travels down entry road

SketchUp, Enscape


Interior View of the Makerspace

Photos by Robert Benson Photography


CENTER FOR ENGINEERING & HEALTH PROFESSIONS Payette - 2021 - 18 month duration New building of 59,000sf for unique mix of multiple engineering and health professions specialty labs across a central daylit commons. SITE: University of Hartford, CT

In the center of the campus main green, an efficient wedge-shaped footprint with a significant pedestrian connection through and sloping green roof above resulted. An efficient form, the quality of the building revealed itself on the inside with simple stepping of classrooms/labs and double- and triple-height spaces as the building increased in height. The sloping roof provided the challenge of coordinating the floor to floor elevations, roof chiller opening, connecting MEP, and elevator overrun to ensure the building fits in appropriately with its context. Exposed MEP and structure were closely coordinated, including in specialty lab spaces such as the high bay gantry crane, drone net, turbomachinery fans, concrete testing, nursing simulaiton mannequins, and motion analysis force plates. STRATEGY:

Job Captain, project designer, and BIM coordinator from DD through CA. Responsible for specialty lab and MEP coordination; lab design; documentation of floor plans, interior elevations, stairs, and lab casework and equipment; and point person for construction administration of all interiors. RESPONSIBILITIES:

TEAM: Jeff DeGregorio (PIC), Peter Vieira (Design Principal), Sara

Gewurz (PM), Mark Bandzak (PA), Dane Clark, Amber Penman, Josh Aranson, Laura Devine Second Floor Program Plan

Revit

Program Engineering Labs Health Professions Classrooms

UP

Circulation: Commons Vertical Circulation Building Support

UP


Interior View facing North through Commons space between engineering (left) and health professions (right) North-south building section facing West through engineering spaces and exterior chiller opening B

C

D

E

F

F.3

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

Revit

N

1 14' - 6"

MEZZANINE 27' - 10"

2' - 0"

13' - 4"

LEVEL 2 13' - 4"

1

SECTION C-C SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

LEVEL 1 0" LEVEL 1 LOW -2' - 0"


42'-6 1/2" 5" GROWING MEDIUM 42'-1 1/2" 1" DRAINAGE/COVER BOARD/MEM 42'-0 1/2" 6" INSULATION 41'-6 1/2" 1/2" SUBSTRATE 41'-6" 3" DECK ~41'-3" --------- (T.O.S.-ANGLED) -------(4" VENT BEAMS WERE REMOVED) 1" BUST: 41'-4" W8 40'-8" 12'-10" ELEVATOR OVERRUN 27'-10" --------- (MEZZ) --------

13' - 11"

CONFIRMED W/ OTIS

ELEVATOR OVERRUN 12' - 10"

27'-10"

--------- (T.O. PARAPET AT CHILLER END-ANGLED) -------33'-3" B.O. 8'-6" H CHILLER 32'-9" + 6" VIBRATION 32'-8 1/4" DUNNAGE T.O.S. / B.O. 3/4" DUNNAGE GRATING 31'-8 1/4" B.O. W12 DUNNAGE STRUCTURE 3'-1" RESULTANT CLEARANCE UNDER BEAMS 28'-7 1/4" 1/2" COVER BOARD/MEM = STEP UP 9 1/4" INTO WELL 28'-6 3/4" +2 3/4" @ 1/4" / FT AT HIGH POINT (EAST & WEST) 28'-4" 6" INSULATION AT LOW POINT (CENTER) --------- (MEZZ) --------

13' - 4 3/4"

~41'-9"

14' - 6"

LIGHTING 6" CEILING 10' - 0"

CLEAR 2" INSUL DUCT 1' - 11"

NEW FTF 14' - 6"

MEZZANINE 27' - 10"

BEAM & SLAB 1' - 10"

MEZZANINE 27' - 10"

LEVEL 2 13' - 4"

13' - 4"

LEVEL 2 13' - 4"

LEVEL 1 0"

LEVEL 1 0" LEVEL 1 LOW -2' - 0" ELEV PIT -4' - 0"

G

H

I

J

K

L

SECTION JOG TO CUT THROUGH SOUTH BRIDGE

COORDINATE VENTING

STAIRS HUNG

W8 BEYOND COORDINATE

3' - 4"

CURRENTLY MODELED

MEZZANINE 27' - 10" 4" SHORT OF 10'-10" CEILING

8"

6"

1' - 10"

2" CLEAR

W16

DUCTWORK W8

REVIEW GUARDRAIL

WOOD SLAT CEILING THICKNESS?

10' - 10"

DOES STAIR GUARDRAIL ALIGN W/ BRIDGE?

CONSIDER 1' LANDING TO KEEP GUARDRAIL IN LINE WITH BRIDGE LIKE AT MEZZANINE LEVEL 2 13' - 4"

HOW DOES STRINGER DIE INTO BRIDGE? BRIDGE SIDES TO MATCH MEZZ BRIDGE?

BRIDGE SIDES TO MATCH MEZZ BRIDGE?

LEVEL 1 0" LEVEL 1 LOW -2' - 0" ELEV PIT -4' - 0"

Coordination section views developing sloped roof, MEP, structure, and elevator

Revit

1 Section detail of roof coordination of exposed and concealed services

Revit

GENERAL NOTE: PROVIDE SLOTTED METAL FRAMING FOR THE SUPPORT OF ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND MEP SYSTEMS AT THE ROOF DECK. COORDINATE LAYOUT WITH ARCHITECT WHERE EXPOSED TO VIEW. REFER TO RCPS FOR DEVICE LOCATIONS.

8"

4' - 0"

8"

4' - 0"

8"

J-BOX FOR POWER REEL AND OCCUPANCY SENSOR SHIM FOR OCCUPANCY SENSOR SO POST DOWN IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOOR (NOT THE ROOF DECK) DASHED LINES: SMOKE DETECTOR MOUNTED TO PRIMARY NORTH-SOUTH SLOTTED METAL CHANNEL

BOTTOM OF ROOF DECK

SLOTTED METAL FRAMING FLANGE CLAMP

MECHANICAL PIPING

1' - 0"

2"

1"

QUIKSTIX UPTIGHT CLIP

1' - 2"

SLOTTED METAL FRAMING

1' - 8"

3 1/2"

11"

5 1/2"

FP

LIGHT FIXTURE SCHED

1/2" 4 1/2" 4 1/2" 4

DUCTS HUNG FROM SLOTTED METAL FRAMING ABOVE

DASHED LINES: DESTRATIFICATION FAN WITH AIRCRAFT CABLE

4' - 6"

TECHLINE "TEE"

POWER REEL CENTERED ON THE APC JOINT AND HUNG FROM SLOTTED METAL FRAMING WITH SECONDARY SLOTTED METAL CHANNEL AND THREADED ROD. CHANNEL ABOVE THE TECTUM IS CONTINUOUS AS NEEDED, BUT THE CHANNEL AT THE REEL AS REQUIRED IS TO BE ONLY THE LENGTH OF THE REEL'S MOUNTING PLATE AND IS TO BE CONCEALED.

OCCUPANCY SENSOR & WIFI WAP POSTED DOWN POST TO BE PAINTED PT-6 AND TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO FLOOR (NOT THE SLOPED ROOF DECK)

HOOK & EYE THRO HOLES. HORIZO NET MUS REMOVABLE ACCESS TO SYST AB

CROSS MEM BEY

DRONE

vt

LIGHT FIXTURE AS SCHEDULED WITH AIRCRAFT CABLE

15 TYPICAL CEILING DETAIL - APC-3

12 DRONE N


1 View facing West through the daylit double-height Commons between the Lab (left) and Office (right) Bars


R&D CAMPUS FACILITY RENOVATION & ADDITION Perkins+Will - 2015 - 10 month duration Fast-tracked state-of-the-art R&D campus facility including 150,000sf of renovations and new 50,000sf front-door, communal atrium, and lab addition pursuing LEED Gold as a means of creating a cohesive collaborative campus. SITE: East Hartford, CT

Given the existing sprawling collection of utilitarian office, research, and service buildings, we aimed to create a center of gravity to unite the campus while integrating with it with the same material and formal language. To do this, we created a central space between the new lab addition and office renovation as a place for paths to cross. A significant focus was to create collaborative and transparent yetB BUILDING highly secure and flexible research spaces. STRATEGY:

5

4

3

2

Job Captain, project designer, and BIM coordinator from SD through CDs. Responsible for documentation of floor plans, RCPs, interior finish plans, cores, reception desk, and lighting coordination. Worked as a team in presentation preparation of drawings and renderings, MEP coordination, and interior detailing. RESPONSIBILITIES:

D

A BUILDING

Bill Harris (PIC), Rick Kuhn (Design Director), Jeannine Campbell (Interiors Design Director), Paul Brouillette (PM), Andy Bennett (PA), Noel Murphy, Brian Ip, Ryan Kurlbaum TEAM:

C

H BUILDING

Campus Scope Diagram

Revit

B

J BUILDING J Building

KK BUILDING Building

L Building L BUILDING WEST

EAST

Renovation

1:50 PM

c:\temp\155206_003 - UTRC - K-South Building - v2015_Lavertyl.rvt

K BUILDING K-SOUTH BUILDING

New Construction A

K-SOUTH BUILDING

K-South Building

N


G

F

C E

D

1

3 A

B

2 4

Lobby: A Exhibit & Conference Room: B Commons: C Laboratory: D High-Bay: E Open Office: F Conference Center: G

5 Level 1 Floor Plan highlighting Collaboration Areas

Revit, Illustrator


EXIST. WALL TO REMAIN 09-P-01 PAINT A1 A52-05-2 ALUM. TRIM

09-BS-03 FRAME OUT LCD RECESS WITH 1/4" THICK ALUMINUM ANGLE. SET ANGLE TO FACE OF TILE. 3/4" THICK MDF, PTD

2 1/2" METAL STUDS WITH 5/8" DRYWALL FURRED OUT/OR BOTH SIDES ACOUSTICAL BATT INSULATION, TYP. POWER/TEL-DATA AS SPECIFIED LCD MONITOR BRACKET. PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQ'D, TYP. LCD MONITOR - FINAL DIMS TO BE COORDINATED 1/4" THICK ALUMINUM TRIM 09-P-01 DBL LAYER OF DRYWALL

09-P-01 DBL LAYER OF DRYWALL FOR FLUSH WOOD BASE PAINTED MDF BASE WITH 1/2" REVEAL, SCRIBE BASE TO FLOOR A -LEVEL K LEVEL011 0' - 0"

Casework section detail

SECTION DETAIL - PRE-FUNCTION MONITOR WALL

" = 1'-0"

Program massing

2 View in double-height Lobby facing Commons 3 View of the Commons feature stair and bridge between program bars

Commons as connector

Commons heat gain diagram

Lobby heat gain section diagram


4 Exterior View facing Northwest toward the addition’s new welcoming campus front door


5 Existing view of existing building’s south facade

Design concept: splayed planes

Facade and glazing language

Axonometric diagram of lab planning informing facade rhythm

5 Exterior view of approach to addition bridging transparency and security


Interior View between Fully-Automated Microfluidics Laboratory (left) and Biology Laboratory (right)

SketchUp, Podium, Photoshop


FULLY-AUTOMATED MICROFLUIDICS LAB Flad Architects - 2013 - 4 month duration A national laboratory’s collaborative hub for researchers and computational scientists with a fully-automated microfluidics lab and coupled data center below to analyze the effects of climate change on thousands of environmental samples daily.

Addition to Argonne National Laboratory Theory and Computing Sciences Building, Lemont, Illinois SITE:

STRATEGY: The 46,000 square foot research center houses offices,

conference spaces, and workstations with collaboration spaces integrated throughout the open plan. The level of automation is the first of its kind at its scale and research goals. Armed with a significant data center on the level below, the lab will accelerate the national lab’s mission of analyzing climate change by testing environmental samples via the integrated automation and modeling in the aforementioned supercomputers. The project’s completion in 2016 coincides with funding and automation requirements involved. Assisted in research and design. Design documentation in two, three, and four dimensions while collaborating with architect-of-record. Fly- and walk-through video using Lumion and renderings. TEAM: Rachel Nelan (PIC), Paul Hansen (PM) RESPONSIBILITIES:

Floor Plan Program Diagram

AutoCAD

Program Laboratory Laboratory Support Office Office Support Building Support


Structure

Envelope

Hidden Line

Conceptual Rendering

Exploded Axonometric View highlighting Revit Categories per Embodied Impacts

Revit, Tally


Tally™ Problem Entry Area: Concrete structure 1%

2% 2%

I2SL PRESENTATION: BIM LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT Flad Architects - 2014 - 3 week duration

5%

2%

Software exploration of Autodesk Tally and Athena Impact Estimator

10% 19%

for whole building life cycle assessment for a LEED Pilot Credit and

1%

presentation at International Institute for Sustainable Laboratories

5%

(I2SL/Labs 21) Annual Conference 2014.

3%

SITE: University of Wisconsin-Madison Hospital, Madison, WI

4%

4% 5%

%

2%

UW1%HEALTH EAST Full Core, Shell, and Structure Summary

30%

Primary Energy Demand Energy Demand Results per Primary Revit Category, itemized by Tally™ Entry 2%

2%

1%1%

3%

1%

10% 22%

6%

1%

Cast-in-place concrete, reinforced structural concrete, 4000 psi (30 MPa) Glue laminated timber (Glulam), softwood Reinforced concrete footing Steel, 2L-section Steel, angle Steel, channel Steel, hollow structural section Steel, round tubing Steel, wide flange shape

5%

RESPONSIBILITIES: Revit, Tally, and Athena life cycle assessments,

3%

4%

4% 5%

2%

Walls Aluminum faced composite wall panel (ACM) Cast-in-place concrete, reinforced structural concrete, 4000 psi (30 MPa) Closed cell, polyurethane foam, spray-applied Concrete, unreinforced, 4000 psi (30 MPa), 25% fly ash Fluid applied synthetic polymer air barrier Glass-fiber, blanket Hollow-core CMU, grouted Hollow-core CMU, ungrouted 34%

Solution: Replace concrete Legend

with steel and increase fly ash Curtain Panels quantities Windows Aluminum, sheet Fluid applied synthetic polymer air barrier Glazing, double pane IGU Glazing, double pane IGU Spandrel, aluminum, insulated Spandrel, glass, insulated Steel, C-stud metal framing Wall board, gypsum

30%

Plywood, exterior grade Full Core, Shell, and Structure Summary PVC roofing membrane, sheet Steel, C-stud metal framing Wall board, gypsum

Structure

Reinforced concrete footing Steel, 2L-section

100%

Revit Category Walls

Aluminum, formed Cast-in-place concrete, reinforced structural concrete, 4000 psi (30 MPa) Cast-in-place concrete, slab on grade Domestic softwood Hollow-core CMU, ungrouted Plywood, exterior grade Reinforced slab, exclusive of deck Steel, composite form deck Steel, sheet, perforated

50%

Structure Roofs

58

5.513E+007 Steel, angle kg Steel, channel

71,488 kgSO2eq

Revit, Tally

3,649 kgNeq

1.681E+007 kgCO2eq

0.1859 CFC-11eq

988,340 O3eq

1.566E+008 MJ

1.454E+008 MJ

1.127E+007 MJ

Primary Energy Demand

Non-renewable Energy

Renewable Energy

Steel, hollow structural section Steel, round tubing Steel, wide flange shape

Walls

Doors

EPDM, roofing membrane Fluid applied elastometic air barrier Metal roofing panels, formed Mineral wool, board, generic

5/8/2014

UW HEALTH EAST

Cast-in-place concrete, reinforced structural concrete, 4000 psiTally (30 MPa) Life Cycle Assessment per Revit Category Results perGlueRevit Category, itemized by Tally™ Entry laminated timber (Glulam), softwood

Aluminum mullion, anodized Aluminum, extrusion Aluminum, extrusion, anodized Steel, sheet, expanded Terracotta tile

Roofs

1%

Primary Energy Demand

Curtain Wall Mullions

Floors

multiple LEED credits’ documentation, and conference copresentation. Assisted in starting firmwide LCA benchmarking system. 2 TEAM: Dirk von Below (co-presenter at I SL Conference 2014) 2%

1%

Global Warming Potential Global Warming Potential

Metal wall panel, formed Plywood, interior grade Precast concrete nonstructural panel Steel, C-H-stud metal framing Steel, C-stud metal framing Steel, C-stud metal framing with insulation Stone veneer wall, limestone, grouted Terracotta tile Wall board, gypsum

Door frame, aluminum Door, exterior, steel Glazing, double pane IGU

5%

19%

Structure

2%

2% 2%

2%

Plywood, 12% exterior grade PVC roofing membrane, sheet Steel, C-stud metal framing Wall board, gypsum

3%

5/8/2014 Flad Architects continues to improve their buildings’ performance with respect to operational environmental impacts but has just scratched the surface on embodied impacts. Leading Flad’s push to understand the latter, Dirk von Below and I tested and compared the two most-used architectural LCA tools: Athena Impact Estimator and Tally. We shared this knowledge at a conference regarding sustainable science spaces to look beyond operational energy uses to that of embodied environmental impacts, highlighting the limitations, how and when to use each piece of software.

STRATEGY:

1%

Floors

Aluminum faced composite wall panel (ACM) Cast-in-place concrete, reinforced structural concrete, 4000 psi (30 MPa) Closed cell, polyurethane foam, spray-applied Concrete, unreinforced, 4000 psi (30 MPa), 25% fly ash Fluid applied synthetic polymer air barrier Glass-fiber, blanket Hollow-core CMU, grouted Hollow-core CMU, ungrouted Metal wall panel, formed Plywood, interior grade Precast concrete nonstructural panel Steel, C-H-stud metal framing Steel, C-stud metal framing Steel, C-stud metal framing with insulation Stone veneer wall, limestone, grouted Terracotta tile Wall board, gypsum

Windows Glazing, double pane IGU

Curtain Wall Mullions 0%

Curtain Panels Mass

Acidification Potential

Eutrophication Potential

Global Warming Ozone Depletion Smog Formation Potential Potential Potential


for equipment 1 View through Open Lab to Tissue Culture rooms with island safety stations to maximize wall space Photo by Jonah Prada


FLEXIBLE BIOMEDICAL LABORATORY RENOVATION Payette - 2018-20 - 17 month duration Multi-phased flexible biology and tissue culture research floor “master plan” and 13,000sf renovation with new rooftop AHU for eminent biology and disease research institute. SITE: Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA

From programming efforts and industry and owner planning metrics, the ratio of office : lab : lab support space was redistributed in phases. The building’s lab supplies department was first relocated and made to be more welcoming in a visible and central location, opening up additional lab space. The renovation included upgrading the floor’s MEP infrastructure and connecting it to a new air handling unit on the roof with dunnage and screen. The plan maximizes bench and equipment space with ample daylight. While staying consistent with existing lab zoning in the building, the design set new standards for lab casework, island safety stations, and tissue culture room entries. STRATEGY:

RESPONSIBILITIES: Job Captain, designer, and architect. Responsible

for owner and MEP coordination, documentation, detailing, and construction administration. Worked as a team on programming, planning, and general design. TEAM: Jeff DeGregorio (PIC), Sara Gewurz (PM)

Colored Floor Plan

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

3' - 0"

8' - 3"

OPEN LAB 944 SF

(7) bench units

SHARED OFFICE 112 SF

SHARED OFFICE 114 SF

CONFERENCE 179 SF

5' - 0"

(12) bench units

Revit

SHARED OFFICE 134 SF

OPEN OFFICE 681 SF

15' - 8"

UNASSIGNED LAB

(19) total bench units

5' - 3"

11' - 6"

4 10' - 8"

TISSUE CULTURE 316 SF

SHARED OFFICE 162 SF

5' - 0"

30' - 10"

2' - 6"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

3' - 0"

8' - 3"

SQM COLD ROOM 7138 132 SF

5' - 0"

5' - 0"

OPEN LAB 586 SF

15' - 8"

5' - 0"

SQM STORAGE 7090 205 SF

COLD ROOM 181 SF

FREEZER 7070 232 SF

SHARED EQUIPMENT 195 SF

9' - 3" 15' - 10"

17' - 0"

SHARED

30' - 10"

5' - 0"

1

STORAGE 7162 47 SF

15' - 8"

ANAEROBIC 313 SF

BL2+ TISSUE CULTURE 7173 502 SF

SHARED EQUIPMENT 168 SF

4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 25' - 0"

BL2 TISSUE CULTURE 7177 371 SF

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

5' - 0"

6' - 0"

(10) bench units

XAVIER LAB

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

(8) bench units

4' - 0"

16' - 0"

4' - 0"

22' - 0"

4' - 0" 6' - 0"

4' - 0" 6' - 0"

(12) bench units

4' - 0"

4' - 0" 4' - 0"

16' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

22' - 0"

25' - 0"

6' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0"

4' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0"

XAVIER LAB

4' - 0" 6' - 0"

5' - 0"

(10) bench units

MICROSCOPE 7179 130 SF

OPEN LAB 2121 SF

4' - 0"

OPEN LAB 2494 SF

(5) bench units

2

3

5' - 0"

XAVIER LAB

10' - 11"

TISSUE CULTURE PATHOGEN 312 SF

10' - 8"

3' - 6" 4' - 7"

(12) bench units

4' - 0"

OPEN LAB 1173 SF

5' - 0"

(12) bench units

4' - 0"

24' - 1"

MOOTHA LAB

SQM COLD ROOM 7138A 110 SF SQM STOCKROOM 7100 1803 SF

4' - 0"

5' - 0" 5' - 0"

(10) bench units

4' - 0"

5' - 0"

(22) total bench units

11' - 11"

TISSUE CULTURE 348 SF

3' - 6"

(8) bench units

N

(6) bench units

METABOLOMICS LAB

XAVIER LAB

(71) total bench units including north lab

SPACE TYPE LEGEND BUILDING SUPPORT

Drawing Scale


EDULE 10 A9.10

10 A9.10

RAME SEE SCHEDULE, TYP

6"

SEE SCHEDULE, TYP

6"

FRAME TYPES

REMARKS RELOCATED EXISTING DOOR, FRAME & HARDWARE FROM CORRIDOR 7000CG, REVERSE DOOR SWING RELOCATED EXISTING DEMOUNTABLE PARTITION DOOR RELOCATED EXISTING DEMOUNTABLE PARTITION DOOR, MODIFY HARDWARE TO SWITCH DIRECTION RELOCATED EXISTING DEMOUNTABLE PARTITION DOOR RELOCATED EXISTING DEMOUNTABLE PARTITION DOOR SLIDING GLASS DOOR SLIDING GLASS DOOR CARD READER, HOLD OPEN CARD READER, CLOSER, WALL STOP 3-PANEL MANUAL-SLIDING ALL-GLASS TELESCOPIC TRANSACTION WINDOW RELOCATED EXISTING DEMOUNTABLE PARTITION DOOR RELOCATED EXISTING DOOR, SIDELIGHT, FRAME & HARDWARE FROM CORRIDOR 7000CF SLIDING AUTO ENTRANCE W/ CARD READER-ACTIVATED MOTORIZED AUTO OPENER, PUSH BUTTON TO EXIT SLIDING AUTO ENTRANCE W/ CARD READER-ACTIVATED MOTORIZED AUTO OPENER, PUSH BUTTON TO EXIT SLIDING AUTO ENTRANCE W/ CARD READER-ACTIVATED MOTORIZED AUTO OPENER, PUSH BUTTON TO EXIT SLIDING AUTO ENTRANCE W/ CARD READER-ACTIVATED MOTORIZED AUTO OPENER, PUSH BUTTON TO EXIT RELOCATED DOOR, FRAME & HARDWARE WITH CARD READER, CLOSER, GASKETING, AUTO DOOR BOTTOM

SEE SCHEDULE, TYP

EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST (none) (none) 01 02 (none) EXIST EXIST (none) (none) (none) (none) 03

3' - 4"

------------------

DOOR PANELS

EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST EXIST MG-1 MG-1 -MG-1 -EXIST EXIST MG-2 MG-2 MG-2 MG-2 --

10 A9.10

SEE SCHEDULE, TYP

6"

GLASS FIRE HARDWARE ONSTR. TYPE RATING SET

12 A9.10 10 A9.10 10 A9.10

10 A9.10

HG

AG

S

F0

F1

HALF GLAZED

ALL GLASS

STOREFRONT ALL GLASS

FRAMELESS

FRAME ONLY

11 A9.10

F3

*KEY FRAME CONSTRUCTION

*KEY DOOR & FRAME GLASS TYPE

DOOR CONSTRUCTION KEY DESCRIPTION

FRAME CONSTRUCTION KEY DESCRIPTION

KEY

DOOR GLASS TYPE DESCRIPTION

-EXIST MG-1 MG-2

NO GLASS REQUIRED EXISTING UNCOATED CLEAR FULLY TEMPERED FLOAT GLASS UNCOATED CLEAR FULLY TEMPERED FLOAT GLASS

ALL-GLASS DOOR EXISTING HOLLOW-METAL DOOR STOREFRONT ALL-GLASS

AL HM

ALUMINUM HOLLOW-METAL

Payette Associates 290 Congress Stree Boston, MA 02210Tel: 617-895-1000 Fax: 617-895-1002

MEP/FP Engineer

13

FRAME WITH A9.10 SINGLE SIDELITE

*KEY DOOR CONSTRUCTION

AG EXIST HM S

Architect

BR+A Consulting E 10 Guest St., 4th Fl Boston, MA 02135 Tel: 617-254-0016

Structural Enginee

McNamara Salvia S 101 Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110 Tel: 617-737-0040

1 3/4" SILL BELOW

TO FACE OF GWB

CORRIDOR PARTITION AS SCHEDULED STOCKROOM

SEALANT

CORRIDOR

GLAZING AS SCHEDULED

CONTINUOUS GLAZING CHANNEL

WOOD BLOCKING

1 1/2" SOLID SURFACE WITH EASED EXPOSED EDGES

3/4" PLYWOOD

CEILING FRAMING SYSTEM

T/SILL 1 1/2"

5/8" GYPSUM BOARD

1/4"

FF/CEILING SEE CEILING PLANS 1/4" SHIM & SEALANT J-BEAD

1/2"

METAL SUSPENSION SYSTEM ACOUSTIC CEILING SYSTEM

PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

STOCKROOM

21 A9.10

CONTINUOUS GLAZING CHANNEL

2"

SILL BELOW

GLAZING AS SCHEDULED

STOCKROOM

SECTION DETAIL - INTERIOR GLAZING SILL DETAIL WITH SOLID

33 INTERIOR GLAZING JAMB DETAIL - SQM FIXED GLAZING

32 SURFACE SILL

SCALE: 6" = 1'-0"

SCALE: 6" = 1'-0"

CORRIDOR

31 SECTION DETAIL - INTERIOR GLAZING HEAD - SQM FIXED GLAZING SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP CONTINUES AS FIXED GLAZING SILL

EDGE OF FIXED GLAZING BEYOND

LINE OF PARTITION BELOW

34 A9.10 BLOCKING & SUPPORT AS REQUIRED

CONTINUOUS GLAZING CHANNEL

TRANSACTION WINDOW

22 A9.10

SOLID SURFACE COUNTERTOP CONTINUES AS LEDGE SOLID SURFACE SILL BEYOND

GROMMET

EDGE OF FIXED GLAZING BEYOND

GLAZING AS SCHEDULED

TRANSACTION WINDOW 3/4" PLYWOOD 3/4" SOLID SURFACE SOLID SURFACE SILL BEYOND

2' - 10"

1 1/2"

2' - 3"

ALIGN

ALIGN

1/4"

TRANSACTION WINDOW

2"

5 4 3 2 1

06/21/2019 05/17/2019 05/10/2019 04/12/2019 02/15/2019

#

DATE

ADDE BULL LAB ADDE SQM

FLUSH MOUNT COUNTER SUPPORT

SHIM & SEALANT

2"

STOCKROOM

CORRIDOR

DESK BRACKET BEYOND PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

GLAZING AS SCHEDULED

2"

2"

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

415 MAIN LABO

PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

PARTITION AS SCHEDULED

REMOVABLE GLAZING STOP

5/8" 3/4"

20 SECTION DETAIL - TRANSACTION WINDOW

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

ALIGN

SEALANT

SEALANT

REMOVABLE GLAZING STRIP

GLAZING AS SCHEDULED

1/2"

1/2"

1/2"

1/2"

DOOR SC DOOR D

2"

VARIES

GLAZING OR DOOR AS SCHEDULED

4"

5/8" 3/4"

VARIES

ALIGN

2"

ALIGN

5/8" 3/4"

2"

21 SECTION DETAIL - TRANSACTION WINDOW HEAD

SCALE: 3" = 1'-0"

5/8"

PARTITION WIDTH + 1-1/8"

22 SECTION DETAIL - TRANSACTION WINDOW SILL

2"

23 PLAN DETAIL - TRANSACTION WINDOW TO GLASS CORNER

2" 2"

VARIES PARTITION WIDTH + 1-1/8"

2"

1/2" 3/8"

OP EDGE

ATTACHMENT TO STRUCTURE AS INDICATED METAL FRAMING

GLAZING AS SCHEDULED

3/4" SOLID SURFACE EASED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES

2"

VARIES

Drawing Scale

2"

As indicated

PARTITION THICKNESS + 1-1/8" REMOVABLE GLAZING STOP

Project Number DOOR AS SCHEDULED

GLAZING AS SCHEDULED

41150.00

FY19.415

Original Date Issu

Above: Interior glazing details at lab supplies transaction counter to create a light, welcoming, and accessible opening using a concealed sliding glass window SEALANT, EACH SIDE

02/15/2019

FLOOR RUNNER

EXPANSION ANCHOR

OPENING FRAME FLOOR SILL DETAIL OPENING FRAME HEAD / JAMB / SILL DETAIL TYPICAL HOLLOW METAL DOOR FRAME HEAD / JAMB DETAIL Next Page: Views of (Top) and (Bottom) open lab10facing toward Tissue Culture 13 TYPICAL GLAZED 12 DETAILseamless transaction window 11 TYPICAL GLAZED TYPICAL DOOR FRAME WITH ADJACENT GLAZING HEAD / JAMB

SCALE: 6" = 1'-0"

SCALE: 6" = 1'-0"

SCALE: 6" = 1'-0"

SCALE: 6" = 1'-0"

glass automatic sliding doors

Photos by Jonah Prada

A


2

4

3


Furniture Plan

MicroStation


CLASS A+ LAW OFFICE RENOVATION Lehman Smith McLeish - 2011 - 6 week duration during internship High-end corporate interior architecture, expanding brand and offices up one floor into previous tenant’s space. SITE: Level 10 of an existing downtown Washington, DC, commercial

building STRATEGY: The aim was to keep the budget minimal and tie the new

space into the existing brand and sophisticated, restrained aesthetics of the levels below into an expansion one level up into a previous tenant’s build-out to increase the number of offices for the firm. The elevator lobby was completely demolished with other small interventions throughout the level to increase the plan’s efficiency and aesthetics. Documented existing space, conditions, and furniture; created as-built drawings; and headed the creation of the construction document set RESPONSIBILITIES:

TEAM: Debra Lehman Smith (lead designer), Robert Grabarz (PM),

Nilam Patel, Nathan Strieter

Interior View facing West into Open Office


1 Interior View facing North toward Elevator Lobby


2 3

Enlarged Lobby:

Finish Plan

Reflected Ceiling Plan

1

Partition Plan

2 Glass Wall Header at Ceiling Transition Section Detail

3

Glass Wall at Stone and Carpet Transition Section Detail


edge facing Northeast 1 Exterior view down the reinforced Grand Allee SketchUp, Kerkythea, Photoshop


CRANBROOK WELLNESS CENTER University of Cincinnati - 2010 - 6 month duration Privacy

Diffusion

Legibility

Order

Visual Interest

Contrast

Awareness

Comfort

The Cranbrook Wellness Center aims to create a sensual escape from the campus while integrating architecturally with its form, scale, and material expression. The legible, linear edge building addresses the context formally as an introverted program within a masonry façade, reinforcing the formal Grand Allee and uses uniquely-manipulated materials and experiential qualities that echo the campus’ prolific use of craft and masonry. SITE: Cranbrook Academy of Art in Bloomingfield Hills, MI, on the

Grand Allee—the linear formal space north of main campus Organized in a simple geometric configuration of separate spaces within a masonry façade, spaces are simply pushed and pulled for light, thresholds, and breakout spaces. The resulting interior gathering spaces parallel Cranbrook’s exterior courtyards; one of these spaces is the studio space—a vertical interior courtyard and central resultant space of the spatial configuration. The board-formed cast-in-place concrete envelope speaks to Cranbrook’s dedication to craftsmanship and use of masonry. STRATEGY:

Site Model facing Northwest

1


Masonry envelope Orpheus Fountain Courtyards Masonry-enclosed thresholds

G R A


N D

E E L L A

N


Program in Public to Private Gradient

Elevate with respect to Privacy


D F

B

D E

A

F C

B

Dining: A Gathering: B Lobby: C Administration: D Library: E Service: F

N

Site Plan

AutoCAD, Photoshop

Space Organization Diagrams

SketchUp, Kerkythea, Illustrator

Wrap Program around Vertical Courtyard

Enclose Program

Manipulate Program


C

A

D

F

B

C

E

G

D

H F

Design Diagram 2 North-South Section facing East: PassiveAutoCAD, Illustrator Minimal apertures: maximum 20.6% on all elevations (5.96:1 mass:glass ratio): A Thickened walls for insulation: mass to mediate temperature: B Operable windows, skylights: provide natural cooling and daylight harvesting: C Concrete content: HVFA and recycled glass as aggregate: D Porous concrete for maximum site stormwater infiltration: E Radiant in-floor heating and free cooling: F Site stormwater collection and re-use: G 1/3 of program (wet zone requiring the most insulation) below grade: H


Primary Structure

2

Integrated Strategies Diagrams: Structural-Mechanical Shafts

Secondary Structure

Structural Envelope


A

C

B

D

E


A

B

C

D

Materiality Studies

Plaster

E

3

through Private Zone facing East 3 North-South Section Perspective SketchUp, Kerkythea, AutoCAD, Photoshop


View facing North toward Micro-Solar Concentrator beyond the Mirrored Box Guest Rooms

Rhino, VRay, Photoshop


NET ZERO ENERGY DESERT WAYSIDE University of Cincinnati - 2011 - 3 month duration

An exploration of the perception of those whose time and space accelerate, pause, and shift—and using this gesture to power it. SITE: Wendover, UT, in the Great Salt Lake Desert, 21 miles east of

the Utah-Nevada border, along Interstate 80 The distortion of time and space is endemic to the I-80 driving experience within the vast and scaleless landscape of the salt flats. Mirages are not uncommon due to the hot summer air rising from the tarmac and sheen of the fall flooding. With the unchanging mountain backdrop and packed salt foreground, the rest stop’s ethereal mirrored walls expand and contract the environment— not unlike that of the nearby West Wendover casinos—leading the traveler to question and temporarily lose him- or herself within the salt flats, the world, space, and time. The mirror is also the basis of the solar concentrator that creates a renewable source of electrical power and water heating for the site, amplifying the sun’s radiation to heat a salt mixture collected from the surrounding salt flats. Each mirror box becomes a heliostat, reflecting the solar radiation to the parabolic solar concentrator with an efficiency of 70%. The concentrator in turn directs the heat toward a steam turbine that powers the entire wayside for a completely self-sustaining power system. STRATEGY:

Aerial View facing Northeast

Rhino, VRay, Photoshop


1

Solar concentrator energy conversion process: 1 : Tracking heliostat on the roof of each mirror box 2 : Facetted truncated parabolic solar concentrator 3 : Molten salt heat exchanger 4 : Molten salt thermal storage tank 5 : Steam turbine 6 : Generator


Sunrise

Up to 14 hours of daylight

Sunset

Solar storage used

40°N sun chart

Available: 1,950 BTU/sf/day mean direct normal solar radiation Harnessed: x 70% efficiency = 1,365 BTU/sf/day x 9,728 sf heliostats = 13,278,720 BTU/day

Experiential view from I-80 toward the rest stop Micro-Solar Concentrator Analysis

2

5 7 : To users

4 6

3


5


1

2

4

6

3

Experiential Site Views Site Plan

6

5 4

3 1 2

N


DIS

TORTION ORIENTATION


North-South Site Section


LUKE LAVERTY 262.707.0997 (US) / 07541.146845 (UK) / luke.laverty@gmail.com


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.