Object City Garden

Year:2021

Competition/Group Project

Members:

My Role: Conceptual development, 2d &3D Drawings

When re-thinking and re-reading the old elements, produce new architectural forms, at the same time, they reveal hidden aesthetic features that were initially invisible to us. In re-defining the project planning and project issue in order to activate its facilities and capacities, the site and the program were expanded. In the proposed plan, the site area and its design problem have been developed from the design of the entrance counter and the main-entrance to the whole complex. In this way, the project has expanded a new layer in redefining architecture and turning it into objects to be seen. In this project, we re-think and re-read the architecture and historical Isfahan objects. collected objects from the history of this city have been detached and deconstructed from their previous context and finally they are recreating in a new and weird condition. This project is formed from the assemblage of founded objects and in the new context, it has gone beyond the previous condition and distanced from itself.

In this way, the «Objects’ City-Garden» is born in the middle of this city in a weird reality.

Re-thinking

What if the assumptions are reconsidered?? Isfahan city and its architecture s history and objects must be re- « read. Returning to past architectural objects as a disciplinary priority is different from return to stabilization, features and pre-modern spaces and balance ideals in composition. Returning to past architectural objects (Isfahan) does not mean inviting to return the tape of history, but it means re-thinking of defaults and avoiding potentially fruitless deadlocks on today's paths. An alternative; generate a new type by re-thinking the past type. Architecture as autonomous object, a discrete, large and discontinuous collection. Due to the greatness of the project, it becomes a landscape or a piece of land that is separated from its surroundings

Ornoment

What if we think of an alternative ? f

Re-thinking the form and shape of historical and traditional carpets will reactivate the capacity of this object as a decoration

The carpet texture, which in the X and Y axes tries to represent the space like flower gardens, was used in an alternative way to ornament objects that have been somehow recreated in the Z-axis and this has led to the reproduction of the flower garden on this axis

In this way, the form and shape of Isfahan traditional carpets are out of the previous familiar position (spread on the ground) and used in the weird reality and unfamiliar situation

Program-Function

What if we avoided detailed restricted schedule? f

We avoid giving functionalityW to architecture because we think that new architectural objects that have been created have no predefined definition and these are the people who can walk among them, play sports or even have an artist to set up a gallery in them. Our idea is that artists and people to be able to use all of these objects, their lands and spaces