MAGDALENA LACH PORTFOLIO 2016
Contents
1. Talent Environment, Birmingham MArch Thesis, AA School of Architecture
2. III Urban Design International Workshops AA / UFPE, Recife, Brazil
3. Urbanisisng Royal Docks, Albert Island London Design Workshop, AA School of Architecture
4. Cultural Centre, Port Wroclaw Award, MA Thesis, Wroclaw University of Technology
5. Sport Hall in Bialystok, Poland II Prize, Copmetition Entry Teamwork in Studio EL, Wroclaw
6. Single family house and community living Architectural Design Teamwork: Bulanda, Mucha Architekci, Warsaw
2
7. Law Court in Nysa Competition Entry Teamwork: Studio EL, Wroclaw
8. Multi-family housing with shopping centre, Kielce, Poland Competition Entry Teamwork: Studio EL
9. Office building in Wroclaw, Poland Competition Entry Teamwork: Studio EL
10. Regional Passenger Airport Terminal in Szymany, Poland Competition Entry Teamwork in Studio EL, Wroclaw
11. Helsinki Central Library Competition Competition Entry Teamwork: Studio EL
12. Guggenheim Helsinki Design Competition Copmetition Entry Teamwork in Studio EL, Wroclaw
13. Multi-family tower in Wroclaw, Poland Competition Entry Teamwork: Studio EL
14. Champagne Bubble Bar, Paris Competition Entry Teamwork: Studio EL
15. University of Rzeszów I Prize in the competition, Realisation Teamwork at Studio EL, Wroclaw
15. City Hostel, Wroclaw, Poland B.Arch Thesis Individual work. Tutor: Jacek Kościuk
16. Ecological competition for renovation of student’s dormitories in E. Wittiga Street in Wrocław, Poland Award, Desig workshops at Wroclaw University of Technology
17. Hand drawings, Paintings, Models
3
1. Talent Environment, Birmingham M.Arch Thesis Housing and Urbanism Programme, AA School of Architecture Individual work. Tutors: Lawrence Barth and Anna Shapiro Knowledge and cultural city models are becoming the strategies for the urban transformations of cities. However, these models often do not clarify how we might gain long-term values through that processes and how these models might support the emergence of liveable environments that would retain and attract new talents. Today, there is a trend that people start to look again at the idea of the living in the city centre. However, this is getting more and more unaffordable in London because of the high developmental pressure. What Birmingham can offer differently is an opportunity for the affordable living just in the city centre rich with resources. The Big City Plan distinguishes Digbeth as an area with a significant creative vocation into which the city living will expand. The existing creative industries start to make the area the trendiest place for affordable working environment. Moreover, the proximity to the city centre and the network of local businesses make it possible to think of this area as particularly attractive for living environment. However, there is a risk that the market-driven approaches might eliminate the local values. The main goal of the thesis was to go beyond the vision of the Big City Plan. Define how housing and creative industry might work together in order to promote values, diversity and rich intensification within Digbeth. How architecture as urbanism can drive change and create new living opportunities in the central city environment.
1. Minimal intervention of the facade, White Building, Hackney Wick, London 4
1. The network of synergies between local creative industries and housing. The integration of Digbeth district with the city centre. 5
3. Location of Digbeth in relation to the city centre.
6. Diagram of the explored typologies and their differentiated orintation.
7. Diagram illustrates the micro mobility system that permeates through differentiated spaces.
4. Digbeth urban structure in 20 years time defined by the Big City Plan.
Aston University Campus ThinkTank Muzeum
Planned Curzon HS2 Station
Fazeley Studios Bullring Shopping Centre
Custard Factory
5. Network of existing creative businesses in Digbeth. 6
8. The orientation and spatial relationships between explored housing typologies.
9. Differentiation and hierarchy in the mobility system.
10. The axonometric projection illustrating the nature of spaces on the ground level. 7
11. Shed as a synergistic space between housing and local creative industries.
8
12. Double L typology and the richness of communal facilities on the ground level.
13. The courtyard type building with the internal gallery acting as a collective space.
14. L - shaped building with the external gallery oriented towards the sun.
9
15. The internal urban space would become a place for integration between residents and creative communities.
16. By orienting the communal facilities towards the canal edge, a more privilidged character of space is achieved for the residents.
17. The internal urban space with a high quality landscaped elements would enhance the sense of community.
20. The relationship between housing and cultural institution within the industrial fabric.
10
18. The walking route acts as an interface between residents and local artists enhancing the creative value of the area.
19. The continuous top light with additional skylight brings value to the internal community space within a shed.
21. The long secton illustrates an interface between existing creative industries and a cultural institution within a shed.
11
2. III Urban Design International Workshops AA / UFPE, Recife, Brazil Design elaborated by team of 15 students. Drawing number 5. to 10. done by author. Tutors: Lawrence Barth, Dominic Papa, Hugo Serra 2. Dominant type - H block. Drawing by team.
The III urban design workshops were organised as part of an academic collaboration between the Housing & Urbanism Programme at the Architectural Association Graduate School and the Departament of Architecture and Urbanism of the Federal University of Pernambuco. The workshops focused on the role of design and spatial reasoning in addressing the challenges faced by the Brazilian national housing programme, entitled “Minha Casa, Minha Vida� (My House, My Life). One of the key aspect of the workshops was to change the constrains of the Jaboatao area located between Recife and Suape airport into opportunities by finding an alternative model for living environment in the area at high rish of the cyclical flooding from the lagoon. One of the design challenge was to adress the aspect of the repeting housing typology of the H block which does not provide any values for the community living but instead bring the lack of integration of amenities + services, lack of street frontage as well as the lack of hierarchy and variation. The main goal was to find an alternative dispersed model which would provide opportunities for a meaningful and differentiated housing developments that would work on multiple scales; economical, political and most importantly - social.
3. Spatial strategy. Drawing by team. 12
4. Spatial strategy. Drawing by Hugo Serra.
5. Three pilot projects characterised by different conditions. Drawing by team.
6. Unconsolidated and fragmented urban fabric.
7. Collaborating with SESC. Repetition of the H block typology unables to integrate SESC educational facilities within the urban fabric.educational facilities with housing.
10. Alternative dispersed model. Arrangement and oriantation of buildings. Integration of SESC educational facilities with housing.
8. Hierarchy and differentiation in mobility system.
9. Multi layered block.
11. Layered relations to water. 13
3. Urbanising Royal Docks AA School of Architecture, Housing and Urbanism Programme London Design Workshop Design elaborated by team of 11 students. Design of the Albert Island, 3D model and drawings number 1. and 3. to 5. done by author. Tutors: Alex Warnock-Smith, Jorge Fiori London’s Royal Docks contain some of the most challenging urban complexities of any region in the city. The example of post-industrial decline, the region suffers from symptoms of high unemployment rates, low education levels, underutilised infrastructure and lack of resources within a fragmented urban fabric. The proposed development strategies presented during the workshops served to envision the future of Royal Docks, deriving a strategic approach that transforms the opportunities and constrains of the site at multiple scales, challenging the region’s current piecemeal and market-driven interventions. The ambition was to create a synthesized urbanity through the distribution of points of intensity influenced by existing conditions and economies. One of the opportunity sites of Royal Docks is Albert Island. The ambition was to build upon surrounding facilities to create an urbanised hub of mixed-use activities, by introducing new economies related to the knowledge sector and marine servicing facilities. The proposed development integrates landscape and architetural responses within the topographical constraints of the site. By this, a diverse urban hub will be achieved.
1. System of networks and town centres within Royal Docks. Drawing by team. 14
2. The perspective of the island’s development. Drawing by author. 15
4. The opportunity areas between Cambridge corridor and Thames Gateway. Drawing by team.
3. Spatial strategy. Drawing by team. 16
5. The areas of intervention: Industrial quarter, Transport Interchange and Albert Island. Drawing by team 17
The recreational layer
Intensification with education, business services and leisure facilities
Connectivity
Activating Albert Island
6. Spatial strategy. Drawing by author. 18
7. Key drivers influencing poposed redevelopment. Drawing by team.
8. Rendering of potential hard (working) edge of the island. Drawing by author.
9. Integration of lanscape with architecture. Drawing by author.
10. Potential recreational edge with marine servicing. Drawing by author. 19
Semi transparent photovoltaic panels
4. Sport Hall in Bialystok, Poland II Prize in the competition Part II Architectural Assistant in Studio EL, Wroclaw
Skylight
Roof coating
Two-curvature, two-layered steel space frames
Main hall
1. The structural diagram. Drawing by author. 20
Design elaborated by team of 6 people. Sketches, drawings number 1., 4., 5., 12. done by author. 3D model of the roof structure done by Lanik. 3D model of the sport hall done by a team. The design consists of two-curvature, two-layered, steel space frames which will cover the space of the sports hall and will be based on the double buttresses located in its ambit. Having in mind viewers’ comfort, the main design decision was to make the level +4,20 the only one to fill and empty the main auditorium. An interface between the functional zones of a main sport hall and the shopping centre is achieved by a walking passage which is a continuation of the main link of the whole urban development.
2. The section through the main sport hall and training hall. Drawing by team.
3. The section through the main sport hall. Drawing by team.
4. Perspective of the sport hall. Drawing by author. 21
6. The flexible plan of the hall gives possibility for variation in functional organisation. Diagrams done by team.
5. The evacuation diagram. Drawing by author. 22
7. The rooftop plan. Drawing by team.
9. Hand model done by Onimo Makiety.
10. Perspective of the main link directing to the sport hall. Drawing by team.
11. Bird’s eye view of the main sport hall. Drawing by team
8. The main level +4,20. Drawing by team and by author.
12. Perspective of the interior of the main hall. 3D model by team. Drawing by author. 23
5. Single family house and the community living Architectural and Building Permit Design Part II Architectural Assistant in Bulanda, Mucha Architekci, Warsaw Design elaborated by team of 3 people. Drawings and model done by author.
The main idea for the design of the single family house was to allocate the main functional spaces into 3 units. These units are separated by a spatious lobby and corridor which create a gradual transition through more public to private sphere of the house. The winter garden becomes the heart of the house and it is accessed through each of the units; living room, kitchen with dining room and the bedrooms.
1. Section through living space and dining space.
2. Detail of the wall in conjunction with the roof. Drawing by author. 24
3. Axonometric projection of the residential area. Hand drawing by author.
4. Longitudinal section.
5. Axonometric projection of the residential area. Hand drawing by author.
6. Hand model done by author. 25
The main tripple hight lobby acts as a transitiona space between the main street and the internal court.
6. Law court in Nysa, Poland 11 courtrooms are located around the central lobby.
Competition Entry Part II Architectural Assistant in Studio EL, Wroclaw, Poland Design elaborated by team of 4 people. 3D model done by team. Drawing number 2., 3., 4., 6., 8. done by author.
The main courtrooms are surrounded by administration program and judge’s offices.
The main design idea is reflected in the centric layout of the building. The main spacious lobby directs to all functional zones allocated on different levels. This key move allows to provide the easy access to the main courtrooms located on the ground floor. By this the minimal communication would be achieved in the whole building. The particular form of the building as well as the design decision to use a brick as a main material is proposed in order to respect the surrounding context of the area.
Minimal communication.
The compact form of the building fitted into the surrounding context.
The existing hedge is integrated with the mass of the building.
Niche in the ground level highlights the main entry point to the building.
The form of the building respects the surrounding context.
1.The fuctional and structural diagram. 26
2. Detail of the facade in conjunction with roof.
3. Section through the main lobby.
4. Section through the functional levels.
6. The perspective illustrating the designed builing in relation to its surrounding.
7. View from the park.
5. Ground floor level.
8. The interior of the courtroom. 27
The residential units are set back from the street to avoid problems with noise.
7. Multi-family housing with shopping centre, Kielce, Poland Competition Entry Part II Architectural Assistant in Studio EL, Wroclaw, Poland The residential units are oriented towards the sun.
Design elaborated by a team of 4 people. 3D model done by a team. Drawing number 2., 3., 4.,6., 8. done by author. The main requirement of the competition brief was to integrate retail services with housing for the diverse society, either young professionals or famielies, of Kielce in Poland. One of the key design decision was to break the building mass into two units. By this, a landscaped plaza was created as a continuation of the urban link directing to the surrounding residential district. The two retail units are bridged by an overhang located over the plaza. The residential units are offset from the main street in order to avoid noise.
The deep plan of the building allow the roof top to be implemented with rectreational facilities and greenery oriented towards the south side.
Both of the retail units are connected by an overhang located above the plaza.
The groundfloor becomes permeable at distinctive places which continue the walking routes.
1.The programmatic and structural diagram. Drawing done by team. 28
2. Bird’s eye view of the mixed use development. Drawing done by author.
3.South elevation. Draing done by author.
7. Perspective of the main plaza with cafe and retail. Drawing done by team.
4.North elevation. Drawing done by author.
5.Longitudinal section. Drawing done by team. 8. Perspective of the main entrance of the shopping centre. Drawing done by author.
6.Typical plan of the appartments. Drawing done by author.
9. Perspective of the mixed use development from the north side. Drawing done by team. 29
Coat
8. Cultural Centre, Port Wroclaw, Poland Award, MA Thesis Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland Individual work. Tutor: Ada Kwiatkowska
Structure
The building is situated on the parcel of port’s “Ujście Oławy” promontry. It is one of the few places in Wrocław with unique landscape virtues and superb terrain exposition. The area is surrounded by water from three side. The important part during designing process was to highlight the place’s character as well as the dynamic shape of the promontory. It was also important for the design to be in accordance with the water context and to include features attractive for society of Wrocław. One of the key planning decisions was to lift the Centre building’s mass above the promontory level. Thanks to that an exceptional public space with visible water scenery has been created underneath the building. This application provides recreational use of the area and allows people walking in the area to have a direct view at city’s panorama and at Odra River. The programme of the Cultural Centre is to complement areas of Wrocław University of Technology and other didactic institutions situated nearby. It is a multifunctional centre targeted mainly at young people and designed to blend in with imaginative and creative development of Wrocław as the European Capital of Culture in 2016. The function of the building is divided to three main spheres: media library, interactive centre and one of a kind cocktail bar directed to the city centre, and displaying the view of Grunwaldzki Bridge and the Cathedral Island.
Functional levels
Promontory
1. Structural diagram. 30
2. Location of the cultural centre in close proximity to the city centre and university campus.
3. Location of the cultural centre along the river Odra. The ground floor plan. 31
5. Longitudinal section
6. Mezzanine level.
4. Photographs of hand model. 32
7. Main level of the cultural centre.
10. The restaurant with a view to the old town.
11. Perspective of the mediateque.
8. Section showing the flexible space of the exhibition space.
9. Details of the facade.
12. The interactive space. 33
9. Office building in Wroclaw, Poland Competition Entry Part II Architectural Assistant in Studio EL, Wroclaw, Poland 1. Close proximity to the old town and market square. Drawing done by team.
Design elaborated by a team of 4 people. 3D model done by a team. Drawing number 3., 4.,5., 8. done by author. The main requirement of the competition brief was to integrate retail services with office programme in the same building. One of the main challenges was to design the commercial building in such a way that it would respect the surrounding context of the existing city fabric in the old town of Wroclaw. One of the key design decision was bring rythm and variation to the longer facade of the building, which acts as a street frontage, in order to enliven the associatinal environment. The corner of the building is accented by slightly rotated office modules which provide view to the old town.
34
2. Building acting as a street frontage. Drawing done by team.
4. Testing different variations of the longer facade. Drawing done by author.
3. Facade diagram. Drawing done by team.
5. Office building as street frontage. Drawing done by author.
8. Rythm and variation on the main facade. Drawind done by team.
6. View to the St Elisabeth Tower and the old town of Wroclaw. Drawing done by team.
7. Typical floor plan of the offices. Drawing done by team.
9. View from the main street. Drawing by author. 35
Skylights
10. Regional Passenger Airport Terminal in Szymany, Poland Competition Entry Part II Architectural Assistant in Studio EL, Wroclaw, Poland Design elaborated by a team of 4 people. 3D model and drawings number 1.,2.,6.,7. done by author.
Roof coating
Reinforced concrete coat
Terminal + Supporting poits
1. The structural diagram. Drawing by author. 36
The main idea for the design of the terminal building was the modular structure of the roof coating. This would allow for the further expansion of the airport terminal. The shape of the roof symbolises the natural landscape of the Mazury region of Poland.
2. South elevation. Drawing by author.
5. Bird’s eye view to the roof structure and the apron
3. First floor plan. Drawing by team.
6. Perspective of the main entrance to the terminal building. Drawing done by author.
4. Ground floor plan. Drawing by team.
7. Ground floor plan. Drawing by author. 37
11. Helsinki Central Library International Competition Entry Part II Architectural Assistant in Studio EL, Wroclaw, Poland Design elaborated by team of 4 people. Drawing number 1.,4.,5., 6. done by author. 3D model done by team. The main idea for the design of the library was the modular facade which is made of the boxes of various depth. They were designed in such a way to provide additional space for individual work or meetings. Not only do they diversify the space of the library, but they also provide views to the surrounding park and act as a thermal insulation as well as sun rays filtration system. The building is made of steel construction. The structure of the building enables maximum flexibility of the interior. Atrium acts as the most esternal layer of the library, made of glass wall. It acts as a buffer zone between outside and inside and by this protects the interior of the building from overcooling and overheating.
1. Detail of facade and section. Drawing by author. 38
2. Location of the library. Drawing by team.
3. Ventilation diagrams. Drawings done by team. 7. Location of the the Central Library and the surrounding context. Drawing by team.
4. Longitudinal section. Drawing done by author.
8. Interior space of the collection area. Drawing by team.
5. Main level of the colection area. Drawing done by author.
6. Ground floor plan. Drawing done by author.
9. Perspective view of the main entrance and lobby. Drawing by team. 39
12. Guggenheim Helsinki Design Competition Competition Entry Outer skin + skylights
Part II Architectural Assistant in Studio EL, Wroclaw, Poland Design elaborated by a team of 4 people. 3D model done by a team. Drawing number 1., 6., 7. done by author. Undoubtedly, what decided about the building’s tectonic form, its overall dimensions and expressive form was the unique localization on the verge of two elements, the earth and the water, as well as visual openings between Tahtitornin vuoriPark and the dock. The newly designed building fits into the context of Etelasatama cityscape, both in the urban and in the cultural aspect. The north side of the building, which is facing dynamically towards the entrance square, includes the visitors’ zone with retail located on the ground floor; multi-purpose atrium on the I floor; restaurant and the main entrance to the exhibition gallery on the III floor.
Structure
An attractive entrance hall space with a vertical ramp with stairs, panoramic elevators, and escalators/ would carry visitors from the ground floor, throughout the next floors, to the main exhibition gallery level which is located on the III floor. The hall’s space provides a spectacular view of the Old Town from various levels, including the view from the observation deck located on the roof. The upper cubature layer is stretched as a bridge over the public space. It includes exhibition gallery zone which is designed in the form of two flexible naves, with an exhibition / communication nave located in the middle. The gallery’s naves are designed to be one-dimensional areas with a possibility of segmentation in any modules relating to exhibition needs. .
Landscaped space under the building
1. The structural diagram. Drawing by author. 40
2. Public space activities. Drawing done by team.
3. Sectional relationship of the building situated between the park and the waterfront. Drawing done by team.
6. Bird’s eye view of the building and its immidiate surrounding. Drawing by author.
4. Ground floor plan. Drawing done by team. 7. The building acts as a gate connecting two elements - water and park. drawing by team.
5. Urban diagrams. Drawing done by team.
7. The exhibition space gain a natural light from the skylights. Drawing done by author. 41
13. Multi-family tower in Wroclaw, Poland Competition Entry Part II Architectural Assistant in Studio EL, Wroclaw, Poland Design elaborated by team of 4 people. 3D model done by team. Drawing number 2., 3., 4., 6., 8. done by author. The main idea was to propose a tower typology for the residential building in order to maximise the public realm on the Pomorska Island. As the building is located in the important and unique central area of Wroclaw, the apartments offer attractive views to the old town as well as the water scenery. On the top floors the building is equipped with swimming pool and gym for residents. Others are welcomed to visit the viewing point with a cafe with views to the city. This would bring the economic benefits for the development.
1.The programmatic and structural diagram. 42
2.Studies of the elevations.
7. Perspective from the main street.
3. Typical floor of apartments. Variation of apartments on the same floor.
4.Top floor equipped with gym and swimming pool.
5. Variations of appartments. 8. Interior of the apartment with the view to the old town.
6.Ground floor plan.
9. View from the swimming pool to the old town of Wrc 43
14. Champagne Bubble Bar, Paris AC - CA Competition entry Individual Competition Design elaborated by a team of 2 students. Drawing number 1. to 5. done by author. 3D model done by a team. The function of the two-storey pavilion is divided to three main spheres: Champagne Bar Area, Administration and Roof Terrace displaying the view of the the city as well as giving the opportunity to enjoy the sunset in an attractive outside space above the river. The bubbly structure gives shelter for visitors and clients of Cafe and Snack Bar located on roof top terrace via use of aesthetic roofing. The shape of the bubbly structure symbolizes the sparkling and bubbly consistency of champagne. Moreover, the foam surface rising above the Seine River refers to nature and water context. Besides the aesthetic value the bubbly structure works as a double skin facade providing substantial benefits connected with sustainability.
1. Structural diagram. Drawing by team. 44
2. Ventilation scheme. Drawing by author
3. Longitudinal section. Drawing by author.
6. Perspective from the river Seine. Drawing by team.
4. Roof top plan. Drawing by author.
7. Perspective from the roof terrace. Drawing by author.
5. First floor plan - bar. Drawing by author
8. Perspective from the main walking route along Seine river. Drawing done by team. 45
1. Section through the lecture rooms.
15. University of Rzesz贸w, Research and Teaching Complex of the Humanities and Nanoelectronics Faculties I Prize in the competition, Realisation Part I Architectural Assistant at Studio EL, Wroclaw Design elaborated by a team of 30 architects. Diagrams number 1., 2., 3.,4., 5. elaborated by author for the publication. Corrections to the drawing number 6. done by author.
2. Longitudinal section.
The main design decision for the university complex was to allocate the programme of the both, Humanites and Nanoelectronics Faculties, into L-shape wings. The main access is located in the corner of the building and directs to the spacious hall connecting both units. The main lobby acts as a transitional space and it provides a direct access to the spacious atriums of both faculties as well as directs towards the main plaza of the university campus.
3. Ground floor plan.
4. Roof plan. 46
5. Functional diagrams.
6. Third floor plan od the vicechancellor’s office and administrative building.
8. Photograph of the main access zone.
9. Photograph of the intersection of the main lobby with the atrium of of of the Faculties.
7. Second floor plan.
10. Photograph of the plaza with the external amphitheatre. 47
16. Ecological competition for renovation of student’s dormitories in E. Wittiga Street in Wrocław, Poland Award, Design workshops at Wroclaw University of Technology
2. Existing conditions of the campus.
Design elaborated by a team of 2 students. Drawing number 1., 2., 3.,4. done by author. 3D model done by a team. The main idea for the revitalisation of the students dormitories was to integrate architectural solutions with urban strategy for the campus. One of the key move was to eliminate the car movement from the area and provide safe pedestrian mobility system permeating between existing buildings. By this, a landscaped value was added to the development which adresses issues such as fragmentation of the site as well as helps to inrease a better integration among students and visitors. The central plaza acts as a main collective space for different kind of events. A retail pavilion which is accessed from the main street helps to economically sustain the revitalisation process. It hosts also students facilities such as common kitchen, dining rooms as well as sport centre on green roof top. The ecological aspects for the buildings themselves include: double insulation panels added to the elevations in order to minimise the waste of energy and heat, heat pump, recuperator and ventilation system for the elevations as well as voids in the floor plan which could provide collective facilities or computer rooms for studens on each floor.
2. Site plan. 48
3. Spatial strategy.
4. Ground floor plan with community facilities and instalation spaces.
4. First floor plan.
5. Typical floor plan of the students’ rooms.
6. Bird’s eye view of the revitalised development.
1. Ventilation diagram.
7. Landscaped plaza acting as a venue for student’s events.
5. Detail of the facade.
8. Landscaped plaza acting as a venue for student’s events. 49
17. City Hostel, Wroclaw, Poland B.Arch Thesis Individual work. Tutor: Jacek Kościuk
The main idea for the design of the hostel building was to to lift up the four living modules so as not to block the access to the riverfront. This allowed to create collective spaces for guests on different levels; the terrace platform on the water as well as the common terrace on the . This is the place for integration, entertainment and relaxation and provides a direct contact with water scenery. Elevations were designed following the dichotomy of edges; water. From the north side, the hostel is opened to the water and nature by glass panels which can be opened during summer time. From south side, elevations are made of ISPPRO prefabricated panels so as to avoid noise from the neighbouring street. 1. Location of the hostel building.
3. The exposition of the building from the river side. 50
2. Dichotomy of edges.
4. Detail of the ISOPRO elevation panel.
9. Bird’s eye view of the building and its immediate surrounding.
5. Section showing the detailed fragment of the elevation in conjunction with the floor and ceiling.
6. Longitudinal section.
10. Collective character of the building.
7. Second floor plan.
8. Ground floor plan.
11. Perspective from the street. 51
52
53