8 minute read
Head to head
from Delano March 2022
Nuclear and gas in the EU taxonomy
The EU Commission recently published a complementary climate delegated act that adds nuclear and gas activities to its taxonomy. The latter will guide investors in their sustainable choices.
Anne Calteux is head of the EU Commission representation in Luxembourg How does the proposal align with existing EU regulations? ANNE CALTEUX The proposal is in line with the Green Deal and the commission’s aim: the EU must engage in a transition to achieve its [emission] goals. Achieving these has a high cost--it’s estimated at €360bn a year up to 2030. Public investments won’t allow us to get there unless they are complemented by massive private investments. The taxonomy--increasing transparency in financial markets for private sector sustainable investments--seeks to encourage companies to launch and upgrade projects, and to meet these criteria. Also, I want to underline that it considers the European reality, which is that member states have a very different energy mix. We need to pick up member states where they are.
MERIS SEHOVIC Yes, but can these be called green investments? The governments of Luxembourg and Austria have already questioned the commission’s decision.
Financial actors, like EIB president
Werner Hoyer, have too. It’s a question of credibility. The initial goal of the taxonomy was to provide the reference for what is a green investment in Europe. If we include gas and nuclear, there is a risk of undermining the credibility of the whole framework. But also, whether or not we’ll be able to channel those huge investments that Anne mentioned--€360bn a year--into the right direction. Every euro spent on nuclear, every euro spent on gas is a euro missing for renewable energy. AC The aim of the taxonomy is not to present gas or nuclear energy as green or as climate-neutral activities. The aim is to present them as transitional activities. Its aim is to define what is compatible with the Paris agreement in terms of sustainable finance. It’s a financial services tool.
EU commissioner for the internal market Thierry Breton said that the energy demand in Europe is growing and that nuclear is the path to follow. How are we going to meet this demand over the long term? MS First, I’d like to question the transitional nature of this [act]. The commission wants to invest in the renewal of old nuclear plants up until 2040 and the construction of new nuclear power plants until 2045. A nuclear reactor has an average lifetime of 40 years, so we’re talking about channelling investments into nuclear until the end of the century.
The decisions that we take today will have an impact until the end of the century, so it’s not transitional.
When it comes to energy supply, the demand in electricity in Europe may be growing, but the gas demand for the past decade has stagnated thanks to energy efficiency policies put forward by the commission. Our number one priority is to consume less energy. I know this is also a priority for the European Commission, and I think that the development and the deployment of renewable energies have come a long way in the past decades. Our solution should be 100% renewable energy and making sure that interconnections between member states exist, so that energy can be shared between countries efficiently. AC I agree with Meris saying that the deployment of renewable energy has come a long way. It’s still our ultimate aim. That’s why, in July 2021, the commission set renewable energy targets and now works on good practices for renewables, and on the publication of a communication on solar energy.
On top of that, as the energy sector will be the biggest contributor in meeting the EU’s climate targets, we will propose an action plan for an accelerated digital transformation of the energy sector. The commission also announced a new strategy on international energy engagement for 2022, which goes beyond the EU. I think this will also give way to new opportunities in deploying and promoting a clean, safe and efficient energy system, while gradually moving away from fossil fuel.
Luxembourg and Austria considered legal action following this delegated act. Does the taxonomy highlight a divide between member states and their energy policies and priorities? What could this rift mean for EU energy policies? AC Being united in a field that lies under national competence is difficult, but this is what makes the EU. It’s just not possible to force members to adopt only specific energy mixes. We must deal with it and give the necessary incentives to member states to choose the right energy sources. But we have always been very good at putting into place instruments which, in the end, also encourage countries--even outside the EU--to adopt the same standards.
Isn’t the inclusion of nuclear and natural gas in the taxonomy--even just as a transitional measure-sending out a certain message to countries outside of the EU? MS I agree. When it comes to energy, of course, there’s division or conflict, but a large majority of Europe--all 27 member states--agrees on the fact that we need more renewable energy. Regarding the taxonomy regulation--nobody is asking the commission to hinder France in their plans to develop nuclear energy. The only thing we ask is to make sure that these activities are not labelled as green and get investments that are needed elsewhere. I think that, in Europe, when we agree on something, we can be very efficient together. Regrettably, the commission decided that it wanted to include nuclear and gas. I can’t influence that, but I do think that the signal it sends out goes in the wrong direction. AC Two important elements are missing from this argument. What comes with this delegated act is that it sets even stricter conditions and screening criteria [for nuclear and gas-related activities]. Let’s not forget that. They are outlined in detail in the delegated act, and they must be complied with. The taxonomy also introduces specific disclosure obligations for businesses related to their activities in the gas and nuclear sector. So, it’s not about greenwashing, it’s about ensuring maximum transparency, and thus avoiding greenwashing. With this, we can help investors identify which investment opportunities include gas or nuclear, and thus allow them to make informed choices.
Meris Sehovic is co-president of Luxembourg’s green party déi Gréng
Traditional banks often have generalised processes which encompass their entire client base (be it retail, corporate, wealth management, financial, etc.). Inevitably, such generalised policies struggle to work efficiently when faced with the specialised and often complex nature of alternative funds.
“The complexity of how funds are structured makes it difficult for traditional banks to understand the processes, meaning there are inefficiencies in how they can monitor these entities,” Maton said. “The result is often delay for both onboarding and transaction processing.”
Considerable investment was made in building a dedicated team and technology to meet specific processing requirements for alternative funds. Over 120 staff now play a part in the onboarding, settlement and compliance of funds and their investment entities, underpinned by a new and bespoke technology stack. All of this was designed specifically for the complex needs of alternative fund players. The platform also enables clients to view and manage all their accounts in different jurisdictions from a single login.
Sam Marsh
Managing Director, Institutional, of Alpha FX
Alpha FX soft-launched this platform with existing clients in mid-2020, and when version 2.0 of the system was up and running they were able to launch fully into the market.
When asked what Alpha FX expects from the Luxembourg market, Sam Marsh, Institutional MD of Alpha FX turns the question around. “It’s more about what the market expects from us, with them telling us about their pain points and us seeing how we can resolve these.” They will work to build on their existing client base in Luxembourg, some of whom are already using this platform.
It was from conversations with these clients that the idea grew of creating an alternative banking service dedicated to players in the private markets area. Alpha FX was originally founded in 2009 to offer currency risk management solutions, and conversations with clients over the years revealed a growing market need for an agile alternative banking platform. An IPO by this London-based firm in 2017 gave them the resources they needed to address this opportunity.
The solution resulted from the work of two specialist divisions: Alpha Institutional--which was founded in 2018--and Alpha Platform Solutions-which develops alternative banking technology. “As these divisions worked more closely together, we could see a growing demand for a banking solution in the alternative space and decided to combine their expertise and capabilities,” said Marsh.
An office in Luxembourg is a key part of this strategy, and Maton is in the process of establishing this presence. He is currently working with the CSSF to this end. He has 30 years’ experience in financial services, half of which have been in the Grand Duchy with J.P. Morgan, HSBC and most recently as Managing Director of Intertrust in Luxembourg. Much of this work has been in the area of banking and the servicing of investment funds. He hopes to complete regulatory processes before the end of this year, but until then, the services available via the platform will be passported into Luxembourg thanks to its European regulatory licence.
“Opening this office is a clear commitment to the strategically important Luxembourg market and demonstrates our desire to serve clients here,” said Marsh. “The alternative investment and private capital industries need a banking solution that is entirely dedicated to that marketplace, and so Luxembourg represents a major market opportunity,” he added. “We’re looking forward to Nick taking this exciting product to the fund industry in this country.” PURPOSE-BUILT FOR ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS
Insight-led
An alternative banking solution developed through extensive client research and insights. MARCH 2022
Publicly listed
Company founded in 2009, with a London Stock Exchange IPO in 2017.
Dedicated team
Over 120 people dedicated to the alternative funds market, servicing clients across more than 50 countries.
Purpose-built technology
Cutting-edge back and front-end technology has been tailor-made to work seamlessly with alternative investment companies.
Growing capabilities
Approx. market capitalisation of £800m.
For more information, please contact Nick Maton by email: nickmaton @alphafx.co.uk
