The thesis starts with the question how does spatiality of inhabitation shape artistic thinking? For this, one has to define both inhabitation and artistic thinking.
For defining artistic thinking I refer to several philosophers like John Dewey and Gaston Bachelard. According to these philosophers, whatever we see and do in our day to day life is an aesthetic experience. It is the ‘experience’ that we sometimes ignore, don't grasp or blur out and move on. For better understanding of ‘experience’, I refer to the physicist Richard Feynman's "Ode to the Flower". He tells the story of his disagreement with an artist who argued about who can better appreciate the beauty of a flower: artists or scientists. To hear Feynman tell it, the artist believed that a deep scientific understanding actually removed some appreciation of the flower as simply a beautiful thing. In other words, knowing the processes that created a thing could detract from appreciation of that thing. Whereas Feyman said, “I can appreciate the be
