Marie Passuello Landscape Architecture Portfolio by Marie Passuello

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO

â&#x20AC;&#x153;The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now.â&#x20AC;? ~Chinese Proverb

Marie Passuello

251 W DeKalb Pike, Apt W808 King of Prussia, PA 19406 717.724.7910 mpass5370@mail.com

EDUCATION

PROGRAMS

The Pennsylvania State University

Adobe Acrobat Illustrator InDesign Photoshop ArcGIS AutoCAD Microsoft Office Excel PowerPoint Word SketchUp

B.L.A. - Fall 2016 Dean’s List - Fall 2012, Spring 2015, Summer 2015, Fall 2015 Cumulative GPA (as of Spring 2016) – 3.43 Study Abroad Barcelona, Spain – Summer 2015 (May 12 – June 20) Bonn, Germany – Fall 2016 (August 27 – December 11)

EXTRACURRICULAR Phi Eta Sigma Honor Society

Pennsylvania State University Chapter – Fall 2012

Alpha Rho Chi Professional Co-Ed Fraternity

Architecture and Allied Arts; Active – Spring 2013-Fall 2014

REFERENCES

Landscape Architecture Student Society

Larry Gorenflo Professor – Fall 2014, Spring 2015 814.863.5337 lgorenflo@psu.edu

WORK EXPERIENCE

Ken Tamminga Professor – Spring 2014, Fall 2015 814.863.2377 krt1@psu.edu

Active – Fall 2013-Spring 2016

Library Desk Assistant

PSU Architecture and Landscape Architecture Library, August 2015 – August 2016 Research: broad range of topics, hard copy and digital resource experience, deadline requirements, detail oriented Social Skills: accommodating client requests, problem solving, proactive Initiative, team player/group work Time Management: duty prioritization, flexible scheduling

Tim Auman Supervisor – Arch. and LA Library 814.863.1636 twa101@psu.edu

About the Designer From a young age, Marie as always enjoyed being outside and learning to appreciate not only the way things work, but how they can serve a greater purpose. Beginning college, Marie intended to study architecture but soon discovered her hidden passion for landscape architecture and landscape design. Through her designs, she focuses on the beauty of the landscape but also the functional aspect of it, believing that nature serves multiple purposes beyond aesthetics. She enjoys linking designs to relevant historical aspects, surrounding designs, user demographics, and creating elements that will thrive long after the design process is complete. Although Marie’s methods may be untraditional, she enjoys finding new ways to complete projects with the mantra “work smarter, not harder” while remembering there is no need to “reinvent the wheel”. She prides herself on her ability to see the bigger picture, in her designs and in life as well; seeking not only formal secondary education, but expanding upon them through studies abroad in Spain and Germany. These opportunities have provided her the chance to see the world and work on designs in various cultures with alternative expectations. Although these studies abroad experiences have allowed Marie to graduate college a semester early, she looks forward to continued learning through experience in the field. One of Marie’s biggest passions is traveling and she believes this has also impacted her designs. Beyond her studies abroad, Marie refers to herself as a world wanderer, having traveled across the country and around the world. These travels have provided her with first hand views of various methods to approaching landscape architecture and design. These opportunities are not forgotten as she regularly tries to blend different design techniques to create unique and innovative designs. Outside of the design aspect, Marie tends to find herself appreciating nature from various perspectives and always noticing something new, with the understanding that nature and landscape is an ever changing design in and of itself. She believes that walking in the park or watching the sunset are some of the greatest and simplest pleasures of life. However, if neither of those is an option, she is also quite content watching a good movie with her dog at her feet. iii

Table of Contents 1 2 3 4 5 6

Community Development

1 -- 6

Factory to Food

7 -- 12

Pocket Intervention

13 -- 18

McKees Rocks Night Alley

19 -- 22

Positive Ecological Impact

23 -- 26

Site Engineering

27 -- 32

Community Development

North Atherton St., State College, Pennsylvania - Spring 2015

Landscape Design, Civil Engineering Individual Project Patton Twp and Ferguson Twp

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Unique, private community which stretches into its surroundingsâ&#x20AC;?

Community

Multifunctional

Stormwater Management

Framework:

An overgrown wooded lot currently housing 30 residential trailers functions as a barrier between residential neighborhoods and big box developments on N. Atherton Street.

Intention:

Develop a neighborhood with equal R1 and R3 housing, while incorporating community amenities: green space, commercial realty, and on-site stormwater maintenance.

Solution:

Utilize existing tree locations and site surroundings to place housing, while establishing community based elements on the interior of the site.

Conclusion: Separating housing along the edges while focusing the community aspect on the interior brings residents together while still appealing to outside visitors. 1

Photoshop

Maximizing Space Incorporate as many R1 and R3 housing into the space as possible, based on minimum lot requirements. Fulfill assignment following township ordinances for both Patton Township and Ferguson Township. Analyze site elements for before and after comparison.

AutoCAD 3

Site Breakdown Circulation

Ecological

All pathways including bike lanes, roads, sidewalks, bridges, and other pedestrian access ways.

Areas designated for ecological infrastructure, including meadow, wetland, and bioswales.

Structures

Tree Canopy

Built structures, primarily residential but also includes public gathering centers and commercial areas.

Areas covered by tree canopies, including existing trees and proposed tree locations.

Socio-Ecologic

Complete

Spaces provided for human interaction with nature, including community garden and playground.

All programs including to show overlap and connection between elements.

AutoCAD 4

Full Site Design Commercial Community Center Wetland Filter Pond R1 Housing

Community Garden Playground Woodland Existing Woodland Communal Lawn

R3 Townhouses Secure Path

Plan: AutoCAD, Illustrator; Section: AutoCAD, SketchUp 5

R3 Apartments Private Outdoor Patio

R3 Townhouses

Commercial

Design Features Before

390

# of trees

7,355 ft lin. ft. Road Length

22,000 8,891

sq. ft. Wetland

sq. ft. Bioswale

27,364 sq. ft. Runnel

103,653 sq. ft. Com. Garden

8,860

After

257

Townhouse Dwellings

lin. ft. Road Length

sq. ft. Built Footprints

Single Res. Dwellings

Com. Res. Dwellings

15,681

7,355 698 ft

Road # of Length trees

370,400 60

2/3/4 Plex Dwellings

43,402 sq. ft. Meadow

8,539

sq. ft. Rain Garden

sq. ft. Playground

9,175

sq. ft. Dog Park

AutoCAD, SketchUp 6

Factory to Food

Site Planning, Reclamation Individual Project City of Barcelona

La Escocesa, Barcelona, Spain - Summer 2015

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Site reclamation through production and community involvementâ&#x20AC;?

Community

Economy

Sustainability

Framework:

Located within an up-and-coming neighborhood, La Escocesa is an abandoned factory site with contaminated soil, currently used for graffiti projects and art studios.

Intention:

Create an updated, community-oriented location that can be used by locals and visitors alike while preserving the history of the site and its surroundings.

Solution:

Link the housing developments through a large path and park system, culminating at a locally supported community garden which can sustain a public market place.

Conclusion: Establish a sense of responsibility through the garden allows locals to get involved by reaping the benefits of the produce, while establishing stronger community bonds. 7

8 Photoshop

- Micro Community Site Information and Preliminary Design - Self Sustainable - Micro Community Major Stores BICING Station Metro Stop Two-Way Bike Lane Bus Line Network Streetcar Line Rounds

District Scale: 22@

Community Garden Urban Garden River Mountain Sea

22@ in Barcelona, Spain

City Scale: Barcelona

Community Garden Urban Garden River Mountain Sea

- La Escocesa - The Influence -

City Scale: Barcelona

Current La Escocesa

La Escocesa in 22@ District District Scale: 22@

Major Stores BICING Station Metro Stop Two-Way Bike Lane Bus Line Network Streetcar Line Rounds

Marie Passuello 18 June 2015 PSU BAC Summer 2015

Originally Proposed La Escocesa

- La Escocesa -

Full Site Design Open Commercial

tion

ublic P n a Urb

Residential

Green Public

Residential

Industrial

uc Prod

Site ercial m m Co

Green Public

The factory site, currently in disarray, would be upgraded to a community garden with adjacent cafe to bring in visitors from throughout the city while providing employment opportunities for the locals. The factory within the entry site works as a focal point of which the paths are based off. This allows for private residential areas and parks within easy access to employment and community elements. Other elements would be updated or maintained based on current use, including the northern commercial area and western industrial space. The housing including is based on the original proposed residential capacity. Small adjustments were made to decrease the building footprints and increase public green space while maintaining the predicted number of housing units.

Infographic: Google Images, Illustrator Plan: AutoCAD, Photoshop 10

Factory Specific Site Design

AutoCAD, Photoshop

The Garden Element

Cucumber

Eggplant

Celery

b Fe

ry rua

Tomato

rch

Onions

Pepper

Garlic

ary

Infographic: Illustrator Perspective: Photoshop

ril

Ginger Green Beans

Cabbage

b tem

e tob

b em

Pocket Interventions

Along train line connection from Bonn, Germany to Cologne, Germany - Fall 2016

Landscape Design, Urban Design RenĂŠ Schulze, Kristal Mendez City of Bonn

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Dual purpose miniature destinations from city to suburbsâ&#x20AC;?

Multifunctional

Sustainability

Place-Making

Framework:

Under-utilized areas located along a train line, connecting Cologne to Bonn, which are frequently used by passersby during morning and evening rush hour.

Intention:

Implement elements that establish the locations as destinations by creating a sense of place and providing multiple uses throughout time of day, day of week, and seasons.

Solution:

Develop destination based on lacking elements in the immediate area and further tailor the design to be used by both commuters and those seeking a small urban oasis.

Conclusion: Allow for open-ended designs to be altered by those frequenting the location, and instill a sense of responsibility to those now using the sites for relaxation and individual gain. 13

Personal Images, Photoshop

ytisrevinU etatS ainavlysnneP ehT ,tceWhen tihyou crfirst A think epofapublic csdopen naspace L ,oyoullemight usthink saPof eiraM ytisrevinU M&A saxeT ,tcetihcatrue, rlarge Aweeplaza, paa cvastsdpark,naor La bustling ,zedstreetscape. neM While latsthat irKis want to challenge you to also imagine public open space pockets or niches filling in the gaps of the fragmented ytisrevinU M&A saxeT ,renasurban npersonal alandscape. lP n abNortwo U pocket ,ezlplaces uhcareStheésame neR which makes

snoitnevretnI tekcoP

Site Surrounding and Overview them beautiful, individual, and enthralling. Pocket places are fluid sustainable designs that are unique and purposeful, fitting the need of a specific area. Pocket spaces can transform underutilized islands of space into useful public settings that provide seating, greenery, business opportunity, and more on a personal and intimate level. Throughout our 3.94 km project site we noticed gaps and vacancies with potential to be redesigned for the benefit of the daily users of the site and people of the surrounding comm nity. Drawing inspiration from the art workshop, we want to expand on the idea that no place is too small to have meaning or purpose. Our vision is to repurpose small spaces along the paths of the rail line where there are islands of underutilized space. It is easy to imagine our site simply as a corridor to get from point “A” to point “B” or to view the small places littered throughout as unincorporated or leftover. However, we hope to encourage urban d signs that are inviting and create a more pleasant space for people to use. Simple installations like a small children’s playground, unique benches, or a pop-up coffee shop can add a sense of place and breathe life back into a bleak and uninteresting landscape. By filling in these gaps we hope to rejuvenate and reactivate the space by encouraging people to use these forgotten spaces in new and exciting ways. The word “pocket”, in regards to urban design, can be interpreted in a number of different ways. In an effort to pilot our search for pocket spaces a compilation of criteria was formed. Spaces that have a potential for improvement, a character different from its surroundings, and could offer a personal and intimate experience are areas of key interest. When looking for pocket places the current use of the space and accessibility by a variety of different transit options will also be taken into consideration. In designing, we do not want to limit ourselves to specific dimensions and aim to fill a need of the surrounding area by creating a “pocket” version of the standard use. However, designs do not need to be complicated and can be a simple as cleaning up an area to make it more inviting and usable. We hope these guidelines and designs can serve as examples of how cities can use pocket spaces as an effective urban intervention tool.

Pocket Interventions Marie Passuello, Landscape Architect, The Pennsylvania State University Kristal Mendez, Landscape Architect, Texas A&M University René Schulze, Urban Planner, Texas A&M University

ytisrevinU etatS ainavlysnneP ehT ,tcetihcrA epacsdnaL ,olleussaP eiraM ytisrevinU M&A saxeT ,tcetihcrA epacsdnaL ,zedneM latsirK ytisrevinU M&A saxeT ,rennalP nabrU ,ezluhcS éneR

Pub Café Size Relativity “Pocket”

Unique Experience “Sense of Place”

Accessibility “Destination”

Potential for Improvement Maps: Illustrator Infographics: Photoshop 15

Through Park

When you first think of public open space you might think of a large plaza, a vast park, or a bustling streetscape. While that is true, we want to challenge you to also imagine public open space as personal pockets or niches filling in the gaps of the fragmented urban landscape. No two pocket places are the same which makes them beautiful, individual, and enthralling. Pocket places are fluid sustainable designs that are unique and purposeful, fitting the need of a specific area. Pocket spaces can transform underutilized islands of space into useful public settings that provide seating, greenery, business opportunity, and more on a personal and intimate level. Throughout our 3.94 km project site we noticed gaps and vacancies with potential to be redesigned for the benefit of the daily users of the site and people of the surrounding comm nity. Drawing inspiration from the art workshop, we want to expand on the idea that no place is too small to have meaning or purpose. Our vision is to repurpose small spaces along the paths of the rail line where there are islands of underutilized space. It is easy to imagine our site simply as a corridor to get from point “A” to point “B” or to view the small places littered throughout as unincorporated or leftover. However, we hope to encourage urban d signs that are inviting and create a more pleasant space for people to use. Simple installations like a small children’s playground, unique benches, or a pop-up coffee shop can add a sense of place and breathe life back into a bleak and uninteresting landscape. By filling in these gaps we hope to rejuvenate and reactivate the space by encouraging people to use these forgotten spaces in new and exciting ways. The word “pocket”, in regards to urban design, can be interpreted in a number of different ways. In an effort to pilot our search for pocket spaces a compilation of criteria was formed. Spaces that have a potential for improvement, a character different from its surroundings, and could offer a personal and intimate experience are areas of key interest. When looking for pocket places the current use of the space and accessibility by a variety of different transit options will also be taken into consideration. In designing, we do not want to limit ourselves to specific dimensions and aim to fill a need of the surrounding area by creating a “pocket” version of the standard use. However, designs do not need to be complicated and can be a simple as cleaning up an area to make it more inviting and usable. We hope these guidelines and designs can serve as examples of how cities can use pocket spaces as an effective urban intervention tool.

Marie Pas Kris

When you first think of public open space you might think of

large plaza, a vast park, or a bustling streetscape. While that is fo kniht thgim uoy ecapatrue, s nweep o cilbup fo kniht tsrfi uoy nehW want to challenge you to also imagine public open space si taht elihW .epacsteeasrpersonal ts gnilpockets tsub oraniches ro ,kfilling rapintthe savgaps a ,ofathe zalfragmented p egral a urban landscape. No two pocket places are the same which makes - y64 ecaps nepo cilbup enigathem mi beautiful, osla o30 tindividual, uo eand gnenthralling. ellahc oPocket t tn65+ aplaces w eare w fluid ,eurt years old years old that are unique and purposeful, fitting the detnemgarf eht fo spagfoesustainable ht ni tghdesigns ngiilm lfiarea. seyheccin ro stpeoktransform cco p lanfooksnreihpt stsarfi uoy nehW need kniofhta specific uoPocket aspaces ps necan ilbupunderutilized public settings provide sekam hcihw emas eht esislands rai tsaehofct aespace llp tinto ek.ecuseful Nn.ielthat csadrnoaseating, 47.6% 18.1% ihW poap cso tew eand rttsomore g tp suaab ,and kl rnaapbtrsu av a ,azalp egra greenery, business opportunity, on personal diufl era secalp tekcoPec.gaintimate n ,lu fiotuy aeegbnem psillnaerlevel. photnceilbdunpae,nlaiguadmivi iodsnlai o tu llaehhctot tnaw ew ,e Throughout our 3.94 km project site we noticed gaps and eht gnittfi ,lufesopdru ngaaerfueqhin isiellfid seelhbcain iraotstueskcop lanosrep etp nedm t fuo esrpaagtaehhtt snni gn vacancies with potential to be redesigned for the benefit of 52% 48% of the anm esm skecand hotPepeople r.aesreofacathe deziliturednu mrofsnsaerktthe adaily chscusers eihcwap taesite clfipsurrounding itceekpcsopa ofcomm owtdoeNen.epacsdnal nab nity. Drawing inspiration from the art workshop, we want to ccaidea llpbtuthat epkcno nisiltoo hite ncetoadhave nsameaning lausd dinvora idlsnii ,lufituaeb me ,gnitaes edivorp tahdtiusexpand gflneirtatonesesthe i18-29 louPplace fe.gsu olatrnsmall p0-17 f,o ero htmgnd in ttvision fi years ,y lutisfientoold suorepurpose prroupppdo nassespaces unqiisnu ube,ryold athe teapaths het esnrg gised elbaniats Our small along years dna lanosrep a no epurpose. a , t e r n deof zilthe iturail reline dnwhere u mrthere ofsnare artislands nac ofseunderutilized caps tget ekfrom cspace. oPpoint .aItera cfiiceps a fo de is easy to imagine our site simply as a corridor.to l e v e l e t a m i t n i ,“A” gntoitpoint aes “B” edor17.4% ivtooview rp tathehtsmall sgnplaces itteslittered cilb16.9% uthroughout p lufesu otni ecaps fo sdna dna spag deciton ewas unincorporated edtnisatlcaenjoosrrorpepleftover. makn4oHowever, 9e.r3om ruo u o h u o r h T wethope togencourage dna ,ytinutroppo ssenisub ,yrenee urban d signs that are inviting and create a more pleasant space fo tfieneb eht rof d engiseder eb ot laitnetop htiw seicnacav .level etamit for people to use. Simple installations like a small children’s playground, unique benches, or a pop-up mmoc gnidnuorrus ehtdfnoa esp lpaogedpecditnoaneetwiseeth oejosrrepshop sm u kcan y4li9add a.d3areuhot tuohguorhT isttcfcoffee sense of place and breathe life back into a bleak and uninteresting ot tnaw ew ,pohsklandscape. rowfotrtafiByeefilling otrfrongaps anrghope iipsesdntoeirejuvenate raDitn.yettionp htiw seicnac nhetbm eh fodietwe rgenbiw otaland in these reactivate the use msmoooctg o rouns etahht tfopeople ptdthese tn isaephxtefo sresu yli30 ayears d ero gninaem evah ot llam sni ispace edcnaulby prencouraging aeeldpiotoeh nnoa edforgotten spaces in new and exciting ways. omtword wop ew p h eivhtru mcan ino shtap eht gnola secaps llaThe stneas“pocket”, ru,p eregards r soktrostow i urban ntoraisdesign, Oorbe .fensooiptarruippsni gniwarD .yt interpreted in a number of ldifferent ways. In our iweanceaeffort lpil oltoinapilot nap tI .ecaps dezilituredrnosearch ugfnoinfor sadepocket nmaelsvspaces iaehraoatecompilation rlaem hts eoroeofthscriteria nwas rtaehhttafeodi eht no d47.6 formed. shSpaces tap ethat hthave gnoa lpotential a secap simprovement, llams esopa character ruper ot si noisiv ruO .esopr for tniop morf teg ot rodirroc a sa ylpmis etis ruo enigami ot ysae si different tI .ecafrom ps ditsesurroundings, ziliturednuandfocould sdnoffer alsia epersonal ra ereand ht erehw enil liar eht experience tuohguorht derettiltintimate seocpalm pollraf m sareeothareas t wofierkey iv interest. ot sraoyWhen ”lBp“mtlooking n iop ot ”A“ nipocket g current roduse rofoctheaspace is etis ruo enigami ot ysae 52% 48% for placeste the and accessibility egaruocne ot epoh eby wta,urvariety eovhegw o H . r e v o t f e l r o d e t a r o p r o c n into uofodifferent rht detransit rettiloptions secalwill p lalso lambes taken eht w ein ivuostaro ”B“ tniop ot ” In a designing, do ecaps tnasaelp erom aconsideration. egtaareuroccdnn genpitoihvwe neiw e,not rraevwant teawhoto t Hslimit n.rgeourselves ivsodtfenl artoobrduetaroprocn18-2 e e o t inu years specific dimensions and aim s’nerdlihc llams aetoecakfillpilassneed tesrnoimelaparea the surrounding tnno aof sitaa elllpa em taiby eSrcreating c.edsnuaoagt“pocket” neitlipvo nieepraro tafht sngis d nab do not need to be s’of noethe lirhoc ,lslaeuse. m tau lla,d tsnnu i eolrpgmyiaSlp .esu ot elpo17.4 ep r a dda nac pohs eeffoc version pu-p prdastandard hscHowever, na eebkilesdesigns unqoin complicated and can be a simple as cleaning up an area to make ni akccp hesusable. peurb -pthese op ae roca,slephand eebsnee usqinu ,dnuorgya and gnitseretninu dna kaelbaaitdmore odtaninviting aob feileeffhoWetcahope d naguidelines fcondesigns can serve as examples of how cities can use pocket spaces as an tso erhetenurban inu intervention danga ekase elhtool. btanoi tgnn i kilclfi abyeBfi.leephatacesrdbndanl a ecalp fo esn dna etanevujer ogtneieffective p 1:600 1:600 1:600w sp dna etanevujer ot epoh ew spag eseht ni gnillfi yB .epacsd Within the context maps are the individual sites (red) designed by Kristal Mendez and Marie Passuello. nettogrof eseht esu ot elpoep gnigaruocne yb ecaps eht etavitcaer Also included are neighboring areas that serve as potential expansion sites (yellow). nettogrof eseht esu ot elpoep gnigaruocne yb ecaps eht etavitca .syaw gniticxe dna wen ni secaps .syaw gniticxe dna wen ni seca eb nac ,ngised nabrueobtnsadcr,anggeisrendin,”atberkucootps“ddraro eih,”Ttekcop“ drow ehT gw er n ruo tolip ot troffe na nrIu.osytaow etunni a ni deterpret liptontetrre off ffeidnfaonrIe.sbym awutnnearn effi iddeftoerrepbrm .demrof saw airetirc fo.dn oirtoaflispam positaelkipcm opocroa fsehccarpasetsekcop rof hcra em wo aicreatisrcefcoan cair52% arhocf ala,ittnneemto evpoarpem rhofta lahittnseetocp retcarahc a ,tnemevorreptm via48% apaSevah taht seca naoclad nonsare,spganriedffnoudolruroucsdsntiam ,sgonrfidtnnueore rrff uisdsti morf tnereff dna lanosrep a reffo ddlu yeekirfeopsxaeereatearm a eitcnnieirepxe etamit gnikool nehW .tseretnginyikeokofl oneshaW era.tseerraetenci n ytilibissecca dna ecaps eht fo esu tnerruc eht secalp tekcop r ytilibissecca dna ecaps eht fo esu tnerruc eht secalp tekcop rof otni nekat eb osla lliw snoitpo tisnart tnereffid fo yteirav a otni nekat eb osla lliw snoitpo tisnart tnereffid fo yteirav a yb ot sevlesruo timil ot tnaw ton od ew ,gningised nI .noitaredisn ot sevlesruo timil ot tnaw ton od ew ,gningised nI .noim tairaeddnisansoncoisnemid cfiice snaoeirsangenm ”tekcop“ a gm niia tad erncayb idinducofirriucsep ehst fo deen a llfi 1:600 ”tekcop“ a gnitaeerbcoytbd1:600aeeenratognnoiddnsunogrisreuds ,erehvtefwoodHe.eesnuadlrlafido nat ts e1:600 ht fo noisr Within the context maps are the individual sites (red) designed by Kristal Mendez and Marie Passuello. Also included are neighboring m ao naHp.e usgund inraaedlcnsaatselephmtifsoa neo b insraecvdna detacilpm ebareasotthatdserve eenas potential ton oexpansion d sngesites iksae(yellow). d o,rteaveerw isaee dld ledisiuageebsenhat cepdonhaedWet.ealcbialp sumdonca gnitivni erom ekam ot aera na pu gsnngin cnsaa seelnpim caophs e teW kc.oeplbeassuund acnsaeg itn icitwivonhi feorsoem lpm sngised dna senilediug ensaeshatseep ti axe sa evres n

Plot Gardens

.loot noitnevretni nabru evitce

Pub CafĂŠ Primary Benefits Economic Revitalization Locally owned business to bring funds back into the neighborhood Inexpensive Building upon existing conditions, minimal new materials needed Primary Characteristics Accessibility Used as a through-way between residential and commercial spaces Potential Relative to Standard Size Designed primarily for locals and only suitable for 10-15 people at a given time Before

Photo: Personal Image; Plan: AutoCAD, Photoshop; Section: AutoCAD, Photoshop 16

Through Park Primary Benefits Sustainable Majority of the area is filled with native vegetation and pervious surfaces Variety of Scales Open spaces of various sizes within the site create unique feelings throughout Primary Characteristics Offers a Unique Experience Relatively secluded compared to the surrounding open commercial area Potential for Improvement Developed from the existing overgrown vegetation to create a human use area Before

Photo: Personal Image; Plan: AutoCAD, Photoshop; Section: AutoCAD, Photoshop 17

Plot Gardens Primary Benefits Supports Communities Provides space for individual garden plots and community involvement Sustainable Growing personal produce that can be used and shared with those involved Primary Characteristics Potential Relative to Standard Size Compact and less intensive compared to the neighboring private gardens Accessibility Situated along a locally used walkway but far enough away to deter disruption Before

Photo: Personal Image; Plan: AutoCAD, Photoshop; Section: AutoCAD, Photoshop 18

McKees Rocks Night Alley

McKees Rock, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania - Fall 2015

Landscape Design Individual Project McKees Rock CDC

“A safe, sustainable nightlife getaway in downtown McKees Rocks”

Community

Stormwater Management

Place-Making

Framework:

A deserted alley lot situated between a visitors’ parking lot and downtown McKees Rocks, surrounded by a theater, locally owned businesses, and an active nightlife.

Intention:

Provide an area that serves as a secure passage between downtown and the parking lot, while making the location a desirable destinations for those visiting McKees Rocks.

Solution:

Incorporate a seating plan and small projection film to grab the attention of those passing by, while also allowing various pathways from one side of the alley to the other.

Conclusion: Including small environmental elements within the site provides inspiration for stormwater management and planting design in small residential areas within the city. 19

Personal Images, AutoCAD, SketchUp, Photoshop 20

Site Breakdown Stormwater Water retained onsite in cisterns, then circulated and purified through a system of rain gardens

Greenery Trees provide shade while perennials and grasses provide aesthetics and heighten the senses

Gathering Spaces Areas geared towards relaxation and rest through entertainment and prospect-refuge

Main Circulation Through way from parking lot to downtown McKees Rocks

Complete Program

AutoCAD, Illustrator 21

Gathering Spaces

the various areas within the site.

Areas geared towards relaxation and rest through entertainment and prospect-refuge

Upgrading the current narrow throughway incorporates ways of experiencing the downtown lifestyle in a safe and enjoyable manner, acceptable for all ages and abilities. The design includes various points of interaction to keep visitors engaged in both the site and what the main strip has to offer. By utilizing the small site in a way that it can be used by various people in a multitude of ways at the same time, the site design and experience stimulates thinking and provokes interest in other means of refurbishing small spaces to better the community.

Final Plan and Section A) Exploded axon of different programs within the space and how they all fit together into the final design

B) Night perspective rendering looking from Chartiers Ave into the space to show how the space can provide a safe passage to the parking lot while encouraging the night life

Main Circulation

Through way from parking lot to Chartiers Ave

Complete Program

C) Section elevation looking to the west including all key elements of the site and how the spaces overlap

Petrichor

D) Plan view of the overall design, including the visual aspect of water movement breaking up the site into various spaces

Stormwater

Water retained on site in cisterns, then circulated and purified through a system of rain gardens

Fall 2015

Greenery

Through the development of a narrow site to revitalize the McKees Rocks nightlife while provide safe passage between sites, PETRICHOR pays tribute to Chartiers Creek adjacent to the site and the mound after which McKees Rocks is named.

Trees provide shade while perennials and grasses provide aesthetics and heighten the senses

As the flow of water is mimicked through the site, spaces are created and tailored to site specific necessities. Strategically raised platforms allow interaction at all levels and amongst the various areas within the site.

Gathering Spaces Areas geared towards relaxation and rest through entertainment and prospect-refuge

Main Circulation

Through way from parking lot to Chartiers Ave

Complete Program

- Boulders from excavations

Movie Projection

- Projector mounted on wall - Projects onto stucco siding

- Local flagstone

- Recycled concrete - Red brick pattern

- New England aster - Blackeyed Susan

Bump Out Rain Garden - Bottlebrush grass - Maidenhair fern - Pennsylvania sedge

Existing Sidewalk

- Pennsylvania sedge - Gray dogwood - Boulders from excavations

Chartiers Avenue

Charrette

Chartiers Avenue

Charrette

- Recycled concrete - Repurposed wood - Steel fencing - ADA accessbility

McKees

ROCKS!

McKees

ROCKS!

- Plaster interior frame - Recycled wooden exterior

Flower Bed

- New England aster - Blackeyed Susan

Ga ut R

Bum

gS stin Exi

Stormwater Cistern

ain

wal ide

Bed wer Flo

the Ga Gathering Areas

nG Rai ion ers Imm

Immersion Rain Garden

iste

n Ma

Main Circulation

AutoCAD, Photoshop

latio ircu in C

ton mS diu Stadium Stone Seating

ard

ing eS

tion jec Pro vie Mo

gS stin Exi Existing Sidewalk

eat

16’

ide

ne Sto ng ppi Ste Stepping Stone Path

12’

Sta

8’

0’ 1’ 2’ 3’ 4’

wal

Pat h

Flower Bed

- Plaster interior frame - Recycled wooden exterior

D) Plan view of the overall design, including the visual aspect of water movement breaking up the site into various spaces

1/4” = 1’ 0”

Stormwater Cistern

- Recycled concrete - Repurposed wood - Steel fencing - ADA accessbility

- Pennsylvania sedge - Gray dogwood - Boulders from excavations

- Recycled concrete - Red brick pattern

- Local flagstone

Gathering Areas

Immersion Rain Garden

Main Circulation

Stadium Stone Seating

- Projector mounted on wall - Projects onto stucco siding

ate

Movie Projection

rmw

B) Night perspective rendering looking from Chartiers Ave into the

- Boulders from excavations C) Section elevation looking to the west including all key elements of the site and how the spaces overlap

rde n

A) Exploded axon of different programs within the space and how they all fit together into the final design space to show how the space can provide a safe passage to the Stepping Stone Path parking lot while encouraging the night life Existing Sidewalk

Sto

LArch 414 - McKees Rocks

16’

12’

Are

Marie Passuello

8’

ring

0’ 1’ 2’ 3’ 4’

1/4” = 1’ 0”

Bump Out Rain Garden Existing Sidewalk

Landscape Architecture @

Your Name

Landscape Architecture @

Your Name

- Bottlebrush grass - Maidenhair fern - Pennsylvania sedge

LArch 414 Pittsburgh

STUDIO Fall 2015

LArch 414 Pittsburgh

STUDIO Fall 2015

Positive Ecological Impact

I-279 Corridor, Northside, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania - Fall 2015

Civil Engineer Jeffrey Holzer Penn State Pittsburgh Extension

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Connecting greenery from one side to the other on a budgetâ&#x20AC;?

Multifuntional

Economy

Sustainability

Framework:

Many existing structures crossing the 10 lanes of I-279 are built solely for pedestrian and vehicular access, with green infrastructure and incorporation as an after thought.

Intention:

Create a structure using existing elements and designed to serve the community, including the local environments, with as little cost to the municipality as possible

Solution:

Build an eco-bridge, designed for small critters, to cross the interstate safely and secure it to an existing pedestrian bridge to minimize construction cost.

Conclusion: Increasing passage between greenery minimizes cost of clean-up along roads from unsuccessful animals, and encourages hands-on human interaction natural elements. 23

Google Images, Photoshop 24

Site Location I-279 Corridor

Google Images, Photoshop 25

The Bridge

Forbs

This eco-bridge is designed to minimize cost and construction by direct attachment to an existing pedestrian bridge. With interior support, the troughs can be easily secured and, when needed, replaced. Excess water drains through the soil into a catch basin which flows into the neighboring bioswale. Netting deters animals from jumping over the edge and projects the site from birds which could disrupt the bridge. Grasses and forbs are planted to provide natural protection, with small paths included for a direct link from either side. Height changes allow human interaction without causing a threatening feeling to the animals.

Blazing Star

Goldenrod

Yarrow

Deertongue

Little Bluestem

Sheep Fescue

Sideoats Gama

Grasses

Aromatic Aster

Wild Rye

AutoCAD, Photoshop 26

Various Site Engineering

Penn State University - Landscape Architecture

Spring 2015 - Fall 2015

Designer, Constructor Penn State LArch Class 2016 Various Clients

â&#x20AC;&#x153;Skill sets and talents through various projects and mediumsâ&#x20AC;?

Hand-Crafted

Planning

Grading

Framework:

Fulfill assignments, in tandem with other classwork, to the best of personal ability while trying innovative methods to broaden capabilities as a student and designer.

Intention:

Work in groups and independently to create designs that fit requirements of the project within personal abilities, while expanding range of skills and talents.

Solution:

Use various methods to complete tasks, including practicing, researching, and discussing designs with professors, peers, and other non-designers.

Conclusion: Further develop existing skills while discovering hidden talents and previously unknown interests, while completing assignments and producing new and unique results. 27

1000 Trees, 1000 Shrubs

Incorporate multiple different typologies into the site, as well as pathways for pedestrians. Include potential parking area and preserve existing wooded areas. Originally drafted by hand, exactly 1000 trees and 1000 shrubs (3 sizes each), scanned and completed in AutoCAD 28

Hedgerow Over Time

Based on Dan Kiley’s work, research and create rough planting plans for hedgerow typology over time, including at planting, 20 years out, and 50 years out.

Crataegus monogyna

Cornus florida Hedgerow Over Time - At Planting Lonicera periclymenum Canopy - Negative Area Crataegus monogyna 2,655.08 ft.sq. Rubus Cornus florida 2,635.44 ft.sq. Lonicera periclymenum 2,576.18 ft.sq. Anthriscus sylvestris Rubus 2,622.76 ft.sq. Viola odorata

Crataegus monogyna

Cornus florida

20’

40’

80’

120’

Hedgerow Over Time - 20 Years Lonicera periclymenum Canopy - Negative Area Crataegus monogyna 2,189.32 ft.sq. Total Canopy Area 00.00 sq ft Tree Canopy Rubus 00.00 sq ft Cornus florida 1,876.44 ft.sq. Hawthorn (1) 00.00 sq ft Lonicera periclymenum 2,021.21 ft.sq. Dogwood (2)Anthriscus 00.00sylvestris sq ft Shrub Canopy 00.00 sq ft Rubus 1,911.28 ft.sq. Viola odorata Bramble (12) 00.00 sq ft Honeysuckle (12)

00.00 sq ft

Crataegus monogyna

Cornus florida

20’

40’

80’

AutoCAD, Illustrator, InDesign 29

120’

Total Canopy Area 00.00 sq ft Tree Canopy 00.00 sq ft Hawthorn (1) 00.00 sq ft Lonicera periclymenum Dogwood (2) 00.00 sq ft Shrub Canopy 00.00 sq ft Bramble (12) 00.00 sq ft Rubus 00.00 sq ft Honeysuckle (12)

Anthriscus sylvestris Viola odorata

Hedgerow Over Time - 50 Years Canopy - Negative Area Crataegus monogyna 1,110.18 ft.sq. Cornus florida 830.28 ft.sq. Lonicera periclymenum 460.18 ft.sq. Rubus 706.08 ft.sq.

Hedgerow Model

2016 ASLA Student Honor Award Dan Kiley Landscapes in Bartholomew County, Indiana and Planting Typologies at the Miller Garden and North Christian Church

Photos: Personal Images, Model: AutoCAD, CNC Router, hand twisted wiring 30

53.0

44.8

53.2

45.2

53.3

2.0

53.4

54.5

2.00 %

LPS

45.3

42 41

45.5

45.3

51 50

TW 54.15 BW 51.15

HP 54.09

47 48

17.00%

50 50

3.65% 3.65%

51.6

Note

51.9

54.0

TW 54.15 BW 51.15

HPS 51.15

52.7

53.5

TW Top Wall Proposed 0.2'ofContours Proposed 5' Contours

45.5

45.3

LPS 44.87

45 45

17.00%

TC 50.7 BC 50.2 0 0

.62

TC 52.9 BC 52.4 9 9

6 51.8 6 TC 51.3 BC

5 52.9 5 TC 52.4 BC

TC 53.0 BC 52.5 2 2

3 53.1 3 TC 52.6 BC

7 51.4 7 TC 50.9 BC

5 50.3 5 TC 49.8 BC

2.05

Note 2 Note 3

.78

DI 49

% 4.00

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

8 50.3 8 TC 49.8 BC

8 50.5 8 TC 50.0 BC

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

4 Risers @ 0'6" Property Line 5 Treads @ 1'0"

Notes Existing 1' Contours 2 Risers @ 0'6" 3 Treads @ 1'0" 4 Risers @ 0'6" Existing 5' Contours 5 Risers Treads@ @0'6" 1'0" 3

4 Treads @ 1'0" 2 Risers @ 0'6"0.2' Contours Proposed 3 Treads @ 1'0" 3 Risers @ 0'6"1' Contours Proposed 4 Treads @ 1'0"

Proposed 5' Contours

Marie Passuello April 26, 2014

Notes

Note 1

4 Risers @ 0'6" 5 Treads @ 1'0"

2 Risers @ 0'6" Legend Note 2 3 Treads @ 1'0"

.78

.26

DI 51

Note 3

DI 49

TC 51.0 BC 50.5 6 6

51.1 2 51.2 0

DI 51

5 53.1 5 TC 52.6 BC

7 52.0 7 TC 51.5 BC

51 48

2.13

TC 53.1 BC 52.6 8 8

Note 2

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

4 48.6

.30

TC 50.8 BC 50.3 9 9

TC 52.2 BC 51.7 2 2

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

0 51.7 0 TC 51.2 BC

TC 52.4 BC 51.9 1 1

TC 52.0 BC 51.5 2 2

1 50.6 1 TC 50.1 BC

.67

51 DI 50

TC 52.2 BC 51.7 2 2

TC 51.2 BC 50.7 8 8

DI 50

TC 51.0 BC 50.5 6 6

(48.64)

46 42

TC 51.4 BC 50.9 6 6

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

8.33%

Note 1

45.3

46.0

Proposed 5' Contours 48

46.5

Top of Stairs

Notes Bottom of Stairs

Bottom of Wall

53.5

Proposed 1' Contours

44 42

47.7

Top of Curb

of Curb BC Bottom Proposed 1' Contours

45 43

Existing 5' Contours

44 46

52.6

53.6

46.0

49 50

HPS High Point Swale

Existing 1' Contours LPS Low Point Swale Proposed 0.2' Contours

High Point

Drain DI Property Line Inlet Existing 5' Contours

52.5

0 54.5 0 TS 53.5 BS

.45

54.0

Spot Elevation

51.9

% 2.00

Existing 1' Stairs Contours Bottom of

Legend

50.4

% 2.00

53.0

53.5

45.5

6 53.1 6 TS 51.6 BS

0 55.0 TW 51.20 BW

45 or Flo Top 53.16 49 r E o FF Flo Top 53.16 or Flo FFE wer 6 r Lo E 44.1 o 2 lo te No er F 6 FF loor w F o 1 . L 44 Top 54.50 FFE FE or Flo 0 F p o 5 r T 54. loo er F FFE Low 45.50 r o E lo FF er F Low 45.50 FFE 9

51.8

Marie Passuello

53.68

% 4.00

53.0

53.2

53.52

53.6

53.7

45.3

44.4

53.46

2.00 %

HP 53.80

53.52

51.4

45.3

2.19

53.7

53.8

45.5

46.0

53.46

6.14%

2.09%

53.1

53.30

53.3

2.09%

53.30

53.1

8.33%

52.5

Drain Inlet Top of Curb High Point Swale Bottom of Curb Low Point Swale Top of Wall April 26, 2014 Top of Curb Bottom of Wall Bottom of Curb Top of Stairs Top of Wall Bottom of Stairs Bottom of Wall Property Line Floor Elevation FFE Finished Top of Stairs

LARCH 231 PROJECT 2

46.0

52.4

0 55.0 TW 51.09 BW

51.0

45.5

3 53.1 3 TC 52.6 0 BC 45.3

HighPoint PointSwale Low

46 47

4 50.6 2 50.7

2 53.0 2 TC 52.5 BC

.50

52.8

ote 45 1 Top LPS 44.87 FFE Floor 54. Top 50 FFE Floor Low 54. 50 FFE er Floo r L 45. 50 owe Top r FFE Floo F r FFE loor 45. 54. 50 Top 50 AD FFE Floor A Low 54. e r 50 FFE Floo A r 45. Low DA 50 FFE er Floo r 45. 50 52.5

19.1

LPS 44.87

8 50.5 8 TC 50.0 BC

45.5

52.5

45.3

TS 54.5 BS 52.5 0 0

52.7

TC BC 53.00 52.5 0

TC 53.1 BC 7 TC 52.9 52.67 BC 52.4 3 3

4752.36

Elevation High Point Swale HPS Spot

HP LPS DI TC HPS BC LPS TW TC BW BC TS TW BS BW

46.5

1B C

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

8 50.3 8 TC 49.8 BC

45.3

6 53.1 6 TC 52.6 BC

2.00

52.2

46.0

TC 53.0 BC 52.5 6 6

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC 47.75

.78

DI 49

0 45.5

2.00

52.6

1.95

TC 52.6 BC 52.1 5 5

52.2

2.35

46.5

0 45.5

3 53.1 3 TC 52.6 BC

2.09%

51.9

8.33%

52.1

.26

DI 51

.78

DI 49

45.5

2.00

53.5

52.4

20.00%

% %

45.3

46.0

HPS 51.15

53.6

6 515.8 TC 52.7 .36 51 BC

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

.64

DI 48

5 47.7

51.9 2 52.0 0

54.0

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

5 50.3 5 TC 49.8 BC

7 51.4 7 TC 50.9 BC

52.6

.60

50.4

0 55.0 TW 51.20 BW

45.52.05 0 %

TW 54.15 BW 51.15

48 50

or Flo 6 Top 49 3.1 5 FFE

51.9

8 51.9

7 52.0 7 TC 51.5 0 BC 52.5

0 54.5 0 TS 5 53.5 BS TC 52.9 5

HP 54.09

51.8

TW 54.15 47 BW 51.15 51 46 50 4459

8 50.4

2 50.7 0 55.0 TW 51.09 BW

6 53.1 61 TS 50 .6.6 TC51 .11 BS 50

51.6

0 51.7 0 TC 51.2 BC

2.00

45.3

53.5

51.1 2 51.2 0

5 52.7

2.00

538.6 53.2

53.5

5 53.4

TC 53.0 BC 52.5 2 2

20.00%

19.1 7%

2.00

45.5

TC 52.9 BC 52.4 9 9

0 55.0 TW 51.20 BW

3 Note50.64

45.3

53.7

45.3

0 54.5 0 TS 53.5 BS

5 53.1 5 TC 52.6 BC

TW 54.15 BW 51.15 53.68

HPS 51.15

49 52 BW 54.0 480

53.5

52.6

.0 0 53

54.0

53.5

53.4

.68

53.6

53.8

53.52

53.1 BC HP 54.09 52 8

.62

BW 51.15 53.68

53.7

54.5

TC 51.0 BC 50.5 6 6

TC 52.2 BC 2 51TW .72 54.15

DI 51

53.46

HP 53.80

53.52

54.0

20.00%

53.0

2.19

52.5

0 52.6

53.4

.65 TC0 52.0 BC 2 51.5 53 2 .70

4.00

48 47

Legend

High Point

InletFloor Elevation DI Finished FFE Drain

50.3

49 or Flo Top 53.16 r 50 o 48 50r Flo FFE Note 3 owloeor 4.16 L r 4 F 2 oo E Note r Fl TopFF 3.16 49 or Flo owloeor 4.16 FFE 5 op 4.50 L 46 F T E p 5 53 To FF53.1 or oor 4487 FFE Flo r Fl FrFE Top 54.50 owe 4.16 o L o l r 4 o er F 50 FFE Note 2 Flo FFE . Lowloo4r 5 wer 6 .00% looTr opFFFE4.54 0 Lo E 44.1 F r 5 e FF 4467 LoFwloo4r 5.50 FFE TopFF5E4.50 or o l er F FFE HP 53.27 Low 5.50 45 52 oor FFE 4 l F er 46 Low 45.50 FFE 3 53.1 3 TC 52.6 BC

53.68

49 0% 2.0

2.00

TC 52.4 B 53.46C 51.9 1 1

2 50.7 0 55.0 TW 51.09 BW

9 51.0

8 51.4

Spot Elevation

53.2

45.5

TC 0 50.8 BC 50.3 9 9

.30

45.3

2.0

53.1

53.3

DI 50

53.30

51.9

0 51.9

6 4TCBC 6 49.8

53.8

53.30

5253.68

53.3

53.52

TC 52.2 BC 51.7 2 2

53.46

HP 53.80

53.52

Legend

FFE Finished Floor Elevation

8 50.5 TC 53.1.068 50 TS BC 51.66 BS

51.6

5 53.7

53.1

54.5

52.8

.40

.67

TC 53.1 BC 7 TC 52.9 52.67 BC 52.4 3 3

53.46

51.8

4.00

0 53.0 2 53.0 % 2.19 TC 52.52 .02 53 BC 8 53.2

DI 50

52.3

52.7

53.0

TC 50.7 BC 50.2 0 0

45.5

.56

TC 51 53.2 BC 50 .28 0 .7 53 8

52.4B 51.0 5C 50 6

1B C

TC 51.4 BC 50.9 6 6

% 53.1

52.2

6 53.1 6 TC 52.6 BC

April 26, 2014

.64

8 50.3 8 9 TC .8 .0 4951 BC 8 51.4

2 53.0 2 TC 52.5 BC

1.95

53.3

45.2

44.4

53.0

52.5

53.30 HP 53.27

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

8 50.5 8 TC 50.0.78 BCDI 49

3 53.1 3 TC 52.6 BC

52 50

DI 48

8 50.3 8 TC 49.8 BC

.26

DI 51

Marie Passuello

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

.64

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

.78

DI 49

.7 DI 49

4.00

53.30

TC 53.0 BC 52.5 6 6

53.1 TC 5 BC 53.00 52.553.3 0 3

6.14%

LPS

TC 52.6 BC 52.1 5 5

52.5

45.5

TS 54.5 BS 52.5 0 0

52.8

TC 53.1 BC 7 TC 52.9 52.67 BC 52.4 3 3

52.4

52.2 52.5 0 8

52.5

45.3

44.8

45.2

45.5

44.4

52.7

52.5

LPS

52.1

52.6

46 45

44.8

ote 1 Top HPS FFE50 Floor 51 51.1 9 54. Top 50 Flo F o FE Low 54. r Note 50 FFE eTr Floo 50 1 45o. p Fl r L FFE50 oor owe Top 54. FFE Tr Floo 50 45op r FFE Floor F . 54. 51 l 5 o FFE 0 or Top Low 50 54. 5L0o ADA FFE2.13%Floor FFE er Floo wer r L 54. 45. 5 FFE T Floo 50 ow ADA 0 45o. p Fl r L 51 FFE er Floo 5 o o F 0 o r FE r wer 45. 5 50 4.5FFE ToFloo 0 4 p r 50 A FF5E.50Floor Low DA 54. e 50 FFE r Floo A r 45. 49 Low DA 50 e r HPS FFE Floo 51 51.1 9 r 45. 50 49 50 51.9

TC BC 53.00 52.5 0

6.14%

50 46

52.3

1.95

TS 54.5 BS 52.5 0 0

2 51.9 2 52.0 0

1B C

6 53.1 6 .6 3 TC 53.1 3 BC 52 TC 52.6 BC

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

50 6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

5 50.3 5 TC 49.8 BC

7 51.4 7 TC 50.9 BC

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC .64 DI 48

.78

52.2

HP 53.27

51.9

TC 53.0 BC TC 52.5 6 53 6 BC 52 .02 .52

% 4.00

6 51.8 6 TC 51.3 BC

5 52.9 5 TC 52.4 BC

1 50.6 1 TC 50.1 BC

April 26, 2014

DI 49

2.35

(48.64)

TC 52.6 BC 52.1 5 5

52.2

2.05

TC 52.9 BC 52.4 9 9

.62

3 53.15 3 TC 53.1.6 52 TC BC 52.65 BC

5 50.3 5 TC 49.8 BC

0 51.7 0 TC 51.2 BC

.26

DI 51

7 52.0 7 TC 51.5 BC

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

7 51.4 7 TC 50.9 BC

6 51.8 6 TC 51.3 BC

5 52.9 5 TC 52.4 BC

TC 53 BC TC .02 52 53 BC .52 .18 52.6 8

TC 52.2 BC 51.7 2 2

DI 51

52.1

51.1

51.2

52.6

494 7 47 46

TC 52.0 BC 51.5 2 2

5 53.1 5 TC 52.6 BC

TC 52.9 BC 52.4 9 9

TC 52.4 BC 51.9 1 1

2.13

51.9 2 52.0 0

7 52.0 7 TC 51.5 BC

51.1

TC 51.0 BC 50.5 6 6

HPS

2.13

.67

DI 50

0 51.7 0 TC 51.2 BC

TC 53.1 BC 52.6 8 8

TC 52.2 BC 51.7 2 2

TC 52.2 D BC I 51.7 2 51.62 2

2.35

TC 51.0 BC 50.5 6 6

TC 51.2 BC 50.7 8 8

TC 50.7 BC 50.2 0 TC 51 .0 0 BC 50.5 6 6 DI 50 .30 51.1 2 51.2 0 TC 2.05% 50.8 BC 50.3 9 9

49 51 50

.30

TC 50.8 BC 50.3 9 9

TC 52.0 BC 51.5 2 2

51 DI 50

TC 52.4 BC 51.9 1 1

50 48

1 50.6 1 TC 50.1 BC

TC 51.4 BC 50.9 6 6

.67

TC 50.7 BC 50.2 0 0

(48.64)

TC 52.2 BC 51.7 2 2

TC 51.2 BC 50.7 8 8

DI 50

50 46

TC 51.0 BC 50.5 6 6

19.1 7%

(48.64)

TC 51.4 BC 50.9 6 6

AutoCAD Marie Passuello

6 50.3 6 TC 49.8 BC

3.65%

8.33%

17.00%

Grading for Existing Design 49

LARCH 231 PROJECT 2

LARCH LA PROJE PR

17.00%

FFE Finished Floor Elevation

3 Risers @ 0'6"

Spot Elevation Note 3 4 Treads @ 1'0"

High Point

Drain Inlet

HPS High Point Swale

L-1 of 1

0’

10’

20’

40’

Education Center

Notes

Legend

Final Project

All curbs are at grade with surrounding land unless otherwise stated with curb designation (TC/BC)

Existing 1’ Contours Existing 5’ Contours Proposed Building Site Boundary

Proposed Site

Proposed 1’ Contours

122

Proposed 5’ Contours

December 5, 2015

122_Final

Swale Centerline

L-1 of 1

Water Movement RDI

1” = 20’ 0” 0’

Drainage Inlet

Education Center

10’

20’

40’

Notes

Drainage Area

All curbs are at grade with surrounding land unless otherwise stated with curb designation (TC/BC)

Spot Elevation

Final Project

Design and Grading from Scratch

Illustrator, AutoCAD 1” = 20’ 0”

Legend

Raised Grate Walkway

Existing 1’ Contours

Existing Vegetation

Existing 5’ Contours Proposed Building

FFE Finish Floor ElevationSite Boundary Proposed 1’ Contours

TW Top Wall BW Bottom Wall

Proposed 5’ Contours

TW TopProposed Stairs Site BW Bottom Stairs 122 TW Top Ramp BW Bottom Ramp

RDI

TW Top Curb BW Bottom Curb 122_Final

Existing Vegetation

1” = 20’ 0” 20’

Notes

Existing 1’ Contours

FFE Finish Floor Elevation TW Top Wall BW Bottom Wall TW Top Stairs BW Bottom Stairs

40’ TW Top Ramp BW Bottom Ramp

All curbs are at grade with surrounding land unless otherwise stated with curb designation (TC/BC)

Legend

Spot Elevation Raised Grate Walkway

HPS High Point L-1 ofSwale 1 LPS Low Point Swale

10’

Drainage Inlet Drainage Area

December 5, 2015

0’

Swale Centerline Water Movement

TW Top Curb BW Bottom Curb HPS High Point Swale LPS Low Point Swale

Thank you

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO