PORTFOLIO MARINA RYZHKOVA
ARCHITECT / ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEER 2018 - 2020
1
ABOUT ME:
I am a 24 years old architect and architectural engineer from Russia, recently graduated with MSc in Building and Architectural Engineering from Politecnico di Milano. Being energetic, adventurous and determined in my work and life, my interest in architecture and the built environment has taken me on a professional journey through various countries, making me aware and familiar with different design and construction principles and practices, cultures and mentalities, enhancing my will to learn and apply the knowledge and skills I continue to acquire.
M A R I N A RYZ HKOVA ARCHITECT / ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEER
CONTACT
WORK EXPERIENCE
@ m.ryzhk.arch@gmail.com
Architectural Intern at Studio di Architettura Alberto E. Frascotti, Milan, Italy, March-May 2019 Refurbishment and extension design project of a 30m2 housing unit , preparation of architectural drawings for commune approval and renders for the client. Helping with preparation of drawings for various refurbishment projects.
+79160589832 Moscow, Russia
SOCIAL LINKEDIN
marinaryzhkova
BEHANCE
marinaryzhkova
ISSUU
marinaryzhkova14
SOFTWARE
Architectural Intern at ABTB, Moscow, Russia, July - August 2016 My role was to design and curate a compiled booklet establishing interior design strategies for materials and lighting for three buildings of the Zaryadye Park in Moscow (completed in 2017). Architectural Intern at KamIGP, Moscow, Russia, July - August 2015 Helping with meeting deadlines and completeing projects; Preparing conceptual booklets for a number of design projects; Producing construction detailing drawings; Petrol station architectural design and drawings preparation (construction is due to be completed in 2020).
EDUCATION Politecnico di Milano, Lecco / Milano, Italy, 2017 - 2019 MSc Building and Architectural Engineering (Laurea Magistrale) with 104/110. Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2014-2017 BA Architecture with Second Class (Division I) Honours; RIBA Part 1 awarded upon completion. INTO Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 2013-2014 International Foundation Degree: Architecture. 1st Class. ART-KURS School of Art, Moscow, Russia, 2004-2011 Academical Drawing, Watercolor Painting, Sculpture.
VOLOUNTEERING NCL APL EXPO CREW, Newcastle University, February - June 2017 Participating in preparation of the Newcastke University School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape annual Graduation Show of 2017. Member of the Publications Team. Installation and assembly of exposition displays. Mentor at Newcastle University, September 2015 - June 2016 Mentor to 1st year BA Architecture students.
LANGUAGES RUSSIAN
native speaker
ENGLISH bilingual proficiency ITALIAN
beginner
KOREAN
elementary
QUALIFICATIONS & AWARDS RIBA Part 1 Qualification, Awarded in 2017 The award gives an access to 2nd and 3rd cycle Postgraduate study necessary to complete the RIBA qualification route to becoming an architect. International Undergraduate Scholarship, Newcastle University, June 2014 A scholarship received in recognition of the successful completion of the International Foundation Degree in Architecture at INTO Newcastle University.
MILANO PHENOTYPES
1. Atrium connection and study space
2. Water piazza main entrance and relaxing area
3. Playground private space for the residence
4. Study space collective space for students
This project was developed in collaboration with 7 other students of Politecnico di Milano. The brief looks into the development or a residential scheme comprised of two buildings, one being an apartment block for young professionals and new families with some public functions hosted on the ground floor, and the other one hosting a student residence with various facilities for students’ comfort with an addition of a cafe for neighborhood use. The concept is based on the idea of re-imagining a typical Milano housing block by dismantling the rigidity of the shape through integration of nature to distinguish between public and private spaces.
POLICENTRIC BEHAVIOUR
A new vision for Milan
MONOCENTRIC BEHAVIOUR
Transition between the volumes and voids in order to create a regonition of space through different experiences
Re-introduce nature in the city
NEIGHBORHOOD
Accessible neighborhoods
Massing development
Private and public
Natural constrains
DESIGN CONCEPT Main fluxes
5
FACADE CONCEPT Horizontal slabs
Vertical divisions
External elements
Panelized cladding
Shading devices
ELEVATION SOUTH
ELEVATION NORTH
PLAN 1ST FLOOR
7
STUDENTS BUILDING ROOM TYPOLOGIES
Double room Area approx. 20m2
Single room Area approx. 14m2
Double room Area approx. 20m2
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING FLAT TYPOLOGIES
Single bedroom apartment
Double bedroom apartment
9
NORTH STREET VIEW
11
STUDENTS BUILDING FACADE
Fiber cement EQUITONE [natura] N074
Fixed anodized aluminum louvers with wooden texture
Vertical rotatable ETFE translucent membrane louvres
13
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING FACADE
Fiber cement EQUITONE [natura] N161
Aluminum mesh cladding panels
Sliding aluminum mesh panel
15
SOUTH COURTYARD VIEW
17
LA ROCCA
PROJECT DESIGN CONCEPT
HISTORICAL + CULTURAL VALUE
NEW FUNCTIONS
CONTEMPORARY REINTERPRETATION
LA ROCCA is a Masters Thesis project developed in collaboration with one other student of Poliectnico di Milano in 2019. The project’s main aim is to explore architecture in a respectful continuous dialogue between the past, the present and the future using a Castle in a small Tuscan town of Ripafratta as a case. The team adopted an approach in which the urban, architectural and detailed levels were developed simultaneously, achieving comprehensive results. Due to the spread character of the site, the project is conceived in parts according to the elements forming the complex - the Castle itself, Niccolai Tower and Centino Tower. La Rocca displays fragmented yet associated volumes creating a journey, expanding from the center of Ripafratta till Centino tower.
Intervention strategy
Schematic program
1. UNDERSTANDING THE VALUE OF THE CASTLE
2. SITE INTERVENTION
3. CREATING A JOURNEY: SUBSTRACTION CONNECTION - ADDITION
4. RELATION TO NATURE AND SURROUNDINGS
5. RELATION BETWEEN OLD AND NEW - EXPERIENCE IN XYZ DIRECTION
PROJECT MASTERPLAN
19
GENERAL FUNCTIONS ARRANGEMENT DIAGRAM CASTLE FUNCTIONAL ARRANGEMENT
THE WALK
SERVICES BUILDING LIFT ACCESS TO THE WALLS WALL CLIMBING
INTERNAL PROGRAM SPACES
PUBLIC SPACES AMPHITHEATER + STAGE AREA
TOPOGRAPHIC LAYER
RUINS
THE RUINS
THE FORTRESS
CLIMBING CENTER
EXTERNAL PROGRAM SPACES
159
CASTLE ROOFPLAN
07.1.3 GENERAL SECTIONS LONGITUDINAL SECTION A-A’ (1:250)
SERVICES BUILDING
STAGE + AMPHITHEATER AREA
MASTIO
EXIT WAY
CLIMBING AREA
WALLS WALK
SECTION AA
+ 10.35 m
+ 8.15 m + 3.3 m
0m -2m
- 5.5 m
LA ROCCA
21 171
SERVICES BUILDING FUNCTIONS
SERVICES BUILDING - UPPER FLOOR PLAN
SERVICES BUILDING - VIEWS
23
INTERVENTION SEEN FROM THE CASTLE WALLS WALK
25
CLIMBING CENTER FUNCTIONS
CTIONS ARRANGEMENT DIAGRAM
FUNCTIONS ARRANGEMENT DIAGRAM
DATA
REA m2 21.3 10.5 15.9 24.8 11.2 9.2 40 51.2 62 132.2 104.7 31.8 29 33 33 3.1 4.9 617.8
Legend Staff Rooms Technical Rooms Legend VerticalStaff Rooms Technical Rooms Circulation Vertical
VisitorsCirculation areas: Reception and Visitors areas: Climbing area and Reception Cafe Climbing area
Cafe Supporting Supporting Rooms: Rooms: Lockers Lockers Restrooms Restrooms Gym Gym Climbing equip. Climbing equip.
187
187
GROUND FLOOR PLAN / LEVEL -7 (1:150)
3130
3130
3130
CLIMBING CENTER - UPPER FLOOR PLAN
STAFF 21.3 m2
-7.00 GYM 33 m2
3200
-2.00 3200 3200
-11.00
-2.00 RECEPTION 62 m2
-7.00
-2.00
3130
D
-7.00
-7.00
3040
3040
-2.00
3040
3200
+6.30
-11.00
-11.00
+14.90
-11.00
3020
+14.90
+6.30
+23.40 3040
3020
0.00
+14.90
+6.30
3020
+10.30
+10.30
+6.30
-7.00
-2.00
+10.30
3020
0.00
+12.10
0.00
+19.80
+7.60
+23.40 +23.40
D’
-11.00
+10.30
+19.80
+14.90
0.00
+23.40 +14.90
+6.30 +19.80 +10.30
+19.80 +12.10
+19.20
+12.10 +19.20
-1.25
-1.25
+7.60 +7.60
+19.80
+12.10 0.00
+7.60 +23.40
+12.10
+7.60
+19.20
+19.20
-1.25
SECTION DD
+19.20
LA ROCCA
-1.25
189
27
905.8
35.5
CLIMBING CENTER FACADE
88.2
1%
MATERIALITY
PROJECT MATERIALITY
EXTERNAL BUILDING RELATION TO THE CASTLE INTERNAL VIEW TOWARDS INTERNAL THE OPEN VIEW THEATER TOWARDS THE OPEN THEATER
INTERNAL VIEW TOWARDS INTERNAL THE CLIMBING VIEW TOWARDS CENTER THE CLIMBING C
CLIMBING CENTER FACADE DETAILING LA ROCCA
LA ROCCA
195
197
29
CLIMBING CENTER OUTSIDE OF THE CASTLE WALLS
31
AURORA PAVILION Project location
The site is located in Iceland, inside the magnetic field of the Aurora Borealis. The pavilion is ideally situated on the hiking trail to the Kirkjufellsfoss waterfall being open to visitors and hikers and offering magnificent views. The best condition for Aurora observaton involves clear sky, darkness and the Aurora activity itself. Considerig the location and the presence of Aurora, the design concept is focused on defining the use of the pavilion as a place for viewing the Aurora, as well as its integration into the landscape and the generation of a fluid shape recalling the movement of the Aurora light waves.
01. Location
02. View
03. Connection
04. Fluidity
This project was developed in collaboration with 4 other students of Politecnico di Milano using Rhinoceros and Grasshopper software as a part of attended course. The Aurora Pavilion is born from the idea of giving the tourists of Iceland and the seekers of the Aurora phenomenon a space for viewing the famous northern lights that can be visible during the dark hours for approximately 200 days per year.
Sinoidal unary forces
Shape with anchoring lines applied
Sine wave equation
The Aurora Borealis shape movement consists of bounded sheets with layers modeled as sine waves with certain phase shifts, in which the parameters are the wavelength and amplitude. The starting points for the electron beams come through the discretization of curves. To recreate digitally this effect and to turn it into something useful for modelling, the Kangaroo plugin for Grasshopper was used to simulate this movement on a simple dimensionally constrained rectangle. The main agent of this simulation was a unary force component that replicated a sine equation, taking into consideration the desired height for the pavillion as its amplitude.
33
PARAMETRIC DESIGN PROCESS CHANGING OF THE UNARY FORCE-WAVE CENTERPOINT
Single force centerpoint
Two force centerpoints with same “in- Two centerpoints with different intensities each give a smoother, more interesting result tensity” returns a turbulent surface
CHANGING OF ANCHOR LINES HEIGHT (CURVEPULL)
Regular anchor lines all around the shapes leave it floating on-air
Too low anchor lines limit the shape’s height too close to the terrain surface
Smaller anchor lines on the sides, close to terrain, turn supporting conditions more feasible
A too high Z component in the wind vector “inflates” the shape
The desired shape assumes the wind vector found in the region
ACTION OF THE WIND
Wind action creates turbulence on the surface’s edges (no Z consideration)
The process above demonstrates the development of the pavilion from defining the initial surface parameters with the application of sinoidal forces through to the defintion of the pavilion structure parameters, such as the number of beams and the rotation of the structure in respect to the surface shape. The final process of the design defintion was to generate a pattern for panelization of the structure, which was influenced by analysing the sortest walk for the users through the pavilion acting as a bridge, with more density of the panels along the path and implementation of a gradient with a transparent material to mimic the dissolving Aurora beams in the sky. In addtion to that, a radiation analysis helped to spread the gradient more evenly.
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT WORKFLOW
Surface from Kangaroo, to be trimmed with contour curve.
UV grid density choice 25 x 25
Trimmed surface, conforming to the terrain constraints.
Beam Depth Choice 0.4 m
Brep with waffle beams generated by Bowerbird.
Rotation 100o
PANELIZATION WITH RADIATION ANALYSIS AND SHORTEST WALK DEFINITION
Surface tiles scaled by proximity to the optimal path curve
Surface tiles rescaled by proximity to highest radiation region
35
INTEGRATION OF PAVILION INTO THE LANDSCAPE
37
PAVILLION STRUCTURE
Composite wood L profile 100x100x6 mm Steel plate 250x250x20 mm Bolts Glue laminated timber 400x150 mm
Bolts Steel plate Steel hinge anchor bolt Anchor Bolts Steel seat plate Concrete
PLAN
ELEVATION EAST
39
Umbrellecco Group 1 Faini Area
UMBRELLECCO
GEOMETRICAL Geometric Survey GEOMETRICO
Survey of Plans, Secti
Not-accessible area
Geometric Survey Measures of Triangulations
00. Survey and Conservation Project survey, Rilievo e Progetto Conservation geometrical plan di Conservazione A
1
640 642
2
Fixed Second Distance Point Point (m) A 1 6,4 A 2 6,42 A 3 6,85 A 4 8,03 A 5 9,16 A 6 9,5 A 7 10,92 A 8 12,97 A 9 14,59 A B 13,01 B 1 14,49 B 2 14,04 B 3 12,53 MATERIAL MATERICO B 4 10,5 B 5 9,11 B 6 8,78 B 7 7,72 B 8 6,71 C 13 12,96 C 14 13,85 C 15 15,51 C 16 16,55 C D 13,87 D 10 11,74 D 11 11,4 D 12 7,96 D 13 7,72 D 14 7,12 D 15 6,42 D 16 6,31
474
18
E
685
506 560
3
80
3
19 4
63
76 5
626
6 0 91 95
20
Not-accessible area
78 5
92 10
65
3
21
4
57
5
129
1449
7
514
145
1301
9
5
22
6
23
472
F
491
125 3
1404
472
501
499
H
G
502
I
J
7
24
8
25
600
78
3
601
0 78
600
630
79
2
2
0
78
78
717
2
666
78
659
703
615
5 77
629
8
87
616 608
91
1
10
50
525
64
2
77
6
B
483
190
671
9
647 642
16
10
421 442
17 K 26
27
13
14
30
29
28
31
499
32
503
461
11
12
16
15
DAMAGE DEGRADO
INTERVENTION INTERVENTO P04 P03 C10 NB: Height of the section: 90 cm
79 6
117
642
2
77
40
712
11
Other part
631
4
Geometric Survey Legend
S06
12
96
1000
1017
1015
P04 51
85
15
13
55
16
S06
P03 S17
C10
C15
General Keyplan of Case Study
Politecnico d Master of Sc
68
12
D
1387 C
Ge Su TRIANGULATION TRIANGOLAZIONI
C
Ge Fie
01. Vision - As a central point of Lecco Vision - Punto centrale di Lecco
Conservation geometrical survey, front elevation GEOMETRICAL +837
ini Area
Politecnico di Milano, Polo Territoriale di Lecco Master of Science in Architectural Engineering
Geometric Survey GEOMETRICO
+781
Conservation + Studio - A.A. 2017-2018 Prof. Elisabetta Rosina, Arch. Alessia Silvetti
Group 01
Ex Faini Area Lecco City Center
Angie Paola Aguilera Ortiz (896391) Marina Ryzhkova (895350)
SKETCH SCHIZZI
Federico Lucchi (818218) Shohei Yamashita (894192)
Ozlem Bozkaya (886373) Luca Sironi (793595)
Geometric Survey Survey of Plan with Triangulations
Survey of Plans, Sections and Elevations
Politecnico d Master of Sci
+611
107
244
186
92
125
19
Geometric Survey Measures of Triangulations
591
47
Fixed Second Distance Fixed Second Distance Fixed Second Distance Point Point (m) Point Point (m) Point Point (m) A 1 6,4 1 2 0,5 17 11 4,42 +243 A 2 6,42 2 3 1,77 17 16 4,21 A 3 6,85 3 4 2,46 17 25 4,83 A 4 8,03 4 5 1,8 E 18 4,74 A 5 9,16 5 6 0,47 E 19 5,06 A 6 9,5 6 7 1,78 E 20 5,6 A 7 10,92 7 8 2,45 E 21 6,34 A 8 12,97 8 9 1,83 E 220 7,65 A 9 14,59 9 10 0,4 E F 6,26 A B 13,01 10 11 0,4 F 18 7,85 B 1 14,49 11 12 4,61 F 19 6,53 B 2 14,04 12 13 0,4 F 20 5,75 B 3 12,53 13 14 1,2 F 21 5,14 MATERIAL MATERICO B 4 10,5 14 15 2,15 F 22 4,72 B 5 9,11 15 16 1,62 F 23 4,72 B 6 8,78 G 24 5,25 B 7 7,72 G 17 6,18 B 8 6,71 G K 6,08 C 13 12,96 G 26 6,15 J Faini27 area with tower Where can we go? Faini becomes a part of life C 14 13,85 Valorizie G 6,29ilbell Dove possiamo andare? Valorizzare l'area Faini con campanile Faini diventa parte della vita C 15 15,51 G 28 6,59 C 16 16,55 G 29 7,03 C D 13,87 Fixed Second Distance G 30 7,82 D 10 11,74 Point Point (m) G H 5,01 D 11 11,4 H 26 Landscape( 7,92 Mountains, Lake, 18 River)19 1,77 Walkable Barriers D 12 7,96 H S27 Histrical7,17 19 +71021 O2,46 and Cultural Heritage Lack of Touristic Points D 13 7,72 H 28 Existing 6,66 21 22 1,8Lack of Urban Furniture Infrastructure +664 D 14 7,12 H 29 Central6,3 22 23 0,47 Localization Lack of Services D 15 6,42 H 30 Accessibility 6 for Main Street Lack of Pedestrian and Bike Paths 23 24 1,78 D 16 6,31 H 31 Variety7,8 of Functions Abandoned Spaces 24 25 2,45 H I High Potential 4,99 of Tourism 25 16 1,88 De-Industrialization I 16 17 T 4,21 W30 Cultural7,8Initiatives No Connection with Urban Space I 31 Green6,01 26 +45727 1,2Weak Accesibility Improvement I 32 7,82 27 29 2,15 I J 5,02 29 30 1,53 J 31 7,83 30 31 4,98 RT SD C07 C02 PL MP C06 C15 32 J 32 6 31 32 5,02
465
228
Leg
118
125
405
200
Su M
Other part
Elevation EE
Conservation materials survey, front elevation I
502
Politecnico d Master of Sc
ORTHOPHOTO ORTOFOTO +837 +781
Other part
600
Co Ge Ex Leg
104
104
292 314 27
C01 C02
S15
S06
73
RT SD
P04
512
P03
277
IR OX
322
S06
C09 C10
596
S17
73
73
PL CR
363
DAMAGE
322
Faini Building 27
503
457
31
104
177
2
78
+611
277
3 78
601
02. Site Analysis & Applying Functions Analisi del sito e Funzioni
Elevation EE C07 C02
Ge
Ma
PL
RT
WO
This project was developed in collaboration with 5 other students of Politecnico di Milano. The project was focused on surveying an existig building for a conservation strategy report followed up by a proposal for a redevelopment of the ex-Faini factory area in the city center of Lecco. The proposal was suggesting a revitalization of the area through creating a center for local craftsmanship, as well as a study space for the adjacent local library building in order to reintroduce the area for public use of the Lecco citizens and visitors. To esure preservation of internal spaces, a concept of a ‘BOX WITHIN A BOX’ was implemented to provide necessary spaces accomodating new functions.
Where can we go?
Valorize Faini area with bell tower
Faini becomes a part of life
REGENERATION MASTERPLAN
41
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION
FAINI BUILDING
MATERIAL
FUNCTION
RE-USE INTERNAL PLAN
RE-USE INTERNAL SECTION
SPACE PERSPECTIVE SECTION
43
WORKSHOP SPACE FOR METALLIC SCULPTURES MAKING
45