Prst. Std. U.S. Postage Paid Naugatuck, CT #27
“The most affectionate creature in the world is a wet dog.” ~ Ambrose Bierce
FR EE
Bee Intelligencer Informing the towns of Middlebury, Southbury, Woodbury, Naugatuck, Oxford and Watertown A FREE COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER
Volume VIII, No. 20
Friday, May 18, 2012
To join or not to join? By MARJORIE NEEDHAM One of the two questions on the ballot for Middlebury voters Tuesday, May 22, will be whether or not the town should become a member of the Torrington Area Health District (TAHD). Under former First Selectman Thomas Gormley, the Town of Middlebury last year closed its health department, which was staffed by Dr. Raymond Sullivan and Dr. Maurice Falk, and signed a oneyear contract with the TAHD. The contract, which began July 1, 2011, will expire June 30, 2012. In it, the town agreed to pay TAHD $48,948, or $4,079 per month. This was based on a population of 7,394 at $4.77, which amounts to $35,269. Another $13,679 is paid by the state at $1.85 per resident. Gormley said last year one reason the town needed to be part of a health district was the state has stopped paying per capita funds to individual health departments and now pays them only to health districts. Gormley formed an ad hoc committee to investigate joining a health district. After comparing 21 health districts, the committee returned with a recommendation to join Torrington. Its per capita cost of $4.77 compared to a high of $17.22 per capita in the Westport/Weston district and a low of $3.91 in the Northeast district. Torrington is 26 miles north of Middlebury. At a sparsely attended May 3 public hearing on the town becoming a TAHD member, current First Selectman Edward B. St. John said the intent of the hearing was to give everyone a chance to weigh in on joining Torrington. He said the process of investigating various health districts was not going to be resurrected. “Since I took office Dec. 5, I have not received one single complaint (about the TAHD),” he said. TAHD Director James B. Rokos handed out sheets with basic information on the TAHD – it is the second oldest health district in Connecticut, initially formed in 1967 with Torrington, Harwinton, Litchfield, Morris and Goshen. Since then, 14 other towns and cities have joined, and the population it serves has grown to 128,000. It has a staff of 15 public health officials and a 25-member board of health whose members are appointed by their municipalities. Rokos also gave out sheets listing mandated services such as food inspection the health
district must perform and non -mandated services such as water testing that it performs even though it is not required to do so. Rokos said the district’s per capita fee started at $1 in 1967 and has been $4.77 the past three years. Resident Heidi Shea asked Rokos what staff the TAHD would provide Middlebury. He said Deputy Director Robert Rubbo would continue to have office hours Wednesdays from 8 to 10 a.m. at Middlebury Town Hall as he has done during the contract year. Other mornings, Rubbo is in the Watertown office and answers Middlebury telephone calls there. Shea also asked what voice Middlebury would have as one member of a 20-member health district. Resident John Cookson, who served on the committee, said members contacted every town already a member of the TAHD and asked what they thought of it. “They all approved,” he said. He said he attended the TAHD annual meeting, and everyone was treated evenly. Neal Lustig, Pomperaug District Department of Health (PDDH) director, was in attendance and rose to say his health district, which is in Southbury, could provide services for $5.40 per capita. However, at the time the data were being collected, the PDDH per capita price was $7.73. Lustig said on the telephone Wednesday the PDDH has cut costs over the past year and, if Middlebury joined it instead of Torrington, the economy of scale would allow a $5.40 per capita cost. “We looked at what Middlebury would bring to the table,” Lustig said. He said the $5.40 rate also would apply to current PDDH members Woodbury, Southbury, and Oxford. Asked what would happen next year, he said, “It’s not a one-year special. It will depend on our expenses.” Lustig said the PDDH has a lot to offer. “We aren’t just inspectors,” Lustig said. “We are a fullservice health district.” At the hearing, Lustig said Middlebury and Southbury share a common school system and a common border. He said his staff administered 3,400 flu shots and offers a variety of vaccinations along with cardiovascular screenings. St. John said the town isn’t about to make a change now. “My recommendation to the town is to vote for the Torrington Health District,” he said.
Middlebury referendum May 22 Two questions will be on the ballot for Middlebury voters Tuesday, May 22. Question 1 is “Shall the Town of Middlebury join the Torrington Area Health District as approved by the Board of Selectmen on April 16, 2012?” Question 2 is “Shall the Town of Middlebury adopt the Property Maintenance Ordinance as approved by the Board of Selectmen on April 16, 2012?” The polls will be open from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. at Shepardson Community Center at 1172 Whittemore Road in Middlebury.
Grass grows in the parking lot cracks, a gutter sags, roof shingles curl upwards and boards cover windows on one of the two vacant buildings on Rte. 64 in Middlebury. The buildings, which once housed Johnny's Dairy Bar and Vinnie's Pizza, are frequently mentioned by Middlebury residents concerned about blight. On May 22, residents will vote on a proposed property maintenance ordinance. (Marjorie Needham photo)
Ordinance on Tuesday’s ballot By MARJORIE NEEDHAM A proposed Middlebury ordinance, the “Property Maintenance Ordinance,” will be on Tuesday’s ballot so voters can decide whether or not it will go into effect. After years of grumbling from residents, often about the vacant former Johnny’s Dairy Bar and the vacant former Vinnie’s Pizza, which sit side by side on Rte. 64, the selectmen appointed an ad hoc committee to create the new ordinance. While the May 3 hearing on joining the Torrington Area Health District attracted few residents, the April 5 hearing on this proposed ordinance attracted a number of residents, some of whom supported the ordinance and others who strongly opposed it. Resident Robert Halgreen said, “I believe my property is blighted.” He said a DVD he checked out of the library showed about half the town was blighted 150 years ago. “Some prefer their back yard to go to nature,” he said. Then he asked, “Are we looking to become the perfect suburb like Disneyworld?” He also asked what the town would do if a citizen is physically unable to do yard work or can’t pay to have it done. He said he felt the ordinance had no leeway. Resident Bob Berger agreed. He said the ordinance was not in the best interests of residents of the town and infringes on their
rights. “If fallen branches or high grass bother you, go help them,” he said. Resident Pat Clark said it was contradictory to discuss offering the elderly a tax abatement (the Elderly Tax Relief Committee is working on this) and turn around and penalize them if they can’t keep up their property. Resident Yolanda Jackson strongly supported the ordinance. “I’m all for it and have been for years,” she said. She said she sees Middlebury houses that are “a total shambles,” have decayed porches, fallen fences, peeling paint, and “grass up to here.” The ordinance, which was slightly modified after the public hearing, addresses properties that are “substandard with respect to structural integrity or maintenance” or are “vacant, blighted, dilapidated or disorderly.” It says such properties adversely affect the economic wellbeing of the town and are inimical to the health, safety and welfare of residents and visitors. It then lists seven conditions, any of which make a property a “Blighted Property.” They include determinations by town officials, the property being in a state of disrepair or “becoming dilapidated,” being unfit for human habitation, having unsafe structure(s), having an “unreasonable” impact on the enjoyment of or value of neighboring properties, or significantly impacting the quality of life of others. The definition of state of disrepair or be-
coming dilapidated is further defined as one or more of 12 conditions, which include missing, broken or boarded-up windows and doors; rodent or other infestation having the potential to cause disease; two or more inoperative or abandoned vehicles; overgrown grass, weeds or other vegetation; abandoned swimming pools; and “any other exterior condition reflecting a level of maintenance which is not in keeping with community standards.” The owner, agent, tenant or “person in control” of properties that violate the list of requirements would be given a written notice stating the violation, what needs to be done to correct it, how long they have to correct the violation, and the cost for noncompliance. They can be fined $100 for each day the violation continues. If the property is still in violation after 30 days, a citation can be issued to the violator to appear at a hearing. Also, the town can take action to correct the violation and then file a civil suit against the violator to recover its costs. If a fine goes unpaid, a lien can be placed on the property. Special exceptions can be granted for up to 90 days, and extensions also may be granted. In addition farms, open fields, open space and forest land are allowed to have overgrown vegetation unless toxic substances are present.
Middlebury absentee ballots available Absentee ballots for the Middlebury May 22 referendum are available in the Middlebury Town Clerk’s office. Electors and property owners owning property assessed at $1,000 or more on the last completed grand list are eligible to vote. They also must be a U.S. citizen and at least 18 years old. There will be two questions on the ballot. Question 1 is: “Shall the Town of Middlebury
join the Torrington Area Health District as approved by the Board of Selectmen on April 16, 2012?” Question 2 is: “Shall the Town of Middlebury adopt the Property Maintenance Ordinance as approved by the Board of Selectmen on April 16, 2012?” An application must be filled out before a ballot can be issued. Ballots will not be mailed. The applications are available at the
Town Clerk’s office at 1212 Whittemore Road or can be downloaded from the Secretary of the State’s website at www.sots.ct.gov under Elections & Voting. Print application form for referendum only. The Town Clerk’s office is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. Additional information may be obtained by calling the office at 203-758-2557.
Book Review.....................2 Adoptable pets.................8 Classifieds.........................7 Community Calendar.........2 Computer Tip....................8 Fire Log.............................2 In Brief..............................4 Library Happenings............2
Library Lines......................2 Nuggets for Life................6 Obituaries.........................5 Parks & Rec.......................6 Puzzles.............................7 Reg. 15 School Calendar...3 Senior Center News...........3 Varsity Sports Calendar......6
Editorial Office: Email: mbisubmit@gmail.com Phone: 203-577-6800 Mail: P.O. Box 10, Middlebury, CT 06762 Advertising Sales: Email: mbiadvertising@gmail.com
Upcoming Events
Inside this Issue
Saturday
May 19
Household Hazardous Waste Collection Day (See details on page 5)
When: 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. What: Collection of hazardous wastes that are poisonous, flammable, reactive or corrosive Where: Woodbury Middle School at 67 Washington Ave. in Woodbury
Bullet Hill School to celebrate anniversary
Page 3 Middlebury Referendum
Tuesday
May 22
When: What: Where:
6 a.m. to 8 p.m. Referendum on: 1) Joining the Torrington Area Health District; 2) Adopting the Property Maintenance Ordinance Shepardson Community Center
Our office is at
2030 Straits Turnpike, Suite 1
203-577-6800
Mail: P.O. Box 10, Middlebury, CT 06762 Published weekly by The Middlebury Bee Intelligencer Society, LLC - 2030 Straits Turnpike, Middlebury, CT 06762 - Copyright 2012