Research Yearbook
2006/2007
Research Yearbook
36 Journals / Articles in referred journals Agell Jané, Núria
Fuzzy Approach to Life Cycle Impact Assessment: An Application for Biowaste Management Systems Patricia Güereca, Leonor; Agell, Núria; Gassó, Santiago; Baldasano, J. M. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Vol. 12, No. 7, 2006, p. 488-496 In LCA the valuation step is very controversial, since it involves ideological elements and value judgments. However, it is a very useful element because it supports the decision-making process. In order to strengthen the valuation step, in this work a new method, which include normalization and weighting, is established. Inspired by the proposal by Seppälä and Hämäläinen (2001), and based on the fuzzy sets theory (Zadeh, 1965), this methodology permits to process information under uncertainty and subjectivity. The method proposed is applied to valuate five biowaste management system scenarios for the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona. Methods. The valuation methodology proposed consists of the acquisition of partial environmental impact indicators, which are calculated on the basis of a characterized impact indicator (results from a LCA), an emissions inventory of the studied region, as well as the political targets and the sustainability thresholds for a given area. Next, the partial indicator obtained is transformed in order to get a fuzzy linguistic descriptor, which permits the construction of a preference order amongst a series of alternatives. The proposed methodology permit to consider the normalization and weighting in LCA from a mathematically strengthen approach because it considers a semantic scale with eleven terms, which permit to define, in a gradual way, the performance of the alternatives according to their level of membership. With this consideration it is admitted and treated the uncertainty and subjectivity that inherently exists in the used data. The results reveal than the worst biowaste management option is the scenario where the totality of biowaste are collected in a selective way and treated only with biological process and the preferred biowaste management scenario is the one in which direct uses of biowaste are
considered. The fuzzy approach considered improves the theoretical strength of the value obtained by the Distance to Target (DtT) method and its modification in accordance to the Multi-Attribute Value Theories (MAVT) because it permits the evaluation of complex systems, which are frequently placed in the field of subjectivity and uncertainty. Therefore, it is a good way of supporting the decision-making process, based on life cycle impact assessment results. In addition, the order of preferences obtained agrees with experts’ opinion and consistent with the characteristics of each one of the scenarios analyzed.
Albareda Vivó, Laura Lozano Soler, Josep Maria
The Government’s Role in Promoting Corporate Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and UK from the Relational State Perspective Albareda Vivó, Laura; Tencati, Antonio; Perrini Francesco; Lozano Soler, Josep Maria Corporate Governance Vol. 6, No. 4, 2006, p. 386-400 The purpose of this paper is to analyse the changing role of governments promoting corporate responsibility (CR) as a result of the challenges raised by globalisation. CR is linked to the restructuring of governments’ agendas in the framework of government/private sector/civil society relationships. It is a result of the research project that applies the Relational State Model Approach to the analysis of CR public policies. The relational state situates the relations between the public and private sectors, between the state and society, in the sphere of co-responsibility. The paper concludes that in the UK a more systemic, national government-centred and business-oriented approach prevails, while Italy has a more extensive, multi-stakeholder and multi-level approach. Future research should complete the comparative analysis expanding it to other European countries: northern and central European countries to analyse
the difference between all European governments in order to promote CR. Practical implications – The analytical framework of this paper could be used for academic, business leaders and policy makers to develop future actions in relation to CR public development. The objective to be achieved is to understand the new political and public framework incorporating CR as a new form of governance. We compare two countries that represent two very different models of government action. The theoretical approach of the paper is based on the comparative analysis of CR governmental vision, objectives, strategies and internal government CR structure.
Albareda Vivó, Laura Lozano Soler, Josep Maria Ysa Figueras, Tamyko
Public Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Government in Europe Journal of Business Ethics Vol. 74, No. 4, 2007, p. 391-407 Over the last decade, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been defined first as a concept whereby companies decide voluntarily to contribute to a better society and cleaner environment and, second, as a process by which companies manage their relationship with stakeholders (European Commission, 2001. Nowadays, CSR has become a priority issue on governments’ agendas. This has changed governments’ capacity to act and impact on social and environmental issues in their relationship with companies, but has also affected the framework in which CSR public policies are designed: governments are incorporating multi-stakeholder strategies. This article analyzes the CSR public policies in European advanced democracies, and more specifically the EU-15 countries, and provides explanatory keys on how governments have understood, designed and implemented their CSR public policies. The analysis has entailed the classification of CSR public policies taking into consideration the actor to which the governments’ policies were addressed. This approach to the analysis of CSR public policies in the EU-15 countries leads us to observe coinciding lines of action among the different countries analyzed, which has enabled us to propose a ‹four ideal’ typology model for governmental action on CSR in Europe: Partnership, Business in the Community, Sustainability, and Citizenship, and Agora. The main contribution of this article is to propose an analytical framework to analyze CSR public policies, which provide a perspective on the relationships between governments, businesses, and civil society stakeholders, and enable us to incorporate the analysis of CSR public policies into a broader approach focused on social governance.
2006/2007
Álvarez Álvarez, Jose Luis Svejenova Nedeva, Silviya Vives de Prada, Luis
Leading in Pairs Sloan Management Review Summer 2007, 48 (4), p. 10-13 The image of one omnipotent and charismatic CEO, alone at the top of the company, is closely held both in business theory and practice. But the authors argue that under the right conditions, co-chiefs — two or even three individuals sharing the top job — can benefit the organization because different leadership styles and competencies are simultaneously available to most effectively deal with differing situations. Notable examples past and present include Google, IMAX, Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs. From their study of over 100 companies that adopted power-sharing — sometimes productively, sometimes not — the authors conclude that it is most likely to work when the relationship between the co-CEOs evinces complementarity, compatibility and commitment. Further, careful design of the leaders’ shared and separate responsibilities — especially regarding communication mechanisms (for external constituents, inside the organization and between each other) — is required. Lastly, it is essential that there be co-evolution, in which each of the coleaders show willingness to change over time and allow their relationship to further develop. In that spirit, the authors offer seven practical “rules of engagement” for forming power-sharing structures with good potential for success, for ensuring smooth day-to-day functioning and for adjusting these relationships as conditions change.
Batista-Foguet, Joan Manuel Saris, Willem E.
Selection of Indicators for the Interaction Term in Structural Equation Models with Interaction Batista-Foguet, J.M.; Saris, W.; Coenders, G. Quality & Quantity Vol. 41, No. 1, 2007, p. 55-72 Kenny and Judd (1984) suggested using structural equation models to model interaction effects since they allow correction for measurement error. They proposed using all possible products of the indicators of the two interacting variables as indicators for the interaction term. Jöreskog and Yang (1996) defended that this is not necessary; one product variable is sufficient to estimate the interaction effect. However, they did not specify which indicators should be chosen if there is more than one possibility. We prove that the optimal choice is to select the indicators with the highest reliabilities. But this is only true if certain assumptions hold. We go on to show that one can get very different results depending on the indicators chosen for the interaction term if the indicators are not congeneric (which is often the case). These methodological arguments will be illustrated by a study of the purchasing or boycotting of certain products for environmental reasons.
37