1.01 / 1.02 / 1.03 /
CHAPTER 1
MAKING SENSE OF SITE
1
1.01
Where is the site, what is the purpose of the building? By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
2
1.02
How did the project originate? Who is the client? By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
3
1.03
What is the business framework for the project, what makes it viable? By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
4
1.04
What is the contract value of the project? What is the time scale? By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
5
1.05
Who are the key professionals and companies involved in the project? By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
6
1.06
Draw a diagram of the basic contractual relationship of the project. By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
7
1.07
What is the architect’s appointment and role on the project? By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
8
1.08
What is the architect’s role whilst the project is on site? Is it effective? By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
9
1.09
What documents and drawings are being referred to on-site and in meetings? By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
10
1.10
Who are all the various professionals on site and in meetings? By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
11
1.11
What happens in a site meeting? By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
12
1.12
Detail examples where the construction team has worked efficiently together. By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
13
1.13
Detail examples where the construction team may not have worked efficiently toegther. By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an entablature due to the fact that it does not By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
By overlaying the ‘Natural Grid’ of trees and the plans of the Barcelona Pavilion (Mies Van Der Rohe) it became apparent that the two could match and work together. Since the area (3) had all the Laugier’s column principles, the decision was made to use the roof of the existing Barcelona pavilion as an entablature that provides shelter, leaving the design of the pavilion missing of only one element, which is the pediment. The roof of the Barcelona pavilion is in this case considered as an
14
CHAPTER 2
THE DESIGN TEAM
17
18
CHAPTER 3
STATUTORY OBLIGATIONS
19
20
CHAPTER 2
BUILDING THE BUILDING
21
22