Tower The Masters School
49 Clinton Avenue Dobbs Ferry, N.Y. 10522
VOLUME 72, NUMBER 6
Editorial Many people in the Masters community treated Donald Trump’s campaign as a joke at first, or at best an attempt to gain publicity. Now that he is the presumptive Republican nominee, the Trump phenomenon should serve as a wake-up call for us to understand American politics outside the Masters bubble.
FRIDAY MAY 6, 2016
tower.mastersny.org
Juniors to pick next year’s theme Tony RosenbeRg Copy Editor
CEDAR BERROL-YOUNG/TOWER
INGRID HIRT AND JONATHAN Greenberg will serve as next year’s co-chairs of student government. Hirt won the female co-chair election on April 19. The male co-chair election was postponed due to freshman class trips, but Greenberg ultimately prevailed on April 29. Greenberg and Hirt will be familiar faces at Morning Meeting.
Greenberg and Hirt take center stage as Executive Committee co-chairs Allie beRdon Op-Ed Editor For the past few weeks, five highly qualified candidates prepared to compete for the coveted spot of co-chair for the 2016-2017 school year. Being elected co-chair is not only a huge honor, but is a responsibility that takes hard work and dedication. This election season, both the female and male candidates were eager to take on the challenge of running Morning Meeting as well as leading Executive Committee. The school-wide elections took place over the past few weeks and Ingrid Hirt and Jonathan Greenberg have been elected as the co-chairs for the 2016-2017 school year. Hirt is looking forward to streamlining Executive Committee to make it
as efficient as possible for the student body and faculty. She is enthusiastic about assuming the role of co-chair. “I am really excited to take on this leadership position because I think that Masters students have great ideas and I am looking forward to putting those ideas into action next year,” Hirt said. Greenberg also expressed his excitement for his new role. “I ran for the position because I wanted to make an impact on the Masters community and leave a legacy,” Greenberg said. One of Greenberg’s goals for his role as cochair is to make Morning Meeting fun and exciting for the students and faculty. He is willing to risk embarrassment to do so. Greenberg and Hirt bring their unique perspectives and strengths to the position and are looking forward to working together. Greenberg emphasized his excite-
ment for Morning Meeting and Hirt highlighted some interesting proposals for Executive Committee next year. One of Hirt’s main goals as co-chair is to work towards passing amendments and proposals to make Masters more sustainable and environmentally conscious, a goal that could benefit the greater community. Both incoming cochairs are eager to take on the new role and institute their own changes and ideas, and also want to continue the great work of the current and previous co-chairs. Current co-chair Annie Canning emphasized the importance of staying organized and being patient when scheduling Morning Meetings and facilitating Executive Committee meetings. Canning expressed her emphasis on the student body as co-chair and hopes that Hirt and Greenberg are able to represent both students and faculty
properly in Executive Committee and Morning Meeting. Canning spoke of the significance of being a positive representative of Masters, whether it is at Morning Meeting, Convocation or prospective student events. “I think that a huge role of co-chair is to really convey the morals and values of the school, and represent the Masters community accurately to new students and members of the community,” Canning said. While Canning and fellow cochair Tim Kaplowitz bring their own strengths and outlooks on the position of co-chair, one common theme is the importance of communication and cohesion between the two co-chairs. “I hope that Ingrid and Jon are able to work together and use each other to their advantage in order to balance out the job, which can be a lot of work,” Canning said.
Seniors have privileges and opportunities that other students can only until their final year comes around to have. Making the Day Student Lounge (DSL) and McKnight Room second homes and having various end-of-the-year ceremonies are just a few examples of how the school traditionally rewards seniors for their dedication and hard work. This year, Masters has created a new senior tradition by allowing juniors to choose the theme for their senior year. In the past, annual themes were selected through a voting process that gave all students and faculty equal opportunity to generate ideas. Although the change could be perceived as excluding the ideas of other members of the community, the school sees it as an opportunity for seniors to encourage one another to work cohesively, as a class, in leading the community. “I’m hoping it will become a way for the seniors to feel more invested and more empowered without taking that power away from other students,” Junior class Dean Stephanie Mestyan said. “It’s hard to get 140 opinions, especially in one room at one time, so I tried to think about the people who have active voices and have been through their four years,” Mestyan said. “I originally invited anyone (25-30 students) who had ever run for any leadership position that I knew about. I then included a few other students who I know are active in clubs and other leaders who may not have a title.” From there, Mestyan asked that the original 25-30 students invite more juniors to attend a second meeting. She then held one final meeting for any other juniors who were interested in helping come up with ideas for the school theme. “The intent was to never have the original group make the decision or to generate the only list [of themes]; it was just to sort of narrow the field, just to have something to build off of to create the ‘broth’ and then to have other people bring their ideas into it,” Mestyan explained. This transition to having juniors decide the school theme serves as an experiment and the feedback will determine if it becomes a tradition in the future. It may act as an opportunity for seniors to take charge and work collaboratively in establishing their legacy.
Seniors hold mixed views of college application process ARiel CensoR Editor-in-chief RAjAn CuTTing Editor-in-chief This year, according to the report the college office gave to Head of School Laura Danforth, members of the senior class were admitted to 258 unique schools. Even though there is some overlap in schools seniors applied to-this year 41 seniors applied to NYU-students are being accepted to a wide range of schools. These acceptances reflect well on the college counseling office which, according to associate head Adam Gimple, strives to make the process as individualized and personalized as possible. At a prestigious college prep school like Masters, the college counseling program is of the utmost importance to parents who often send their children to private school specifically for the college program. However, there has been some debate among students about the effectiveness of our college counseling program. The college counseling office has four counselors who oversee approximately
35 to 40 students per grade, except for Many students Tower polled report- to their counselors, who meet with stuthe junior class which is slightly larger. ed their college counseling process was dents and their families. Naturally, Kathi Woods, Director of College Coun- positive. many students want to apply to schools seling, believes that in comparison to “I am more than happy with how my beyond their reach simply because of many other schools, our department is college process turned out,” one respon- the school’s name or due to parental instrong. “First the student to counselor dent said. fluence. Gimple noted that the meeting ratio is much smaller at Masters than One anonymous survey respondent enables families and students to foster many schools, where some may have explained why they regretted not get- a relationship with their college couna 1 to 100 counselor to selor, but also serves to student ratio or larger,” manage expectations. Woods said. “Also, unlike “The point of meetmany high schools in the ing with the sophoI got into none of my top colleges, and only northeast, our counselmores is to foster trust ended up with two choices and am pretty unors have a master’s deand make them feel excited about where I am going next year. I gree in counseling. Our comfortable about the had no idea that so many of the colleges I apcounselors understand college process. We supplied to were unrealistic options. If I had had a the college process and port students regardcompetent college counselor from outside of are qualified to help the less of what they decide school, I would have known this. students on an emotional but want to cultivate a level as well.” culture that encourages - ANONYMOUS SENIOR Nevertheless, many students to realize the seniors hired out of school value in applying to less college counselors because they felt ting an outside of school counselor: “I schools but to be methodical and holistheir experience here was inadequate. got into none of my top colleges, and tic about the decisions they make,” he Of 60 seniors who responded to an only ended up with two choices and said. anonymous Tower survey, 23 had hired am pretty unexcited about where I am Senior Emme Sudock thinks she outside of school counselors, approxi- going next year. I had no idea that so had some support during the process mately 38% of those who responded to many of the colleges I applied to were but not enough. the survey. The remaining 37 students unrealistic options. If I had had a com“I felt like I had a lot of emotional reported that they did not hire outside petent college counselor from outside of support but not a lot of support about counselors. Of these, 10 regretted not school, I would have known this.” the actual logistics of applying to and doing so. Only two students who hired The official process begins sopho- choosing colleges,” Sudock said. “I counselors wished they had not. more year when students are assigned didn’t feel like the counselors reached
“
out to us enough.” A big area of criticism against the department comes from its perceived lack of activity after the Jan. 1 deadline. Before the Jan. 1 deadline, the office sends out student’s transcripts, teacher recommendations and assists in sending out the Common App. But for some students, the process doesn’t stop after that. Students who are applying for financial aid generally have until February to send all of their financial documents and all students can send test scores after the official deadline. However, according to the survey, some seniors didn’t get into certain schools because they didn’t know parts of their application were missing. “Financial aid wasn’t something my counselor and I talked about,” senior Khyle Richards-Corke said. Gimple realizes that the topic of financial aid can be difficult because of the stigma surrounding it. It can be challenging for families to reach out because they may feel uncomfortable or even embarrassed. Unless students go to their counselors seeking help there isn’t much they can do. Gimple along with the rest of the department is looking for ways to market financial help to make it more appealing and accessible.