Tower Issue #2 2015-2016

Page 1

Tower The Masters School

49 Clinton Avenue Dobbs Ferry, N.Y. 10522

VOLUME 72, NUMBER 2

Editorial The line between “privilege” and “right” can often become blurred by personal opinion. The current senior speech dilemma has sparked conversation regarding the “right” of each senior to a senior speech. But how true is this conclusion? If opportunity is present elsewhere for students to voice their thoughts and reflections, then can a senior speech really be considered a right?

TUESDAY NOVEMBER 17, 2015

tower.mastersny.org

YIYI (MIA) OUYANG/TOWER

SO MANY SENIORS HAVE signed up to give senior speeches that not everyone will be able to present at Morning Meeting. Five seniors will give their speeches in the form of musical performances during assigned Musical Mondays. In addition, the senior class presidents have proposed that students give presentations at senior class meetings in place of, or as well as, their speeches. These can be traditional speeches or more like informative lectures.

Controversy unfolds surrounding senior speeches arieL Censor Editor-in-Chief

I

f you passed the Day Student Lounge (DSL) or the McKnight Room on Nov. 3, you probably heard seniors lamenting the waitlist for senior speeches. Head of the Upper School Matt Ives sent out an email informing the senior class that out of the 71 people who signed up to give a senior speech, only 50 seniors, selected at random, will be able to speak at Morning Meeting in addition to the five who will present at Musical Monday. The remaining 16 have been placed on a waitlist. If a senior who is on the list is unable to give his or her speech for any reason, including not giving it to his or her advisor at least two

weeks before the scheduled date, a classmate on the waiting list gets the spot. The new procedure has created a lot of backlash. “When I first heard about the waiting list, I was pretty confused but also pretty upset, because to me that just screams ‘poor planning’,” senior Karina Ceron said. “Senior speeches are one of the best traditions at Masters and they should have expected this many people to sign up.” No senior class has ever had so many people request to give speeches. Even last year, when an unprecedented number of seniors signed up, the number wasn’t even close to that of this year. “Everyone involved, all of the senior leadership, worked really hard to get everyone a slot, but no other class has had this many people sign up,” Senior Class President Dylan Chan said. “Unfortunately, there

are only so many Morning Meetings and the amount of people we do have signed up is pushing the limit already.” “We all recognized that the amount of people that signed up for senior speeches was too many to reliably schedule at Morning Meeting,” co-chair Tim Kaplowitz said. “I understand why people would be frustrated that they can’t give their speech, especially because I realize that many have looked forward to it since their freshman year, but this was the best solution we could come up with.” However, many seniors think that there is more that could be done to ensure that everyone who wants to give a speech is able to do so. “A lot of people on our class page on Facebook were talking about how Matters of Spirit takes up a lot of Morning Meeting time that should

be used for senior speeches and, although sometimes Matters of Spirit is valuable, I think our speeches should take priority,” Ceron said. Although Ives concedes that on rare occasions Matters of Spirit presentations are “duds,” he still believes that they are a tradition that is as valuable as senior speeches. “One of the only requirements that we still have from Eliza Masters is the religious class requirement, which is why we have everyone take World Religions,” Ives said. “Another way we honor that legacy of learning about religion is through Matters of Spirit. I understand where the seniors are coming from, but it’s an important time and not just a filler that can be replaced by speeches.” Despite the controversy it has created, Ives said that the waitlist has its benefits. “I think the waitlist helps the

people who really want to give their speech and are prepared take priority over those who don’t take it seriously,” Ives said. “We can all think of speeches where the person wrote it the night before and it’s basically been a waste of everyone’s time, so the fact that people have to write their speech at least two weeks in advance eliminates that.” While the controversy unfolds, the senior leadership is working to find solutions to the problem. “We’re looking at every possible angle to get everyone off the waitlist,” Chan said. “We can’t make any promises, but we’re looking at everything from extended Morning Meetings to mandatory meetings at break. Even if we don’t do that and seniors aren’t able to present at Morning Meeting, they’ll probably be able to do something at our class meetings.”

Students may dive head-first for diplomas Logan Toporoff Copy Editor The new Fonseca Center is finally here and open with a brand new swimming pool. There has been discussion of a graduation requirement for swimming that all students must take and pass at some point. This new requirement, if adopted, would not apply to current Upper School students, however. “There will possibly be a graduation requirement involving a developing swim test that would start next year with the incoming freshmen and continue from there,” swim coach Susan Greally said. Many other private schools and a handful

of public schools that have swimming pools also have adopted this requirement to ensure student safety. Some colleges have made these rules as well. Though this would not affect the majority of the current student body, the requirement will continue to be discussed and most likely be considered for next year. This idea originally came from Head of School Laura Danforth, who believes it is an “obligation” to make sure young people can swim. “Teaching kids how to swim is like teaching someone how to read; it is a ne-

cessity,” Danforth said. She also noticed during the senior’s first swim that some students were unable to participate because of their lack of swimming ability. But she and Athletic Director Kevin Versen are working hard to establish a solution for this dilemma. Versen will be drafting the proposal of this requirement to present to the Academic Committee. The proposal will include ideas like having Upper School students, new or in-

RACHEL SAUNDERS/TOWER

coming, take a swim test and of- wouldn’t affect them directly, confer students lessons until they are sidering they are all experienced able to pass. These lessons could with swimming. be taken Ives also at another said he school or “thinks it’s class if the helpful belessons at cause stuMasters do Teaching kids how to swim is like dents would not fit into teaching someone how to read; it is a end up cutting a student’s necessity. themselves off schedule. - LAURA DANFORTH from opportu“I think nities if they it is a weren’t able great idea, to swim.” but at the Once Verssame time I have mixed feelings en has finished drafting the proabout it,” Head of School Matt posal, it will be officially discussed Ives said. “I would hate to see a with the Academic Committee and kid not graduate just because they more details will be worked out couldn’t swim, but I do agree that from there. it is a safety issue.” For now, the coaches are just exIves also asked his advisees cited to see the development of the their opinion and they all agreed swim team and for the swim proit was a fine idea considering it grams begin.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.