The Price of Taste
he Price of Taste hopes to chronical the correlation between the cost of food juxtaposed with its size, the mood it inspires, & its taste. The process used to reveal these desperate truths was a series of decadent & depraved scientific experiments. The scientific method was not limited to moral human treatment nor confined to what exists outside the realms of torture. Our actions will no doubt
be justified in time when these truths become self evident and proof that all men are created equal in their hunger and their cognitive conception of reasonable cost. Unfortunately, due to the volative nature of this research, our lab was ransacked by agents working for Willem De Kooning, stealing most of our data. In lieu of coherent fact we have replaced it with imagination. The inforgraph below explains in depth...
COST ANALYSIS in relation to TRUTH.
COST in relation to SIZE.
The comparison of COST in relation to SIZE reveals a direct relationship between the two variables. This is because the correlation holds a constant of quantity increasing with cost. The studies have shown that if one was to pay more then one would always, in all scenarios, get more. We found this to be a shocking revelation because it was the negation of opinion
from what popular slogans had propogated - from the likes of MdDonalds and company. We have also stumbled upon a correlation between SIZE and HEALTH which dictates that the large size meals lead to intensiďŹ ed health risk. An infograph below explains the inuence of large size meals in relation to health, which compromises the simple logic of assuming more is better.
LARGE SIZE in relation to HEALTH.
COST in relation to MOOD.
Considering COST in relation to MOOD one discovers an inverse relationship between the two. Which suggests that the less one spends the better a mood they will be in. Which coincides with concerns of frugality. However the negation of this study has also been researched and one finds that under inadequate conditions the reverse is true. If one observes the spending of someone during
discourse altered than usual means of self preservation, take a date for instance, they wil observe again a direct relationship between COST and MOOD. However this study has been criticized as being overtly sexist and materialistic, as it assumes a woman might be impressed if a man spends more on a date. This is why the negation should be taken with a grain of salt. It is quite volatile.
Negation.
COST in relation to TASTE. The pinaccle of our study was when comparing COST and TASTE. In this scenario you also encounter a direct relationship between the two. Which leads us to believe that the more you spend the better your food will taste. The research seems to suggest this is a constant with all eating situations, however the tests were limited only up to $20. Any spending correlations with taste above this dollar amount
are inconclusive at the moment, though many of our top scientists have suggested they fall into the realm of superous spending. Mark Rothko, the great 19th century king of Tanzania, suggested that meager meals of Chinese food were adequate to live off of and one need not spend any higher than $20. In that respect we so no need to further the research but to rely on hear-say, the most reliable form of research.
units: YUMs
YUMS scale correlated towards MOOD
Relativity of TASTE paradigm. In accord with United States law we are required to mention the relativity of such a study concerning TASTE. This study enters into the subjective realms of opinion in regards to reacting to human
senses. Thus we must divulge this research to be inconclusive and not applicable to self beneďŹ t. We encourage those interested to use it as a suggestion for their next meal, but nothing more.
Š 2011 Maximillian Piras www.MPiras.com