Emerydocument

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 1 of 15

BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 United States Attorney District of Oregon NATHAN J. LICHVARCIK Assistant United States Attorney Nathan.J.Lichvarcik@usdoj.gov 405 East 8th Avenue, Suite 2400 Eugene, Oregon 97401-2708 Telephone: (541) 465-6771 Facsimile: (541) 465-6917 Attorneys for the United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v.

Case No. 6:16-mj-00056-JR GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR RELEASE

MICHAEL RAY EMRY, Defendant. ____________________________________

The United States of America, by and through Billy J. Williams, United States Attorney for the District of Oregon, and Nathan J. Lichvarcik, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby submits this opposition to the motion for release filed by defendant Michael Emry, and asks that Defendant remain detained.

I.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The factual background is set forth in detail in the affidavits for the complaint and search warrant, and those facts are hereby incorporated by reference.

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

II.

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 2 of 15

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

After being charged by criminal complaint, on May 24, 2016, the Court held a detention hearing, heard arguments from both parties, carefully analyzed the detention factors as they applied to Defendant’s case, and concluded there are no conditions that will reasonably assure the safety of the community.

Less than two months later, Defendant has now renewed his request for release, proposing that he be allowed to work as a welder and fabricator while living in a trailer in Crescent, Oregon. At bottom, there has not been a substantial change in circumstances that should cause the Court to feel any more comfortable about Defendant’s pretrial release.

III. A.

APPLICABLE LAW

Rules of Evidence Do Not Apply at a Detention Hearing

The Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply in pretrial detention proceedings.

Fed. R. Evid. 1101(d)(3); 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). Accordingly, both the government and the defense may present evidence by proffer or hearsay. United States v. Winsor, 785 F.2d 755, 756 (9th Cir. 1986); see also United States v. Bibbs, 488 F.Supp.2d 925, 925 26 (N.D. Cal. 2007).

B.

Standards

Under the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142, et seq., which governs the detention of a defendant pending trial, the Court shall order a defendant detained if, after a hearing, it finds that “no condition or combination of conditions will GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 2 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 3 of 15

reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of any other person and the community.” 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e). Detention is appropriate where a defendant is either a flight risk or a danger to the community. It is not necessary to prove both. See United States v. Motamedi, 767 F.2d 1403, 1406 (9th Cir. 1985); United States v. Kouyoumdijan, 601 F. Supp. 1506, 1508-10 (C.D. Cal. 1985). The United States bears the burden of establishing danger to the community by clear and convincing evidence; risk of flight need only be proved by a preponderance of the evidence. United States v. Aitken, 898 F.2d 104, 107 (9th Cir. 1990); Winsor, 785 F.2d at 757.

In determining whether pretrial detention is appropriate, the court should consider four factors: (1) the nature and circumstances of the offense charged; (2) the weight of the evidence against the defendant; (3) the history and characteristics of the defendant, including the person's character, physical and mental condition, family and community ties, employment, financial resources, past criminal conduct, and history relating to drug or alcohol abuse; and (4) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the defendant's release. United States v. Hir, 517 F.3d 1081, 1086 (9th Cir. 2008); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g).

IV.

DISCUSSION

As found by the Court at the last detention hearing, the § 3142(g) factors pointed, and still point, in one direction – detention.

GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 3 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 4 of 15

1. Nature and Circumstances of the Offense In the world of federal gun possession crimes, possessing an unregistered .50 caliber machine gun is among the most serious and dangerous. This is a gun with military, war-time capabilities. By Defendant’s own admissions, this machine gun could fire 550-650 rounds a minute. In the hands of someone with bad intentions, that many rounds of .50 caliber ammunition – as depicted by the representative .50 caliber round at the far left in the photo below – could be devastating.

There are several facts of this case that ratchet the seriousness and dangerousness of this offense to higher levels: GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 4 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 5 of 15

(1) Defendant admitted he stole the .50 caliber machine gun from a man in Idaho. This man in Idaho confirmed the same and valued the machine gun at approximately $25,000.00.

(2) Defendant admitted he transported the machine gun from Idaho to Oregon earlier this year (which constitutes a separate potential criminal charge pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 5861(j)).

(3) Defendant admitted that prior to bringing the machine gun to Oregon, he obliterated the serial number, as depicted in the photograph below. This act rendered the firearm either untraceable or significantly harder to trace.

(4) Defendant’s move from Idaho to Oregon coincided with the armed occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge (“MNWR”) in Harney County, GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 5 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 6 of 15

Oregon. In fact, on the day of the execution of the search warrant, Defendant admitted to agents that he traveled from Idaho to Oregon in late December 2015 in a van loaned to him by Ammon Bundy, one of the leaders of the armed occupation of the Refuge. Upon arrival in Oregon, Defendant stayed in a house in Burns, Oregon with Ammon Bundy, Ryan Payne, and other militants. 1 (5) On January 11, 2016, a Deschutes County Sheriff’s Deputy reported that Defendant approached a checkpoint at the Tactical Operations Center at the Burns, Oregon airport and told the Deputy that there was a .50 caliber belt-fed machine gun on the refuge. Law enforcement perceived Defendant’s statement regarding the .50 caliber machine gun as an attempt to intimidate them.

(6) According to the cooperating witness in this case, Defendant stated he wanted to take the .50 caliber machine gun onto the MNWR during the occupation but he could not because of the law enforcement presence. The cooperating witness also relayed that Defendant has a large arsenal of weapons, access to grenades, // // // // // Ammon Bundy and Ryan Payne are two of the defendants charged in the criminal case involving the armed occupation of the MNWR, U.S. District Court of Oregon Case No. 3:16-CR-00051.

1

GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 6 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 7 of 15

spoke about shooting police officers and how a bullet from the .50 caliber machine gun would penetrate the side of a police car and a Kevlar vest. 2 Independent of the cooperating witness in this case, a second unrelated confidential source (“CS”) relayed in late May 2016 that he/she was glad that law enforcement seized the .50 caliber machine gun. According to this CS, one of the occupants of the MNWR, Darryl Thorn, had talked about the .50 caliber machine gun, wanted another occupant to help retrieve it from Defendant, and asked for training on how to use the .50 caliber rifle. 3 (7) Just prior to the execution of the search warrant to seize the machine gun, Defendant was in negotiations to sell the machine gun in Oregon to a person Defendant had been told was a felon and the captain of a Texas militia group (this person was in fact an undercover law enforcement officer). // // //

As was made clear in the search warrant affidavit and at the last detention hearing, this cooperating witness has been dishonest and unreliable in the past, and carries significant baggage. However, the cooperating witness proved correct when he/she said Defendant was in possession of a .50 caliber machine gun. And prior to executing the search warrant, FBI agents were able to listen to separate recorded calls of Defendant discussing, and expressing his desire to sell, his .50 caliber machine gun.

2

Darryl Thorn is one of the defendants charged in the criminal case involving the armed occupation of the MNWR, U.S. District Court of Oregon Case No. 3:16-CR00051.

3

GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 7 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 8 of 15

(8) Defendant, contemporaneously with his possession of the machine gun, possessed a belt of blank .50 caliber shells as depicted in the photograph below.

// // // // // // // GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 8 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 9 of 15

(9) At the same time he illegally possessed the machine gun, Defendant illegally possessed a destructive device – specifically, a blasting cap which is a detonator for a bomb – as depicted in the photograph below (which constitutes a separate potential criminal charge pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d)).

(10) Defendant contemporaneously possessed the parts to manufacture yet another machine gun.

2. Weight of the Evidence The weight of the evidence is strong and again points in favor of detention.

There are recorded conversations, made prior to the seizure of the gun and Defendant’s arrest, of Defendant discussing the .50 caliber rifle and how it’s fully GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 9 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 10 of 15

automatic. Defendant confessed to federal agents multiple times about how he stole the machine gun in Idaho, obliterated the serial number, brought it to Oregon, and knew he had broken the law. And he confessed to the crimes in recorded jail calls post-arrest.

3. History and Characteristics of the Defendant This factor too weighs in favor of detention. While Defendant is quick to emphasize his age, marital status, highly regarded skills as a gunsmith, and lack of significant criminal history, he neglects, for good reason, to mention his history of illegally making a bomb out of C-4 and a silencer for a drug dealer to kill potential witnesses. Defendant’s bomb had the potential to blow up a room three times the size of a federal courtroom and “put a couple foot crater in the center of the area and blow every single wall out and just turn it into cinder.” Govt. Ex. 1 at 1793 (Defendant’s 2004 trial testimony in United States v. Kenneth Kimball, et al, U.S. District Court, Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, Criminal Case No. 3:02-CR-00053, Doc. 558). Defendant further testified that he was “not very proud of this, I should have better discretion, should never have got myself involved with it,” and knew that the bomb he made “could cause great harm” and was “highly, highly illegal.” Id. at 1790-91.

Nor does Defendant mention that in the past he illegally “built upwards of 66 machine guns, belt fed” for a friend’s weapons locker in case there was a civil revolt, and that this friend he armed with 66 machine guns became increasingly “paranoid GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 10 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 11 of 15

and radical.” Govt. Ex. 1 at pp. 1784-85. Or how Defendant had also received detonators for bombs from this person. Id. at 1784.

All told, if anyone was attuned to the illegality and seriousness of these types of offenses, it was Defendant, as highlighted in the following exchange from his 2004 trial testimony: QUESTION:

You were aware that you possibly were looking at a mandatory 30-year sentence if a bomb was used in a violent offense?

EMRY:

Yes, sir.

QUESTION:

And you knew that a bomb and a silencer was used, two items, in separate events, it was a mandatory life sentence, sir, did you know that?

EMRY:

I didn’t know anything about that.

QUESTION:

You didn’t know?

EMRY:

I knew it was a maximum heavy sentence and you might as well spend the rest of your life in jail.

Govt. Ex. 1 at p. 1830.

Years ago he was caught, avoided prison, had a chance to learn his lesson and live a life free of illegal weaponry. He either did not take that lesson to heart or simply does not care – and the fact that he has continued to engage in similar conduct tells the Court he may not be trusted to abide by Court ordered conditions.

As a final point on this detention factor, Defendant does not have deep-seated ties to Oregon or a history of steady employment here, which poses a risk of flight.

GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 11 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 12 of 15

He only recently relocated to Oregon from Idaho, living in a moveable trailer and bringing with him a dangerous, illegal weapon in the process.

4. Nature and Seriousness of the Danger to the Community A man with a history of making a bomb and silencer for a drug dealer to kill witnesses, and manufacturing 66 machine guns for another person in preparation for a civil revolt – who then brings a .50 caliber machine gun to our state during a time of unrest and then negotiates to sell it to someone purporting to be a felon and the captain of a militia – poses a serious danger to the community. Defendant has now accumulated a large enough track record when it comes to these types of offenses that he can no longer be trusted to cease his illegal behavior.

Several more portions of Defendant’s 2004 testimony should be noted, as they shed light on Defendant’s mindset when he brought the .50 caliber machine gun to Oregon earlier this year: (a) When asked about how Defendant seemed cavalier about having made an illegal bomb, machine guns and a silencer, the following exchange occurred: EMRY:

Okay. It’s not a past-time. It’s just a due responsibility for every citizen to protect our very nation against any enemies, foreign and domestic. Unfortunately, our leaders are progressively putting us into a police state that no one wants.

QUESTION:

And everybody needs to get themselves together to protect themselves, right?

EMRY:

No, I think we should try to do it politically. But unfortunately our political measures and the deeds in

GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 12 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 13 of 15

court aren’t justified enough to get it done. And so I hope that it never comes to that day.

QUESTION:

So we need to get ourselves prepared with weapons?

EMRY:

Unfortunately, the only thing you’re going to stop a bullet with is through brute force, and that’s the only thing the history of this world has ever changed anything.

.........

QUESTION:

You were doing nothing illegal at the time in your mind?

EMRY:

The only thing I did illegal, and I think that I did wrong in my own mind was if you’re talking about the course of the laws and things that we say are illegal in our courts, yes, I did. The explosive’s illegal. Our Constitution guarantees the firearms.

QUESTION:

Our government is wrong right now, right about guns?

EMRY:

Unfortunately they are, but we’re going to have to fight through the courts and get our Congress to understand that the nature--

QUESTION:

You believe it’s appropriate to circumvent the law and nake (sic) the guns that you wish to protect this great nation?

EMRY:

I believe that unfortunately there’s been examples and women and children are going the (sic) die because of these examples, and that’s been like Waco and Ruby Ridge and, you know, all of these people have died standing for their principles.

Govt. Ex. 1 at pp. 1813-15. (b) Defendant then expressed that Timothy McVeigh was a loose cannon, and that he did not want a repeat incident of what Timothy McVeigh did “because in my book he wasn’t concise.” Govt. Ex. 1 at 1815. This exchange then occurred: GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 13 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 14 of 15

EMRY:

This is what we call a soft war. This isn’t a war to go out and start shooting people. Lord forbid I ever have to pull a gun on a law enforcement officer that’s got a family and everything else.

QUESTION:

But you may have to?

EMRY:

I may have to if they start breaking the Constitution and the oaths that they upheld. It strictly states in our constitutional law that we are to purge our government if they become out of control.

Govt. Ex. 1 at pp. 1815-16. (c) Defendant succinctly explained his ability when it came to manufacturing weapons: “Again, I have a natural aptitude for this stuff. Nobody has ever trained me on any of this stuff. Probably known as one of the top guys in the country to build guns that were cut from scratch. I don’t know why I have the aptitude but I do.” Govt. Ex. 1 at 1794.

Lurking behind this case is witness safety as well. After being arrested, Defendant spent time on the phone talking to different people about who he believes the confidential witness is, and he’s gone so far as to say, “He ain’t going to escape this one.” And sure enough, according to the cooperating witness, he/she has received several phone calls since Defendant’s arrest – a number of them were simply hang-ups, but at least one stated something to the effect of “We know where you are.” // // GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR

Page 14 of 15

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14

Filed 07/13/16

Page 15 of 15

The quantity and significance of the anonymous threats have increased since the last detention hearing – with people telling the cooperating witness things such as “PHW we are coming for you” and “you are going to die.” 4 V.

CONCLUSION

Detention is just as appropriate today as it was on May 24, 2016, and the United States requests that Defendant remain detained pending trial.

Dated this 13th day of July 2016.

Respectfully submitted, BILLY J. WILLIAMS United States Attorney s/ Nathan J. Lichvarcik NATHAN J. LICHVARCIK Assistant United States Attorney

According to the cooperating witness, PHW stands for Pale Horse Warning, a reference to death riding on a pale horse, and is a type of threat that originated with an unsavory group in the past. The cooperating witness believes that the PHW reference signifies that the threat is legitimate.

GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO RELEASE MOTION United States v. Emry, 6:16-mj-00056-JR Page 15 of 15 4

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 1 of 76

GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT

1

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 62 of 281 PageID #: 2755

6:16-MJ-00056-JR

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 2 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 2

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 63 of 281 PageID #: 2756

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 3 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 3

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 64 of 281 PageID #: 2757

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 4 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 4

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 65 of 281 PageID #: 2758

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 5 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 5

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 66 of 281 PageID #: 2759

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 6 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 6

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 67 of 281 PageID #: 2760

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 7 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 7

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 68 of 281 PageID #: 2761

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 8 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 8

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 69 of 281 PageID #: 2762

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 9 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 9

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 70 of 281 PageID #: 2763

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 10 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 10

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 71 of 281 PageID #: 2764

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 11 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 11

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 72 of 281 PageID #: 2765

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 12 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 12

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 73 of 281 PageID #: 2766

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 13 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 13

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 74 of 281 PageID #: 2767

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 14 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 14

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 75 of 281 PageID #: 2768

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 15 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 15

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 76 of 281 PageID #: 2769

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 16 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 16

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 77 of 281 PageID #: 2770

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 17 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 17

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 78 of 281 PageID #: 2771

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 18 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 18

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 79 of 281 PageID #: 2772

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 19 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 19

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 80 of 281 PageID #: 2773

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 20 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 20

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 81 of 281 PageID #: 2774

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 21 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 21

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 82 of 281 PageID #: 2775

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 22 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 22

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 83 of 281 PageID #: 2776

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 23 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 23

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 84 of 281 PageID #: 2777

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 24 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 24

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 85 of 281 PageID #: 2778

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 25 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 25

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 86 of 281 PageID #: 2779

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 26 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 26

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 87 of 281 PageID #: 2780

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 27 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 27

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 88 of 281 PageID #: 2781

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 28 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 28

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 89 of 281 PageID #: 2782

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 29 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 29

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 90 of 281 PageID #: 2783

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 30 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 30

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 91 of 281 PageID #: 2784

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 31 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 31

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 92 of 281 PageID #: 2785

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 32 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 32

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 93 of 281 PageID #: 2786

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 33 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 33

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 94 of 281 PageID #: 2787

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 34 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 34

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 95 of 281 PageID #: 2788

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 35 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 35

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 96 of 281 PageID #: 2789

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 36 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 36

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 97 of 281 PageID #: 2790

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 37 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 37

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 98 of 281 PageID #: 2791

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 38 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 38

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 99 of 281 PageID #: 2792

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 39 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 39

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 100 of 281 PageID #: 2793

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 40 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 40

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 101 of 281 PageID #: 2794

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 41 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 41

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 102 of 281 PageID #: 2795

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 42 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 42

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 103 of 281 PageID #: 2796

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 43 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 43

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 104 of 281 PageID #: 2797

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 44 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 44

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 105 of 281 PageID #: 2798

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 45 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 45

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 106 of 281 PageID #: 2799

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 46 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 46

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 107 of 281 PageID #: 2800

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 47 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 47

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 108 of 281 PageID #: 2801

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 48 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 48

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 109 of 281 PageID #: 2802

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 49 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 49

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 110 of 281 PageID #: 2803

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 50 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 50

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 111 of 281 PageID #: 2804

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 51 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 51

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 112 of 281 PageID #: 2805

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 52 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 52

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 113 of 281 PageID #: 2806

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 53 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 53

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 114 of 281 PageID #: 2807

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 54 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 54

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 115 of 281 PageID #: 2808

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 55 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 55

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 116 of 281 PageID #: 2809

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 56 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 56

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 117 of 281 PageID #: 2810

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 57 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 57

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 118 of 281 PageID #: 2811

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 58 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 58

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 119 of 281 PageID #: 2812

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 59 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 59

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 120 of 281 PageID #: 2813

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 60 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 60

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 121 of 281 PageID #: 2814

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 61 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 61

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 122 of 281 PageID #: 2815

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 62 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 62

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 123 of 281 PageID #: 2816

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 63 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 63

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 124 of 281 PageID #: 2817

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 64 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 64

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 125 of 281 PageID #: 2818

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 65 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 65

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 126 of 281 PageID #: 2819

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 66 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 66

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 127 of 281 PageID #: 2820

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 67 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 67

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 128 of 281 PageID #: 2821

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 68 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 68

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 129 of 281 PageID #: 2822

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 69 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 69

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 130 of 281 PageID #: 2823

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 70 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 70

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 131 of 281 PageID #: 2824

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 71 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 71

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 132 of 281 PageID #: 2825

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 72 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 72

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 133 of 281 PageID #: 2826

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 73 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 73

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 134 of 281 PageID #: 2827

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 74 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 74

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 135 of 281 PageID #: 2828

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 75 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 75

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 136 of 281 PageID #: 2829

Case 6:17-cr-00005-AA

Document 14-1

Filed 07/13/16

Page 76 of 76

Gov't Exhibit 1, Page 76

Case 3:02-cr-00053 Document 558 Filed 06/21/04 Page 137 of 281 PageID #: 2830