The McGill Tribune TUesday, March 8, 2016 curiosity delivers
Volume No. 35 Issue No. 21
Editorial: more formal co-curricular record must become more inclusive
feature: Diversity Unravelled—student perspectives on race at M c Gill
pg. 05
pg. 08 - 09
m c gilltribune.com @m c gilltribune
Exploring the World of math Clare Lyle Staff Writer
McGill’s only sketch comedy group delivers lots of laughs. (Selin Altuntur / McGill Tribune)
Bring your own juice is serious about silliness Gendered policies must avoid crossing line into paternalism Emma Avery Contributor Part of working towards true gender equality, whatever that looks like, is creating policies to help dismantle institutional practices that give men an advantage over women. This can be a controversial and contentious process, but is necessary in eliminating subconscious, institutionalized sexism. The challenge, however, is that in working towards gender equality, society cannot just
simply say that women get exactly the same policies as men: Women and men are inherently different biologically, and always will be. This may be stating the obvious, but it means that in some cases, different policies are required for different genders. This is the fine line between equality and paternalism. Historically, gendered policies often meant paternalism. Women couldn’t vote, own property, or hold certain jobs, to name a few. Today, these lines are being drawn in new
policy arenas, such as healthcare. In light of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) recent recommendation that all women not on birth control should not consume alcohol, and a UK company’s recent decision to pioneer a “period policy,” it is apparent that certain solutions venture too far into the field of a woman’s personal discretion. While perhaps well-intentioned, the CDC’s recommendation stirred resentment about paternal-
istic undertones for implying that women couldn’t make such decisions for themselves. If the recommendations had been framed differently, such as by outlining risks in detail so that women would be able to make informed decisions for themselves, there might not have been such backlash. But when a gendered policy is framed in a way that leaves a woman’s personal discretion out of the picture, it feels much more like paternalism than a friendly PSA.
The fast-paced world of finance has always been filled with big numbers. Astronomical numbers. Mind-bogglingly huge numbers that inspire the question: How does this much money even exist? Investors turned to mathematicians for help answering this question. Thus, quantitative finance was born. Simply, quantitative finance is a math-intensive subfield that lets investment firms use computational methods to gain insight into markets. Sebastian Dragnea is a McGill alumnus currently working as a quantitative analyst, known as a ‘quant,’ at Morgan Stanley, an investment banking firm. He graduated from McGill in 2014 with a joint honours degree in Mathematics and Computer Science. The decision to enter quantitative finance was, for him, natural. “I liked both sides [of the program],” Dragnea explained. “I enjoyed programming and I enjoyed the math [....] So I wanted a job that combined both of those and the best field I found that combined [them] was quantitative finance. What I found at Morgan Stanley was that I was doing a lot of programming, but also doing math, and also applying a third field of finance, which involved different ways of looking at data.”
PG. 12
PG. 05
McGill Principal Suzanne Fortier responds to failed BDS motion Alumni express hesitation with regards to donating in future Laura Hanrahan News Editor The passage of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) motion at the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) Winter 2016 General Assembly (GA), and its subsequent failure in an online ratification period, has garnered a variety of reactions among the McGill community—including the administration’s condemnation of the
university’s participation in the BDS movement. The motion, brought forward by petition and initially passed at the GA, proposed a mandate for SSMU to support campaigns associated with the BDS movement through the office of the vice-president (VP) External, and specifically outlined a need to divest from corporations the supporters of the movement considered complicit in the occupation of the Palestinian territories.
McGill Principal Suzanne Fortier released a statement following the release of the online ratification results, explaining the university’s position on the BDS movement. “The BDS movement, which among other things, calls for universities to cut ties with Israeli universities, flies in the face of the tolerance and respect we cherish as values fundamental to a university,” Fortier wrote. “It proposes actions that are contrary to the principles
of academic freedom, equity, inclusiveness and the exchange of views and ideas in responsible, open discourse.” Laura Khoury, U2 Engineering, an organizer of McGill BDS Action Network—the group responsible for bringing the motion forward—expressed dismay with Fortier’s letter. “It was extremely disappointing to see Principal Fortier, through her statement, delegitimize the voices of more than 2,000 students without
attempting to understand their concerns,” Khoury wrote in an email to the Tribune. The motion specifically referenced McGill’s investments in companies operating in Israeli settlements, including Mizrahi-Tefahot Bank and Re/Max real estate. Principal Fortier’s statement did not address those investments, focusing rather on the implications of divesting from Israeli universities. PG. 04