McGill Tribune Vol. 35, Issue 22

Page 1

The McGill Tribune TUesday, March 15, 2016 curiosity delivers

Volume No. 35 Issue No. 22

Editorial: winter 2016 ssmu referendum endorsements

SSMU Executive Candidate Profiles and Endorsements

pg. 04

pg. 09 - 12

m c gilltribune.com @m c gilltribune

Winter 2016 SSMU Rererendum questions Sara Cullen Staff Writer Every semester, the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) hosts a referendum period where students can put forth and debate motions that impact SSMU and McGill as a whole. Read on to learn more about the 10 motions that will be up for voting this semester.

The Motion Regarding the Bicycle Facility Plebiscite Question

The Martlets and Redmen put on a show in front of record crowds. (Mayaz Alam / McGill Tribune)

Martlets, Redmen win Rseq championships

PG. 19

State of the SSMUnion: The fate of the General Assembly Morgan Alexander Managing Editor The Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) held its annual Winter General Assembly (GA) on Feb. 22, hosting roughly 900 students within the SSMU Building for a six-hour debate over multiple different issues. The GA was a dramatically different showing than the Fall 2015 GA, which, due to a lack of controversial agenda items, failed

to reach quorum. This prompted SSMU President Kareem Ibrahim to make a simple and effective argument: Dismantle the bi-annual GA system, and replace it with one annual general meeting. Over the past few years, the GA has faced wavering student interest due to lack of consistency in the controversy of the motions and, in some cases, poor promotion on behalf of SSMU. The variation in student attendance just in the past three years is striking:

The Fall 2013 GA reached a maximum attendance of 50 students, while the Winter 2014 GA maintained quorum through all but one motion. The next two GAs saw an attendance of 739 and 550 students respectively, far surpassing the number of students required to meet quorum due to the contentious nature of the motions brought forward, both regarding the situation in Palestine. The inability of this meeting to fulfill its democratic purpose unless emo-

tional and personal controversies are brought forward illustrates its ineffective nature at actually addressing needs relevant to students’ day-to-day lives. SSMU Vice-President (VP) Finance & Operations Zacheriah Houston noted how, in addition to inconsistent attendance rates, figuring out where to host the GA every semester presents its own challenges.

PG. 06

Design in a university context The ethical implications of McGill’s iconography Evelyn Goessling Staff Writer The world is saturated with imagery that dictates ideologies. Brand loyalty cultivated by familiar icons affects cultural, political, and individual identity. “There’s a reason that Coca Cola has barely changed its logo in 120 years,” Christopher Moore, professor of Design and Computation

Arts at Concordia University said. “It gives a sense of establishment, and establishment can lead to trust and familiarity.” For good or for bad, over hundreds of years these organizations have built up a lexicon of associations to particular shapes and colours that now influence how we act as a society. Maybe your family has voted conservative in every election for 100 years, or maybe you wouldn’t

dream of using a Canon camera over a Nikon. These preferences, although sometimes arbitrary, are a result of many years and hundreds of thousands of dollars put into creating brand loyalty. Graphic designers are essential in creating this relationship. “We tend to have lifelong associations with brands based on how we were raised and the kind of products that our family would purchase,” Moore explained.

“The designer has to interpret [an organization’s] ideas into something concrete.” This task becomes quite complex, as the graphic designer’s toolbox (line, color, shape, contrast, etc.) is inherently influenced by power structures that have been evolving and compounding over hundreds, and even thousands, of years.

PG. 15

This plebiscite question has been proposed in order to address the lack of bicycle parking on campus and aims to create a secure bicycle parking facility. The facility will be located in the basement of the Shatner Building with the partnership of the University. “This secure bicycle parking and access to shower and locker facilities would be available to students and McGill community members with the purchase of a per-semester membership, much like the McGill Fitness Centre,” reads the motion. If this question passes, the construction of the facility will be explored by the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU).

The Motion Regarding the Creation of a Club Fund Fee

This motion proposes a fee to finance the SSMU Club Fund. “The creation of a dedicated fee to fund the Club Fund would ensure a secure source of [financial support] to student groups and would double the available funding for clubs to foster student life on campus,” the motion reads. The Club Fund currently supports over 240 clubs and is allocated approximately $25,000 per semester, according to the motion. The proposed motion would create a question on the Winter 2016 referendum that proposes an opt-outable fee of $2.75 per student per semester in order to come closer to the $117,369.48 that was requested by clubs in the Fall 2015 semester.

PG. 03


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.