EDITORIAL
Tuesday, January 27, 2015 Volume No. 34 Issue No. 16
Balancing peer support and inclusivity essential for progress pg. 7
@mcgilltribune
www.mcgilltribune.com
See inside for...
Track and field p. 21
Windy City for the win in AUTS’ Chicago Student production brings professionalism, sizzle, and sexuality
P
(Remi Lu / McGill Tribune)
Record-breaking weekend at McGill Team Challenge SUS retroactively runs fee referendum questions following confusion over constitution
T
JENNY SHEN Editor-in-Chief
he Science Undergraduate Society (SUS) is retroactively running two referendum questions regarding student fees that were collected in the January statement for all Science and Arts & Science students. The SUS Base Fee and the newly-introduced Student Space Improvement Fee (SCSS) were collected under the impression that their referendum questions had passed when students had
voted in November during the mislabeled Fall 2014 referendum, which was run instead under online ratification guidelines. The SUS executives initially brought the two fee questions as motions to the General Assembly (GA) held on Nov. 5, 2014. Because the GA failed to meet quorum, the GA results were presented to the SUS General Council (GC) as a consultative body, in accordance to Article 7.1 of the SUS general assembly bylaws. The GC then approved to
send the two fee questions into a referendum to be voted on by all Science and Arts & Science students. According to Zach Houston, Science representative to the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU), the confusion stemmed from the fact that the fee questions were sent out as “Fall referendum questions” yet operated under online ratification guidelines, which have a lower quorum requirement than referendum questions. Houston,
along with the SUS Speaker and CRO, determined that quorum had not been met for the fee questions following the Dec. 4 SSMU Council meeting when Houston was asked by Council about voter turnout at the GA. However, this occurred after SUS executives had already submitted the results to Ollivier Dyens, deputy provost (Student Life and Learning) (DPSLL).
Continued on pg. 4
CHRIS LUTES Staff Writer
art of the thrill that comes from live musical theatre is knowing that something could go wrong at any moment. The best theatre uses this suspense to its advantage, radiating a sense of jubilant spontaneity that wriggles its way into the audience’s hearts and leaves them humming the songs on the walk home. The Arts Undergraduate Theatre Society’s (AUTS) production of the 1975 musical, Chicago , fits this description with a top-notch cast and production value to match. Set almost entirely inside a 1920s jazz bar “where the gin is cold and the piano’s hot,” Chicago tells the story of Roxie Hart—a young, resourceful singer who is sent to prison after murdering her philandering lover. Roxie is introduced to an ensemble of murderous women and a media-savvy lawyer who takes a special interest in her case. As her murder case becomes famous, Roxie begins to angle for a place in the spotlight while faking her innocence in order to avoid the death penalty.
Continued on pg. 14