McGill Tribune Vol. 33 Issue 18

Page 1

Volume No. 33 Issue No. 18

TRIBUNE THE mcgill Px

Published by the Tribune Publication Society

CURIOSITY DELIVERS

Considering your impact The nuances of international volunteerism P10

The bibeau years basketball siblings reflect on legacy p 17

@mcgilltribune ­ • www.mcgilltribune.com ­

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Students debate freedom of dress in SSMU Building at Winter GA See inside for...

Story P 4

The General Assembly met quorum for three of the four motions debated at council. (Alexandra Allaire / McGill Tribune)

Conference on fossil fuels interrupted by occupation protesting lack of representation Divest McGill demonstrators support occupiers; conference organizer defends choice of speakers Jessica Fu News Editor McGill’s Petrocultures 2014 conference faced criticism last Friday, when participants were forced to relocate following an occupation of the Faculty Club by a group called “LockOut Petrocultures.” Later that day, student campaign group Divest McGill demonstrated outside the conference as well. At 8:00 a.m., approximately 30 members of the Montreal community group occupied the Faculty Club, interrupting nearly one and a half hours of the conference. Due to the occupation, the conference was temporarily relocated to Redpath Hall. Mona Luxion, an Urban Planning Ph.D. candidate and media relations officer for LockOut Petrocultures, said that the group planned the disruption to question the effectiveness of the

conference. “Staging a debate [where] fossil fuel company executives have equal say as potential critics is reinforcing the status quo; it’s not moving us forward,” she said. “We really wanted to challenge this idea that this is a debate that should be happening, and really push towards concrete actions that gets [McGill] out of the business of fossil fuels.” Hosted by the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada (MISC), Petrocultures is an annual conference that draws participants from the arts, social sciences, sciences, and engineering from across Canada to speak on the consequences of reliance on fossil fuels and to discuss responsible alternatives. “Petrocultures 2014 will bring together leading figures to discuss and debate the role of oil and energy in shaping social, cultural, and political life in Canada at present and in the

future,” the conference program reads. “[The] event involv[es] a diverse group of speakers from across Canada.” Members of Divest McGill, a student campaign group against university investment in fossil fuel industries, attended the conference as participants but also expressed support for the occupiers. In the Divest McGill demonstration that same day, protestors chanted in support of divestment and invited members of the community to envision a future without reliance on fossil fuels. “[The conference] purport[s] to be really non-partisan, but in reality they had two hourlong sessions from people from oil companies or from energy boards, and had very clear, vested interests,” Bronwen Tucker, Divest McGill coordinator, said. “There was not a single grassroots Indigenous activist. They just didn’t do a proper job at representing the whole spectrum.”

However, William Straw— professor and director of the MISC—noted that 17 of the 26 speakers at the conference were activists. These included five people from Indigenous communities who work on the impact of fossil fuels, although two had to withdraw at the last minute due to personal reasons. “To the accusation that the conference offered a false ‘balance,’ I will simply point to the overwhelming representation of environmental activists,” Straw said. “To the accusation— made before the conference had begun—that we were going to debate ‘climate change’ as if it were an unsettled issue, I will note that no one at the conference, with the possible exception of [one attendee], challenged the reality of climate change.” Luxion said the occupation achieved their goals of critiquing and interrupting the conference. “I think we led people to

question the starting point [of the conference], in addition to actually having a material impact in terms of forcing the conference to move,” she said. Straw said that he was disappointed that attempts to communicate with the occupiers were ineffective. “We hoped to talk to the occupiers, and several participants […] made an effort to speak to them,” Straw said. “That wasn’t successful.” Straw maintained that he was pleased with the conference’s turnout this year, and that the protests would not impact future conferences. “Building a conference is a multi-month process of awaiting responses, last minute withdrawals, pressures from various quarters, and disappointments,” he said. “Given all this, I’m pleased with what we came up with.”


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.