Tribune The McGill
Published by the Tribune Publication Society Volume No. 31 Issue No. 22
Board of Governors Editorial Mass Effect 3 Spring fashion Jiro Dreams of Sushi Martlet & Redmen Soccer
4 6 9 12 14 17
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
record store guide (pages 10-11)
SSMU Elections results (see p. 2)
Allison Cooper celebrates her election as VP Clubs and Services 2012-2013. (Sam Reynolds / McGill Tribune)
Exceptional referendum to decide QPIRG’s existence Majority “yes” vote would enable QPIRG to renegotiate Memorandum of Agreement with administration Erica Friesen News Editor
The Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) will host an exceptional referendum period from April 10 to April 16, featuring a question regarding QPIRG’s existence and a question that would require motions passed at General Assemblies (GAs) to be ratified online via referendum. QPIRG’s Memorandum of Agreement (MoA), a document that determines the relationship between QPIRG and the administration, will
expire May 31, 2012. For QPIRG to be able to renew it, students must vote in favour of QPIRG’s existence in a referendum. Earlier this semester, the administration invalidated a referendum question posed by QPIRG in the fall, noting that the question did not follow the SSMU constitution because it asked students to support two separate issues in a single question —the existence of the organization and their student fees becoming non-optoutable online. Deputy Provost (Student Life and Learning) Morton Mendelson wrote in an email to the Tribune
that QPIRG developed their special referendum question in accordance with the suggestions of the administration. Rather than dealing with two issues, the new question will only ask students to support the existence of the organization. QPIRG’s student fee will remain opt-outable online. “The question being asked [by QPIRG] is based on a suggestion by the administration for a clear question on continuance, but there was some back-and-forth between the administration and QPIRG regarding the preamble,” he wrote. Although the winter referen-
dum period ended last week, the SSMU Constitution provides the provision for an exceptional referendum period when a motion for such a period is passed by a 2/3 majority in Council. Like regular referenda, quorum for this exceptional referenda will be 15 per cent of the student body. Following the invalidation of the fall referendum, QPIRG was in negotiations with the McGill administration throughout the beginning of the winter semester. The motion for a special referendum period was moved by four SSMU councilors, citing QPIRG’s situation as the main
reason for this exceptional period. “McGill notified QPIRG on the 8th of March, 2012, that they would not extend the current [MoA] until the Fall 2012 semester in order for QPIRG to reasonably obtain another referendum vote,” the motion reads. “This notification came after the Winter 2012 referendum period had already closed.” According to the motion, the administration suggested that an exceptional referendum period would be QPIRG’s “only option.” Mendelson wrote that it is necessary for QPIRG to go to refSee “EXCEPTIONAL” on page 2