S e l l in
g
Y
o ur self fo r
Sc
h o o l
Kris Michaud | 1 3
E
l
V
ez
: T
he
K
in g
L
Trevor Davis | 2 2
iv e s
VOLUME 18 ISSUE 3 T u e s d a y , 15 S e p t e m b e r 1 9 9 8
O N L IN E
P u b lish e d bv the S tu d e n ts’ S o cie ty of M c G ill U n iv e r s it y
httn ://w \vw .trib u n e.m o n treal.q c.
O r g a n ic fo o d s to r e fa c e s s e tb a c k B y C h r is t in e P r it c h a r d
T he legitim acy o f last sp rin g ’s referendum on the establishm en t o f a c o -o p o rg an ic fo o d store in th e M cG ill ghetto has b een challen g ed by M c G ill’s a d m in istra tio n , le a v ing som e pro ject o rganizers q u e s tio n i n g th e in te g r ity o f s tu d e n t dem ocracy and its practice. D u rin g a M a rc h referen d u m , s tu d e n ts v o te d o n a p ro p o se d $2 in c re a s e in s tu d e n t s o c ie ty fe e s w h ic h w o u ld g o t o w a r d s an “ a ffo rd a b le n o t-fo r-p ro fit org an ic food store to provide students w ith a so cial and environm ental altern a tiv e to c o n v e n tio n a l s u p e r m a r k ets.” T he referendum passed w ith a 6 2 .3 p e r ce n t m a jo rity , b u t th is vote o f support w as only a p relim i nary step in gaining adm inistrative approval. A c c o rd in g to R u s se ll U n g er, the initial co -o rd in ato r fo r M cG ill S tu d ents for O rganic Food, “ [The referendum ] essen tially asked stu d e n ts fo r a m a n d a te to ap p ro a c h the u niversity.” U n g e r b e lie v e s th a t s tu d e n t approval o f the organic food store i l l u s t r a t e d th e s t u d e n t b o d y ’ s en th u siasm for its proposed estab lish m en t. In th eo ry , th is m a n d ate should have prom pted the adm in is tration to support the organic food sto re and given the M S O F access to the fee increase requested.
A legal o v ers ig h t N e v e rth e le s s , D ean of S tudents R osalie Ju k ier w ould not a c c e p t th e M S O F as a le g itim a te body to collect funds from students because it is not an accredited stu dent organization. “ M c G ill a b id e s b y th e A c t R e sp ec tin g the A c c re d ita tio n and F in a n c i n g of S tu d e n t A sso ciations,” she stated. “I could n o t p u t this [referendum ] th ro u g h b e c a u s e it d id n o t m eet th e le g al and constitutional req u irem en ts.” A ccording to the A ct, fees can
Sum o w re stlin g a t C am pu sF est — c o r p o r a te b a ttle f o r stu d e n t do lla rs.
SSMU hires controversial Quebec lawyer to take differential tuition case to next level B y St e p h a n ie L e v it z
T h e S t u d e n t s ’ S o c ie ty o f M cG ill U niversity has hired a new law yer to deal w ith the differential tu itio n case. Je an -G u y B ertrand, a p ro m in en t Q uebec C ity law y er best k n o w n fo r his w ork in a S u p rem e C ourt case o n unilateral succession, has b een retained by S SM U to try th e c a se b e fo re th e Q u eb e c C o u rt o f A ppeals. In June 1997, S S M U launched a la w s u it w h ic h c h a lle n g e d th e Q u eb e c g o v e rn m e n t’s d iffe re n tia l t u i t i o n f e e s p o lic y — a p o lic y w h ic h e ffe c tiv e ly d o u b le d tu itio n fo r o u t-o f-p ro v in c e stu d e n ts w ith an a d d itio n a l $ 4 0 fe e p e r c o u rse c r e d i t . T h e S t u d e n t s ’ S o c ie ty a r g u e d t h a t Q u e b e c E d u c a tio n M i n i s t e r P a u lin e M a r o is o v e r stepped her m inisterial role in cre
Continued on page 7
W M cG ill BOOKSTORE 3 4 2 0 M c T a v is h * 3 9 8 - 7 4 4 4
C h e c k m
o u t
e d ic a l
th e
a n d
Catherine Farquharson
ating the po licy , thereby ren d erin g it ille g a l. T h e se c o n d p a rt o f th e argum ent stated th at the policy w as d is c r i m in a to r y a n d v io la te d th e C a n a d ia n c o n s titu tio n . L a st F ebruary, h o w ev er, the courts ru led in fa v o u r o f th e Q u e b e c g o v e rn m e n t, l e a v i n g S S M U w ith th e op tio n o f appealing the decision. S S M U ’s legal dilem m as began in late Ju n e w hen V P E xternal Je ff F ein er m et w ith t.he S o cie ty ’s then cu rren t law yer, A ndré D urocher, to discuss the details o f ap p ealin g the c a s e . A c c o r d i n g to F e i n e r , D u ro c h e r sa id th a t th e re w e re no d ea d lin e s th a t n ee d ed to b e m e t in o rd e r fo r S S M U to p ro c e e d w ith th e case. H o w ev er, in July, F ein er d isc o v e re d th a t D u ro c h er h a d fo r gotten to m en tio n that there w as a d ea d lin e to su b m it th e fa c tu m fo r th e ap p e al. T h e fa c tu m is a c o m p en d iu m o f all the legal argum ents
C e le b r a te
Welcome Back!
n u r s in g
b o o k s
illia m s a n d
M e d ic a l D ic tio n a r y , s p e c ia lly
im
&
W
ilk in s
m e d ia !
B r in g
p r in t e d
w
ith
d is p la y in
th is
y o u r
o n a d
th e f o r
s c h o o l
a n d
I m
1 0 %
lo g o .
f lo o r
- y o u r
d i s c o u n t
a t th e
p r o v e d
c G ill B o o k s to r e
th ir d a
Continued on page 3
H o m e c o m in g
N e w M
L ip p in c o tt W
tim e, he ag reed to take the case if M cG ill w as dropped from the law suit. A ccording to Feiner, this w as not an option. “ W h e n w e w e n t b ac k to o u r corporate counsel and asked if this w as possible, they to ld us it w ould be d a n g e ro u s. If w e d ro p p e d M cG ill from the law suit, w e w ould be adm itting that w e d id n ’t hav e a case ag ain st M cG ill and the co u rt w o u ld b e lia b le to a s s e s s c o u r t costs ag ain st us, w hich w ould be a fairly hefty sum ,” F ein er said. W ith the extended deadline for su b m ittin g th e factu m , S ep te m b er 14 f a s t a p p ro a c h in g , S S M U w as le ft w ith v e ry little tim e to fin d th em selv es a law yer. F e in e r again sought the advice o f the law facul ty , a n d th is tim e w as d ire c te d to B e rtra n d . “ T h e q u o te th a t I g o t
that S SM U w ould use in th e appeal — the case could not proceed w ith o u t it. F r u s t r a t e d w ith D u r o c h e r , S SM U tran sferred the resp o n sib ili ty f o r th e c a s e to its c o r p o r a te counsel, John Feldm an. “ [Feldm an] h as b een o u r counsel fo r the last 27 y ears,” stated Feiner. “T ransferring th e c a s e to h im b o u g h t u s m o re tim e — it w ould b e silly to see the case ju s t d ie.” S w i tc h in g c o u n s e l g r a n te d S S M U an autom atic 60 day ex ten s io n , w h ic h w as e n o u g h tim e to fin d new leg al re p re se n ta tio n . O n th e ad v ice o f the M cG ill F aculty o f L aw , F e in e r so u g h t the assistan ce o f n o te d M c G ill p r o f e s s o r a n d law yer, Julius G rey. H ow ever, the f a c t th e S S M U h a d a ls o n a m e d M c G ill U n iv e rs ity in th e la w s u it c r e a te d a c o n f lic t o f in te r e s t fo r G rey. A fter stalling for q uite som e
# 1 o n
a n d
C a fe .
s o u r c e
f o r
S te d m a n 's
(offer valid /sept. 15-20)