r ib u n e
Published by the Tribune Publication Society Volume No. 31 Issue No. 16
lUesday, January 31, 2012
Nov. 10 police report Almas Jiwani Editorials Time-wasting websites Marc Tessier-Lavigne Atwater Poetry Project Pack the House
2 4 7 12 13 14 17
MIKE BABCOCK, PA C ES l o - n
SSM U suspends judicial Board, citing legal concerns II 1 ;UPte.fe#IB
1
9 B
V.! \
\
\
A
SSMU President Maggie Knight abstained from voting on the decision to suspend j-Board. On Jan. 19 she disclosed potential conflicts of interest with the case. (Elisha Lerner / McGill Tribune) By Carolina Millân Ronchetti News Editor
Last Thursday, the SSMU Board of Directors (BoD) suspended the Judicial Board indefinitely due to legal issues arising from its cur rent structure. The structure of the J-Board was reviewed by the Bylaw Com mittee Jan. 30, and the committee’s findings will be discussed in a meet
ing of the BoD this Thursday, Feb. 2. On Jan. 30, the J-Board was scheduled to hear a case proposed by students Zach Newburgh and Bren dan Steven on the constitutionality of the fall referenda. “We first went to talk to our lawyer about this case because [SSMU] had never had a case where a J-Board case had to determine whether a vote by members needed to be overturned or not,” VP Uni
versity Affairs Emily Yee Clare ex plained to the Tribune. According to the SSMU Con stitution, the J-Board is the highest authority in SSMU, capable of over turning any decision made by any other body within SSMU. However, under the Quebec Companies Act, the Board of Directors has to be the highest governing body in SSMU and nothing can limit the power of the BoD.
Redmen Hockey vs. Concordia 19 h 0 0
sfe
If the J-Board had ruled to overturn the student referendum, the decision would negate the role of the BoD as maximum authority and therefore violate Quebec law. Be cause the structure of J-Board was not revised in the SSMU Constitu tion since the BoD was instituted as the highest legal authority by law, its existence has also been illegal since then. Additionally, SSMU is bound
as a student union by the Quebec Accreditation Act. Under this act, every member of SSMU has the right to a binding and representative vote through referenda. Overturning the vote would also involve retro actively taking away students’ right to vote. By invalidating a vote, any student who had voted in the refer endum could sue SSMU for not fol lowing its constitution or Quebec See “J-BOARD” on page 3
Basketball vs. Laval Martlets 18h0 Redmen 20h00 / Red & White Game Redmen Hockey vs. Carleton $2 on all concessions
redbtrd
19 h 0 0