ribune
Published by the Tribune Publication Society Volume No. 31 Issue No. 24 â
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
S S M U to r a is e f e e s
2
I n t e r - T r ib a l Y o u t h C e n t r e
4
E d it o r i a l
6
E a r th H o u r M ic r o s o ft U EFI W h o r e s â G lo r y
M L B p r e v ie w
8 17 18 2 2 -2 3
â
M asquerade protest marches dow ntow n (see p.4)
Multi-pronged mascarade protest aimed to disrupt downtown Montreal and raise awareness on student concerns. (Sam Reynolds / McGill Tribune)
Motion to censure SSMU VP External fails by vote of 11-11-1 Carolina MillĂąn Ronchetti News Editor
A motion to censure SSMU VP External JoĂ«l Pedneault failed at SSMU Councilâs meeting last Thursday, March 29, with a narrow vote of 11 for, 11 against, and one abstention. The motion, submitted to the floor by nine movers, cited several reasons to censure Pedneault, in cluding his use of SSMU funds to print materials promoting a student strike, his decision to grant students and members of Coalition Large de l âAssociation pour la SolidaritĂ© syn dicale Ă©tudiante (CLASSE) afterhours access to the SSMU office, and his participation in picket lines at other Montreal universities. The motion also referenced the fact that last week the administration exclud ed Pedneault from the university
campus for five days. The motion was addressed dur ing confidential session and then de bated in an open session in front of a full gallery, which included mem bers of campus political groups, in cluding the Mobilization Commit tee (Mob Squad) and the Moderate Political Action Committee (ModPAC). In a subsequent vote, Council voted against debating in confiden tial session. Kady Paterson, education rep resentative and a mover of the mo tion, said that the motion was draft ed on the day of Council. âItâs us [movers] trying to keep our executive accountable and make sure that our constituentsâ opinions are heard,â Paterson said. SSMU president Maggie Knight opened the debate by em phasizing the gravity of a motion to censure.
âCensure implies miscon duct. It implies that policies [and] rules have been violatedânot that somebodyâs actions were disagreed with,â Knight said. âRegarding the concerns around VP Pedneaultâs political actions, I think itâs very im portant for the SSMU as it goes for ward [to consider] that no executive, councillor, or any other member of the society be a scapegoat for poli cies people disagree with.â Knight, who stated she would vote against the motion, continued to refute the clauses identifying the reasons for the censure. Among her reasons, she noted that allowing stu dent activists supporting a SSMU mandate to use SSMU printers âcould be entirely appropriate.â âIâm not clear that [granting af ter-hours access to CLASSE mem bers has] been proven to be true,â Knight said. âTo my knowledge, thereâs no written rule that says this
SPRING SPECIAI Check out our new line of tees and tanks
FREE McGill gift with purchase* M in u fflu in p urchase o f $10 before tax, v a lid from A p ril 1-3!
is not allowed to happen, therefore it is not a specific violation." Senator and VP University Affairs-elect Haley Dinel explained her rationale for being a co-mover of the motion. âItâs because of the actions, not because of the person,â she said. âItâs mainly because a lot of students this year have felt that the way the VP External portfolio [sic] has acted and has not [represented] undergrad uates as a whole.â Some councillors raised con cerns of the lack of clarity of some current SSMU mandates. âI think a lot of actions are being defended by the current man date of [promoting] accessible edu cation,â arts representative Joshua Fagen said. âLike councillor Her nandez was saying, âaccessibleâ is an extremely vague word. Itâs very much open to interpretation.â Several councillors were vocal
about their concerns with the mo tion. âI feel that this resolution to censure VP Pedneault would effec tively mandate him to not do his job, which to me [is] a contradiction of what we should be promoting the executives to do,â Carol Fraser, VP Clubs and Services, said. âThe pull of Council is to promote executives to do their job. If this resolution passes, I donât know exactly what VP Pedneault is expected to do.â Arts representative Justin Fletcher described the atmosphere during debate as tense and empha sized the small margin of the final vote. âIt was crazy to hear that it was a tied vote with one abstention,â he said. âI think it reveals some of the divided sentiments on campus.â Following the meeting, Ped neault said he was surprised that the See âC E N S U R E â on page 3
redbird
SPORTS SHOP