The McGill
T
^
^
r i b
u
P u b lis h e d b y th e T rib u n e P u b lic a tio n S o c ie ty V o lu m e N o . 31 Issu e N o . 25
n
QPIRG Referendum SSMU Report Cards Editorial Summer in Montreal Tomlinson Award Cold Specks Sports report cards
e
2 8 9 12 17 21 26 -2 7
T H E YEAR IN PH O TO S (PAGES 14 -15 ) mam
Major events of the year (see p. 6-7)
After a tumultuous year, the McGill winter term winds down. (Sam Reynolds / McGill Tribune)
Internal review on asbestos research is inconclusive Bea B ritn e ff Contributor
On Tuesday April 3, Dr. David Eidelman, vice principal (health affairs) and dean of medicine, an nounced the completion of the pre liminary internal review of profes sor J. Corbett McDonaldâs research on the health effects of chrysotile asbestos. The review was conducted by professor and chair of the depart ment of epidemiology, biostatistics, and occupational health Dr. Rebecca FĂźhrer. The results of the prelimi nary review were published in last Tuesdayâs email from McGillâs
Media Relations Office (MRO), sev eral weeks after they were planned to be released at a senate meeting in mid-March. âThere was no attempt to delay, it just simply took time to get the information ... and decide on the proper course of action,â Eidelman said in an interview with the Tri bune. âWe are very concerned about research integrity ... and thatâs why weâre making a careful effort to go through things as they come in.â Although the internal inves tigation found no evidence of mis conduct, Eidelman has consulted McGillâs Research Integrity Office (RIO) for advice on how to proceed. âWhat weâre doing now is not
an investigation,â Eidelman said. âAt this point, all Iâve asked for is an opinion from the RIO ... on whether there is a basis to proceed with any further investigation.â McGill came under scrutiny in early February following allegations in an episode of CBCâs The National that McDonald, a retired professor and chairman of the department of epidemiology and health, colluded with the Quebec asbestos industry to downplay the health repercussions of chrysotile asbestos. The CBC documentary also claimed that Mc Donald received a total of nearly $1 million in research funding from the industry between 1966 and 1972. In response to the allegations,
SPRING SPECIAL C h e c k o u t o u r n e w lin e o f t e e s a n d ta n k s
FREEMcGill giftwith purchase'
Eidelman announced on Feb. 9 that the faculty of medicine had decided to launch a preliminary review of McDonaldâs work, in order to de termine whether McDonald allowed his research to be improperly influ enced by the asbestos industry. âYou remember, [this research] was done decades ago ... so it was done in a very different context,â Principal Heather Munroe-Blum said to campus media on March 27. âOur dean ... has a deep concern about the issues, but the fundamen tal issue is that of the quality of the research, and thatâs being investi gated very thoroughly.â Kathleen Ruff, a senior human rights advisor to the Rideau InstiÂ
tute, is among those actively criti cizing McDonaldâs research and his connections to the asbestos industry. Ruff and Dr. Fernand Turcotte, professor of public health and pre ventive medicine at Laval Uni versity, sent an email to Eidelman and FĂźhrer on Feb. 12, stating that Fuhrerâs review âfails to meet nor mal standards of independence and transparency and is being carried out in a climate tainted by a strong per ception of bias.â â[Dean Eidelman] provided no answer [to our Feb. 12 email], which provided examples of improper con duct by Prof. McDonald,â Ruff said in an email to the Tribune. S ee âA S B E S T O S â on page 3
redblrd
SPO RTŠ SH O P