megha Jhawar
por tfolio
portfolio megha Jhawar
selected works 2015-20
Megha Jhawar PERSONAL DETAILS
Date of Birth: 21.04.1998 Language: English, Hindi Email: meg.jhawar@gmail.com Mobile no: +919321592513
OBJECTIVE
Seeking position of an architect
EDUCATION
2015-2020 2011-2015
AWARDS
2016 Best Perfomance in Building Technology for the Academic Year, SEA
WORKSHOPS
2020 2019 2019 2018 2017 2017 2016 2016 2015
EXPLORATIONS & EXHIBITS
2018 - Personal art project - Something About Mental Health 2017 Shanghai Biennale (as a part of SEA) 2016 Kochi Muziris Biennale (as a part of SEA)
School of Environment and Architecture, Mumbai 10+2 St. Agnes Higher Secondary School, Kharagpur, West Bengal
Architecture + Urban Design Academy Portraits of Erangal by Prajakta Palav Lino Printing by Tamal Mitra Film Making by Prajay Shah Zine Making by Himanshu S Art History by Sabih Ahmed Hands on workshop at Laurie Baker Center Urdu Poetry by Fatima Permaculture by Rakesh B
SELECTED ENTRY IN FORUMS
2020 Thesis entry- Unbuilt 2.0, Architecture of future collectives 2020 Thesis presentation at Ar.Critique by Mobile Offices
EXPERIENCE
2020 2020 2019 2018-19
PARTICIPATION
2020 The Little Big Loo by Volume Zero, Competition 2020 Presented ‘Of Land or Water?’ at EnviroVision 2020, by the Indian Environmental Association 2019 Mumbai Metro Line 3 Student Competition
PUBLICATION (academics)
2019-20 2017-18 2017-18 2016-17 2016-17 2016-17 2016
SKILLS and SOFTWARE
Autodesk | AutoCad,Revit Google | Sketchup Rhino | Rhinoceros Adobe | Photoshop, Indesign Technical | Hand Drafting, Model making Skills | Sketching, Basic Carentry
OTHER INTEREST
Digital Art | Cooking | Amateur Photography | Reading
Logo design for The Hastakala Girl Wedding invitation Design for Mystica Creations The Chavan’s House for Anup Chavan Hundred Hands, Internship for 5 months
Of Land or Water?- Study of floods and rising sea levels Poisar- the river and it’s context Joal Koathaa, Story of the wet lands of Kolkata What is a Home, Cultral Studies, Eastern Suburbs of Mumbai Measuring Baker, Laurie Baker Cetre SEAhive, Adaptive Threshold Morphology The Water People, Settlement Studies
contents housing typology and appropriation: 01 Rethinking Government Housing Quarters
02 Of Land or Water? 03 An Urban Pause: Toilets as rhythms in the City 04 Technical Drawings 05 Refabricating Heritage: A case of Scottish Cemetry 06 Repair and Retrofit 07 Deliberating Old Housing Stock 08 Explorations
01
Rethinking housing typology and appropriation: Government Housing Quarters Undergraduate thesis project Mentors: Prasad Shetty, Sabaa Giradkar The thesis is an inquiry in housing as a result of standardisation and mass production. Looking at large public sector employee housing, there seems to be an effort to more or less make them standard houses. Occupying a quarter with pre-defined rooms, there seems to be an act of inventing and reinforcing a narrative to it in order to mould the quarters according to one’s need. There seems to be a prolonged act of appropriating the standard houses. Mass production renders a house as an absolute object to be used where one constantly negotiates with extensibility and the fixity of home. It opens up the question ‘what would be the form of a house which allows itself to be appropriated in multiple ways?’ It then becomes a typological inquiry which opens up the concepts of incrementality, flexibility, and appropriation in built-form and the various opportunities of inhabiting and appropriating a given space according to the needs of the city and the people. 01
02
Sample Case: Reconfigurations and transformations
Taking the case of government quarters of Kharagpur, West Bengal, the quarters get reconfigured in parts, several times during the occupancy period of a family. In this act of reconfiguring and transforming the given built structure and space, it becomes a way of inserting claims and practices in the standard house form. It usually changes the way the space was built to be inhabited. The act of home-making in standard housing quarters thus take places as strategies and tactics performed in the form of adjustments, alterations and adaptations.
03
Concepts and Strategies:
50 sqm
75 sqm
100 sqm
150 sqm
200 sqm
The units are envisioned as a typology which is incremental in nature to the preceding unit which allows for multiple possibilities of additions and reconfiguration.
Government Housing Quarters 04
Kharagpur Railway Settlement 05
imagined idea of the neighbourhood
masterplan strategy to activate the neighbourhood The old housing stock of the city sits isolated from the changing and growing city around it. With these changes around, the idea was to design a typology that responds to a. underutilization of land, b. absence of public spaces and changing city conditions. Such typology is expected to provide space for markets, shops, cafes, tuition classes, gathering spaces, etc. and, which can be further reconfigured as a residential dwelling unit when the need arises.
Government Housing Quarters 06
Imagining the neighbourhood functioning as a market and other public provisions.
07
The opportunity to occupy the common/shared spaces creating multiple opportunities like a cafe, tuition class or small business to take place.
Government Housing Quarters 08
The purpose behind this sort of a typology was that it not just accommodates the housing aspect of the project, but also has the potential to accommodate the spills of the house and provisions for the neighbourhood.
09
The intent was to build and create the units as fast as possible using familiar materials which allows one to build and add by oneself.
Government Housing Quarters 10
02
Of Land or Water? Collaborators: a15 batch,SEA Mentors: Ravindra Punde, Komal Gopwani, Vastavikta Bhagat, Abhijit Ekbote This study is an inquiry into flooding and the rising sea level’s impact on Mumbai’s habitability. It is set in the context of the prevalent discussion on climate crisis and its repercussions on everyday life. In the country itself there are various irregularities in weather patterns. Set in the northern suburbs of Mumbai, the took place by investigating the practices and impacts of floods on the everyday life of the local residents. By understanding watershed boundaries in relation to the administrative boundaries, the study was carried out in two phases. Starting by mapping the site using tools like GIS data, fieldwork verification, detailed analysis and stakeholder narratives, policy implementations it went ahead to generate a vulnerability map for 2050 for multiple measures of heavy rainfall coupled with high tide to identify which are the areas that would be vulnerable or even completely submerged. With the future projections of the vulnerabilty, it proposes design strategies for builtform, open spaces, infrastructure and suggested policy changes, spread over phases of short, mid and long term with the aim of building a resilient city. 11
12
Mapping flood spots - Rward
1820
With the rapid urbanisation in the recent times, the administrative boundaries follow a certain logic which does not necessarily respond to the terrain. It leaves the water system administration fragmented. Here the phenomenon of flooding is ethnographically documented in relation to human- centric measurements of ‘ankle, calf, knee, waist and shoulder’ level of flooding along a certain duration of time ranging from an hour to two days along the span of the last two decades.
1970
1990
2010
2019
13
Base Data Source: UDRI
Base data Source: UDRI
Legend of Flooding
Of Land or Water?14
Mapping vulnerability on Site:
Base Data Source: UDRI
Projected Crisis for 2051
Base Data Source: UDRI
Mapping vulnerable stakeholders and the vulnerablility of land by 2050 with the help of IPCC, UDRI, GIS and census data of India. Projected sea level rise of 0.5m and a high tide of +4m from the mean sea level. 15
The narratives and experiences of the three major stakeholders: the locals, elected representatives and the administrative wing informed the design questions and the larger questions around the diverse aspirations of the stakeholders. Of Land or Water?16
Aim : To make a city resilient to flooding
17
Short Term - 2021
areas to be shifted areas for transit camps
Policy for open land and the area to build upon
Transit camps as intermediate shelter for the vulnerable Of Land or Water? 18
Mid Term - 2034
Charkop as existing
Giving vulnerable land back to the water.
Charkop as proposed
Strategies of a new open space system to connect the recreational grounds so as to drain off excess water into the water channels. 19
Long Term - 2051
Builtform strategies based on vulnerability zoning
Seasonal zoning as public commons and spaces of income generating public programs on a temporal scale.
Drain and run-off water system
Of Land or Water? 20
Zone 3-4 builtform Co-operative housing societies and high rises - redefining plots and their configurations
Form of a safe city
Zone 2 builtform Incubator Building Typology: densification sponges for the settlements in the low-lying areas
Form of an Incubator scheme
21
Rainwater Harvesting
New Grounds
Different zones and the typologies
Of Land or Water? 22
03
An Urban Pause:
Toilets as rhythms in the city Collaborators: Ankita Dhal Competition entry for The Little Big Loo The premise of the competition was to rethink the idea of public toilets which aims at changing the outlook towards public utility and washrooms. The site was chosen for the proposed intervention is the western side of the Borivali Station, Mumbai. We approached the various identities and communities on the site through the lens of “Personas�. Personas tell a story of what people would like to do in the city, the psychological impacts they experience when faced with the inappropriate facilities whilst maintaining an aura of anonymity (Bichard, Hanson, Greed). Through personas we established 5 conceptual concerns: Equity- acknowledging the difference in spatial experience of all genders and the differently abled. Phenomenology- due to the gendered nature of public toilets they become hot spots of gendered based voilence. Appropriations- a key in claiming city spaces for persona’s that lack ownerships in the city. Leisure- essential for citizens to enjoy city spaces and transgress within them. Women and gender fluid personas especially require safe spaces to engage with leisure. Associational memories- personas remembering the city and creating a rich plethora of relationships. 23
24
Design Section 25
Dawn
Morning
Rain
Dusk
An Urban Pause 26
Non-confirming plus Female Washroom and Corridors
27
Male Washroom and corridors
An Urban Pause
28
04
Technical Drawings Public Library Working Drawings Located near Bandra Fort in Mumbai, the project intended to design a public library on the edge of the sea with a fort ahead, high rises on one face and settlement on one side of the plot. The idea was to look at access and view of the city, sea, the sea link while creating inclusive spaces for the stakeholders using the site. The exercise intended to look at services, accessibility and end with making GFC (Good for Construction) drawings.
High Rise Design Approval Drawings The design was a proposal of an hybrid entertainment building containing of auditoriums, video libraries, sound recording studio. The design addresses the profile of a high rise building in a thick urban neighbourhood. The aim was to understand various kinds of circulation and the different building norms to get a holistic view of design detailing. 29
Public Library 30
WD-SEA-ST-02,WD-SEA-C-01 FOR OTHER DIMENSIONS.
SR.NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
GENERAL NOTES
C12
C10
1480
-
PUBLIC SEATING
16970
C13
ISSUED BY
73
204
10
C14
00
W1
27
1490
KEY PLAN
SEA SIDE
0
-
300
-
27100
-
CHECKED BY
1200
3720
2400
-
KEY PLAN
C9
1360
-
CHECKED BY
ISSUED BY
EXISTING ROAD 10 M WIDE
-
32845
C11
820
30
15
KITCHEN 25 SQ M. +1200 SW1
1200
3400
7220
SW3
D1
DN
5 294
T LIF SE
RV
IC
E
D2
20
SW9
3130
R EN
GE
EXISTING ROAD 10 M WIDE
SR.NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 1290 5880
4360
STAMP & SIGN
B
D
31
SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT
CHECKED BY
KEY PLAN
0 61
PA
20
D3
31
5 D1
80
25
STAMP & SIGN 47
10
C5
EQ
-1200
EQ EQ
1200
DN
16135
EQ
RAMP FROM THE BASEMENT
5130
RISER - 150 TREAD - 600
EQ
ROLL NO | A15 - 18 THIRD YEAR B.ARCH 2017 - 2018 3
0
EQ
MEGHA JHAWAR
690
2650
PUBLIC LIBRARY AT BANDRA, MUMBAI
C4
0
1285
C3
ROLL NO | A15 - 18 THIRD YEAR B.ARCH 2017 -F2018 E G
SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT AND ARCHITECTURE
0
3500
DN
580
SCALE
NORTH 4980
3550
4520
3345
1930
H
II
SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT AND ARCHITECTURE NORTH
EXISTING ROAD 10 M WIDE
SEA SIDE
PUBLIC LIBRARY AT BANDRA, MUMBAI
ROLL NO | A15 - 18 THIRD YEAR B.ARCH 2017 - 2018
48
1200
C
ISSUED BY
MEGHA JHAWAR
PUBLIC LIBRARY AT BANDRA, MUMBAI
SW7
MEGHA JHAWAR 2020
A
85
85
08 R 5 TR ISE EA R D 15 -3 0 00
2310
5430 2330
1
SW8
50
62
2000
2690
1
SW6
14920
300
2
60
C6
70
EQ
KEY PLAN
D2
14
D3
21
00
4
D2
10
RAMP TO THE BASEMENT
SW5 1200
0
2045
ISSUED BY
ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL THE WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE 1200 900 FOLLOWED. DRAWINGS TO BE SEEN WITH RESPECT TO ALL OTHER DRAWINGS. P.C.C. IS IN THE RATIO OF 1:3:6 (CEMENT : DN SAND : COARSE AGGREGATE). ALL LEVELS SPECIFIED IN METERS. ALL DECISIONS REINFORCEMENT CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE TAKEN BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWING. C1 ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO NOTICE TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. RICHER CONCRETE MIX TO BE USED FOR THE FOUNDATION AND M:30 MIX TO BE USED FOR THE SUPER STRUCTURE, ALL MIXES SHALL BE DN SUGGESTED, EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. VERIFY FIELD CONDITIONS AND COORDINATION 0 0 WITH THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO 35 PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. WORK WITHIN THE FIELD BOUNDARIES AS SPECIFIED IN THE PROJECT DOCUMENT AND COMPLY WITH ALL THE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. OCCUPANTS ON THE ADJACENCIES TO THE C2 PROJECT AREA SHALL CONTINUE UNINTERRUPTED/UNDISTURBED OCCUPANCY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. REFER TO SHEET WD-SEA-ST-01 FOR THE SHEAR WALLS. REFER TO SHEET WD-SEA-ST-01, WD-SEA-ST-02,WD-SEA-C-01 FOR OTHER DIMENSIONS.
D1
53
2300
CHECKED BY
0
520
SS
30 21
840
GENERAL NOTES
STAMP & SIGN
SW11
28
SW10
FIR ST E AIR ES CA CAP SE E
RIS TR ER EA - 1 D 5 -3 0 00
LIF
T
80
1340
1200
SW4
36
-
SEA SIDE
EXISTING ROAD 10 M WIDE
30 85 42
C16
6
5
0
1200
RAMP
8
7
09
CHECK IN COUNTER/ BAGGAGE DROP
55
3690
9
0
RISER - 150 TREAD - 300
7084
SEA SIDE
1485
SW2
00
-1770
SR.NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
14
C15 20
10
90
0
RIS TR ER EA - 1 D 5 -3 0 00
D1
SCALE
1:75
300
-
SR.NO. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
3460
-
ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL THE WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE FOLLOWED. DRAWINGS TO BE SEEN WITH RESPECT TO ALL OTHER DRAWINGS. 16 P.C.C. IS IN THE RATIO OF 1:3:6 (CEMENT : SAND : COARSE AGGREGATE). ALL LEVELS SPECIFIED IN METERS. ALL DECISIONS REINFORCEMENT CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE TAKEN BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWING. 15 ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO NOTICE TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. RICHER CONCRETE MIX TO BE USED FOR THE FOUNDATION AND M:30 MIX TO BE USED FOR 15 THE SUPER STRUCTURE, ALL MIXES SHALL BE SUGGESTED, EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 14 VERIFY FIELD CONDITIONS AND COORDINATION WITH THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 13 WORK WITHIN THE FIELD BOUNDARIES AS SPECIFIED IN THE PROJECT DOCUMENT AND COMPLY WITH ALL THE APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCE 12 REQUIREMENTS. OCCUPANTS ON THE ADJACENCIES TO THE PROJECT AREA SHALL CONTINUE UNINTERRUPTED/UNDISTURBED OCCUPANCY DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. REFER TO SHEET WD-SEA-ST-01 FOR THE SHEAR WALLS. REFER TO SHEET WD-SEA-ST-01, 11 WD-SEA-ST-02,WD-SEA-C-01 FOR OTHER DIMENSIONS. 3500 2765
-
2470
-
2483
J
K
L
1:75
DRAWING TITLE & NUMBER
GROUND FLOOR STRUCTURAL PLAN
WD - SEA - ST - 03
STAMP & SIGN
DRAWING TITLE & NUMBER
DETAILS
-
SCALE 1:10
-
KALZIP
DETAILS DETAILS-
SCALE SCALE 1:101:10 -
VAPOUR CONTROL INSULATION
kalzip
KALZIP STEELKALZIP RAFTER
vapour control insulation
-
VAPOUR VAPOUR CONTROL CONTROL INSULATION INSULATION
steel rafter STEEL RAFTER STEEL RAFTER
-
PLAN AT LEVEL 3
-
THIRD FLOOR PLAN PLANPLAN AT LEVEL AT LEVEL 3 3
PLAN AT LEVEL 3
THIRD FLOOR THIRD FLOOR PLANPLAN
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
KALZIP ROOF RAFTER
A
SR
PLAN LEVEL 2 I-BEAM
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
PLANPLAN LEVEL LEVEL 2 2
REBATE
i-beam
LEVEL 4 13200
PLAN LEVEL 2
I-BEAM I-BEAM
SECOND FLOOR SECOND FLOOR PLANPLAN
rebate REBATE REBATE
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
GLASS
J
K
glass GLASS GLASS
LEVEL 3 9000
SEA SIDE
B
PLAN LEVEL 1 C
FIRST FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 2 4800
D
PLAN LEVEL 1
PLANPLAN LEVEL LEVEL 1 1
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
MICRO CONCRETE FIRST FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLANPLAN
RCC SLAB
EXTERNAL PLASTER 18MM
micro concrete rcc slab external plaster 18mm MICRO CONCRETE MICRO CONCRETE
RCC RCC SLABSLAB
LEVEL 1 1200
EXTERNAL PLASTER EXTERNAL PLASTER 18MM18MM
P A
E LEVEL 0 00
M
PLAN LEVEL -1
RO TH 20
PLAN LEVEL -1
GROUND FLOOR PLAN PLANPLAN LEVEL LEVEL -1 -1
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
SC AN
LEVEL -1 -3600
GROUND FLOOR GROUND FLOOR PLANPLAN F SECTION
BASEMENT PLAN
BASEMENT PLAN
External Wall Section BASEMENT BASEMENT PLANPLAN
Public Library 32
W2
W1
10
D1
9
D2
D1
D2
D2
D4
FD2
8
7
D2
6
D2
D1
D2
D4 D1
D2
D2
D2
FD1
W1
FD2
D2
D2
D2
UP
UP
5
FD1 4 A. AREA STATEMENT 1 2 3 4 5
r1a
6
FD1
3
7
D3
Total area sq. metres
sq. metres
1340.09 GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR 1083.12 SECOND, SEVENTH, EIGHT FLOOR 1661.18 THIRD,FOURTH,FIFTH,NINTH FLOOR 1799.29 834 SIXTH-REFUGE FLOOR NINTH-TWELFTH, 574 FOURTEENTH-FIFTEEN FLOOR FOURTEENTH-REFUGE FLOOR 574 TOTAL
1340.09 1083.12 4983.54 7197.16 834 3444 574 18881.41
D3 PROFORMA -A
FD2
A. AREA STATEMENT r1b r1c
sq. metres
1
AREA OF PLOT (As per P.R. Card)
2
DEDUCTIONS FOR
6420
(a) ROAD SET-BACK AREA (b) PROPOSED ROAD (c) ANY RESERVATION
D3 FD2
TOTAL (a+b+c)
FD2
W2
W1
10
D1
r1e
D4
3
BALANCE AREA OF PLOT (1-2)
4
DEDUCTIONS FOR R.G. (IF DEDUCTIBLE)
5
NET AREA OF PLOT (3-4)
6
ADDITIONS FOR F.S.I.
2
9
FD2
D2
D1
D2
D2
FD1 D1 FD1
D2
D2
10
D2
6
W2
D2
D2
b
PROPOSED BALCONY AREA PER FLOOR
c
EXCESS BALCONY AREA PER FLOOR
d
TOTAL EXCESS BALCONY AREA
C. a
TENAMENT STATEMENT
c
AREA AVAILABLE FOR TENAMENTS (a-b)
d
TENAMENTS PERMISSIBLE
e
TENAMENTS PROPOSED
f
TENEMENTS EXISTING
TWO WHEELERS
UP
b
10
PARKING PROPOSED CARS
270
TWO WHEELERS
15
VISITORS COVERED GARAGES E. TRANSPORT VEHICLES PARKING (i) REQUIRED (ii) PROVIDED
UP E
G
F
A
I
J
B
K
C
D
E
G
F
H
I
CONTENTS OF SHEET
K
J
FD1
LOCATION PLAN, TRIANGULATION PLAN AND CALCULATIONS, BLOCK PLAN, R.G. CALCULATIONS, TOTAL AREA CALCULATIONS
4
A. AREA STATEMENT 2 3
D3
D1 FD1
D4
FD2
a2
r1c
FD2
D2
Ram
D2
r1e
FD1
2
r1h
p dn
to th
b
PROPOSED BALCONY AREA PER FLOOR
c
EXCESS BALCONY AREA PER FLOOR
mer 1455cial Bu sq ildin (Gr. g + 17 .m uppe r)
W2
1
Com
.m
r1h
637. R2 19 sq
e ro of th Exte nt of
d8
d9
d9
d9
TOTAL EXCESS BALCONY AREA TENAMENT STATEMENT
b
LESS DEDUCTIONS OF NON-RES. AREA
c
AREA AVAILABLE FOR TENAMENTS (a-b) TENAMENTS PERMISSIBLE TENAMENTS PROPOSED
f
TENEMENTS EXISTING
Open Areas D
E
10
D
E
G
F
H
COVERED GARAGES
I
CONTENTS OF SHEET
SCALE
5
As specified
6 7
NAME
A
PROFORMA -A D
C
B
E
Megha Jhawar
1 2
r1c
(c) ANY RESERVATION TOTAL (a+b+c)
CERTIFIED THAT I HAVE SURVEYED THE PLOT UNDER REFERENCE ON ____________ AND THAT THE DIMENSIONS OF THE SIDES, ETC. OF THE PLOT STATED ON THE PLAN ARE BASED ON TRIANGULATION FROM THE MUNCIPAL DRAWING NO. WORLI/LG/GEN/1/12-4-94, WORLI/LG/GEN/2/12-4-94, WORLI/LG/GEN/3/12-4-94 RECEIVED ON 21/11/2006 FROM WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE DEPARTMENT.
r1e
d10
a2
b3
d10
FD1 628.2 R1 4 sq .m
1200
mp
Ra
D1
D2
d3
16 F.S.I BALANCE
dn
to th
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
D2
D3
FD1
FD2
b7
2000
ad
of th
e ro
G
F b5
H
I
J
TENAMENTS PROPOSED
f
TENEMENTS EXISTING
JOB NO.
b
d5
PARKING PROPOSED CARS TWO WHEELERS
nter
SCALE As specified
Door Window Schedule
COVERED GARAGES E. TRANSPORT VEHICLES PARKING
d1
(i) REQUIREDd12 (ii) PROVIDED
Ce
K
Ba sem ent
E
DATE
PROFORMA -B
FILE NAME: NAME
the
D
C
B
e
b6
VISITORS
1
W2
d5
A
TENAMENTS PERMISSIBLE
d6
d9
W1
AREA AVAILABLE FOR TENAMENTS (a-b)
PROPOSED AREA (A-12 ABOVE)
COVERED GARAGES PERMISSIBLE
Exte nt of
d9
LESS DEDUCTIONS OF NON-RES.a4AREA
d
VISITORS DRG. NO.
1300
1200
t of Exten d9
d9
d6
TENAMENT STATEMENT
c
TOTAL TENEMENTS ON THE PLOT
d7 d8
EXCESS BALCONY AREA PER FLOOR TOTAL EXCESS BALCONY AREA
b
TWO WHEELERS
nt seme the
Ba
a1
PROPOSED BALCONY AREA PER FLOOR
c d C. a
D. PARKING STATEMENT d7 a PARKING REQUIRED BY REGULATIONS d9 FOR d8 d9 d9 d9 CARS
NAME AND SIGNATURE OF OWNER
mm er 14
637. R2 19 sq.m
roa d the r of
1000
Ce nte
628. R1 24 sq.m
r1h
W2
b5
F.S.I. CREDIT AVAILABLE BY D.R. d9
13 EXCESS BALCONY AREA TAKEN IN F.S.I. 15 F.S.I CONSUMED (14/5)
1000
t men
UP
Co mm erc 1455 ial Bu sq ilding (Gr. + 17 .m uppe r)
637.1 R2 9 sq .m
D2
D2
b1
PERMISSIBLE F.S.I.
14 TOTAL BUILT-UP AREA (11+12+13)
se
e ba
1
TOTAL AREAa2 (5+6)
9
b
d3
D2
7 8
B. BALCONY AREA STATEMENT a PERMISSIBLE BALCONY AREA PER FLOOR
D2
a3
fro
2100
to the
b2
2100
dn
up
m
base
D1
me base
2100
mp
mp
Ra
e m th
r1i
D1 D1
nt
Ra
2500
750
1000
d9 d10
d13
12 PROPOSED AREA
ent
cia 55 l Build sq (Gr. ing + 17 .m uppe r)
d13
ADDITIONS FOR F.S.I.
11 EXISTING FLOOR AREA
OF RECEIPT OF PLANS
fro
Co
d2
up
NET AREA OF PLOT (3-4)
10 PERMISSIBLE FLOOR AREA (7x8)+9
d10
2100
mp
Ra
2100
d10
d2
r1h
STAMP OF APPROVAL
STAMP OF DATE
b4
DEDUCTIONS FOR R.G. (IF DEDUCTIBLE)
6
2(b) 100% OF PROPOSED ROAD
r1g r1f
d10
nt
me
base
BALANCE AREA OF PLOT (1-2)
5
2(a) 100% OF ROAD SET-BACK AREA d4 d10
SIGNATURE OF ARCHITECT m the
3 4
r1d
FD2 d10
d4
I
(b) PROPOSED ROAD
CERTIFICATE OF AREA
FD2
b3
H
AREA OF PLOT (As per P.R. Card) DEDUCTIONS FOR (a) ROAD SET-BACK AREA
D3 d12
2
G F A. AREA STATEMENT
r1b
LOCATION PLAN, TRIANGULATION PLAN AND CALCULATIONS, BLOCK PLAN, R.G. CALCULATIONS, TOTAL AREA CALCULATIONS
d1
D3
1
sq. metres
1340.09 GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR 1083.12 SECOND, SEVENTH, EIGHT FLOOR 1661.18 THIRD,FOURTH,FIFTH,NINTH FLOOR 1799.29 834 SIXTH-REFUGE FLOOR NINTH-TWELFTH, 574 FOURTEENTH-FIFTEEN FLOOR FOURTEENTH-REFUGE FLOOR 574 TOT
FILE NAME:
PROFORMAK-B
J
3
r1a
4
15
E. TRANSPORT VEHICLES PARKING
K
J
A. AREA STATEMENT
3
270
VISITORS
of th
b5
C
B
I
D2
JOB NO.
230
TWO WHEELERS
(ii) PROVIDED
H
DATE
2
PARKING PROPOSED CARS
(i) REQUIRED
A G
F
D2
1
COVERED GARAGES PERMISSIBLE
d5
D2
W2 DRG. NO.
VISITORS b
C
r1h
D2
D2
TWO WHEELERS
FD1
D2
Open Area R1
TOTAL TENEMENTS ON THE PLOT
Open Area R1
D1
PROPOSED AREA (A-12 ABOVE)
d
e
d9
D1 D1
NAME AND SIGNATURE OF OWNER
d
D. PARKING STATEMENT a PARKING REQUIRED BY REGULATIONS FOR CARS
d6
B
FD1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
18877.3 2.94 382.69
C. a
d7
4
6420 3 19260 18877.3
15 F.S.I CONSUMED (14/5)
sem ent
UP
a1
F.S.I. CREDIT AVAILABLE BY D.R.
16 F.S.I BALANCE
UP
W2
b5
the Ba
D2
PERMISSIBLE F.S.I.
14 TOTAL BUILT-UP AREA (11+12+13)
D2
Ce
D2
TOTAL AREA (5+6)
9
B. BALCONY AREA STATEMENT a PERMISSIBLE BALCONY AREA PER FLOOR
nter
UP
D2 D2
7 8
13 EXCESS BALCONY AREA TAKEN IN F.S.I.
D2
D2
ad
D2
1
6420
12 PROPOSED AREA
Ram
D2
d3
ADDITIONS FOR F.S.I.
11 EXISTING FLOOR AREA
D2
D1
NET AREA OF PLOT (3-4)
6
10 PERMISSIBLE FLOOR AREA (7x8)+9
r1i
e ba
Co
FD1
r1f
t
en sem
D1 D1
DEDUCTIONS FOR R.G. (IF DEDUCTIBLE)
5
FD2
6420
BALANCE AREA OF PLOT (1-2)
4
2(b) 100% OF PROPOSED ROAD
r1g
D1
mm er 1455cial Bu sq ilding (Gr. + 17 .m uppe r)
637. R2 19 sq.m
a3
b1
5
3
TOTAL (a+b+c)
2(a) 100% OF ROAD SET-BACK AREA
D1 D1
e
th ANY RESERVATION (c)
from
r1d
Ra
FD2
r1d
men
(b) PROPOSED ROAD base
FD1
b2
FD2
t (a) ROAD SET-BACK AREA
p up
e Ba
to th
D1
e ro
ent
sem
e ba
dn mp
DEDUCTIONS FOR
Exte nt
2
2
6420
of th
D2
d9
FD2
d10
AREA OF PLOT (As per P.R. Card)
b3
628. R1 24 sq.m
7
6
d3
r1b
FD2 d13
SIGNATURE OF ARCHITECT
OF RECEIPT OF PLANS
sq. metres
1
STAMP OF APPROVAL
STAMP OF DATE
A. AREA STATEMENT
b4
d10
D3
574 18881.41
PROFORMA -A
d10 d2
3
D1
D2
ad
t
D2 men
base
ter
up
the
r1c
Cen
mp
Ra
d4
from
sem ent
D2 d10
r1b
D3
3444
.m
9
r1a
W1
D3
628. R1 24 sq
W2
CERTIFIED THAT I HAVE SURVEYED THE PLOT UNDER REFERENCE ON ____________ AND THAT THE DIMENSIONS OF THE SIDES, ETC. OF THE PLOT STATED ON THE PLAN ARE BASED ON TRIANGULATION FROM THE MUNCIPAL DRAWING NO. WORLI/LG/GEN/1/12-4-94, WORLI/LG/GEN/2/12-4-94, WORLI/LG/GEN/3/12-4-94 RECEIVED ON 21/11/2006 FROM WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE DEPARTMENT.
1340.09 1083.12 4983.54 7197.16 834
UP
3 10
CERTIFICATE OF AREA
Total area sq. metres
sq. metres
1340.09 GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR 1083.12 SECOND, SEVENTH, EIGHT FLOOR 1661.18 4 THIRD,FOURTH,FIFTH,NINTH FLOOR 1799.29 834 5 SIXTH-REFUGE FLOOR NINTH-TWELFTH, 6 574 FOURTEENTH-FIFTEEN FLOOR 7 FOURTEENTH-REFUGE FLOOR 574 TOTAL 1
D3
r1a
PROFORMA -B
H
4
8
230
Grounf Floor Structural plan
VISITORS COVERED GARAGES PERMISSIBLE
D
D2
FD1
TOTAL TENEMENTS ON THE PLOT
5
C
FD2
PROPOSED AREA (A-12 ABOVE)
LESS DEDUCTIONS OF NON-RES. D2 AREA D2
D2
FD1
D2
D2
b
D3
D2
18877.3 2.94 D1 382.69
D. PARKING STATEMENT a PARKING REQUIRED BY REGULATIONS FOR CARS
UP
W2
FD2
5 D2
r1h
D2
D2
D1
B. BALCONY AREA STATEMENT a PERMISSIBLE BALCONY AREA PER FLOOR
7
W1
18877.3
16 F.S.I BALANCE
D2
D2
D4
6420 3 19260
15 F.S.I CONSUMED (14/5)
D1
D2
D2
D2
F.S.I. CREDIT AVAILABLE BY D.R.
14 TOTAL BUILT-UP AREA (11+12+13)
UP
D1
D2 D2
9
13 EXCESS BALCONY AREA TAKEN IN F.S.I.
8
W1
1
r1i
D2
D2
PERMISSIBLE F.S.I.
12 PROPOSED AREAW2
9
FD1
D1
6
TOTAL AREA (5+6)
10 PERMISSIBLE FLOOR AREA (7x8)+9
D1
D2
D1 D1
7 8
11 EXISTING FLOOR AREA
D1
W2
r1h
FD2
7
6420
2(b) 100% OF PROPOSED ROAD
r1g r1f
8
6420
2(a) 100% OF ROAD SET-BACK AREA
r1d
Megha Jhawar
CONTENTS OF SHEET
LOCATION PLAN, TRIANGULATION PLAN AND CALCULAT R.G. CALCULATIONS, TOTAL AREA CALCULATIONS
d1
CERTIFICATE OF AREA
d12
CERTIFIED THAT I HAVE SURVEYED THE PLOT UNDER R ____________ AND THAT THE DIMENSIONS OF THE SIDE PLOT STATED ON THE PLAN ARE BASED ON TRIANGULA THE MUNCIPAL DRAWING NO. WORLI/LG/GEN/1/12-4-94, WORLI/LG/GEN/2/12-4-94, WORLI/LG/GEN/3/12-4-94 RECE 21/11/2006 FROM WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE DEP
d10
Area Line Diagram d4
d10
d2
d13
a2
b4
SIGNATUR nt
me
b3
d10
mp
Ra
d9
up
from
the
base
STAMP OF DATE OF RECEIPT OF PLANS
d10
a3
628.2 R1 4 sq .m
33
b2
nt
me
mp
Ra
dn
to the
base
STAMP OF
+76.8 M LEVEL 16
+72.6 M LEVEL 15
+68.4 M LEVEL 14
+64.2 M LEVEL 13
+60 M LEVEL 12
+55.8 M REFUGE FLOOR 2
+51.6 M LEVEL 11
+47.4 M LEVEL 10
+43.2 M LEVEL 9
+39 M LEVEL 8
+34.8 M LEVEL 7
+30.6 M LEVEL 6
+26.4 M LEVEL 5
+22.2M REFUGE FLOOR 1
+18 M LEVEL 4
+13.8 M LEVEL 3
+9.6 M LEVEL 2
+5.4 M LEVEL 1
+1.2 M PLINTH 0.0 M GROUND -3.0 M LEVEL -1
-7.2 M LEVEL -2
Section- High Rise 34
05
Refabricating heritage: A case of Scottish Cemetry
Collaborators: Hitha Chandashekhar, Ashitha Tharian, Nithyashree Balachandar, Samiksha Gadodia Workshop by AUDA The approach to the Scottish Cemetery and the neighbourhood it sits in, started with questioning and reading about the community that does not identify and connect to it’s history. It opens up the concept of appropriation and catalysing incentives that can connect the cemetery to the community and the city. The design is strategized at 4 different scales which aim at reinforcing a new narrative of the cemetery and it’s history. It starts by conceptualising a new grounda bridge which connects the three cemeteries in the neighbourhood and also starts acting as a leisure/ pause space for the dense community around. It further aims at re-organising the movement in and around the cemetery with the idea of opening up pedestrian pockets which allow for markets, meeting spaces, exhibition, release spaces for the immediate stakeholders and the people moving in and out of the area on a regulatory basis. Further ahead, the wall of the cemetery is re-imagined to allow for more visual connection with a transactional capacity which works as an incentive to activate the immediate area of the cemetery. It helps in sculpting the cemetery additional to the smaller pockets of gallery and sculptures inside the cemetery. 35
36
Master plan strategy to connect the three burial grounds and activating the existing neighbourhood.
37
Refabricating Heritage 38
39
Refabricating Heritage
40
06
Repair and Retrofit: A case of Eksar Village
Collaborators: Ankita Dhal, Foram Desai, Vinisha Kuckian The study took place as a part of the three year long investigation by SEA in the practices of repair and retrofit of the old housing stock of the city. The urban villages of the city consists of various existing community formations that developed over time. Eksar village houses more than 500 families. The inhabitants of this village practice farming, whereas some started fishing later. Most of the families living in the village are dated back to the 1890s. Most of the house in the village is owned by the people residing in the house. Three street conditions can be identified in the village which are: main road, alleys between houses and the street adjoining naala. Main road is 9m wide paved road and maintained by BMC. The alleys between houses are narrow spaced roads with poor light and ventilation is some areas. Through the stages of site work and the various analysis conducted, two main questions regarding urban villages arose: -How do we better living conditions without destroying and remaking the village? - How do we regulate growth and expansion in the future? 41
42
Plan and identification of the four typologies of structures.
Different street conditions throughout the village. 43
Mapping heights of the structure through the settlement.
Mapping the drainage pattern through the village. Repair n Retrofit 44
Design Strategies for light, ventilation and dampness - Ground Floor
Existing
45
Existing
Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Design Strategies for light, ventilation and dampness - First Floor
Existing
Existing
Existing
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Existing
Existing
Proposed
Proposed
Repair n Retrofit 46
Future projection of the ground floor clusters: Introducing policies of expansion for an urban village
Individual Expansion Leaving some space on the first floor for light and ventilation for the ground floor. Ground floor accommodated 13 families. First floor accommodates 7 families.
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
Existing ground floor section
a a’
Section a - option 1
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION Section a’- option 2
47
Hatched part - first floor
Future projection of the ground floor clusters: Introducing policies of expansion for an urban village
Communal Expansion
not to build above the verandah’s
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
Community expansion together
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
Existing ground floor section
the stairs to be inside the houses if it is an individual expansion
RODUCED BY AN AUTODESK STUDENT VERSION
Individual expansion in a community
Repair n Retrofit 48
07
Delibrating Old Housing In major port towns around India, an ever-changing cityscape has been inevitable. In the context of Vizag as a naval town hosting the largest railway station under the East Coast Railway, certain pockets of the city haven’t developed as organically as the rest of the city around them, in the last 70 years. In the light of Visakhapatnam becoming an independent railway zone, the project dissects the isolation and abandonment of the railway quarters, along with its typological diversity to ponder the anticipated densification that will take place. The settlement of Railway Quarters, Visakhapatnam has given its land to overgrown weeds and dilapidated houses. The already less dense area has a lesser human presence in the colony. Being bound by an 8 feet high wall, it makes for an unsafe place while being cut off from the city around it. The aim behind the project is to propose a pattern of urban inserts on a land with builtforms dating back to the 1950’s. The intent behind these urban insertions is to increase interactions with the city while proposing redensification.
49
Deliberating Old Housing 50
Conceptual representations of the strategy of the new with the old
Apartment Type - 9 units in a block
51
Strip Blocks - 3 units in a block
Proposed design on the existing site
Deliberating Old Housing 52
Strip Units Area of each unit - 105 sqm Designed as long strips of 4- 5.5 meters running between the existing units, raised above the ground to maintain the circulation movements and ventilation for them.
53
Each units spans to the next floor Deliberating Old Housing
54
Apartment Typology Area of each unit - 95 sqm Designed to create public spaces in and at the top of the structure defining a new ground. Each unit on a floor has a different configuration depending on its entrance and the units around.
55
Each unit spreads over one and a half floor resulting in a dynamic facade.
Deliberating Old Housing
56
08
Explorations Explorations, interests and crafts in various forums and disciplines.
57
Bookmark series: Of Bangalore
58
SEAhive - adaptive threshold morphology Parametric Architecture
Mumbai Metro 3 Student Competition
SEEPZ underground metro station - public transport
Kochi - Cutchi Menon community map Kochi Muziris Biennale
59
Lifting Device
Bamboo SEAsaw
Vile Parle Station Painting
As a part of the beautification process of the station
Adjustable Device
Wooden hands that allow two inclinations
The Chavan House
Her Everyday: narratives of Erangal
The Hastakala Girl
Wedding E-invite
Design - Family house in Solapur
logo design
Something About Mental Health Personal art project
Book - Narratives of women in the village
Lino Printing
Printmaking technique
Explorations 60