MKT
ARCHITECTURE & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO 2010 - 2015
Name
Melissa Krisanti Tanuharja
Date of birth
25/11/1988 Nationality
Indonesian
Phone number
+31 641 61 2460
Email address
melissatanuharja@gmail.com
EDUCATION 2013 - 2015
Master of Science Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands Faculty of Architecture, Urbanism & Building Science Building Technology Track
2006 - 2010
Bachelor of Science Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia Faculty of Architecture
WORKING EXPERIENCE 2010 - 2013
Architect
PDW Architects (http://www.pdw-architects.com)
2010
Intern Architect PDW Architects (http://www.pdw-architects.com)
SKILL
Outstanding analytical and problem solving skills Excellent working in a team environment Great communication skills Fast learner and self motivated
ARCHITECTURAL EXPERIENCE 2014
International Facade Workshop on Adaptive Building Envelope Lucerne, Switzerland
2014
Future of Craftmanship Seminar 14th Venice Architecture Biennale by IAI-EU Venice, Italy
2010
ITB Architecture Competitioin 2nd Prize Bandung, Indonesia
SOFTWARE Design
Rhino 2D & 3D AutoCAD SketchUp Revit Adobe Illustrator Adobe InDesign Adobe Photoshop Climate Analysis
Ecotect Design Builder
LANGUAGE
Bahasa Indonesia / Mother Tounge English / Fluently in Oral & Written Spanish / Elementary
1
Integrated Facade System in High Rise Office Building in Tropical Climate Condition
3
Senopati Suites II & III Residential Apartments Professional project, 2010
Master course thesis project, 2015
2
Institut Teknologi Bandung Architecture Design Competition Architectural competition, 2010
5
Bank Danamon New Headquarter Professional project, 2012
PROJECTS
4
Extreme Antarctica Research Station Master course project, 2014
Integrated Facade System in High Rise Office Building in Tropical Climate Condition Master course thesis project, Year II
Type Location Role Year
Individual Jakarta, Indonesia Master Student, Building Technology Track 2015
1
DESCRIPTION Office buildings in hot and humid climate condition are designed to meet the expectation of human thermal comfort, which most of the time the use of air conditioning system is inevitable and becomes a necessity which then leads to a high energy consumption. Therefore, the aim of this thesis project is to study and perform different possibilities of an integration between building strategies both active and passive, and facade system regarding to the climate characteristic of hot and humid climate condition and requirements for high rise office buildings which are able to reduce the high cooling energy demand. An integration between different knowledge about architecture, climate, and facade design were integrated in this project to be able to outcome the best result. In this project, I was fully responsible for analyzing and researching the available data, developing the ideas and design concept, climate strategies, facade strategies, energy performances, structural strategies, and integrated it as a final design. During the process, I learned into detail on integrated facade system, energy consumption and building performance in an office building. Hand sketches, computer program, including building simulation program were performed.
Equipment
24%
Lighting
12%
Air Conditioning
64%
active
BUILDING s t r at egies
3
passive
BUILDING s tra te g i e s
sun shading device
2
indirect evaporative cooling
condition
4
result
FACADE integration
dehumidification
start
CLIMATE
hot and humid climate
1
design strategies climate strategies
3.4% fan forced ventilation cooling
60.9% sun shading of windows
cooling with dehumidification
96.4%
pump solar heat
Regenerator unit
evaporation
to/from centralized system
6
heat exchanger
regenerator unit
5
pump 4
Indirect evaporative cooling unit
3
2
Dehumidification unit
fan
1 warm and humid air
1 Common full glazed facade with sun shading
3
2 Integrated facade system
25% 75%
37% 63%
Integrated facade system with opaque panel
55%
45%
Total cooling consumption Reduction
1
2
3
1 Module 1 - Sun shading module 2 Module 2 - Opaque module 3 Module 3 - Visible module monsoon window for intake air
indoor intake air
floor structure
integrated sun shading and regenerator unit
Detail 2 & 3 indirect evaporative cooling unit
opaque panel dehumidification unit
Detail 1
2 1
Detail 1
4
1 Double glass unit (8mm + 12mm air gap + 6mm) 2 Aluminium mullion profile 3 Aluminium mullion profile cap 4 Opaque panel 8mm 5 Aluminium transom profile 6 Adjustable aluminium grill for dehumidification intake air (monsoon window)
3 6 5
Detail 2
1
2
1 2 3 4 5
Aluminium transom profile Aluminium grill for outake air to indoor space Opaque panel 8mm (inner pane) Microporous polypropylene tube Opaque panel 8mm (outer pane)
3 4
5
3
4
Detail 3 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Opaque panel 8mm Microporous polypropylene tube Aluminium grill for outake air to indoor space Aluminium mullion profile Double glass unit (8mm + 12mm air gap + 6mm) Regenerator unit Sun shading louver Aluminium profile for sun shading panel
2
7 8
6 5
ASSEMBLY PROCESS
Pre-assembled
1
2
manufacture and transportation
1
On-site
bracket fixing
On-site assembly process
1
3
4
2
3
2
3
Institut Teknologi Bandung Architecture Design Competition 2 nd Prize
Type Location Role Year Team
Team Bandung, Indonesia Junior Architect 2010 Baskoro Tedjo, Ir., MSEB., Ph.D Bayu Prayudhi Donald Aditya
2
DESCRIPTION Institut Teknologi Bandung, as one of the best academic institution in Indonesia, has a great number of achievements and recognized by world of industry. Based on that reputation, they intended to provide various international standard facilities. In 2010, the university planned to establish three new buildings in the northern of the complex. The aim of this architecture design competition was to obtain the best architectural schematic design that would be further developed in technical drawing for construction purpose. The team was lead by my professor who is also one of a well known architect in Indonesia. With the team member of me and two partners as a student of Bachelor in Architecture in Institut Teknologi Bandung. As a junior architect, I was responsible in developing the idea and concept of on particular building as well as its surrounding. In addition, three of us had to incorporate Baskoro Tedjo’s ideas as the leader of the team, with our own ideas. During this project, I learned how to work in a architectural competition situation as a team. I contributed in developing the main concept into conceptual design document such as plans, sections, elevation and 3D modelling through sketch and several computer programs such as 2D CAD, SketchUp, and Adobe Photoshop.
Centre for Research and Community Services (CRCS)
Centre for Advanced Studies (CAS)
Use for a public building which consists of offices, meeting rooms, and multifunction rooms.
Consists of several advanced science laboratories, which facilitates the Department of Mathematics and Department of Astronomy
The elliptical form represents the building as the main icon of the university as a communal space.
The basic rectangular form represents its functionality and modularity
Centre for Art, Design, and Language (CADL) Facilitates the Department of Art, Design, and Language of the university. The triangular form represents the building as a poetic and expressive building for its department.
Senopati Suites II & III Residential Apartments Professional project, construction stage
Type Location Role Year Owner Design Architect Project Architect Main Contractor Structural Consultant MEP Consultant
Team Jakarta, Indonesia Project Architect 2010 PT. Asiana Lintas Development RT+Q Architects Pte Ltd PDW Architects PT. Nusa Konstruksi Engineering Wiratman & Associates PT. Malmas Mitra Teknik
3
DESCRIPTION Total Planning Area: 7.390 m2 Building Use: Residential & facilities Building Description 2 storey lobby and facilities 30 storey residential 3 storey basement parking Building Coverage Area: 2.131 m 2 Gross Floor Area: 45.278 m 2 Total Units: 135 units Situated on a prime residential area and minutes away from the main business district of Jakarta, Senopati Suites II and III offer comfort and luxury. The aim of this project is to establish an elegant and exclusive residential suite which is integrated with consideration sense of place and relentless attention to detail. I worked in this project as the youngest project architect in collaboration with RT+Q Architects, Singapore as design architect who was fully responsible for further studies on the initial design, coordination with clients and other consultants, providing advices and reviews regarding local building codes and involvement in technical support in design development phase, tender drawing phase, and construction drawing phase. During this project I learned to be familiar to work in an international environment and comply with local consultants and authorities, analyzing building performance through OTTV calculation.
Senopati Suites II
Senopati Suites III
The key concept of this building is to incorporate pockets of garden in the sky which allow view and ventilation.
The key concept adapts from the provious tower which wrap around the building with 2m deep balconies and ovehang sky gardens.
Large fin walls and aluminum fins are applied to ensure the privacy of the tenants and provide shadings.
Pivoting planter screens are applied to give enough shading and privacy.
Ground Floor Plan
Senopati Suites II
Senopati Suites III
heat conduction through walls
+
heat conduction through window (glass)
+
solar heat gain through window (glass)
< 45 W/m2
wall type 1 wall type 2 wall type 3 wall type 4 wall type 5 glass type 1
Senopati Suites II OTTV Wall OTTV Glass OTTV Solar
3.81 W/m2 2.05 W/m2 28.42 W/m2
OTTV Total
34.28 W/m2
Overall Thermal Transfer Value (based on SNI 03-6389-2000 Building Envelope OTTV)
wall type 1 wall type 2 wall type 3 wall type 4 glass type 1
Senopati Suites III OTTV Wall OTTV Glass OTTV Solar
7.24 W/m2 4.26 W/m2 27.80 W/m2
OTTV Total
39.55 W/m2
Extreme Antarctica Research Station Master course project, Year I
Type Location Role Year
Individual Brunt Ice Shelf, Antarctica Master Student, Building Technology Track 2014
4
DESCRIPTION Antarctica was chosen to be the site of this project due to the purpose of learning and analyzing the problems and its solution on designing a building in an extreme condition. A research building is needed in Antarctica with a condition of extreme temperature, little daylight during winter, safety issues, and logistic difficulties. In this individual project, I was fully responsible for developing the ideas and design concept, climate strategies, construction strategies, as well as structure feasibility. Energy awareness was another issue which need to be taken into consideration, since the building in this extreme climate conditon should not only rely on natural energy sources. The structure of the building should be demountable and able to be transported by a Hercules airplane. Therefore, all parts of the building elements should be able to fit on the airplane in size and weight. The result of this project is an integral design in terms of the functionality, aesthetic, feasibility, and safety factors. In this project, I was able to integrate three main design principles which are climate, construction, and structure during the process of the design.
Site description on Brunt Ice Shelf
o
C -3 o of 5 C p. f -5 em p. o xt Ma n tem Mi
Av e of . sp 6.5 ee m/ d s
Halley station 1200m away
E re mpe se ro ar r p ch e st ngu at io ins n
s es r kn a ic /ye th ow 1m sn BRUNT ICE SHELF
76 oS 27 oW
B A Moving ice shelf (500m/year)
MAIN
C
B
C
Different function that needs to be connected
MAIN
A
B
C
Detachable due to emergency situation and mobilisation MAIN
B
Functional and safety building create comfort
C MAIN
A
Strategies to solve various function and safety difficulties
A
Floor Plan A
A
B
BOX A
BOX B D
BOX A sleeping + sofa BOX B sleeping + working desk
A B C D
C
ceiling with integrated installation A wall panel for room divider 50 mm wall panel connected to outdoor glazing wall panel with build-in door unit floor cassette module
Building Section I Building Section II Connected to other modules
Interior of one module
Modular Rooms
Integrated module
1
2
3
4 2
5
6
3
4
5
7 1
6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
glass reinforced plastic window profile 2 panes safety glass (6 mm) 2 panes laminated glass (4 mm low iron) glass reinforced plastic 6 mm thick low iron glass (0.76 PVB foil) 60 mm aerogel filling window spacer
7
8 9
1 2 3
4
5 10
1 2 3 4 5
resin infused cross fibre PIR closed cell foam insulation aluminium internal cover mounting strip composite neoprene insulation glass reinforced plastic
2
12 13
14
1 3 4
11
5
6 7 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2 panes laminated glass (4 mm low iron) 60 mm aerogel filling 6 mm thick low iron glass (0.76 PVB foil) silicone rubber sealing openable glass reinforced plastic profile glass reinforced plastic window profile glass reinforced plastic profile PIR closed cell foam insulation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
glass reinforced plastic panel connection integrated room installation PIR closed cell foam insulation exhaust unit light pipes filled with aerogel u-value 0.3 W/m2K prefabricated dry wall prefabricated sleeping box window glazing filled with aerogel, u-value 0.3 W/m2K composite timber cassette glass reinforced plastic panel connection with structure steel frame structure hydraulic leg bottom bearing sealed with PTFE impregnated resin ski crampon strapped to the ski (easily detachable)
solar and light gain
exhaust unit
solar and light gain
room air temperature 21oC air handling unit heat exchanger + humidifier
solar storage tank
radiator
external temperature -55oC
WIND TURBINE
Safety
Install capacity 30 kW (5 wind turbine x 6 kW rated output) height 9000 mm & rotor diameter 5500 mm
SOLAR COLLECTOR Snow melter Bioreactor heating Hot water production
PHOTOVOLTAIC
Building Operation Back-up Regenerator
Workshop
45 kW Daily Use 66 MWh /year
Stand alone PV Panel Energy Sources
Building integrated PV
Entertainment
Energy Load
4 5
3
2
1
12
13
14
1
2
3
4
Module C - 3 items
Module B - 12 items
Module A - 9 items
Module A - Module B
6
7 8
9 10
11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
steel frame structure leg base connection with structure modular interior boxes building integrated photovoltaic panel modular prefabricated element for main quarter roof (module D) light pipes modular prefabricated element without light pipes (module A) detachable module for emergency with silicone rubber flexible connection modular prefabricated element with light pipes (module B) modular prefabricated element with emergency exit (module c) aluminium mouting strip for panel connection modular prefabricated element for main quarter (module E) ski foundation with hydraulic leg emergency stair
5
6
7
8
Module F - 3 items
Module A - Module B
Module E - 3 items
Module D - 2 items
Bank Danamon New Headquarter Professional project, tender document stage
Type Location Role Year Owner Design Architect Project Architect Structural Consultant MEP Consultant Facade Consultant
Team Jakarta, Indonesia Project Architect 2012 PT. Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk. Tange Associates PDW Architects Wiratman & Associates PT. Sigmatech Tatakarsa Paul Adam Facades
5
DESCRIPTION Total Planning Area: 4.141 m2 Building Use: Office & facilities Building Height: 21 storey 3 storey lobby banking hall, facilities 18 storey office 5 storey basement parking
Building Coverage Area: 1.389 m 2 Gross Floor Area: 24.013 m 2 Located along one of the main business district in the capital of Indonesia. The aim of this project is to represent the image of a private bank as strong and solid, yet presents the sleek, modern, and transparent look to become a customer centric organization. I was the youngest project arhitect in collaboration with Tange Associates as the design architect, who had a full responsibility in the design and technical stage. I was responsible for the further studies on the initial design, coordination with clients and other consultants, providing advices and reviews to comply with local regulations and authorities, and involvement in technical support since the design development phase until tender drawing phase. Moreover, I was also responsible for the OTTV calculation which is an important stage of the project. I was able to work in an international environment and have a great skill to cooperate facade consultant, structural consultant, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing consultant.
Site restrictions as challenge Narrow site Building setback line Floor area ratio Maximum building height
41m x 100m 12.5m 5.85 110m
Design action Straight facade from the bottom to the top
to achieve efficient office space and due to local building codes, 10% bonus setback deducted from the building setback is achieved
Maximize the floor plate area within the setback line with approximately 1.400m2
21 floor levels
maximum GFA (Gross Floor Area) is used up
Sky garden add an iconic feature to the building and its surrounding
Boundary Line Road Setback Line Setback Line (for 18-32 storey) Core Sky Garden Office Banking Hall
South Facade open office area
North Facade core wall area
heat conduction through walls
+
heat conduction through window (glass)
+
solar heat gain through window (glass)
< 45 W/m2
wall type 1 wall type 2 wall type 3 wall type 4 wall type 5
wall type 6 wall type 7 wall type 8 wall type 9
Overall Thermal Transfer Value (based on SNI 03-6389-2000 Building Envelope OTTV)
OTTV Wall OTTV Glass OTTV Solar
0.04 W/m2 12.24 W/m2 29.08 W/m2
OTTV Total
41.36 W/m2