Monday, November 29, 2021
1:30 PM- 2:30 PM via Microsoft Teams
1. Review Panel’s Purpose, Structure, and Procedures
a. The EPP/Unit Quality Assurance System Review Panel
The purpose of the Quality Assurance System Review Panel is to provide oversight in the implementation of the QAS; approve amendments to QAS; recommend policy and procedures supporting assessment; and review data, reports, and recommendations. Full Quality Assurance System Review Panel meetings shall be held within the first six weeks of every fall and spring semester. Committee meetings shall be held monthly if new business is pending. Full Quality Assurance System Review Panel meetings, both formal and informal, may be called by the COE dean and/or by the assessment coordinator (Adopted spring 2010).
b. The EPP/ Unit QAS Review Panel consists of three subcommittees
i. Data Collection Committee
1. Mrs. Tiffany Jackson
2. Provost Connie Walton
3. Ms. Peggy Hanley
4. Dr. Shalena Johnson
5. Dean Debbie Thomas
6. Ms. Tiffany Winzer
7. Ms. Melanie Monroe
8. Dr. Patricia Johnson
ii. Assessment System Policy and Procedure Committee
1. Mrs. Tiffany Jackson
2. Dr. Cheyrl Ensley
3. Dr. Obadiah Simmons
4. Dr. Larry Proctor
5. Ms. Natorshau Davis
6. Dr. Waneene Dorsey
7. Dr. Dagne Hill
8. Dr. Kathryn Newman
9. Dr. Bobby Burkes
10. Mr. Terry Matthews
11. Dr. Elaine Foster
12. Dr. Pamela Payne
13. Dr. Danielle Williams
14. Dr. Mary Ghongkedze
15. Dr. Roshunda Belton
16. Dr. Harrison Jones
iii. Action Research Committee
1. Mrs. Tiffany Jackson
2. Dr. Patricia Johnson
3. Ms. Rosalind Russell
4. 5 clinical educators selected from PK-16 advisory (2 mentor teachers, 2 principals, and one HR representative)
c. Recommendations for amendments to appendices, policies, or procedures outlined in the Quality Assurance System shall be presented and voted upon at full panel meetings when a quorum is present.
2. Review linked catalogs, handbooks and appendices. Discuss updates
3. Review proposed updates to QAS Handbook.
4. Make motions, get seconds and table email vote until further review. (aye- no further discussion needed, nay- further discussion needed, or nay)
5. Propose committee and panel meeting dates and times
a. Data Collection Committee- Thursday, December 2, 1:00 PM
b. Assessment System Policy and Procedure Committee- Monday, December 6, 3:30 PM
c. Action Research Committee- Thursday, December 9, 4:00 PM
d. UAS Panel Email Vote- Deadline: Monday, December 13
Commented [TJ1]: This agenda item was discussed but no motion or second was passed in order to add it to the voting slate. Please would someone add your motion and second as a comment if you are in agreement?
Commented [CE2R1]: I so motion.
Old Language:
The EPP/Unit Assessment System Review Panel
The assessment coordinator is chair of the Assessment System Review Panel and serves along with the Associate Vice President/Planning and Institutional Research and with faculty representatives across programs (see Appendix 6 Table of Stakeholder Committee Members). Originally developed in 2006 and revised in 2010, the purpose of the Assessment System Review Panel is to provide oversight in the implementation of the UAS; approve amendments to UAS; recommend policy and procedures supporting assessment; and review data, reports, and recommendations. Assessment System Review Panel meetings, both formal and informal, may be called by the COE dean and/or by the assessment coordinator (Adopted spring 2010).
Proposed Change:
The EPP/ Unit Quality Assurance System Panel consists of subject-matter experts, clinical educators, staff members, and administrators that serve the panel at-large and also have subcommittee appointments (see Appendix 6 Table of Stakeholder Committee Members) The purpose of the Quality Assurance System Review Panel is to provide oversight in the implementation of the QAS; approve amendments to QAS; recommend policy and procedures supporting assessment; and review data, reports, and recommendations. Full Quality Assurance System Review Panel meetings shall be held within the first six weeks of every fall and spring semester. Committee meetings shall be held monthly if new business is pending. Full Quality Assurance System Review Panel meetings, both formal and informal, may be called by the COE dean and/or by the assessment coordinator (Adopted spring 2010).
Old Language:
Policy and Practice Changes
These procedures were proposed by the Assessment System Review Panel and adopted spring 2010. Policy and practice changes including changes in program and EPP/Unit assessments are presented to the dean and administrative council. These changes may be initiated at various levels: 1) by program faculty, 2) by department heads or the dean, and/or 3) by committees such as Assessment System Review Panel or PK-16+ Council. The initiating entity must: 1) provide a rationale for the change; 2) collect, analyze and summarize quantitative or qualitative data; 3) provide evidence that the change was approved by program faculty and by the department head; 4) present the change with required documentation to COE Dean (see Appendix 17 EPP/Unit Decision Flowchart).
Proposed Change:
Policy and Practice Changes
These procedures were proposed by the Quality Assurance Assessment System Review Panel and adopted fall 2010 fall 2021. Policy and practice changes including changes in program and EPP/Unit assessments are presented to the dean and QAS administrative council. These changes may be initiated at various levels: 1) by program faculty, 2) by department heads or the dean, and/or 3) by committees such as Assessment System Review Panel Recruitment and Retention Committee, Curriculum Committee, or PK-16+ Council. The initiating entity must: 1) provide a rationale for the change; 2) collect, analyze and summarize quantitative or qualitative data; 3) provide evidence that the change was approved by program faculty and by the department head; 4) present the change with required documentation to COE Dean EPP/ Unit QAS Panel. COE Dean and Provost have veto power. (see Appendix 17 EPP/Unit Decision Flowchart).