2018-09-18

ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SEVEN YEARS OF EDITORIAL FREEDOM

Tuesday, September 18, 2018

Ann Arbor, Michigan

michigandaily.com

Michigan Medicine nurses vote in favor of authorizing work stoppage

Hospital says strike illegal for public employees, both sides continue contract bargaining RACHEL CUNNINGHAM Daily Staff Reporter

The University of Michigan Professional Nurses Council announced Monday morning that Michigan Medicine

nurses voted overwhelmingly to strike for three days amid bargaining efforts. Over 4,000 nurses voted in favor of a strike.

UMPNC represents more than 5,700 registered nurses at University Michigan hospitals, clinics and other health care facilities.

UMPNC members have filed unfair labor practice charges against the University for failing to bargain in good faith, making changes in work shift without notification and discrimination against free speech.

In a press release, Michigan Medicine nurse Katie Scott said the University created barriers to negotiation.

“The University keeps violating our rights,” Scott said.

“They’ve created a wall that’s blocking us from negotiating the issues that are important to nurses and our patients. We’re saying, break down that wall so we can bargain in good faith.”

Michigan Medicine spokeswoman Mary Masson wrote in a statement to The Daily that hospital administrators were disappointed to hear the outcome of the vote. Since it is illegal for public employees to strike, Masson wrote the hospital is willing to take legal action to avoid one.

“Nurses are critical to the delivery of safe

patient care,” she wrote. “The most critically ill patients in the state come to Michigan Medicine. A strike could put patient safety at serious risk.”

The statement goes on to clarify how patient care will be handled in the event of a work stoppage.

“Since UMPNC announced it was seeking the vote, Michigan Medicine leaders have been developing a comprehensive continuity of operations plan in place in the event of a strike,” the statement reads.

“This will include hiring and training temporary nurses to replace absent employees, deferring and rescheduling select procedures and making staff scheduling adjustments as needed. Michigan Medicine remains committed to patient safety during any union activity, and will do everything possible to maintain the highest quality of care during a strike...

We remain ready to continue bargaining with the UMPNC and are eager to resolve the contract negotiations.”

Katie Oppenheim, Michigan Medicine nurse and chair of UMPNC, said the nurses’ goal is to create a fair contract for all of its members.

“Our goal is not a work stoppage,” Oppenheim said.

“Our goal is a fair agreement which respects nurses and guarantees safe staffing. The University can remedy this situation immediately, by stopping their unfair labor practices and bargaining in good faith.”

COMMUNITY AFFAIRS

Prof. revokes offer to write Israel study abroad letter

‘U’ admin., Jewish community condemn boycott by prof. in support of Palestinians KATHERINA SOURINE Daily Staff Reporter

University of Michigan professor John CheneyLippold is facing claims of anti-Semitism after rescinding his offer to write a recommendation letter for LSA junior Abigail Ingber, who requested the letter for an application for a study abroad program in Israel.

Cheney-Lippold, who works in the American Culture Department, expressed his apologies in the email but claimed that as part of an academic boycott against Israel, he would be unable to write a recommendation for the student.

Club Z, an organization that works to empower and network Jewish students who are committed to Zionism, posted the screenshot of the email exchange to Facebook Sunday afternoon. The group criticized the email, claiming the message was anti-Semitic.

The post also noted the U.S. Department of Education recent changes its definition

of anti-Semitism to include situations that hold Israel to a double standard in comparison to other democratic states.

“As you may know, many University departments have pledged an academic boycott against Israel in support of Palestinians living in Palestine,” the email read.

“This boycott includes writing letters of recommendation for students planning to study there.”

This boycott follows last year’s controversy regarding the #UMDivest movement and the Central Student Government resolution that called for the University to investigate divestment from companies that violate Palestinian human rights.

The resolution passed last November with 23 votes in favor, 17 against and five abstentions. The following December, the Board of Regents rejected the resolution.

Michigan Hillel Chair Kendall Coden, an LSA senior, described her disappointment See LETTER, Page 2

ACADEMICS

Commissioner of FCC talks political battle for net neutrality laws

Ann Arbor water treatment Assembly manager warns residents not considers to eat foam in Huron River issues with

Jessica Rosenworcel one of the two dissenters in body’s decision to ban net neutrality last December

City Council also discussed last week’s police oversight board proposal, comprehensive transportation update plan

GOVERNMENT

LEAH GRAHAM Daily Staff Reporter

Ann Arbor’s water treatment plant manager Brian Steglitz spoke to City Council Monday night about contamination warnings along the Huron River, including the expansion of a do-not-eat fish advisory to

include a warning against consuming foam from the river.

In August, the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services announced polyf luoroalkyl substance tests showed fish in five counties along the Huron River were contaminated beyond safe levels. PFAS have been linked to health

problems including increased risk of cancer and higher cholesterol levels.

PFAS compounds are used in various industrial processes and consumer products, such as non-stick cookware and fast food wrappers. Because the PFAS compounds don’t occur naturally, they can See RIVER, Page 3

MATT VAILLIENCOURT/Daily

FCC Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel discusses net neutrality at a policy talk put on by the Ford school Monday afternoon.

JULIA FORD

Daily Staff Reporter

Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel of the Federal Communications Commission visited the University of Michigan Monday night to discuss net neutrality with Jack Bernard, associate general counsel of the University, to a crowd of about 150 students, staff and community members at the Ford School of Public Policy.

The FCC decided to repeal net neutrality rules on Dec. 14, and the repeal took effect June 11. This decision allows broadband providers to change the pricing packages for

different users and different content. Rosenworcel was one of the two dissenters in the agency’s decision to repeal net neutrality and has since been a vocal supporter of the protections.

Bernard said a cloud of confusion often surrounds net neutrality, so he began the policy talk by asking Rosenworcel to define the term.

“It means that you can go where you want and do what you want online, and your broadband provider does not make decisions for you,” Rosenworcel explained.

“It means your broadband provider does not have the See FCC, Page 3

GOT A NEWS TIP? Call 734-418-4115 or e-mail news@michigandaily.com and let us know.

Check out the Daily’s News podcast, The Daily Weekly

ROSEANNE CHAO/Daily

MATT VAILLIENCOURT/Daily

attendance Faculty Senate members also suggest permanent Tri-Campus committee DANIELLE PASEKOFF Daily Staff Reporter

The University of Michigan’s Senate Assembly convened Monday afternoon for its first meeting of the academic year. The group discussed a motion to create a tri-campus committee for the Senate Assembly, as well as a resolution to change the assembly rules to allow remote attendance and electronic voting for representatives.

The meeting opened with remarks by Joy Beatty, vice chair of the Senate Assembly and an associate professor at U-M Dearborn, in which Beatty explained the foundational principles of the Senate Assembly to new members, as well as the assembly’s position in regard to other governing bodies at the University. The assembly consists of 74 elected faculty members from across schools and departments on the University of Michigan’s three campuses.

“I’d encourage you to

Ann Arbor City Council member Julia Grand (D-Ward 3) asks a question after a presentation by the city’s water treatment manager during a City Council meeting at City Hall Monday evening.

For more stories and coverage, visit

michigandaily.com

INDEX

Vol. CXXVII, No.137 ©2018 The Michigan Daily

NEWS.........................2 OPINION.....................4 ARTS......................6

See ATTENDANCE, Page 3

SUDOKU.....................2 CLASSIFIEDS...............6 SPORTS....................7

News

2 — Tuesday, September 18, 2018

TUESDAY:

By Design

MONDAY: Looking at the Numbers

LETTER From Page 1 with Cheney-Lippold’s decision not to write the letter, saying professors should encourage students to explore educational opportunities without the influence of personal politics.

“I can’t speak for all students, but I know that I and many others feel hurt by this decision,” Coden said.

“Studying in or visiting Israel is an opportunity to immerse ourselves in an Israeli culture that is different from our own, but also a Jewish culture that is very familiar and part of our own identity. Students should not be denied the opportunity to experience another culture as a result of a professor’s political viewpoints.”

University Public Affairs released a statement regarding the incident, reaffirming the consistent opposition of boycotting Israeli institutions of higher education. The statement upholds no academic department or unit officially maintains a boycott.

“It is disappointing that a faculty member would allow their personal political beliefs to limit the support they are willing to otherwise provide for our students,” the statement read. “We will engage our faculty colleagues in deep discussions to clarify how the expression of our shared values plays out in support of all students.”

Cheney-Lippold acknowledged his mistake in claiming University

departments support the boycott and amended the statement he made in the email, saying his support of the boycott is a personal stance.

“I support the boycott because I support solidarity,” he said in an interview with The Daily. “I follow the idea that people who are being discriminated against or people who need help … I feel compelled to help them.

I was following a call by representatives of Palestinian civil society to boycott Israel in a very similar tactical frame as South Africa. The idea is that I support communities who organize themselves and ask for international support to achieve equal rights, freedom and to prevent violations of international law.”

Cheney-Lippold affirmed the boycott focuses on institutions rather than people and stated that denying Ingber’s academic opportunities should not be in question. He confirmed upon further contact she did find another person to complete the letter.

“The perennial claim of antiSemitism I fully deny,” CheneyLippold said. “I have no bad will against the student, and I would have very gladly written a letter for any other graduate program or study abroad. The idea is that I am just one person, and by refusing to write that letter or at least rescinding it, I tried to keep to my conscious and to the fact that I believe that the boycott is a good tactic to enhance human rights and to get everyone in Israel-Palestine to have what international criminal court and the U.N. in

WEDNESDAY: This Week in History

general has requested, which is equal rights for everybody.”

Cheney-Lippold also said he wanted to focus on the importance of dialogue within the University on this issue as well as highlight the student organizations on campus who are furthering knowledge on the issue for the campus and upholding diversity of thought.

“As a professor, I’m not just a machine writing things for people,” he said. “I have opinions and even though a letter of recommendation is about the student, a lot of thought goes into them. It’s not a blank check where I’m signing for them to go to any place they want, it is a dialogue.

It’s what the University is about, talking through differences and really figuring out where each other stands, not expecting something or assuming something, but really trying to get into what is the key difference. Seeing what can we do more, how can we have a larger campus-wide discussion.

I want to push it beyond the horse-race politics of what John did or did not say.”

LSA junior Sophee Langerman claimed she fully supports Cheney-Lippold’s decision as a boycott, divestment and sanctions activist, but reaffirmed the complexity of the issue and the diversity of opinion among students on campus.

“I believe that this professor is 100 percent correct in his refusal of writing a recommendation letter in support of the BDS movement,” she said. “A trip to Israelioccupied Palestine would

mean the support of the mass murder and oppression of not only Palestinians, but Ethiopian Jews, Mizrahi Jews, East-Asian immigrants and other non-white minority communities. BDS cannot support that. I would also like to point out that this professor was never under any obligation to write this student a letter of recommendation, and in fact, she got more than most students do by receiving a reply about why he would not participate.”

Langerman hopes the boycott can encourage peaceful dialogue and activism for students and faculty alike at the University.

“As far as I have experienced, Jewish and Palestinian communities on campus have always had a divide due to the rhetoric produced by Zionist entities that anything ‘proPalestine’ is anti-Semitic, which is just flat out incorrect,” she said. “If anything, I hope that this professor’s boycott empowers the rest of the academic community to take a stand against apartheid regimes, and brings forth more fruitful dialogue surrounding the BDS movement – and why it is such a crucial form of nonviolent activism.”

Ingber told The Michigan Daily she is currently unable to comment on the incident, as she is waiting to discuss it with University officials. According to Club Z’s Facebook page, they did not receive the message from Ingber, but rather from another University professor to whom the email was sent.

The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com

FRIDAY: Behind the Story

THURSDAY: Twitter Talk

420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1327 www.michigandaily.com

ALEXA ST. JOHN

NATHAN GUPTA

Editor in Chief 734-418-4115 ext. 1251 alexastj@michigandaily.com

Business Manager 734-418-4115 ext. 1241 nathankg@michigandaily.com

NEWS TIPS

news@michigandaily.com

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR tothedaily@michigandaily.com

EDITORIAL PAGE

opinion@michigandaily.com

PHOTOGRAPHY SECTION

ARTS SECTION

photo@michigandaily.com

arts@michigandaily.com

NEWSROOM

SPORTS SECTION

734-418-4115 opt. 3

sports@michigandaily.com

CORRECTIONS

ADVERTISING

corrections@michigandaily.com

dailydisplay@gmail.com

Editorial Staff DAYTON HARE Managing Editor

haredayt@michigandaily.com

RIYAH BASHA and SOPHIE SHERRY

Managing News Editor news@michigandaily.com Senior News Editors: Andrew Hiyama, Carly Ryan, Kaela Theut, Matt Harmon, Maya Goldman Assistant News Editors: Jordyn Baker, Remy Farkas, Riley Langefeld, Elizabeth Lawrence, Rachel Leung, Molly Norris, Maeve O’Brien, Shannon Ors, Amara Shaikh, Katherina Sourine

ANU ROY-CHAUDHURY and ASHLEY ZHANG

Editorial Page Editors tothedaily@michigandaily.com Senior Opinion Editors: Tara Jayaram, Joel Danilewitz, Jeremy Kaplan, Ben Charlson, Magdalena Mihaylova

MIKE PERSAK and LANEY BYLER

Managing Sports Editors sportseditors@michigandaily.com Senior Sports Editors: Mark Calcagno, Robert Hefter, Max Marcovitch, Paige Voeffray, Ethan Wolfe Assistant Sports Editors: Aria Gerson, Ben Katz, Tien Le, Anna Marcus, Ethan Sears, Jacob Shames

DANIELLE YACOBSON and MADELEINE GAUDIN Managing Arts Editors

arts@michigandaily.com

Senior Arts Editors: Becky Portman, Sam Rosenberg, Arya Naidu, Dominic Polsinelli Arts Beat Editors: Jack Brandon, Fallon Gates, Shima Sadaghiyani, Tess Garcia, Sofia Lynch

ROSEANNE CHAO and CASEY TIN Managing Design Editors

design@michigandaily.com

Senior Design Editor: Jack Silberman

Faculty debate reclaiming terms with A/PIA dept. in community dialogue

Sudoku Syndication

http://sudokusyndication.com/sudoku/generator/print/

ALEXIS RANKIN and KATELYN MULCAHY Managing Photo Editors

photo@michigandaily.com

Senior Photo Editors: Amelia Cacchione, Emma Richter, Evan Aaron Assistant Photo Editors: Alice Liu, Darby Stipe, Max Kuang, Ryan McLoughlin, Alec Cohen

BRIAN KUANG

Statement Editor statement@michigandaily.com Deputy Editors: Colin Beresford, Jennifer Meer

FINN STORER and ELISE LAARMAN

SUDOKU HARD

2 6

9

5

3

7

2 4

9

2

6

5 7

6

8 1

4

4 1 3 4

1

2

3

8

6 7

APPLE SPICE.

2

2

3 © sudokusolver.com. For personal use only.

puzzle by sudokusyndication.com

Managing Copy Editors

LIZZY LAWRENCE Daily Staff Reporter

University of Michigan students and faculty discussed issues of free speech, derogatory terms and minority groups’ efforts to reclaim these terms Monday night at the Harlan Hatcher Graduate Library.

The Asian/Pacific Islander American Studies Department and student group WeListen hosted the event, which used the example of The Slants — an Asian-American rock band who went to the U.S. Supreme Court to trademark their name — as a starting point for the presentations and WeListen discussion.

Last week, the A/PIA Department invited The Slants to campus for a concert and a keynote lecture discussing their case. The Slants band name originated as an attempt to reclaim the derogatory term for the A/PIA community.

Generate and solve Sudoku, Super Sudoku and Godoku puzzles at sudokusyndication.com!

Their trademark was rejected in 2010, but after years of legal battle, the Supreme Court ruled the government could not deny trademark protection to names considered derogatory.

Five University faculty members spoke on the topic, including a free speech and hate speech specialist from the Law School and several ethnic studies professors. John Kuwada, director of A/PIA studies, said he reached out to faculty with diverse backgrounds and research interests to speak at the event.

“I asked faculty who had quite a bit of experience with this idea and I tried to cover the whole wide range,” Kuwada said. “There’s a lot of slurs out there. These things are very nuanced and very complex.”

Former A/PIA Director Amy Stillman also spoke on The Slants case, showcasing a quote from lead singer Simon Tam about why he chose the band name. He wanted to use See RECLAIMING, Page 3

copydesk@michigandaily.com

Senior Copy Editors: Emily Stillman and Allie Bopp

BOB LESSER and JORDAN WOLFF

Managing Online Editors lesserrc@michigandaily.com Senior Web Developers: Patricia Huang, Abna Panda, Hassaan Ali Wattoo, Rebecca Tung

IAN HARRIS

Managing Video Editor video@michigandaily.com Senior Video Editors: Abe Lofy, Robby Weinbaum, Jillian Drzinski, Danielle Kim

JASON ROWLAND and ASHLEY TJHUNG Michigan in Color Editors

michiganincolor@michigandaily.com

Senior Michigan in Color Editors: Lorna Brown, Zainab Bhindarwala, Christian Paneda, Nisa Khan, Na’kia Channey Assistant Michigan in Color Editors: Angelo McKoy, Kareem Shunnar, Maya Mokh, Priya Judge, Efe Osagie

KAYLA WATERMAN

Managing Social Media Editor

Business Staff ADRIANNA KUSMIERCZYK CAMERON COANE

Creative Director

DEANA ZHU

Sales Manager

Special Projects Manager

JEFFREY ZHANG

MARIO DRESAJ

ALEC SPELLER

ROHIT IYER

Local Accounts Manager Marketing Consulting Manager

Brand Manager

Business Development Manager

The Michigan Daily (ISSN 0745-967) is published Monday through Friday during the fall and winter terms by students at the University OF Michigan. One copy is available free of charge to all readers. Additional copies may be picked up at the Daily’s office for $2. Subscriptions for September-April are $250 and year long subscriptions are $275.

University affiliates are subject to a reduced subscription rate. On-campus subscriptions for fall term are $35. Subscriptions must be prepaid.

The Michigan Daily — www.michigandaily.com

“Separate from the project, the university is pursuing renewable energy options”

Jack Eaton, D-Ward 4, and Anne Bannister, D-Ward 1, would bring forward the task force’s proposal at the next City Council meeting Oct. 1. Kailasapathy said it was “what the residents want from us.”

“I take it as my duty to put forward the ordinance written out by the task force,” she said.

City Council also passed a resolution setting aside $351,670 for a comprehensive transportation plan update from Sam Schwartz Engineering DPC. The plan would ask Sam Schwartz Engineering DPC to recommend implementation methods for multimodal transportation systems with the hopes of zero fatalities on the road.

Councilmember Zachary Ackerman, D-Ward 3, supported the resolution.

“For those of you have driven in Ann Arbor at the rush hours may use the term gridlock from time to time,” he said. “I actually found out that the term gridlock was first coined by the consultant we’re hiring. He for many years was a senior traffic planner for the city of New York, bringing a lot of traffic congestion solutions to neighborhoods, improving quality of life, as well as taking an incredibly progressive and forward-thinking approach to his practice, as to how do we deal with pedestrians and cyclists in our public right of way to ensure that they are safe when surrounded by cars.”

Eaton voted against the resolution, arguing it was “an inappropriate use” of money.

“This is $351,000 we could be using for actual pedestrian improvements, on street lighting, on (rapid f lashing beacons), signage at some of the roundabouts that are poorly marked at best for pedestrians,” he said.

Tuesday, September 18, 2018 — 3

RECL AIM ING R ACIST NA M ES

RIVER From Page 1

take a long time to discompose and harm surrounding areas for longer periods of time.

Steglitz said a do-not-eat foam warning for the Huron River would be issued soon.

We’ve provided some communication to council on the issue of foam in the river recently, and that is something that is going to be coming out in the next couple days, is there will be a do-not-eat the foam amended to the existing fish advisory notifications,” Steglitz said.

PFAS levels in Michigan’s public drinking water systems are not regulated, and while there is a federally designated “health advisory level” of PFAS in drinking water of 70 parts-pertrillion, it is not an enforceable guideline, meaning there is no court-mandated cleanup standards cities and governments have to follow.

City Council’s meeting also included discussions on other topics including a proposal for the formation of a police oversight board, which was debated during a work session at City Hall in March. Since then, City Council has fielded recommendations from citizens about the organization and content of the board. Members of the citizen task force that drafted the proposal argued recommendations made

by Lazarus would undermine the oversight board’s independence.

Councilmember Sumi Kailasapathy, D-Ward 1, said she and fellow Councilmembers

News

ALICE LIU/Daily

LSA professor Matthew Countryman speaks on issues of free speech and hate speech at a panel and discussion session hosted by A/PIA studies and WeListen at Hatcher Graduate Library Monday evening.

through these organs of the Senate, without waiting for a crisis to take place,” Potter said. “The University works better when they’re actually

listening to the community.”

The meeting continued with the introductions of two resolutions. Sarah Lippert, an associate professor at U-M Flint, proposed a resolution to create a permanent tricampus committee within the Senate Assembly. Within the three campuses, differences in interpretations of various policy documents and a lack of communication between each campus present issues in terms of relaying accurate information to all faculty.

The committee will serve as a central repository for all policy documents and resources across campuses and standardize explanations of such documents to prevent confusion and miscommunication within the entire University.

As stated in the resolution, if passed, the committee will aim “to consider points of interest... such as those that relate to the relationship between the three campuses or policies across the

institution.”

“One of the needs that the tri-campus task force identified was that it would be really helpful to have a permanent group that people could refer to when there are interpretation issues,” Lippert said. “It would be a committee that looks at things relevant to faculty across the institution, not at local governance below that.”

An ad hoc Tri Campus Taskforce already exists in faculty governance after the Senate Advisory Committee on University Affairs voted to reinstate the body last fall, hoping to improve communication between the three campuses.

In April, members of Flint’s Faculty Council penned a letter opposing the creation of a standing Tri Campus taskforce due to a lack of clarity on the proposed body’s jurisdiction.

The meeting closed with another resolution introduced to the assembly, touching

on current issues regarding quorum and the allowance of electronic voting during Senate Assembly meetings.

Scott Masten, rules chair and professor at the Ross School of Business, mentioned that since 2004, there have only been quorums at three Faculty Senate meetings. The meetings in which quorum was reached occurred only during meetings related to tenure, course evaluations and other issues closely related to the faculty. Quorum for the Faculty Senate is 100 out of the 3,000 total members.

This continued lack of participation is partially due to the fact that most faculty confuses the Faculty Senate with the Senate Assembly, a much smaller body of University representatives.

“Most faculty don’t know they’re on the Senate,” Masten said. “People don’t understand that they’re actually Senate members.”

American Culture Department who specializes in LGBTQ and Hispanic Caribbean studies, spoke about examples of rethe word “slant” to present the claiming derogatory terms such band’s perspective, or slant, on as “queer.” Law professor Leonlife as people of color in the en- ard Niehoff discussed the legal tertainment industry. She reiter- complexities of the case. Bethated a question Tam brought up any Hughes, an assistant proin his lecture the week before. fessor in the American Culture “The question he really put Department who focuses on forward in his concert last Native American studies, talked week is ‘Shouldn’t a commu- about the infamous Washingnity really have the right to ton Redskins football team. name itself?’” Stillman said. The Redskins, Niehoff noted, The panelists’ presenta- are an example of a group bentions went beyond The Slants efitting from the Supreme Court case with panelists discussing decision and are not reclaiming their own areas of specialty. a hate term for empowerment Lawrence La Fountain-Stokes, purposes. Niehoff explained an associate professor in the how other organizations too,

like the Ku Klux Klan, could potentially use this case to trademark hate speech of their own.

“The First Amendment has a kind of fearful symmetry to it,” Niehoff said. “Whatever you get on one side, you get on the other side as well.”

Building on this idea, Matthew Countryman, an associate professor of American Culture, noted how the meaning and intent of a disparaging word alters based on which side is using it, specifically focusing on the use of the n-word in white and Black communities. He also discussed further complexities within the Black community about whether the n-word should be used at all, recalling

a debate between two great African-American thinkers during his freshman year of college.

“I have this very distinct memory when I was a college freshman of... the AfricanAmerican literary community arguing about the word,” Countryman said. “(We argued) about whether or not it was evidence of the power of a kind of internalized self-hatred in the Black community or whether it was proof of a sense of masculine solidarity in those communities. It’s always a contested question, whether or not it’s possible to reclaim the word.”

Following the panelists’ presentations, WeListen split attendees into dialogue groups

to discuss the issue. LSA senior Eli Rachlin, a leader of WeListen, talked about the importance of The Slants case and how he hopes the discussion will delve into deeper themes.

“It pertains in a lot of way to that Supreme Court case, but also in a broader sense just the idea of reclaiming derogatory terms, which shows up in many situations,” Rachlin said.

LSA freshman Zhehao Tong said as an international student, he has much to learn about reclaiming hate terms.

that phone call — it’s up to you.”

To provide insight to the other side of the aisle, Bernard asked Rosenworcel to provide a “steel man” instead of a “straw man” argument for her opposition.

“We want our broadband providers to experiment and come up with package plans that serve everyone, and making revenue from online platforms is an important part of that mix, or setting up services that only allow people to reach small portions of the internet could create more and different packages,” Rosenworcel said. “We want them to have that freedom to experiment.”

Though Rosenworcel provided the statement, she quickly added she could refute what she had just said.

Rosenworcel said her support of net neutrality protections would be questionable if the broadband provider market was competitive, but that is currently not the case.

“I believe you need less oversight if you have a competitive marketplace,” Rosenworcel said.

“Competitive marketplaces are themselves the best regulator of activity. But when you look at the broadband provider marketplace, according to the FCC’s own data, about half of the American public does not have a choice of broadband provider.”

Opponents to net neutrality claim the protections hamper business and innovation.

However, Rosenworcel insists the opposite is true. Since broadband providers are no longer legally obligated to treat their internet traffic equally, Rosenworcel said small businesses could experience adverse effects.

“They have the right to go to any entrepreneur or creator that wants to put something online, and say, ‘Hey if you want to reach that customer, you have to pay us a toll,’” Rosenworcel said.

As an engineer possibly

interested in government work, Business and Engineering sophomore Amulya Parmar found Rosenworcel’s comments on entrepreneurs especially important, as he himself started a small web-hosting business in high school.

“To me this net neutrality conversation is important,” Parmar said. “It epitomizes that I was, even as a high school student, able to build my own internet company.”

Gloria and Wayne Baker attended Rosenworcel’s policy talk because their hometown — Manchester, Michigan — recently voted overwhelmingly against an initiative to bring broadband internet to the community.

Installing broadband internet would have charged residents based on how much land they own, so people with large farms generally did not support the initiative.

The Bakers rely on satellite internet access, which is typically slower than

broadband internet.

“People who had more money had access to pay for Wi-Fi as much as they wanted, and those people who had more money also had larger land, so they would have been charged more for it,” Gloria said.

Rosenworcel is known for coining the term “homework gap,” referring to the lack of internet access for many low-income and rural students to complete their schoolwork.

Wayne said other Manchester residents suggested simply waiting for 5G, a faster satellite internet service, instead of installing broadband internet. However, waiting for the upgrade could take years.

“The problem with that is 5G is not tomorrow, it’s years and years away,” Wayne said.

“So in the interim, what can people with young families do whose kids need to do homework and don’t have access to good internet speeds to do that?”

ATTENDANCE From Page 1 be an ambassador for the importance of faculty governance,” Beatty told the assembly. “People aren’t always aware of what we do, so thank you for being here and for standing up for faculty governance.”

Later, the assembly discussed potential improvements to their current execution of meetings and potential guests to invite to their future assemblies.

Members noted a disconnect between the administration and the Senate Assembly, except when the University needs the faculty in times of crisis.

David Potter, secretary of the Faculty Senate and a professor at U-M Ann Arbor, cited the instances of white nationalist Richard Spencer’s efforts to speak on the University’s Ann Arbor campus earlier this year,

stressing the importance of collaboration between the University administration and Senate Faculty to unite in these instances instead of divide.

“I think that the ideal is to create a dialogue between faculty and the administration

“Most faculty don’t know they’re on the Senate.

People don’t understand that they’re actually... members”

RECLAIMING From Page 2

FCC From Page 1 legal right to block websites, to throttle online services or censor online content.”

Rosenworcel emphasized the importance of the nondiscriminatory protections of net neutrality, which ensured broadband providers could not treat the traffic on their networks differently based on source or content. In order to illustrate the meaning of nondiscrimination protections, Rosenworcel compared old telephone networks to internet providers.

“Think back to the basic telephone network,” Rosenworcel said. “It is a given that if you went to a wired phone on a wall, you could call whoever you want.

The telephone company can’t decide you can’t call that person, nor can they go in and edit your conversation. In other words, you have a nondiscriminatory right to make

Read more at MichiganDaily.com

Opinion

4 — Tuesday, September 18, 2018

The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com

ALEXANDER SATOLA | COLUMN

Modern Reading: Humanism vs Algorithm

Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan since 1890.

420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 tothedaily@michigandaily.com

ALEXA ST. JOHN Editor in Chief

ANU ROY-CHAUDHURY AND ASHLEY ZHANG

DAYTON HARE Managing Editor

Editorial Page Editors

EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS Emma Chang Ben Charlson Joel Danilewitz Samantha Goldstein Emily Huhman

Tara Jayaram Jeremy Kaplan Lucas Maiman Magdalena Mihaylova Ellery Rosenzweig Jason Rowland

Anu Roy-Chaudhury Alex Satola Ali Safawi Ashley Zhang Sam Weinberger

Unsigned editorials reflect the official position of the Daily’s Editorial Board.

All other signed articles and illustrations represent solely the views of their authors.

KRYSTAL HUR | COLUMN

E

Neri Oxman’s electric stage presence

ach week, University does at the MIT Media Lab and of Michigan Business introduced a process she calls students enrolled in the the Krebs Cycle of creativity.

She explained class Business and how she and her Leaders: The Positive students combine Differences are biology, fashion, required to attend architecture, design an evening event to and more in order to learn from visiting spawn fantastic and industry leaders almost otherworldly and experts. Last creations based in Wednesday, students both the real world congregated in the Hill Auditorium to KRYSTAL and the imagination.

She spoke of the see Neri Oxman’s HUR importance of using lecture, “The Krebs Cycle of Creativity.” Oxman the word “and” rather than is an architect, designer and “or” — of realizing instead of associate professor at the arguing about what discipline or Massachusetts Institute of invention is more important than Technology. Her work has been the other, it’s more productive to showcased at world-renowned engage with both and recognize institutions such as the the contributions that each Museum of Modern Art and the brings to the world. Oxman also spoke about some of the Smithsonian Design Museum.

As I waited for the lecture to many projects she’s worked on, start, looking at the stage where including creating a structure three big screens had been set for 6,500 silkworms to use as up with moving black and white a base for their silk production images, I wasn’t sure what to and putting half a million bees expect. Her photo, which had into an artificial urban habitat. been posted around the Ross School of Business along with the lecture details, cut her as an intimidating figure — her makeup perfectly applied and her hair styled in that masterful “I didn’t try but it still looks great” kind of way I myself have never been able to accomplish.

She smolders at the camera in a way that exudes confidence. I was expecting her to be like all the other speakers that business school people love: suave and Despite the obvious genius charming, with enough humor to offset any possible criticism that exuded from her and her passion for difficult, intricate about being too dry.

Oxman maintained However, when she walked work, on stage after an enthusiastic the same level of humor and introduction by Business School relatability with which she Dean Scott DeRue, she was so started the lecture off as she unlike the image I had painted delved deeper into the intricacies in my head that I had a hard of her work. She told everyone to time reconciling the Oxman I not use their phones or laptops, had seen in the posters with laughingly saying, “It pisses the woman on stage. She spoke me off.” She asked questions of to the audience like she was the audience, teasing them like entertaining old friends in she would a close friend when her living room rather than no one knew the answer (“This giving a lecture to thousands of is rudimentary information!”). strangers (many of whom were While she did have carefully probably snobby intellectuals), prepared slides, she made it clear and her warmth was clearly she had no intention of following visible when she affectionately any strict plan and simply let acknowledged the students who her enthusiasm direct her had attended her Q&A session path. During the Q&A session that followed her lecture, she earlier in the day.

The lecture was fascinating. sat down on the stage with She spoke about the work she crisscrossed legs and listened

Oxman was unapologetically unpolished.

intently to the questions that audience members asked. And, her parting words to an audience filled with Business students when asked how students can be like her and produce powerful, creative work? “Don’t do budgets.”

Oxman’s lecture was profoundly organic and intimate in the best way possible — though I know that some of my peers, who are used to buttoneddown men giving lectures (while throwing in the occasional obligatory joke, of course) were taken aback by her eccentricity.

The almost uncomfortably casual way in which she presented her lecture was a direct contrast to the perfect image of being professional but affable that so many professors believe they have to exude when they present.

Oxman was unapologetically unpolished. She stuttered and punctuated her statements with laughs and “ums” and “uhs,” and she paced and waved her hands around in a way that some would probably criticize as being too distracting. All of this only added to her charisma and charm; her behavior showed she doesn’t care about proper presentation decorum and her paramount focus was to show off her work on her own terms.

This kind of candor made her lecture much more effective than any carefully timed jokes and seamless transition between slides.

To be completely honest, I didn’t understand much of what she spoke about, and I know that was the case for many people in her audience. Despite this, I found what I did understand incredible, and as I left, I was struck by how, for perhaps the first time ever, I actually enjoyed a science lecture. It was amazing to see an obviously brilliant, incredibly talented woman toss away the stuffy presentation guidelines set by professionals who believe they have to always present the best version of themselves in order to appeal to their audience. And while it’s true that appearance means everything in some cases, I prefer Oxman’s wonderfully disjointed and invigorating method of lecturing.

HANNAH MYERS | CONTACT HANNAH AT HSMYERS@UMICH.EDU

Krystal Hur can be reached at kryshur@umich.edu.

T

here is something “Frequently Bought Together” special about walking suggestions that use this into a bookstore algorithm to add to the average value of orders. and exploring As opposed to the the collection. discovery that occurs Though I don’t do in a bookstore, the it purposefully, if Amazon algorithm is it is my first time set up so that you only there, I tend to see what the site wants follow a similar you to see. This is path through the especially problematic store to get myself in terms of people’s acquainted. First, habits I f loat toward ALEXANDER reading because you only are the literature SATOLA recommended books section and walk across the wall from A to Z, that reinforce your current scouring through the names tastes and opinions. We should of authors both familiar and be uncomfortable with the unknown. Then, my eyes idea that a digital extension of wander to the history and ourselves, created by website philosophy sections, where I algorithms for financial gain, can usually find esoteric titles has so much sway in how we that sometimes hint more at think. Blurred lines now exist the tastes of the bookstore between our own original employees than the interests of thoughts about what we might like and what an algorithm their customers.

This brick-and-mortar decides for us. meandering is in stark contrast to the clickbait world of the internet. In fact, online retailers such as Amazon have vastly changed the way we consume books. Any product, for that matter, is filtered through the technology giant’s recommendation algorithms and spit back at the customer in the hopes of making a sale.

What we do not often consider is how these algorithms are destroying the humanistic side of reading and how we share books with others.

In many ways, the digital The basic idea of Amazon’s recommendation engine is identity we simultaneously to predict what consumers create for ourselves and may want to buy based on that companies create for us their previous search history. is the same person. At the The engine seeks to create Code Conference 2016 — an conference relationships between “objects” invitation-only — which include users, items hosted by the technology and products — and makes news website Recode — the entrepreneur a recommendation based on controversial Elon Musk suggested that these relationships.

For example, a relationship humans in the modern age may represent a user adding are already cyborgs who a product to their wish list or possess a “digital layer” giving it a five-star rating. The above the naturally occurring recommendation engine then limbic system or cortex. The uses these raw data to compute common tropes of implanted the similarity between the chips and robotic arms pale product they had just viewed in comparison to the reality and another product in the same that your smartphone holds category. The final step is to the same computing power integrate the recommendation as the NASA computers that into one of Amazon’s many guided astronauts to the moon on-site or email platforms. in 1969. Each person must Approximately 35 percent of decide for themselves if this Amazon’s revenue is generated powerful digital layer serves a by advertising tools such as symbiotic role or one that has the “Recommended for You” or the potential to pollute their

The next time you find yourself in a bookstore, take the opportunity to slow down and see what’s there.

independent, natural selves. It is also necessary to question who actually has control over this digital layer: the user or the corporation?

What algorithms take away from the modern reading experience is its crucial interpersonal dimensions. My grandfather, who has lived in South Africa since the 1970s, told me once on a hike in the mountains above Cape Town about a book titled “Cry, the Beloved Country” written in 1948 by Alan Paton. The novel details the desperate journey of a village reverend from the countryside of South Africa who goes to Johannesburg to find his son, only to discover that he is charged and convicted for the murder of a prominent white man and advocate for racial justice. The story is masterful and nuanced in its treatment of race relations and reconciliation in the country, yet after I finished the novel, what I remember most are the conversations with my grandfather afterward about how it impacted him many years ago. I definitely would not have found “Cry, the Beloved Country” relying on Amazon’s online book recommendations, and more importantly, I would not have had this shared reading experience that brought my grandfather and me closer together.

The next time you find yourself in a bookstore, take the opportunity to slow down and see what’s there. If you are feeling really brave, you can ask an employee for a recommendation. I guarantee their reasoning process will not be based a detailed personal history of “likes” or “dwell times” (the amount of time you spend on a webpage before you click on a different item), and unlike an algorithm, they have most likely read the words on the pages they are about to endorse. Better yet, exchange books with a friend for free and pay attention to the meaningful conversations that follow.

Books have a unique way of bringing people together that cannot be replicated by social media or technology. You only have to step back from your digital identity to see it.

Alexander Satola can be reached at apsatola@umich.edu.

ABBIE BERRINGER | COLUMN

T

Your mom is cool

he other day, I was “too cool” for my parents but as confronted with a my years as a college student have waned on, I shocking have learned a very experience while important lesson: working a greeter My mom is definitely shift at the Mary cool. You know why?

Markley Residence Because one thing Hall dining hall. It that is most definitely was the final day of not cool is turning a new student movewhole load of laundry in, and a mother blue and ruining half and her son came to of your wardrobe. It the front door of the ABBIE is also not cool to have dining hall. The son BERRINGER to have a friend spot stopped and turned you grocery money to his mother, who then asked if she could come when your bank account is in and sit with him for lunch overdrawn because you don’t before she left. In a tone of pure know how to manage a budget.

Oh and also, my dad is cool. annoyance and embarrassment, he responded with a cold, “No, This one was a little harder maybe next time,” which his for me to swallow personally, mother begrudgingly tried to because in the most redneck, understand. She gave him a hug, Budweiser T-shirt with camo which he accepted with an equal boots way possible, my dad amount of cold embarrassment is not “cool” by Ann Arborite before leaving her behind to standards — But guess what? enter the dining hall. Bless this It is not cool to sit outside poor woman’s heart for being of Meijer with frozen tears so understanding, because all I streaming down your cheeks could think about was the seven because you left a light on in levels of “Oh, you want to see your car and have no clue how embarrassing” that my mother to use jumper cables. It is also surely would have verbally not cool to have a picture of whipped me with if I had ever your favorite football player been so rude to her after she ripped out of the wall and glass spent her whole day helping me shatter everywhere because you didn’t know what a “stud” get settled into college.

So, suffice to say, at this was.

The truth is that those of point, I simply couldn’t help myself. As I took his Mcard to us with parents who invest in swipe it, I told him, “Your mom our education, help us get into is cool. You should have let her a good school, give us every eat with you.” His face turned cent they can offer in order to a cool shade red before he said, see us succeed here and then, to top it all off, offer to sweat yet again, “Maybe next time.”

For some reason, I can’t their butts off on a 90-degree, get this sad encounter out of humid day to help us move into my mind. I mean, I remember college, should be nothing but what it was like to be young and grateful because, sadly, that

is not the reality for so many kids here in the United States.

I don’t care if your mom rocks Crocs and gauchos or if your dad wears an “I’m With Stupid” T-shirt to drop you off. The fact that you have a parent around to embarrass you at all is an immense blessing that you should not — for one second — take for granted.

That’s not to say that everyone has the best relationship with their parents, I’m just pointing out that there are nearly 450,000 kids in the foster care system on any given day in the U.S. and, according to some of the most recent studies, fewer than 10 percent of them will attend college.

If you’ve grown up in a stable home in a decent economic bracket, you have an incredible advantage that so many youth today don’t have.

So, next time your mom or dad calls, pick up the phone.

Thank them for supporting you throughout your life. So many parents worry endlessly about their children who are at college. It may seem over the top to you, but they’ve spent the last 18 years investing most of their lives into making sure you have the opportunity to succeed at an institution such as the University of Michigan and they would do anything to make sure that is a reality.

Don’t let their investment go to waste and remember that even on her dorkiest day, your mom is still cool!

Abbie Berringer can be reached at abbierbe@umich.edu.

The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com

Arts

Tuesday, September 18, 2018 — 5

BOOKS NOTEBOOK

Women’s stories and foiling the tired marriage plot JULIA MOSS

Daily Arts Writer

I always assumed that I would get married someday.

Until recently, I never questioned my reasons for assuming it; marriage seemed like an inevitable stepping stone between birth and death, like something that happens to a person rather than something a person does. It wasn’t until my brother’s wedding that I realized the terrifying enormity of this thing that, up until that point, I thought everyone stumbled into one way or another. Watching someone I loved, someone who in my mind was still only about 17 years old, commit the rest of his life to another person, I was forced to reckon with how poorly the love stories of my childhood prepared me for the realities of marriage. Beyond the fairy tale, beyond the wedding, my media education had left me pathetically in the dark.

It’s no surprise when you realize how heavily the “marriage plot” figures into our pop culture narratives, especially those targeted towards young women. The marriage plot is at the core of virtually any romantic comedy: boy meets girl, boy and girl circle around each other for the better part of the story, boy and girl overcome all obstacles and realize they’re meant to be together forever. The defining feature of the genre is that the story ends in a wedding (more traditionally) or some other kind of presumably permanent coupling for the protagonists.

Once you become aware of the marriage plot, it’s difficult to unsee it. Think of every Disney movie you watched as a kid, every rom-com and sit-com you’ve seen in the past year and virtually anything starring Meg Ryan. The marriage plot is one of the few basic formulas by which we know how to consume and understand narratives about women. And, like any formula that distills a wide range of human experiences into a narrow set of possibilities, it fails to tell the whole story.

One reason the marriage plot fails to accurately or insightfully represent real relationships is that it is, quite literally, archaic.

The genre was encoded in Shakespeare’s comedies, which were defined less by humor than by their wedding finales, and then popularized in the 19th century novels of Jane Austen. But there’s a significant disconnect between what marriage meant for women in a pre-feminist age and what it means now. For Shakespeare, Austen and their respective contemporaries, marriage was essentially an economic contract between the groom and the bride’s father. The bride’s consent was largely irrelevant and, whether or not there was any real love involved in the match, her position relative to her new husband was servile at best. I was always struck by how much less interesting I found the heroines of these stories after their weddings; take Beatrice, the heroine of Shakespeare’s “Much Ado About Nothing,” who, despite being one of the more opinionated and spunky

women of English literature, ceases to have any lines at all after her wedding. She is literally silenced by marriage, her identity completely obfuscated by that of her husband.

What’s more, the marriage plot and its prevalence in female-centric narratives suggests that marriage — or more accurately, a wedding — is the most significant event of a woman’s life. In Shakespeare’s or Austen’s time, this might have been true; women were denied entry into most professions, couldn’t own or inherit property, and had virtually no economic or reproductive rights, making marriage the climax of their lives even though they had very little say in the matter. These stories end in weddings because, beyond that point, the woman more or less ceases to exist with any degree of independence.

So why is it that the marriage plot is still the most popular template for romance today, when by all accounts we should know better?

I’ll admit that I’m as susceptible to a good romantic comedy as the next person — so susceptible, in fact, that I’ve been under the spell of the marriage plot for a long time without even knowing it. The media available to me as a child and teenager taught me that romantic love was the most important pursuit of my life. But the key word here is “pursuit.” I was supposed to pursue love, or more accurately to be pursued as a passive object of someone else’s love, and then the most interesting part of my life would be over, the rest of my story left

FILM REVIEW

to vague conjectures of “happily ever after.” On the screen, or in the pages of the book, that kind of narrative offers a rush, but when I stopped to imagine it applying to my own life, it became deeply unsatisfying. I doubt that the media directed at young men contains the same message.

Their narratives have problems of their own — the glorification of mindless violence, enforced heterosexuality and emotional constipation to name a few — but they also tend to be stories about taking action and fighting in the pursuit of an ideal rather than passively waiting to be chosen.

Romance, if it shows up at all, is secondary to or conflated with sex.

This isn’t a hopeless case.

As much as the marriage plot continues to dominate the popular imagination around romance, we’ve already begun to see a shift in the focus of women’s narratives in the media; “Lady Bird,” “Big Little Lies,” “Moana” and “Hidden Figures” are only a few recent examples of stories that are more interested in the ambitions and platonic relationships of their protagonists than in their marriage prospects. The marriage plot also faces an interesting challenge from the increasing representation of non-heterosexual romances.

While some gay love stories have erred towards the ostentatiously tragic (see “Brokeback Mountain”) and

others conform to marriageplot conventions in an effort to normalize non-heterosexual experiences (see “Love, Simon”), these narratives are inherently less tied down by the limitations and ingrained inequalities of heterosexual marriage, and therefore open up a third possibility for the portrayal of romantic love: as one event in the complex web of factors that make a person who they are, rather than the sole defining aspect of their life. I hope that the generation after mine takes their cues from these stories, and doesn’t make the mistake of sitting around waiting to be chosen just because John Hughes and Walt Disney told them to.

COLUMBIA PICTURES

TV REVIEW

‘White Boy Rick’ doesn’t ‘Forever’ is only worth live up to expectations watching for the talent STEPHEN SATARINO Daily Arts Writer

After eight months of release push-backs and a screening at the Toronto International Film Festival last week, Yann Demage’s “White Boy Rick” has arrived, only to, sadly, not live up to the expectations set by its (pretty outstanding) trailer. I couldn’t help but put

“White Boy Rick” Sony Pictures Michigan Theater “Rick” beside “Boyhood” in my mind, as both features are led by young, inexperienced actors who struggle to carry the weight of the film on their shoulders. In the case of the latter, directed

by Richard Linklater, the father figure is given enough room in the script to pull the film back and bring it into an evenbetter-than-just-redeeming place. Matthew McConaughey, the father figure in “Rick,” isn’t able to fill those same shoes, his relatively minor role in the film not giving him nearly enough time to rise it out of the ashes.

Now, of course the two roles are

different, but there is something to be said about hiding your headliner too much behind the rook.

“Rick” doesn’t try to do enough for the audience. It’s not heartwarming, it’s not especially active, it doesn’t provide for many gut-busting lines — the film just sort of plays, sitting on your palette but lacking flavor.

Some of this can be attributed to the strange, push-and-pull relationship the protagonist Richard Wershe Jr. (Ritchie Merritt, newcomer) has with his father, Richard Sr. (Matthew McConaughey, “Interstellar”).

McConaughey’s character is a deadbeat from the drop-of-thepuck, his “lion’s pride” attitude not materializing into anything that might stave off poverty and self-destruction for his family.

By the end, after young Rick has gone through multiple fazes of FBI informant, to gun trafficker, to drug trafficker, back to FBI informant, we are supposed to see the Junior’s misguided ways as some glaring fault of the father — even though McConaughey had been trying to hold his son back from getting in too deep the entire time. The film makes it hard to get into young Rick’s head, making his eventual life-sentence outcome hard to attribute to anyone but him.

Sure, his dad could have moved out of Detroit instead of trying to stay and turn things around — but no one forced young Rick to get in too deep, eventually so deep that he can’t get out.

There’s not enough consistency in theme surrounding the prodigious crack dealer. Had the film taken a firm stance on the morality of Rick Junior’s actions — possibly portrayed him as more of an anti-hero than a lamb to the slaughter — it would have been easier to access the emotions of the character for both the audience and for the actor himself.

“White Boy Rick” lacks a defining texture throughout.

The sound design and score never hit quite right. There are lapses in the story where, from one moment to the next, it doesn’t feel like the narrative is approaching any final destination. Many have already touted McConaughey’s performance, which was standout amongst the rest of the unaffecting acting suite, but it even feels that he at times isn’t sure what type of movie he’s in. For how fun and interesting the preview material made “White Boy Rick” look, it doesn’t manifest in the final product.

Score one, LBI Productions marketing team, I guess.

SONY PICTURES

SAYAN GHOSH Daily Arts Writer

Fred Armisen (“Big Mouth”) and Maya Rudolph (“Big Mouth”) are probably the single most prolific duo one could dream up in the world of TV comedy.

Along with Alan Yang of “Parks and Recreation” and “Master of None” fame, they team up wonderfully in “Forever,” a short,

“Forever” Amazon Video Season 1, Episodes 1-4 easy Amazon series that tackles some familiar themes with a surreal touch.

The show launches into the exposition of Oscar (Armisen) and June’s (Rudolph) relationship immediately, telling the story of their entire lives together in the space of a short montage minimally backed

by Miles Davis’s “It Never Entered My Mind.” Rudolph and Armisen’s vast experience in stage and sketch comedy is in full display, with their expressive facial and bodily expressions (as well as Armisen’s trademark awkwardness) replacing the need

for any other forms of dialogue.

Their story is a well-worn one (albeit told in the space of roughly five minutes). After years of marriage, the pair finds their relationship stale and detached, without the spark of young love.

Despite the façade of contentedness with the state of their lives, their relationship has deeper problems, which June takes an admirable first step in repairing by suggesting the couple refrain from their annual fishing trip to go skiing instead.

And then Oscar dies. Thankfully, the show takes only an episode to show how June grieves before she, too, kicks the bucket and joins her husband in the afterlife.

From this point, the show seems to take a familiar direction, focusing once again on the relationship between Oscar and June, except now in the afterlife. The afterlife depicted here is slightly less whimsical than “The Good Place” (in which Rudolph stars as well), but still provides a cast of memorable and hilarious side characters, including a young man who died in the 1970s and still uses terms like “orientals.”

Unfortunately, it is difficult to fully understand why the story is set in this world in the first place.

The same issues that seem to be explored could just have easily

been examined in the real world, and the situation makes the first two episodes — especially the second — feel superfluous.

For the most part, the afterlife is exactly the same as the real world, despite a few quirks. It feels more like the backdrop of a surreal “Portlandia” sketch rather than a fully thought out one fit for a longer, multi-episode series.

Nonetheless, “Forever” makes for short, yet still worthwhile, viewing due to the overabundant comedic talent of Armisen and Rudolph.

Somehow, anything these two actors do can somehow turn out funny.

While Armisen’s character is much of what we expect from him, he and Rudolph maintain incredible chemistry, and their witty dialogue and interactions are constantly entertaining. The pair also exhibit moments of skillful dramatic acting as well, making the explorations of the progression of romantic love more effective.

“Forever” does not do anything groundbreaking and is certainly not the strongest work of its stars. However, at eight short episodes in length, it is a bingeable, entertaining watch for fans of the style of comedy that Rudolph and Armisen execute so effortlessly.

AMAZON VIDEO

Arts

6 — Tuesday, September 18, 2018

FILM REVIEW

Oscilloscope

‘Madeline’s Madeline’ is a successful self-reference MAX MICHALSKY Daily Arts Writer

Josephine Decker’s (“Flames”) latest cinematic offering, “Madeline’s Madeline,” hails from one of the most difficult-to-achieve subgenres of cinema: art about art. The film is a deep-dive into the legitimacy of high

“Madeline’s Madeline” Oscilloscope State Theatre art and creative authorship.

Did I really write this review? I mean, of course I wrote this review, but is it truly mine? On one hand, my analysis and interpretation is a creative entity unto itself, one that seems like it would belong to me. On the other, though, nothing I can say here is exactly new, but

a creative process balanced atop another creative process, that of Decker. They’re my words, sure, but they’re about her film, her ideas, her life.

The film follows Madeline (Helena Howard), an angstfilled teenager who joins a performance art theatre troupe led by the magnetic and talented Evangeline (Molly Parker, “1922”). Drawn in by Evangeline’s artistic vision, Madeline quickly earns the lead in the troupe’s upcoming production, but as the show starts to eerily mirror Madeline’s life, it becomes unclear where the performance ends, and just whose story Evangeline is telling.

It’s no secret that the upper echelons of high art love to pat themselves on the back and celebrate their own artistry. From the aptly named Evangeline to the masks and dances of the performers, Decker’s depiction of high art is imbued with an intense, borderline-violent level

of religious zeal. There’s something decidedly cult-like about the troupe, amplified by Madeline’s desperate desire to find a community to which she belongs. Decker toys with this malicious fanaticism, using her lurid and intimate brand of cinematography to turn the mundane and ordinary into overwhelming sensory experiences. She offers a cinematic experience that audiences will be hard pressed to find anywhere else, taking the viewers into Madeline’s mind as she struggles with loneliness, mental illness and artistic discovery. I won’t mince words: “Madeline’s Madeline” is a weird, weird movie.

Unlike similarly bizarre offerings such as Boots Riley’s “Sorry to Bother You” — where there’s ample creativity but little intent or precision — Decker wields her creative vision with poise and purpose, delivering a well-tested rumination on the creative process.

The film’s subject matter

Release Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2018

Los Angeles Times Daily Crossword Puzzle Edited by Rich Norris and Joyce Nichols Lewis

ACROSS 1 Publisher Alfred 6 Spur to action 10 Mus. key with three sharps 14 Lost cause 15 Overconfident racer of fable 16 Hawaiian island 17 Hawaii or Alaska 18 Oil gp. that includes 57-Down 19 Take a load off 20 Horse sense 23 Pool tool 24 Try to win 25 Colonel Sanders facial feature 28 Main attraction 32 Lab maze navigator 33 Letter flourish 34 “... good witch, __ bad witch?”

35 Angry or achy 36 Test proctor’s reminder 40 Soap units 43 Gold in Granada 44 Semiaquatic salamanders 48 The “A” in “IPA” 49 Hard-boiled genre 52 Like Easter eggs before the hunt 54 Duct opening?

55 Debate side 56 Its measurements include liters and grams 60 Squared up 62 Tax-sheltered plans: Abbr.

63 More than suggest 65 Partial view?

66 Scandinavian language 67 Circular 68 Decrease 69 Organic compound 70 Sch. district VIPs DOWN 1 56-Across wts.

2 On the fence 3 Winning like crazy 4 Korda of ’80s-’90s tennis 5 Library amenity

6 Camera buff, for short 7 Shoots the breeze 8 Utah city near Provo 9 10-point star polygon 10 Main blood vessel 11 Orchestra leader 12 Contented sighs 13 Stick (out) 21 Years and years 22 Word after fuel or fly 23 LP successors 26 Cup handle 27 Season after printemps 29 Erma Bombeck’s “At __ End” 30 Décor choice 31 MLB’s D-backs 35 Editorial “let it stand” 37 Event often visible in the evening sky 38 “__ tu”: Verdi aria 39 Cutting teeth 40 Derisive interjection 41 “Rope-a-dope” boxer

42 Paleo diet protein source 45 Took care of, as a spill 46 Annoy persistently 47 __-cone: summer treat 49 Safety feature at a trapeze school 50 La Brea discovery

51 Wall-climbing plant 53 Slow on the uptake 57 Pakistan neighbor 58 “Duck Dynasty” attire, for short 59 Pants, briefly 60 Flow back, as a tide 61 By way of 64 Ave. and st.

ANSWER TO PREVIOUS PUZZLE:

By Roland Huget ©2018 Tribune Content Agency, LLC

09/18/18

09/18/18

The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com

is decidedly self-referential, making it difficult to explain to those who haven’t seen it.

Much of the wit in Decker’s writing rests on the layers of artistic performance present within the film, from playswithin-plays to acting about acting. She positions these moments deftly, using them to make sharp observations about the nature of artistic performance. For example, the film is scathingly critical of the holier-than-thou pretension of the arthouse scene. When, the film asks, does art become less about documenting the human condition and more about masturbatory selfcelebration? If an artist were to cover themself in oil and lie screaming on a canvas, are they really making an artistic statement? Decker weaves these questions into the narrative as Madeline and Evangeline take its twists and turns.

Decker is able to pull these

feats off with the assistance of Helena Howard. In her film debut, the young actress

The film is a deep-dive into the legitimacy of high art and creative authorship

proves herself capable beyond her years, f launting a range that should be the envy of many veteran performers.

Her relationships with the mentors in her life take a variety of permutations from

loving and supportive to borderline oedipal to outright adversarial.

Nevertheless, Howard’s energ y is incendiary as she makes each of these dynamics uniquely her own.

If this weren’t enough of a challenge, she’s also asked to pantomime a number of animals, including a cat, a sea turtle and a pig.

Wonderfully weird but surprisingly grounded and coherent, “Madeline’s Madeline” never lets its own surrealism stop it from sending a coherent message or telling a well-crafted story, a problem that seems to have plagued similarly experimental releases. Decker manages to hone her artistic vision to a point, creating a film that is a creatively unprecedented but all the while neatly assembled affair. In the end, “Madeline’s Madeline” serves as proof of its own hypothesis: The artist must control their art, lest it control the artist.

FOOD COLUMN

We wheat again: Navigating celiac disease in a world of gluten ELI RALLO

Daily Food Columnist

When I die I am going to ensure that my last meal is filled with all of the wheat, barley, spelt, kamut and rye I can stuff inside my mouth. I want my small intestine to shrivel up and go with me — its weaknesses no longer my problem — my body, laid to rest filled with all of the things that have been its poison for my whole life.

I will instruct the nurses and doctors to bring over plates of tall chocolate cake piled high with layers of rich icing resting between its moist, fluffy sponge.

I will start with the cake, moving on to a bowl of pasta next, spirals of noodles filling a glass bowl that reflects my chubby, round profile as I march down the high road to my own demise. I will ask for a package of Oreos, a package of those pink frosted cookies that are so sweet they hurt your jaw and a stillwarm plate of my grandmother’s brownies. I will move on to a tray of croissants and muffins, drizzled with percisise ribbons of Nutella and sparkling with gems of round blueberries and chocolate chips. I will have a bagel imported from the shop in New Jersey — everything and undressed, naked in its doughy, carbohydrate-filled glory. I will have a Corona with lime, a stack of pancakes, a plate of fried chicken and a plate of mozzarella sticks. I will dip crispy, white-hot egg rolls into a bowl of gleaming soy sauce. I will finish with a chipwich — the kind from the ice cream trucks and a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Because when I was little, before I was diagnosed with celiac, before I even knew what it was, those were my favorites.

Little did I know then, I was poisoning my eight-year-old insides, bite by bite.

Three million people, about one percent of the population, live with celiac in the United States of America. The disease is, by definition, an immune reaction to gluten, a protein found in wheat, rye and barley.

In response to the consumption of the protein, the body is triggered to begin an immune response that attacks the small intestine. This affects nutrient absorption in the body and makes most people with celiac really freaking bloated and causes a whole bunch of other complications I’ll let you imagine for yourself.

Basically, my body has not made a hospitable environment for pizza, pasta, cookies, bread and happiness. I’m Italian, from a family of restaurateurs and chefs and I can’t eat pasta or pizza without being in agony, clutching my stomach and wondering where my genes went

wrong. Everything I feel my culture and heritage is founded on — sharing meals, sharing bread — is a problem. Each pizza crust dipped in olive oil is like my own personal cyanide. I wonder if my grandfather is rolling over in his grave, wishing to disown me for my inability to ingest our Italian holy grail: pasta.

In a modern world, having celiac disease is getting easier every single day. Restaurants and grocery stores are keen on promoting gluten free products, which trendy moms who are testing out a gluten free diet and patrons who think they’re being healthy would consider “actually edible.” But the problem, for me at least, isn’t the lack of options or navigating restaurant menus, but rather the social awkwardness and stigma that comes along with being “gluten free.”

No matter how many times I can stress that I am not “gluten free,” but rather have a diagnosed disease that makes my body strongly irritated by gluten products and will lead to the destruction of my small intestines if I do not avoid it, I’m still that gluten free girl. It makes me feel like a burden or an annoyance — always being the one creating the problems when a group of people is ordering out, or when someone wants to share something. Being asked “Oh ... you’re gluten free?” in that monotone and judgemental drawl makes me want to scream, but normally I just respond, “actually, I have celiac,” and the conversation ends there, the person on the other end blinking in strange disbelief and biting into their quesadilla.

The awkward situations that come up are almost constant.

Thinking about how food is pretty much the main form of American socialization, one can imagine how the celiac community runs into quite a few fumbles. Being offered a bite of someone’s food — a taste of cookie dough ice cream, a salad dotted with croutons, a dumpling, a slice of thick pumpkin bread — all accompanied by the “I’m allergic” comment will end a conversation every time.

Birthdays and office gatherings when everyone wonders why you’re avoiding the cupcakes like the plague and proceeds to offer you them multiple times when in reality you simply can’t have them. Tailgates where people hand you beers, dates where you scan the menu for something not weird but also allergen friendly that won’t bring up the glutenfree thing right away and the “let’s order pizza!” comment with the realization that you’ll be skipping out on dinner — all accompanied with the awkward pity coming from everyone around you.

I don’t want anyone to feel bad for me. I don’t want anyone

to think I’m doing this to be on some trendy diet, or because I want to drop 10 pounds fast (which, by the way, going gluten free doesn’t do). In fact, I’ve really grown into what it means to be affected by celiac, and how I can make positive changes to enjoy the world of food without gazing, sardonic, on the other side of a bakery display, my head bubbling with dreams of round profiteroles and strawberry eclairs. Instead of just the gluten free flour options, I reach for interesting substitutes, expanding my palate and knowledge on food — and cooking tremendously for someone who has to try different approaches.

Before being diagnosed, I was always eager to choose going out to eat over cooking in, but now that it is easier to cook for myself to ensure I’m not eating anything I simply shouldn’t be, I love to cook. Recently, I became interested in chickpea pasta, which tastes much better than brown rice pasta and brings a different flavor profile entirely to one of my favorite pre-celiac dishes. I also make cauliflower pizza doughs and gnocchi, gluten free cookie skillets and gluten free banana bread. The substitutions I make for flour — opting for almond flour, coconut flour, rice and cauliflower have opened my eyes to substitutions I can be making for other ingredients as well — clarified ghee for butter and oil, cacao for chocolate, almond and coconut milk for regular dairy products and a myriad of vegetables for other common ingredients.

After getting past the separate pie on Thanksgiving — alone in its dingy glory, the awkward encounters and the occasional craving for chicken parmesan, celiac disease has been a blessing for me. It has pushed me into the kitchen, testing recipes, experimenting with flavors, trying new things.

It has led me to opt for healthy alternatives, exploring the potential of food and its effects on my body. It has led me to celebrate the ingredients I can eat, to perfect my recipes and dishes and share them with those around me — especially those who can eat gluten — to show them that gluten free is not a burden, but a chance to look at things in a new light. I used to think my grandfather would roll over in his grave, a master chef and food connoisseur, imagining his granddaughter and her small intestine opposing of pasta and pizza and cannolis and the like.

But I’m sure he actually looks down on me with pride, my defeats accepted and turned into gluten free triumphs, navigating the world of food as it should be navigated: with a unique perspective, fresh ideas and a pot of water, salted and boiling on the stove.

The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com

VOLLEYBALL

‘M’ drops its first set of season, still beats Irish TIEN LE

Daily Sports Writer

Here’s something you haven’t heard all year — the No. 18 Michigan volleyball team dropped a set.

Then again, here’s something you have — the Wolverines won.

If you asked them, they would only talk about the latter, not that the team ignored dropping a set.

It’d be hard to avoid when making adjustments and improvements. But in the bigger picture of things, it was what it’s been all year — a non-factor.

“I don’t even think we set any expectations,” said Michigan coach Mark Rosen on dropping a set. “We didn’t think we weren’t going to drop a set all season long. Nobody really felt that was a thing.

“It was more about how we recovered from that just like in any match and first set, second set, and especially third set, ‘How are we going to do the next set?’ And I think they responded well.”

After 32 consecutive set wins, the Wolverines dropped one in their matchup against Notre Dame during the backend of a home-andaway. The usually disciplined team committed 26 errors compared to the Fighting Irish’s 18, and the balanced offense Michigan prides itself on was reduced to a season-low .093 attack percentage for the losing third set.

But it was all within the game plan.

Not losing a set that is, but encountering the heavy and suffocating Notre Dame defense, adjusting to the schemes and bouncing back.

“They did a really good job of adjusting to us,” Rosen said. “They’re a very good defensive team. They can do some things to take things away from you.”

The adjustments didn’t start straight out of the fold, though. Rosen pointed to attack percentage and kills as indicators of the Wolverines’ hot start. Eighteen kills on 36 attempts —

a .361 attack percentage — for a single set are the most efficient posted by Michigan in the Notre Dame series.

The second set is when the chess match began for Rosen, however.

“They made some adjustments in the second set,” Rosen said. “And they took some things away from us that we did really well, and the game started flipping. Our offense certainly was not efficient. We were able to pull it out, but I don’t think we were playing great.

“It was kind of a back-and-forth thing where there were lots of adjustments made with them and us.”

In order to clinch an up-anddown second set, senior outside hitter Carly Skjodt and junior setter Mackenzi Welsh had to post backto-back kills when the set was tied, 23-23. Skjodt had a team-high 13 kills and added 16 digs for a doubledouble. Welsh posted a game-high 46 assists while expanding the team’s offensive options when the Fighting Irish figured out how to counter the initial offense.

And after the third set, Michigan needed it. With just 11 kills and a .093 attack percentage — a percentage well below the standards of any team — the Wolverines looked to their depth for an answer. And thus the adjustments began.

Using the middle offense more, junior outside hitter Sydney Wetterstrom and sophomore middle blocker Kiara Shannon saw an immediate impact early in the final set that helped atone for the plethora of errors committed by the early offense. With a 5-0 burst late in the set due to the rotation of bench players, Michigan overcame Notre Dame, which had a top-heavy offense and relied on three players for the majority of its offensive impact.

And the Wolverines had all seen this before, in the teams’ prior matchup on Friday. But as Rosen noted, “Part of it is that you’re used to it or you’ve seen it, but it doesn’t make it any easier.”

Sports

Tuesday, September 18, 2018 — 7

Harbaugh, players react to targeting calls ETHAN WOLFE Daily Sports Writer

How do you fix something that doesn’t seem wrong to you?

It’s a question coach Jim Harbaugh and his players are trying to figure out themselves.

Early in the third quarter of Saturday’s game against SMU, junior VIPER Khaleke Hudson was ejected for targeting after he initiated helmet-tohelmet contact with Mustangs quarterback William Brown on a run play.

In Harbaugh’s weekly Monday press conference, he didn’t understand the call.

“Waiting for clarification on the targeting, still not with that one,” Harbaugh said. “I’d like an explanation, we’d all like an explanation on that.

You compare it to other plays in the game where you’re hitting a ball carrier with the crown of your helmet, that’s happened a lot. In fact, the runner is leading with the crown of their helmet when they’re running a play. Didn’t think Khaleke’s was with the crown of his helmet. I thought he led with his shoulder.”

As the NCAA football rulebook states: “No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder.”

The impact of the aforementioned rule and its refinements to increase player safety have been highly publicized in recent years — a judgment typically drawing ire from coaches for its inherent subjectivity. Whether or not Hudson led with his shoulder or head, there was indisputable contact made with the crown of Brown’s helmet, which is defined as any area above the facemask, 360 degrees around the helmet. The players understand that targeting

ALEC COHEN/Daily

Junior VIPER Khaleke Hudson was kicked out early in the third quarter of Saturday’s game for targeting.

is not exclusive to helmet hits, but the definition of “forcible contact” has spurred disagreement.

“When a person like that is moving so fast, and the decision is almost instant and he ducks his head, I have nothing else left to hit besides lower my head lower than his and hurt my neck for him,” said junior middle linebacker Devin Bush.

“It’s kinda hard to make those decisions going that fast. “(Referees are) more trigger-happy with it. Any sign of a person getting hit, and it makes a certain kind of sound or their neck goes a certain way, they’re throwing a f lag. If I’m hitting a person and I could get kicked out of the game for that, I’m only hurting my team for trying to win.”

Hudson’s ejection, which will force him to also miss the first half of the Big Ten opener

against Nebraska on Saturday, was already the second targeting call for a Michigan player through three games.

Early into the season opener against Notre Dame, junior safety Josh Metellus was ejected for targeting Fighting Irish tight end Alize Mack on a 26-yard reception.

Again, the referee’s decision bred confusion and a sobering realization.

“It’s just something we’ve gotta live with and work around with the rules of the game changing,” said senior safety Tyree Kinnel.

“I didn’t think Khaleke or Josh committed targeting, but the ref called it so we’ve gotta deal with it.”

In the aftermath of the targeting calls, the defensive players have remained steadfastly confident that it’s an issue that can be mitigated, and one that can be overcome when faced in games.

“Didn’t think Khaleke’s was with the crown of his helmet.”

Kinnel later praised backup safety Brad Hawkins for his emergence in the secondary, as well as backup VIPER Jordan Glasgow in the absence of Hudson in the second half.

But for others, like cornerbacks coach Mike Zordich, the reality of the now oft-enforced targeting rules has changed the way he coaches his unit.

“We watch film on things of that nature to remind the guys of those hits, those helmet-tohelmet (hits),” Zordich said after the Notre Dame game.

“When I played, this is what it was all about — you put your face on things. Now you’ve got to keep that out of the way. It’s a whole different way to play.

“And I totally appreciate it. But don’t hurt the team because of a judgment call.”

For now, Harbaugh, Zordich and their team await explanations from the Big Ten office about the targeting calls and other penalties the team inquired about. But even with clarification, a quick fix that satisfies all parties isn’t in the cards.

Wolverines offensive line still has a way to go in run blocking MARK CALCAGNO Daily Sports Editor

The Michigan football team was without its starting running back in its win over SMU. After getting banged up in practice, senior Karan Higdon missed Saturday’s game with an undisclosed injury.

The status of Higdon, as well as junior running back Chris Evans, is not yet clear. Evans limped off the field following a 35-yard scamper in the fourth quarter and didn’t return.

“Karan was a game-time decision, just didn’t feel like he could go,” said coach Jim Harbaugh in his postgame press conference. “And then Chris, we’ll see what his situation is exactly.

It is like a strain or a cramp. We’ll see (about next week).”

The Wolverines missed Higdon’s down-hill style in short-yardage situations, instead relying on the shiftier Evans and junior Tru Wilson. Both finished with respectable numbers — Evans had 18 carries for 85 yards while Wilson gained 53 yards on 11 rushes — but not without moments of ineffectiveness.

Michigan had seven runs of one yard or less and averaged just 2.8 yards-per-carry in the first half. The running game’s inefficiency prevented the Wolverines’ offense to find the the end zone more than twice in the first half against a defense that had allowed 88 points through two weeks.

The series of small ground pickups were reminiscent of the Wolverines’ season-opening loss at Notre Dame. Out-manned by a dominant front-seven, Michigan rushed 33 times for just 58 yards.

But a 308-yard, two-touchdown effort last week against Western Michigan quieted concerns about the Wolverines’ run game.

That was until Saturday’s first half.

Higdon’s absence undoubtedly made a difference. There’s a reason he’s Michigan’s firststring back. But to find the true culprit behind the tempered running game, look no further than the Wolverines’ offensive

ALEC COHEN/Daily

Junior left guard Ben Bredeson and the Michigan offensive line didn’t get as much push in the running game against SMU as they did the week before in the Wolverines’ win over Western Michigan.

line. Sounds familiar, right?

It’s the same five starters that were maligned for their pass protection in Week 1.

Though junior quarterback Shea Patterson hasn’t been pressured as consistently since, Michigan’s front is still lapse-prone in run blocking. Let’s roll the film.

The situation: 3rd-and-1 on Michigan’s first drive Higdon’s absence was first detrimental on the game’s third play from scrimmage. Needing just a yard to move the chains, the Wolverines line up I-formation and handoff to Evans. It’s simple, Jim Harbaugh power football.

Only power football doesn’t work without blocking — nothing does.

Moving off the left side of

the formation, redshirt junior tight end Zach Gentry whiffed on his primary target at the second level. Junior right guard Michael Onwenu and sophomore fullback Ben Mason, meanwhile, can’t seal the defensive end, forcing Evans to cut inside. That’s where Gentry’s assignment, linebacker Trevor Denbow, had already come through, dropping the Michigan ballcarrier for a loss.

Whether or not Hidgon would’ve gotten the first down is

besides the point. Gentry, Mason and Onwenu all missed or overran blocks.

Sometimes, the problem is not limited to offensive linemen.

The situation: 2-and-1, scoreless in the 1st quarter Another shortyard situation with similar results.

Here, the Wolverines’ interior line falls apart. Onwenu and junior left guard Ben Bredeson generate zero push off the snap, and once the SMU’s linebackers meet the pile, sophomore center Cesar

“... Chris, we’ll what his situation is exactly.”

Ruiz falls over.

This was never going to be a big play for Michigan. The Mustangs have too many heads in the box, as they’re anticipating an inside run in the redzone.

But after a strong performance last week, Bredeson, Owenu and Ruiz struggled to create space against a mediocre defensive line. It’s one thing to get beat by Notre Dame’s Jerry Tillery — a top-end NFL defensive tackle prospect. It’s another to struggle against a defense that’s now 0-3.

The situation: 1st-and-15, Michigan up 15 in the 4th quarter This is an example of the Wolverines’ play-calling working to perfection.

After gaining 11 yards on

an Ambry Thomas jet sweep in the first half, Michigan sent sophomore wide receiver Nico Collins in motion across the formation. This attracts the attention of two SMU linebackers, who are caught motionless or moving left when Evans gets the handoff.

Simultaneously, Onwenu sealed his block and both Bredeson and senior left tackle Jon Runyan Jr. get to the second level, and Evans was off to the races.

That jet sweep action won’t work every time. But if the Wolverines can find other ways to make defenses hesitate, expect more big runs like this despite Michigan’s share of blocking blunders.

Sports

8 — Tuesday, September 18, 2018

The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com

Wolverines’ offense growing, used ‘half ’ of playbook so far this season MARK CALCAGNO Daily Sports Editor

The Michigan football team’s offense is already showing signs of improvement from a season ago.

Between three starting quarterbacks and an offensive line that couldn’t keep them upright, the Wolverines ranked among the Big Ten’s worst in yards-per-play, points and third-down conversion rate in 2017. Three games aren’t enough to start making statistical comparisons. But they’re plenty to see an elevated level of play.

Just take Michigan’s second touchdown Saturday in its win over SMU. From the Mustangs seven yard-line, junior quarterback Shea Patterson lobbed a back-shoulder fade to sophomore receiver Donovan

Peoples-Jones, who adjusted in mid-air to corral the pass. A completion of that difficultly simply wouldn’t have been made last season.

Instead, more simplistic throws were the concern.

Even when Michigan’s young receivers got separation, passing opportunities were frequently either errant or not seen entirely because the quarterback was on his back.

But Patterson has been mostly on the money in three starts so far, completing roughly 70 percent of his passes for 589 yards and six touchdowns.

“He’s getting out of trouble and creating plays when sometimes there isn’t one to be there,” said coach Jim Harbaugh following Saturday’s game.

“He’s playing the position really well and making the throws when they present

themselves.

He’s hitting the short ones, he’s hitting the intermediate ones, he’s hitting the deep ones. Good quarterback play.”

Improved quarterback play hasn’t changed the Wolverines’ play-calling too much, though. Despite the departure of offensive coordinator Tim Drevno, Michigan has maintained a run-first approach to try to open passing opportunities.

Per teamrankings.com, the Wolverines threw on 42 percent of their plays last year — their exact distribution so far in 2018.

Junior offensive guard

Michael Onwenu does think Patterson has become more ingrained in the offense since fall camp, but he doesn’t expect Michigan to run an air-raid system anytime soon.

“Since we have a new quarterback, I think we’re incorporating him more,” Onwenu said.

“I’m not saying we’re building the offense around him, but it’s meshing at a good time.”

Establishing an offensive identity takes time. What the Wolverines are calling now is different from what they’ll be able to run in November.

After all, Harbaugh’s West Coast offense is known for

“We have so much more we can improve on.”

its complexities, filled with variations that could fill an NFL playbook.

At times, it looked like too much for Michigan last season, especially given its quarterback turnover. That’s why, this fall, the Wolverines learned the playbook at a tempered pace.

“I wouldn’t say slower, but it’s definitely less,” Onwenu said.

“Last year, we were installing about 10 plays every few days.

Fast-forward to this year’s camp, and we’re installing basic plays that we already knew but are taking time to master.”

Re-learning plays makes sense considering the addition of Patterson. Coming from a spread offensive system at Mississippi, he wasn’t forced to learn a playbook as expansive as Harbaugh’s.

Michigan hasn’t either — yet.

Onwenu said the Wolverines haven’t shown “half” its playbook through three games and are installing plays “week to week.”

“We definitely have a lot of weapons that we haven’t used yet,” Onwenu said. “We have so much more we can improve on.”

Time will tell what those weapons are. Michigan would certainly benefit from more explosiveness and plays down field. Still, with Patterson under center, the Wolverines are confident in their offense’s development.

“They got a high ceiling,” said junior linebacker Devin Bush. “They got a lot of playmakers over there that can do something with the ball in their hands. I think they’re getting better at what they do.”

ALEC COHEN/Daily

Junior offensive guard Michael Onwenu says Michigan’s offense can still improve greatly, and that they have shown less than half of their playbook so far.

Michigan extends win streak to five

MANY

Umar Farouk Osman scores two goals in win over Rutgers

OUR MICHIGAN

TEDDY GUTKIN Daily Sports Writer

Sophomore forward Umar Farouk Osman netted two goals in a showing that propelled the Michigan men’s soccer team (1-0-0 Big Ten, 5-1-0 overall) to a victory over Rutgers (0-1-0, 1-4-1), 2-0 on Friday night. Michigan coach Chaka Daley spoke glowingly of the Wolverines’ newest star after the game, who has already matched his scoring total from all of last season with four.

“He was definitely on the crest of the hill last year,” Daley said. “And now he’s growing leaps and bounds and getting some confidence by scoring a few goals. And as a result of that, it’s given him the confidence to shoot and take chances.”

Osman launched a booming kick from outside the box off a perfect pass from sophomore forward Mohammed Zakyi that curled into the top left corner of the net to give Michigan a 1-0 advantage in the 62nd minute.

“I looked up at the goal and just bended it, top corner,”

Osman said when discussing the play.

The Wolverines doubled their lead just four minutes later when Osman tapped in a ball that had been def lected by a Rutgers defender on a Michigan throw-in. While it wasn’t nearly as impressive as his first goal, it still gave the Wolverines a much-needed cushion as they were able to cruise for the rest of the match.

While Michigan dominated the scoreboard, the game was not without its tough moments.

Rutgers nearly had a chance to score on a corner attempt that clanked off the post, and the Wolverines struggled to get into an offensive rhythm despite controlling possession for the majority of the first half.

“I think we’ve just shown great togetherness, great resiliency,” Daley said. “Every game they’ve had their tough moments, and I think they’ve

just stuck together and we’ve been very unselfish. We’ve worked hard for each other, we compete for each other, and we’ve just found a way in each of these games.”

While Michigan has a fivegame win streak on paper, Daley and his squad truly only care about one win in their record: Rutgers. That one match marks the number of wins the Wolverines have in Big Ten play thus far, after starting conference play with a win in one of the toughest conferences in college soccer.

“The season starts over, and fortunately we’re 1-0,” Daley said. “We don’t worry (about) all the others, five in a row, that’s out of our system. We’re just 1-0, we’re just worried about the Big Ten right now.

We’re 1-0 in the Big Ten, we have our noses in front, and we have a lot of work to do. It’s a long season and a lot of tough opponents ahead.”

“He was definitely on the crest of the hill last year.”

VOICES

2018 DIVERSITY, EQUITY & INCLUSION SUMMIT OCTOBER 8 9–10:30 am | POWER CENTER Community Assembly & Discussion REMARKS BY PRESIDENT MARK S. SCHLISSEL AND OTHER SENIOR LEADERS

Featuring Diane Guerrero Moderated by Leonard Pitts, Jr.

2–3:30 pm | PALMER COMMONS, FORUM HALL Social Transformation through Public Engagement 3:30–5 pm | GRADUATE HOTEL, TERRACE BALLROOM Promoting Equity and Inclusion: Eliminating Sexual Misconduct at U-M

OCTOBER 10 6:30–9 pm | WEISER HALL, 10TH FLOOR Student Life Design Thinking Event for Campus Climate Initiatives

OCTOBER 12 3–5 pm | TOWSLEY CENTER – DOW AUDITORIUM (MEDICAL CAMPUS) A VOICES of the Staff Film Screening and Conversation – Me, The “Other” Plus more unit-sponsored and central events the week of October 8–12 CARTER FOX/Daily

Sophomore forward Umar Farouk Osman scored two goals in Michigan’s win over Rutgers on Friday night.

diversity.umich.edu/summit-events | #UMichDEI @UMichDiversity