ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY THREE YEARS OF EDITORIAL FREEDOM
Wednesday, October 25, 2023
Ann Arbor, Michigan
NEWS
michigandaily.com
Santa Ono talks one year as President
University of Michigan President Santa Ono speaks with The Michigan Daily to reflect on his first year as President RILEY HODDER, BRONWYN JOHNSTON & SNEHA DHANDAPANI
Daily News Editor & Daily Staff Reporters
The Michigan Daily sat down with University President Santa Ono Wednesday afternoon to ref lect on his first year as president, his official statements to the campus community about the Israel-Hamas war, the construction of the new residential complex on Central Campus and much more. The Daily provides Ono with the questions prior to the interview. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity. The Michigan Daily: During the September Board of Regents meeting, you said you would support the creation of an unarmed non-police emergency response program to be available to the University community. What do you envision that program looking like and when do you plan to begin implementing it? Santa Ono: Well, we’ve already started the process of having conversations with different people who are familiar with similar systems. As you know, Ann Arbor is in the midst of having those kinds of conversations as well. I know the city manager of Ann Arbor, Milton Dohoney, so he’ll be an incredible resource, and since he’s close to home we can have a head start on that. He will be a great resource, and so will other universities who are thinking about similar kinds of response units. So, initial conversations will be held with an information-gathering approach, but it won’t be myself who’s doing it, there will be a group of individuals that I name that will be involved in gathering all that information. So, I would say the process has already started. I’m already consulting with people who might be knowledgeable and helpful in informing me about the best approaches. At the last board meeting, there were individuals who actually spoke to this and who have said that they have expertise in that area. Probably it’s not a good idea for us to rush, because public safety, especially concerning members of our community, is a top priority, so we don’t want to just rush into something without being thoughtful about how we go about doing so. But I don’t
want this to be a protracted effort. I think we should be able to move quickly to be able to identify best practice and then try to stand that up. It will take a little bit of time, but not that long. TMD: The semester started out with the Graduate Employees’ Organization coming to an agreement with the University and ending their six-month strike. How do you feel coming out of the strike, and what changes have you seen to our campus community with the new contract between the University and GEO? SO: I’m incredibly happy that we have a contract that both the University and GEO’s members and leadership are happy with. That’s something that was the top priority for the institution in the past year, so I’m very, very pleased that there has been an agreement. It’s almost certainly a relief to the University community and everyone involved including the graduate students themselves, the faculty members that work with them directly in their capacity as graduate students and undergraduates who are instructed or supported by them. Everyone’s very pleased that we’re at that stage in the process. TMD: Are you currently living in the President’s House? SO: I am in and out because I have a lot of things in my home in Vancouver. So we’re in the process of moving stuff in and out, and it’s going to take some time. I actually spent quite a bit of time moving yesterday as well. So the first thing I want to say is that it’s not my house. It is called the President’s House, but it’s really the University’s house. And as you know, much of its use, and the entire ground floor, is really dedicated towards being a facility for celebrating faculty, staff and students and also for events. So I don’t view it as my house even though that’s what it’s called. TMD: You have moved partially into the President’s House after its completed renovation, and are the first president of the University to inhabit this version of the historic residence. What changes have you made to the house’s landscape and interior to make it feel like home? How does it feel to be living in the house partially? SO: I have almost no say in the house because it is the
University’s house. The only thing that I contributed to designing the house was the three cherry blossom trees, and they’re all in the front yard. I chose trees as my only input to the house because of their importance in the sustainability of the planet and because I tend to like cherry blossom trees, which are beautiful in the spring. So I can’t wait for spring to come around so we can see the cherry blossoms. The trees tend to get bigger and bigger. I planted a cherry blossom tree at the University of British Columbia, and you’d be amazed how quickly these trees grow. Even within seven years or so, they’re quite large. I hope that faculty, staff, students and alumni will enjoy seeing these blossoming trees in spring. The house is a wonderful place because we didn’t have a place to welcome people and to celebrate them. It’s a space that was designed primarily by two regents, Denise Ilitch and Sarah Hubbard, who did a really good job. I think it’s going to be a lovely space to celebrate the community. One of my favorite parts of the house is that there’s a beautiful Steinway piano, and I like music. I’ve heard a student play on it already, and it’s lovely to hear such a historic piano being played by our students. The most important thing for me in terms of the home is that it’s a place for my family. So my wife and I are living here now because my youngest daughter is in college at UBC and my other one is married and living in Oregon, so they’re unfortunately not there except when they come to visit. So home for me is where my wife, Wendy, and my dog, Romeo, live. TMD: On Oct. 10 , the University released a statement on the Israel-Hamas war that has prompted an intense reaction on campus, including a protest staged outside of the President’s House on Oct. 13. Then, two hours into the protest, the University released another statement in response to backlash from some members of the campus community about your first statement. What went into crafting both of these statements? What have been your thoughts on the campus reaction to the statement? SO: Let me first correct and say the second statement wasn’t in response to the campus community’s reaction to the
SARAH BOEKE/Daily
University of Michigan President Santa Ono speaks in the Ruthven Building Wednesday afternoon.
first statement, they were just sequential statements. The first statement was informed by what was happening around that time, which was the initial attack. As time went on, as you would expect, a further statement would build upon the first statement, taking into account inputs I received from the entire community. So the first statement and the second statement reflect the evolution with what was happening during that time. So it was not a response, it was just me taking into account the evolution of a world event, which has affected many people on both the Israeli and the Palestinian sides of the conflict. And it was also taking into account that there are many members of the community that are impacted including Jewish students, students from Israel and students who are Palestinian or Muslim, and they are all a part of the University of Michigan community and they all matter. I was integrating all the inputs that I received not as a response, but internalizing that and sharing that in the second statement is something I felt was very important. I think the demonstration in front of the President’s House is something that is very, very much part of the ethos of the University. If you look at the history of the University, there have been many protests in front of the President’s House. As you probably noted in my second statement, we embrace that. We think it’s a very important part of freedom of expression for members of the
community. So when I say “we” I mean the University, but I also personally think that that’s healthy. I think it’s important for people to express divergent views. Certainly, with this conflict, there are divergent views and people are passionate about those views because they’re personally impacted due to their culture, their ethnicity or their national origin. So I think that that’s understood, and I support that. TMD: The Lecturers’ Employee Organization is nearing the beginning of their negotiations for a new threeyear contract. How does the University plan to engage in negotiations with the union and reach an equitable agreement? SO: LEO, and the individuals that are represented through LEO, are incredibly important parts of not only our academic community but our general community. I know many, many members of LEO. I’m friends with some of them. They play a very critical role with instruction but also mentoring of our students, and so the University — because I don’t personally bargain with any union — respects their contributions. The University looks forward to those conversations and that dialogue, and also to reaching an agreement and contract. TMD: On Aug. 22, two students participated in homophobic graffiti at the Jewish Resource Center. The University of Michigan and Michigan Athletics both declined to comment on the
disciplinary actions of the two students involved. What role do you play in deciding disciplinary measures for students and how does this influence the University’s ability to hold those who commit hate-based crimes accountable for their actions? SO: I can’t comment on those particular cases because they involve individual students and their privacy considerations. I can say that the University will deal with them through established procedures that are documented, but also when it involves situations that might be governed by the law of the jurisdictions where we reside, it will go through those processes as well. In terms of myself, I usually do not get involved in those kinds of deliberations or discussions or certain decisions, because there are individuals and parts of the institution that are charged with investigating and also making those decisions directly on behalf of the institution. I do not personally make those decisions, but I care greatly about the individuals who are impacted by such alleged acts, and it’s incredibly important for the institution to look at what happened and the veracity of an allegation in an appropriate and fair manner to all involved. But I’m taking it very seriously, whether it’s on the campus itself or adjacent to campus. It involves many members of our community and requires careful investigation and thoughtful decision. Read more at MichiganDaily.com
NEWS BRIEFS
Social Security numbers compromised in August cybersecurity attack ITS reveals further details about cause of campus-wide internet outage
IRENA LI
Daily News Editor
Social Security numbers and financial details were among the pieces of information compromised in the August 2023 cybersecurity attack,
the University of Michigan revealed in a statement released Monday afternoon. The breach led Information Technology Services to disconnect the campus network from the internet for several days, leaving the campus community without internet access for the first few
days of the fall 2023 semester. According to the release, an unauthorized third party gained access to the personal information of students, employees, healthcare patients, alumni and other members of the campus community. Compromised information
included Social Security numbers, driver’s license numbers, financial account details and medical records. The University discovered “suspicious activity” on the U-M campus computer network on August 23 and promptly disconnected the network from
the internet. The University went on to mandate password resets for all accounts following the attack. The University said campus administration will continue to work with law enforcement and third-party cybersecurity experts to investigate the attack
and prevent future incidents. The number of individuals whose information was compromised by the attack was not provided. The release states that the University has mailed letters to “relevant individuals” who were impacted by the breach.
MAIZE & BLUE
Insured by NCUA
REPRESENT YOUR
PRIDE WITH A BLOCK M DEBIT CARD FROM ®
GOT A NEWS TIP? E-mail news@michigandaily.com and let us know.
Follow The Daily on Instagram, @michigandaily
For more stories and coverage, visit
michigandaily.com
INDEX
Vol. CXXXII, No. 110 ©2023 The Michigan Daily
N E W S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 ARTS........................4 MIC.........................7
OPINION................8 S P O R T S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11