Volume I • Spring 2013
A note from Dr. Jack Cox INSIDE
Welcome to the first edition of Perficio, Premier’s newsletter updating you on our organization’s commitment to performance improvement. More than ever, quality and performance improvement are taking center stage in healthcare. News stories about wrong-site surgeries, heightened awareness of medical errors, and public demands for greater scrutiny of healthcare professionals have placed new stresses on the healthcare system.
PAGE 2 Clinical performance initiative: Atrial fibrillation
PAGE 4 Performance Improvement Goal 2004: Executive summary
Compounding these issues is the need to remain competitive in the marketplace. I have been asked on many occasions, “How can I get into the Top 100?” While there is no silver bullet for achieving that industry accomplishment, being proactive in creating performance improvement solutions is certainly a step in the right direction. That’s why Premier has launched its “Performance Improvement 2004” initiative. It’s our way of helping our valued members leverage the resources and skill sets contained in the alliance that can help accomplish healthcare breakthroughs. Hence the title of this newsletter, Perficio, which in Latin means “to achieve” or “accomplish.” We’re homing in on 11 clinical areas – areas that reflect the clinical priorities of Premier’s Clinical Performance Initiatives. Based on our research, these areas present the greatest opportunities to reduce practice variation, improve outcomes, and decrease costs. These clinical areas also are of major interest to external groups such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) and the Leapfrog Group. A list of Premier’s focus areas, along with corresponding metrics and Premier PI resources, is found on page 5. Why are we doing this? To assist in your commitment to provide the best healthcare delivery in your community. The more your improvements are documented, the more you can leverage those activities to enhance your position with the Joint Commission and local quality panels.
PAGE 6 Fusing together teams for spine care at Mission St. Joseph’s
What do you have to do? For now, all you have to do is pick one to three clinical areas from the list and sign up with your relationship management vice president. Signing up means you are making a two-year commitment to make clinical performance improvement a part of your performance improvement plan, which should align with your overall strategic plan. But the real work won’t start until after June 30, 2002. That’s when the clock starts ticking toward 2004. Many hospitals have already joined. If you’re one of them, welcome aboard. If you haven’t, I encourage you to contact either your Premier representative or one of the participating hospitals. Find out what’s in it for them, and find out if there’s something in it for you. Look forward to more updates, anecdotes, and success stories in future issues of Perficio. Jack Cox, M.D., M.M.M., is senior vice president of Premier's Clinical Innovations group. He is responsible for Premier's quality initiatives.
MORE INFORMATION A note from Dr. Jack Cox . . 1 Participating hospitals . . . . 5
Clinical performance initiatives:
Atrial fibrillation W
hen representatives from the Medical Center at Bowling Green attended a Premier Clinical Performance Initiative conference on atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in 1999, they weren’t sure their organization had any problems in this area.
The Medical Center already used betablockers before and after surgery, as recommended by the American College of Cardiology, but staff made a renewed effort to ensure that every eligible patient received the medication. As a result, the post-surgical use of beta blockers rose from 86 percent in 1999 to 93 percent in 2000.
By the time the conference was over, the clinicians from Bowling Green were sure – sure they didn’t have a problem. "People were asking us what we were doing there, because our numbers were already so good,’" said Don Johnson, R.N., cardiac nurse liaison at The Medical Center. "The national average for new onset a-fib at that time was 20 percent to 50 percent. It turned out our rate was 5 percent to 10 percent." But Bowling Green is committed to performance improvement. So Johnson and others looked deeper for reasons to participate in the initiative. They found that Bowling Green’s length of stay for patients experiencing post-surgical atrial fibrillation was higher than it should be, at 8.29 days. So they decided to focus on reducing that key measure.
The medical center also implemented a protocol that required a faster response to post-surgical atrial fibrillation when it did occur. By talking to representatives of other facilities involved in the Clinical Performance Initiative, Bowling Green learned that a protocol-driven quick response is not the norm everywhere. 2
“At some facilities we’ve talked to, patients are in a-fib for 24 hours before the cardiologist sees them. Our surgeons manage all follow-up post-operative care, so there’s no delay,” Johnson said. “We found that the more quickly you respond, the better the results. As soon as we see someone go into post-operative atrial fibrillation, we put them on a Cardizem drip until we attain normal sinus rhythm. The majority of people convert with chemical management alone.” These are the lessons Bowling Green learned through its improvement efforts and its participation in the CPI: • Emphasize early detection and aggressive treatment. • Implement a standard protocol that requires immediate response. • Use beta-blockers before and after surgery. • Perform all anastamosies – proximals and distals – in cross clamp using antegrade and retrograde cardioplegia. “The nice thing about the CPI is we get the different ideas of people across the country,” Johnson says. “If you do have a
Standing orders problem, there are people who have tried different things and can speak from experience. In that respect, it really works.” One important thing about Bowling Green’s experience is that the hospital didn’t rest on its laurels, says Leslie McCombs, R.N., Ph.D., project director in Premier’s Clinical Performance Initiatives unit and leader of the atrial fibrillation CPI. Rather, it showed an unusual degree of commitment to the performance improvement process. “Bowling Green’s CEO, Connie Smith, came to all three CPI meetings, which just shows extraordinary organizational commitment,” says McCombs. “That’s an organization that really believes in performance improvement and understands what it takes to make a difference.” The heart program at Bowling Green is always looking for ways to improve, according to Randy Carter, M.D., a thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon who is participating in the atrial fibrillation performance initiative. It takes continuous work. “We want to meet with other people to find out what they’re doing out there on the cutting edge. I think just meeting with other groups of people in healthcare and working through Premier has been a great benefit to us. It’s not like we just automatically got a post-operative a-fib rate of five percent. This is something we’ve been working on over the past few years.” Despite its excellent results, Bowling Green continues to learn from its
involvement in the Clinical Performance Initiative. For example, the heart team thought it was doing well with extubations, completing most of them within eight hours of surgery. Based on what they learned from other collaborators, the Bowling Green team has now gotten 50 percent of its extubations down to the four-hour range, and about 90 percent of them occur within six hours. In the year ahead, Bowling Green is going to focus on reducing blood and is gearing up to submit data to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) registries for benchmarking. Through Premier’s relationship with the American College of Cardiology, owner hospitals such as Bowling Green can combine data from Premier’s Perspective Online with ACC data for an even more powerful benchmarking tool. “This is all part of an ongoing effort in our heart program to look at how we can improve outcomes, reduce costs, and improve the quality of care, making it better all the way around,” Johnson says. “We’re not
Atrial fibrillation by the numbers A-fib average length of stay
Percent of patients receiving beta-blockers
SOURCE: The Medical Center, Bowling Green, KY
3
3
• Check blood pressure, heart rate, and O2 saturation. • Begin supplemental O2 to get saturation to > 90 percent. • If systolic BP is < 90 percent or heart rate > 150, call cardiac surgeon and transfer patient to OHR. • If systolic BP is > 90 percent and heart rate is > 120, begin Cardizem drip. • Bolus 0.25 mg/kg over 30 minutes. • Begin infusion after bolus of Cardizem drip at 10 mg/hr and titrate up to 15 mg/hr to achieve heart rate control if necessary. • Monitor BP Q five minutes during bolus of Cardizem.
Performance Improvement Goal 2004 Executive summary Background Premier’s core purpose is to improve the health of communities. Our vision calls for member hospitals to operate in the top quartiles of quality, safety, and cost. Premier’s tools can assist hospitals in improving clinical performance. Premier believes its success is directly related to the success of its hospitals. Therefore, our goal is to partner with our hospitals and support them in reaching top clinical performance. The performance improvement goal Premier is seeking interested hospitals to engage in a relationship whereby Premier shares in the responsibility and accountability for the success of the hospital’s performance improvement efforts between now and June 30, 2004. There is no cost to join. Why? Premier’s board of directors has adopted a strategic priority – Align and adapt resources to support hospitals’ improvement of core clinical processes leading to breakthroughs along the dimensions of quality, safety, and cost.
Program summary Goals
Next steps
• June 30, 2002: 250 hospitals have agreed to participate, selected one to three clinical focus areas and agreed to PI targets and plans. • June 30, 2003: 50 percent of those participating have met their targets. • June 30, 2004: 80 percent have met their goals.
• Obtain other information and resources the hospital needs to evaluate this goal. • Get executive team approval to participate. • Select one to three clinical focus areas in which to collaborate. • Identify performance improvement champion(s) for each clinical focus area. • Complete sign-up process with RMVP (must be done by May 31, 2002). • Set improvement targets for each clinical focus area by May 31, 2002. • Implement ongoing collaborative efforts with the performance improvement team(s).
Hospital agrees to: • Participate in one to three clinical focus areas*. • Submit data to Perspective™ database on a scheduled basis. • Set specific improvement targets, including the quality and cost indicators that Premier monitors. • Involve Premier field staff (as appropriate) in your PI process for those clinical focus areas. • Integrate the chosen clinical focus areas and improvement targets in your JCAHO PI plan. • Attend regional PI meetings.
Sample resources available • Safety Institute • Clinical Performance Reports (CPRs) • Supply chain resources • Partnerships (Zynx, IHI, ACC, Bridges) • Performance consulting • Networking • Baseline and progress reports • Idea database (read-only access)
Premier agrees to: • Make resources* available to four PI teams (as appropriate). • Provide recognized and regular comparative data and other proven metrics (JCAHO, Leapfrog, etc.). • Serve as a facilitator for networking. • Provide best practices, tool kits, and lessons learned. • Provide regional PI meetings. • Share accountability for cost and quality improvement targets. * See list of clinical focus areas and resources on next page.
4
• Perspective data • JCAHO Core Measures • New clinical performance initiatives (CPIs) • Completed CPI Toolkits • New tools and resources as developed • Performance Engineering • Regional PI meetings
Clinical focus areas Focus area
Cost indicator
Quality indicator
Hip and knee replacement
Inflation and severity-adjusted total cost/case
Complication rate
CABG (coronary artery bypass graft)
Inflation and severity-adjusted total cost/case
Risk-adjusted mortality rate
Ischemic stroke
Inflation and severity-adjusted total cost/case
Risk-adjusted mortality rate
CHF (congestive heart failure)
Inflation and severity-adjusted total cost/case
30-day readmission rate
AMI (acute myocardial infarction) with non-surgical reperfusion
Inflation and severity-adjusted total cost/case
Risk-adjusted mortality rate
CAP (community-acquired pneumonia)
Inflation and severity-adjusted total cost/case
30-day readmission rate
Adult ICU
Inflation and severity-adjusted ICU cost/case
Severity-adjusted average days on mechanical ventilation
Acute pediatric respiratory conditions
Inflation and severity-adjusted total cost/case
30-day readmission rate
Mental health (psychoses)
Inflation and severity-adjusted total cost/case
30-day readmission rate
Pain management
Inflation and severity-adjusted total cost/case
Percent of four-hour intervals with a pain score < 3
Adverse drug event (ADE) reduction
Inflation adjusted cost/case for defined subset of patient population with high rates of ADE (APR-DRGs)
Reduction of ADE rate among defined subset of patient population with high rates of ADE (APR-DRGs)
Currently enrolled hospitals We hope you join these hospitals in making a commitment to Performance Improvement 2004: Twin County Regional Healthcare
Southcoast Health System, Tobey Hospital
Johnston Memorial Hospital
Northeast Health, Samaritan Hospital
Greater New York Hospital Association, St. Barnabas Hospital
Community Memorial Hospital
Northeast Health, Albany Memorial Hospital
Grenada Lake Medical Center
East Alabama Medical Center
Adventist Health, Enloe Medical Center
Southeast Alabama Medical Center
Adventist Health System, Florida Hospital - Altamonte
Health Enterprises Cooperative, Northeast Iowa Regional Medical Center
Jefferson Health System, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital St. Luke’s Hospital and Health Network, St. Luke’s Hospital - Quakertown
Alegent Health, Alegent - Bergan Mercy Medical Center Avera Health, Innovis - Fargo
Heartland Health, Heartland Regional Medical Center Jefferson Health System, Bryn Mawr Hospital
St. Luke’s Hospital and Health Network, St. Luke’s Hospital - Allentown
Avera Health, Avera McKennan Hospital
Legacy Health System, Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center
Avera Health, Avera Queen of Peace Hospital
St. Luke’s Hospital and Health Network, St. Luke’s Hospital - Bethlehem
Legacy Health System, Emanuel Hospital
Avera Health,Avera St. Luke’s Hospital Aberdeen, SD
Methodist Medical Center of Illinois Central DuPage Health System, Central DuPage Hospital
Baptist Health Systems of South Florida, Homestead Hospital
Mercy Hospital and Medical Center
Baptist Health Systems of South Florida, Baptist Hospital of Miami
Palomar Pomerado Health System, Palomar Medical Center
Baptist Health Systems of South Florida, South Miami Hospital
Palomar Pomerado Health System, Pomerado Hospital
Blount Memorial Hospital
Eisenhower Medical Center
Bon Secours Health System, Inc., Maryview Medical Center
Baystate Health System, Baystate Medical Center
Bon Secours Health System, Inc., Richmond Community Hospital
Southcoast Health System, St. Luke’s Hospital
Bon Secours Health System, Inc., Bon Secours - Memorial Regional Medical Center
Southcoast Health System, Charlton Hospital
Danville Regional Medical Center
5
Norton Healthcare, Norton Audubon Hospital Norton Healthcare, Norton Southwest Hospital Norton Healthcare, Norton Suburban Hospital Norton Healthcare, Norton Hospital Sharp HealthCare, Sharp Coronado Hospital Sharp HealthCare, Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center Sharp HealthCare, Sharp Memorial Hospital The University of Texas - M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Thomas Memorial Hospital Vantage Health Group, St. Vincent Health Center Watauga Medical Center, Inc., Watauga Medical Center
I
t came as no surprise that spine care was going to change in Asheville, NC.
For years, residents had two major local healthcare resources available to them: St. Joseph’s Hospital and Memorial Mission Medical Center. Located across the street from one another, these centers housed two excellent programs to treat patients with spine and neck problems. There was one interesting facet to their work: St. Joseph’s maintained an orthopedic unit, and Memorial Mission was home to a neuroscience program. While the community had its choice of providers, the rivalry between the two groups eventually brought to light that the two hospitals should work together and find common ground to begin coordinating their efforts around spine care. The patient population in Asheville was getting older. Volume was expected to increase in the coming years. Costs were expected to rise, potentially impeding the quality of care. In 1997 and 1998, members of the respective orthopedic and neuroscience units began a collaborative effort that would make Mission St. Joseph’s a top performing hospital in the Premier network. This team directed its energies to creating a new pathway for lumbar spine fusion.
Fusing together teams for spine care at Mission St. Joseph’s 6
Building trust According to Robin Jones, R.N., case manager for the Mission St. Joseph’s neurosciences unit, “We were trying to blend two different and unique cultures. Trust was a difficult barrier to overcome.” After securing buy-in among physician leaders, they set about the task of identifying system commonalities and differences and finding an easy first step to accomplish. That came by way of simplifying their standing order sets.
Between the two groups, there were at least 10 different standing order sets. These variations led to inefficiencies that would trickle down to the O.R. O.R. teams had to contend with different procedures. Surgical preferences could not be captured soon enough to cut down prep time. From a practical standpoint, printing became expensive. After weeks of collaboration and spirited negotiation, surgeons, nurses, and others created a standardized order set for both ortho and neuro teams. In the end, there was one pre-op and one post-op order set. Other changes slowly began to take place. The teams developed a single site for preoperative testing and teaching. A same-day discharge unit was established for both groups. Before leaving the hospital, surgical patients began to have all of their follow-up appointments prescheduled – a big win in building customer satisfaction. These efforts may have seemed unique to the team members. In retrospect, they recognized that other groups shared this vision of teamwork. “This collaboration followed the same pattern we witnessed among our cardiologists and thoracic surgeons,” commented Lary Schulhof, M.D., a neurosurgeon at Mission St. Joseph’s. Then in 1999, things got more interesting. Memorial Mission and St. Joseph’s, once competitive rivals, fully merged. The new organization would be called Mission St. Joseph’s. Now change was no longer voluntary. It was expected. “In 1999, it was the community that told the hospitals how to merge,” says Jones. “At this point, it wasn’t like we were asked to bring these two units together. It was inevitable.” Hospital employees saw their world changing. Among the spine care teams, this pivotal event made their work move at an even more rapid pace. And they directed their efforts toward one goal: standardization. “The drive towards standardization created a collaborative between the orthopedic and neurosurgeons,” says Michael Goebel, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon. Schulhof agreed. “We set up regular meetings to hash out problems [in the
system] and find solutions. The teams got to know what others were doing because we had confidential data that allowed us to view everyone’s progress. Surgeons are competitive types, so their desire to be the best was a great motivator for them to find new ways to make a high quality system.”
Most of all, a level of trust has been developed among the two groups. Surgical trays, for instance, are fairly standardized. Schedulers now have a form to review and check off the surgical needs for particular cases ahead of time. This organizes surgical preparation and reduces delays. Surgical team leaders, typically nurses, take a leadership role in ensuring that time is used efficiently and surgeons are never idle. Team leaders also are extremely knowledgeable about surgeons’ preferences and keep all surgical members apprised of new technology. These team leaders – like Coleen Kerr, R.N. for the neurosurgical team – keep turnover times under 30 minutes. Kerr believes that even more time can be squeezed out of turnover. Another important strategy for both groups is “block scheduling.” Vacant O.R. suites are expensive propositions for hospitals. Used throughout the entire week, block scheduling keeps the suites fully utilized and surgeons working efficiently on multiple cases. Patients undergoing similar procedures are scheduled in “bundles,” allowing O.R. turnover to be more efficient. Surgeons are also freed from readjusting to different techniques. Beyond the two groups rallying around a common cause, Jones believes something even more important has happened in this new culture. “Most of all, a level of trust has been developed between the two groups.” The bottom line Today, Mission St. Joseph’s sees more than 1,800 spine patients for inpatient and 7
outpatient surgery each year, ranking it fifth in the nation for surgical volume. While the medical team takes quality seriously, they have also realized that their efforts are supporting the hospital’s financial stability. In fiscal 1999, using Premier Healthcare Informatics’ Perspective data, Mission St. Joseph’s determined its average length of stay to be one day lower than the national average (4.87 days versus 5.82 days). Average total cost at discharge was thousands lower, as well. Mission St. Joseph’s average total wage- and severityadjusted cost was $10,237, versus the national average of $12,000 per discharge. The organization can reinvest the savings in additional resources. A new case manager, Allyson Brown, was recently hired to continue the work in neurosciences. “Most importantly, these lowered costs and systems allow us to focus on patient satisfaction,” says Brown. “We monitor satisfaction on a monthly basis. We don’t want to sit on our laurels.” And there’s more to come. Both groups have realized that the increased volume is placing a strain on hospital facilities. Information technology needs to be upgraded. (A project with Cerner is scheduled to start in the coming months.) And there is still occassional resistance to change. “We hope to learn a lot from [the Clinical Performance Initiatives],” Brown concluded. “While we’re honored for this recognition, we still have much work to do. And we look forward to what the collaborative is going to offer in this coming year.”
Upcoming events Breakthroughs in Performance Improvement conference April 14 – 17, 2002 San Diego, CA Our annual conference spotlighting quality and safety initiatives members have successfully implemented. For more information and to register, visit www.premierinc.com/quality. Premier Award for Quality 2002 Premier’s annual award honoring excellence in healthcare begins its second year with a new set of criteria and judges. For more information check www.premierinc.com/qualityaward.
2320 Cascade Pointe Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28208