285 unopposedmotionforextensionoftime kcsr

Page 1

Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 285 Filed: 10/25/13 1 of 4 PageID #: 4235

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION KMART CORPORATION VS.

PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-103-GHD-DAS

THE KROGER CO., E&A SOUTHEAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; FULTON IMPROVEMENTS LLC; THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY; CITY OF CORINTH; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN DOE; AND ABC CORPORATION

DEFENDANTS

______________________________________________________________________________ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ______________________________________________________________________________ COMES NOW, Defendant The Kansas City Southern Railway (“KCSR”), by and through counsel, and files this its Motion for Extension of Time for it to file its reply in further support of its Motion to Exclude Testimony of John R. Krewson [Doc 240], and in support thereof would state unto the Court as follows, 1. Pursuant to this Court’s Order of August 2, 2013, the deadline for filing dispositive motions and motions in limine to exclude experts was October 8, 2013. On September 20, 2013, KCSR filed its Daubert motion to exclude the testimony of Plaintiff’s expert John R. Krewson. [Doc 240]. Under the Rules, Plaintiff’s response to KCSR’s motion was due on October 7, 2013. On October 1, 2013, this Court granted Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for an extension of time until October 18, 2013 to file its response to KCSR’s motion. [Doc 245]. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules, KCSR’s reply is currently due to be filed October 28, 2013.

1


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
285 unopposedmotionforextensionoftime kcsr by Milton Sandy - Issuu