313 unopposedmotionforextensionoftime fulton

Page 1

Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 313 Filed: 11/07/13 1 of 4 PageID #: 5913

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION KMART CORPORATION VS.

PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:11-CV-103-GHD-JAD

THE KROGER CO., E&A SOUTHEAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; FULTON IMPROVEMENTS, LLC; KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY; CITY OF CORINTH; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN DOE; AND ABC CORPORATION

DEFENDANTS

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME COMES NOW, Defendant, Fulton Improvements, LLC, by and through its attorneys, Jacks Luciano, P.A., and files this its Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for them to file its reply to Plaintiff’s Omnibus Response in Opposition to the Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of John R. Krewson [Doc 294], and in support thereof would state unto the Court as follows, to-wit: 1.

On October 30, 2013, the Plaintiff filed their Omnibus Response in Opposition to

the Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of John R. Krewson. 2.

The Defendant’s reply to Plaintiff’s response is currently due on November 11,

3.

The Defendant respectfully requests this Court enter an Order extending Fulton’s

2013.

deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s response for seven (7) days, until and including Monday, November 18, 2013. 4.

Undersigned counsel for the Defendant has contacted counsel for the Plaintiff

regarding this extension, and said counsel has no objection to this extension and has agreed to


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.