Case: 1:11-cv-00103-GHD-DAS Doc #: 329 Filed: 11/14/13 1 of 4 PageID #: 6220
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION KMART CORPORATION VS.
PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-103-GHD-DAS
THE KROGER CO., E&A SOUTHEAST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; FULTON IMPROVEMENTS LLC; THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY; CITY OF CORINTH; THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN DOE; AND ABC CORPORATION
DEFENDANTS
______________________________________________________________________________ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF PAGES ______________________________________________________________________________ COMES NOW, Defendant The Kansas City Southern Railway (“KCSR”), by and through counsel, and files this its Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Pages relative to its reply in further support of its Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc 253], and in support thereof would state unto the Court as follows: 1. Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Uniform Local Rule7(b)(5), Movant KCSR’s original and rebuttal memorandum briefs in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment may not exceed a total of thirty-five (35) pages. 2. KCSR’s original memorandum brief in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment was thirty-one (31) pages. Therefore, under the Rules, KCSR has four pages remaining for its rebuttal memorandum brief. 3. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(2), where a party, here Plaintiff, in opposition to a
1