Tiers Without Tears:
A Systematic Approach to Implementing RTI in PLC Schools
Austin G. Buffum
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 1
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 2
Tiers Without Tears: A Systematic Approach to Implementing RTI in pg PLC Schools
Austin G. Buffum
Key Recommendations
• Introduce and discuss RTI in terms of how it will help students—and not just meet federal mandates or raise test scores.
• Focus onthe three bigideas of PLCs in order to on the big ideas build a foundation to support RTI.
• Create a systematic approach to RTI that does not leave it up to each teacher to respond.
Essential Questions
• What is our mission?
• Why create a PRTI?
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 3
Our mission is not to
• Meet mandates
• Raise test scores
Our Mission
To assure high levels of learning for all students!
If our mission is high levels of learning for all students, the question is:
Is it possible?
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 4
Schools Do Make a Difference
Effective Schools research of Ron Edmonds, Lawrence Lezotte, Wilbur Brookover, Michael Rutter, and others concludes that:
• All children can learn!
• Schools control the factors assuring that students master the core of the curriculum.
Schools Do Make a Difference
“An analysis of research conducted over a 35‐year period demonstrates that schools that are highly effective produce results that almost entirely overcome the effects of student backgrounds.”
—Marzano
Schools Do Make a Difference
90 / 90 / 90 schools are schools in which:
• 90% of the students are living at or below poverty level.
• 90% of the students are from an ethnic or language minority.
• 90% of the students are achieving at or above grade level.
—Reeves
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 5
"We embrace explicitly the proposition that effective practice and popular practice are very likely two different things."
Reeves
For all students to learn, we must:
• Start with highly effective, research‐based core instruction.
• Systematically identify students who are not succeeding in our core program.
• Provide these students additional time and support until they learn.
Over the past decade, two proven processes have been developed to achieve this goal:
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 6
1.Pyramid of interventions
Over the past decade, two proven processes have been developed to achieve this goal:
1.Pyramid of interventions
2. Response to intervention
Essential Question
Why create a PRTI?
It is our moral responsibility!
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 7
Team Time the window?
Does your staff look in the mirror or out
Building the Foundation: and d PLCs
If a school tried to build an intervention program in isolation of its core program, it would be like trying to build a house, yg , starting with the roof. Without a proper foundation, no structure can stand.
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 8
RTI’s expectation of collective responsibility for learning is a radical departure from the way most U.S. schools have functioned for the past four decades.
Implementing RTI will require restructuring school procedures and reculturing a staff’s fundamental assumptions and beliefs.
Considering that many schools have developed a strong resistance to change, how does a staff create the conditions necessary to ensure that all students learn?
Fundamental Assumption
There is conclusive, compelling research that being a PLC is the most powerful and effective process to systemically change school culture and improve student learning.
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 9
The Bottom Line
Never in our nation’s history has there been
greater consensus on what it takes to assure high levels of learning for all kids!
“We can, whenever and wherever we choose, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us. We already know more than we need to do that. Whether or not we do it, must finally depend on how we feel about the fact that we haven’t so far.”
—Edmonds
We accept high levels of learning for all students as the fundamental purpose of our school, and therefore are willing to Big Idea 1: Focus on Learning examine all practices in light of their impact on learning.
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 10
Fundamental Assumption
To have a mission of learning for all:
• You must believe all students can lt hih ll learn at high levels.
• You must take responsibility to ensure that all students learn.
Restructure vs. Reculture
“If you intend to introduce a change that is incompatible with the organization’s culture, you have only three choices: modify the change to be more in line with the existing culture alter the culture to be culture, in line with the proposed change, or prepare to fail.”
Salisbury & Conner
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 11
A Candid Mission Statement
It is our mission to help kids learn if they are conscientious, responsible, attentive, developmentally ready, fluent in English, and come from homes with concerned parents from who take an interest in their education.
A Candid Mission Statement
Our mission is to create a school with an unrelenting focus on learning; failure is not an option. But, ultimately, it will be the responsibility of the student and his or her parents to take advantage of the opportunities for learning.
A Candid Mission Statement
Our mission is to take credit for the accomplishments of our highest achieving students and to assign blame for low performance to others others.
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 12
A Candid Mission Statement
It is our mission to ensure the comfort and convenience of the adults in our organization.
To promote this mission, we place a higher value on individual autonomy than we do on ensuring that all students learn.
We will avoid any change or conversation that might create anxiety or discomfort or infringe on individual autonomy.
Activity
Discuss your current reality.
Essential Questions
Does your staff believe all students can learn at high levels?
D tff ibilit
oes your staff accept responsibility to ensure that all students learn?
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 13
The Three Big Ideas
1. Focus on learning
2. Collaborative culture
3. Focus on results
Why collaborate?
“We can achieve our fundamental purpose of high levels of learning for all students only if we work together.We cultivate a collaborative culture through the development of high‐performing teams!”
—DuFour, DuFour, & Eaker
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 14
“Improving schoolsrequirecollaborative cultures. Without collaborative skills and relationships, it is not possible to learn and to continue to learn as much as you need to know to improve.”
Fullan
“Creating a collaborative culture is the single most important factor for successful school improvement initiatives and the first order of business for those seeking to enhance the effectiveness of their schools.”
Collaborate about what?
Eastwood & Lewis
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 15
In a PLC, collaborative teams focus on three key questions:
1.What do we expect students to learn?
2.How will we know when they have learned it?
3.How will we respond when they don’t?
In a PLC, collaborative teams focus on three key questions.
1.What do we expect students to learn?
2.How will we know when they have learned it?
3.How will we respond when they don’t?
Criteria for Selecting Essential Standards
1.Endurance
2 Leverage
.
3.Prepare for the next level
—Reeves
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 16
• Do you have frequent, collaborative time embedded in your professional day?
• Have you clearly defined what all students hld l?
Essential Questions should
• Does your collaboration impact individual teachers?
Three Big Ideas .
Big Idea 2: Where do you stand?
1. Focus on learning
2 Collaborative culture
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 17
3. Focus on results
“We assess our effectiveness on the basis of results rather than intentions. Individuals, teams, schools, and districts
Big Idea 3: Focus on Results seek relevant data and information and use that information to promote continuous improvement.”
—DuFour, DuFour, & Eaker
2 Which instructional practices did or Key Assessments Information did not work?
1.Which students did or did not master specific essential standards?
Big Idea 3: Focus on Results
To guide your site interventions, you need timely and frequent information: – on your students’ achievement – in meeting agreed‐upon standards – on a valid assessment – in comparison to others
—DuFour, DuFour, & Eaker
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 18
School Performance Report
Far Below Bi BelowBasicBasicProficientAdvanced Basic 0.00%0.00%6.67%13.33%80.00% Classroom Performance Summary Report StudentName Number Correct Percentage Correct Student 1 30 100% Student 2 29 96% Student 3 13 43% Student4 30 100% Student 4 Student 5 19 63% Student 6 30 100% Student 7 27 90% Student 8 28 93% Student 9 25 83% Student 10 25 83% Average 26.2 87% Classroom Standards Report Student Name Number Correct Percentage Correct LS 2.d LS 2.c LS 2.a LS 2.b LS 2.e Student 130100%100%100%100%100%100% Student 22996%100%67%100%100%100% Student 31343% 33%0%100%100%100% Student 430100%100%100%100%100%100% Student 51963%33%33%100%100%100% Student 630100%100%100%100%100%100% Student 72790%100%100%100%100%100% Student 82893% 67%67%100%100%100% Student 92583% 67%100%100%100%100% Student 102583%100%33%100%100%100% Averages:26.287% 82%78%100%97%100% © 2010 Solution Tree Press 19
Do
Classroom Teacher Report Teacher ATeacher BTeacher CTeacher DTeacher E LS 2.d82%89%90%90%79%86% LS 2c 100% 75% 80% 82% 71% 82% 2 c LS 2.a100%100%100%100%73%95% LS 2.b97%93%96%100%82%94% LS 2.e100%83%86%91%80%88% Class Averages 96%91%90%88%77%89% Identify the 8–10 big ideas per semester. Teamwork Before and After Common Assessments Establish team norms for collaboration. Monitor for learning of individual and collective results Tally and review common assessment results Create a plan for appropriate interventions Assess again— monitoring for results Revise curriculum, instruction and assessments Process for Common Assessments Instruction and ongoing assessment Examine school data and establish SMART goals. Create a road map of CAs and targets. Monitor progress on SMART goals. Identify assessment targets Design formative and summative assessments Instruction and ongoing assessment Repeat intervention loop as needed as needed —Erkens
the kind of data that informs intervention wheel? your © 2010 Solution Tree Press 20
you have
Interventions
Tier 1
• All students are screened to find students at risk (universal screening)
• All students receive core program which includes differentiated instruction.
• Responsive students remain in Tier 1.
• Unresponsive students move to Tier 2.
Interventions
Tier 2
• Creative, flexible scheduling creates sufficient time for small‐group instruction.
• Personnel are used creatively.
• Thirty minutes of additional time and support, threeto fourtimes per week.
• Progress is monitored more frequently than in Tier 1.
• Responsive students return to Tier 1.
• Unresponsive students move to Tier 3.
Interventions
Tier 3
• It is more intensive, with frequent individualized intervention.
• Interventions are highly targeted, prescriptive‐diagnostic, and focused on not symptoms , symptoms.
• Actual interventions may be the same as in Tier 2, but are more frequent and longer in duration.
• Progress is monitored even more frequently than in Tier 2.
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 21
Interventions
Interventions become more intensive by:
• Increasing the frequency qy (5x versus 3x per week)
• Increasing the duration (50 versus 30 minutes)
• Decreasing the pupil–teacher ratio
Thank you!
Austin G. Buffum
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 22
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 23
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 24
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 25
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 26
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 27
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 28
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 29
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 30
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 31
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 32
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 33
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 34
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 35
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 36
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 37
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 38
Notes
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 39
Notes
Creating a PLC Foundation: Current Reality and Steps to Success
Big Idea #1: A Focus on Learning
Do we believe all students can learn at high levels?
Will we take responsibility to make this a reality?
Big Idea #2: Collaborative Culture—
Frequent team collaboration time during the professional day
Norms
Solution Tree Press
What do want our students to learn?
Big Ideas #3: A Focus on Results
Common Assessments—How will we know if our students are learning?
How often do collaborative teams meet?
Is the collaboration time during the teacher’s professional day? Is it required?
Has each team identified team norms? Are they reviewed at every meeting? Is there a “norm check” procedure?
Have collaborative teams clearly defined essential learning outcomes?
Have collaborative teams created common assessments to measure essential standards?
Do the assessment results show on how each student did on individual essential standard?
Is common assessment data shared in comparison to others?
START!
What can you start doing tomorrow that will move your site closer to your PLC goals? What obstacles must be addressed?
Potential Bump Essential Question(s) Your Current Reality Desired Outcome (Long Team Goal) First Steps (Short Team Goal)
Pioneer 2008-2009 First Semester Team Collaboration Outcomes
Our Mission
Our mission is to maximize every student’s academic potential and personal responsibility.
School SMART Goal
All students demonstrate mastery of their coursework essential standards by the end of the 2008–2009 school year. To achieve this goal, we agree to be “tight” about the following team outcomes:
Norms
• By September 10, teams collaboratively create or revise teammeeting norms.
• Teams review norms at every meeting, and revise as needed.
Smart Goal(s)
• By September 10, teams write one or more SMART goals for the year.
• Teams work interdependently and hold each other mutually accountable to achieve goals.
Essential Standards
• By October 8, teams collaborate to identify essential learning standards (no more than 10) for each course of study.
• Standards must prepare students for success at the next study level.
• Teams write standards in kidfriendly terms, determine the level of rigor, identify prior skills and academic vocabulary needed, create and select the common assessment to measure student mastery, and determine when the standard is to be taught.
Common Assessments
• Common assessments must measure student mastery of essential standards.
• Teams collaborate to create at least one common assessment.
• Teams collectively use the five common assessment guiding questions when reviewing common assessment results.
Intervention–POI–Tutorial
• Teachers refer at-risk students to the pyramid of interventions every three weeks.
• Teams offer weekly tutorial support.
Student–Parent Communication
• Teachers update grades at least once every three weeks.
• Students monitor their progress toward meeting essential standards.
Areas of Staff Learning
• Best grading practices
• Engaging and connecting students to Pioneer
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 41
Team Goal-Setting Plan
Team or Department:____________________________________
What is our team’s current reality? (Areas of strength and potential areas of focus)
Based upon our current reality, we have identified the following area of focus to improve student learning:
We have collectively created the following SMART goal to address this area of focus:
To Achieve This Goal
Action Steps: What steps or activities will be initiated to achieve this goal?
Designation: Who will be responsible?
Timeframe: What is a realistic timeframe for each step or activity?
Outcomes or Evidence: What outcomes on student learning do we expect? What evidence will we have to show that we are making progress?
Agreement
This goal was created collectively, and we are committed to achieving this goal. (Team Signatures)
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 42
Identifying Essential Standards: What Do We Expect Students to Learn?
Grade Level: _______ Subject: _________________Team Members: _________________________________________________
1. Standard/Description
2. Example/Rigor
3. Prior Skills Needed
4. Common Assessment
5. When Taught?
1. Standard: What is the essential standard to be learned? Describe it using student-friendly vocabulary.
2. Example/Rigor: What does proficient student work look like? Provide an example or description.
3. Prior Skills Needed: What prior knowledge, skills, and vocabulary are needed for a student to master this standard?
4. Common Assessment: What assessments will be used to measure student mastery?
5. When will this standard be taught?
Solution Tree Press
Course Title: ALGEBRA 1
2007/2008 Second Semester Essential Standards
Team Members: Jackie Martin, Bre Welch, Jackie Stoerger, Mary Hingst
Standard # Standard or Description Example or Rigor Prior Skills Needed Common Assessment When Taught
2.0
10.0
11.0
Solution Tree Press
12.0
Students understand and use the rules of exponents.
Students multiply and divide monomials
Students apply basic factoring techniques to second- and simple third-degree polynomials. These techniques include finding a common factor for all terms in a polynomial, recognizing the difference of two squares, and recognizing perfect squares of binomials.
Students simplify fractions with polynomials in the numerator and denominator by factoring both and reducing them to the lowest terms.
2.0
14.0
Students understand and use the operation of taking a root and raising to a fractional power.
Solve a quadratic equation by factoring or completing the square.
Simplify: 37 9 5 10 x y xy
Factor completely:
1. 3a2 – 24ab + 48b2
2. x 2 – 121
3. 9x2 + 12x +4
Simplify: 3 168 + 22 2 44 36 x xyy xyy −+
Simplify: 3 168 +
Solve by completing the square: x 2 + 4x = 6
Multiplying monomials and polynomials (Chapter 4)
Multiplying and dividing monomials and polynomials (Chapter 4 and Chapter 5: Sec 1-3)
Chapter 4 CA February
21.0
Students graph quadratic functions and know that their roots are the x- intercepts.
Graph: y = x2 – 3x – 4 and state the x intercepts.
Factoring by finding GCF, difference of two squares, and trinomials (Chapter 5)
Understanding rational and irrational numbers and prime factoring
Factor quadratics (Ch. 5) and simplifying radicals (Ch. 11)
Solving quadratic equations by factoring, completing the square and quadratic formula (Chapter 12)
Chapter 5 CA February
Chapter 6 CA March
Chapter 11: Sec 3, 4, 5 CA March
Chapter 12: Sec 1–4 and Chapter 5
Sec 12 CA Late March
Chapter 8: Sec 8 and pg 389 CA April
Essential Standards Student Tracking Chart
Standard 4.0
I can solve equations in one variable.
Standard 5.0
I can solve multi-step problems involving linear equations in one variable and provide justification for each step.
Equations Test (sections 3-1 through 3-3, 3-5, 7-3, and 10-5)
Standard 6.0
I can graph a linear equation and compute the x and y intercepts.
Standard 7.0
I can write linear equations given points on a line.
Standard 8.0
I understand the concepts of parallel and perpendicular lines and how their slopes are related.
I can find the equation of a line perpendicular to a given line that passes through a given point.
Ch. 8 Test (sections 8-1 through 8-5)
Common
Essential Standard
Assessment Date Passed Teacher Initials
Solution Tree Press
Essential Standards: U.S. History
Standard # Standard/Description Example/Rigor Prior Skills Needed Common Assessment When Taught
8.1.1
Describe the relationships between the moral and political ideas of the Great Awakening and the Enlightenment and the development of revolutionary fervor. Prompt: Describe how the movements led to the revolutionary fervor.
Understand the major events preceding the American Revolution.
8.1
Solution Tree Press
8.1.2
Analyze the philosophy of government expressed in the Declaration of Independence (individual rights). Test question:
Which of the following is not an unalienable right?
Define and understand: The Great Awakening Enlightenment
Cause-and-effect relationships
Venn diagram: Compare and contrast movements with written analysis
Timeline of events: Illustrated & annotated
1st quarter: September
Resources: Holt Ch. 2
8.2.5
8.2.7
Understand the significance of religious freedom within the First Amendment and the importance of separation of church and state.
Describe the principles of federalism, dual sovereignty, separation of powers, checks and balances, purpose of majority rule, and ideas of American constitutionalism.
Why did the Supreme Court overturn Tinker vs. Des Moines?
7.6.5 Experience analyzing historical documents (Magna Carta)
Analysis of primary source document: The Declaration of Independence
Identify key phrases: “All men are created…
Unalienable rights
Understand the various elements of the 1st Amendment
How does the legislative branch check the executive branch?
Understand the three branches of government as well as the idea of checks and balances
1st quarter: Sept.–Oct.
Resources: Holt Ch. 3
1st quarter: October
Resources: Holt Ch.3
1st Amendment case study: Research Case, prepare visual, and present 1st semester November
Constitution test 2nd quarter
Common Assessment Desired Outcomes
We give common assessments so we can:
• Identify specifically which students did not demonstrate mastery of essential standard(s)—Because we give common assessments to measure student mastery of essential standards, common assessments should identify students that need additional help and support. Additionally, if an assessment measures more than one essential standard, then the test results must provide more than an overall score for each student. The results must also delineate specifically which standards each student did not pass.
Essential Question
Specifically which students did not demonstrate mastery?
• Identify effective instructional practices—Because our teachers have autonomy in how they teach essential standards, it is vital that common assessment data help validate which practices were effective. It is best when common assessment results are displayed in such a way that allows each teacher to compare their students’ results to other teachers who teach the same course.
Essential Question
Which instructional practices proved to be most effective?
• Identify patterns in student mistakes—Besides using common assessment results to identify best instructional practices, this data should also be used to determine ineffective instructional practices. When analyzing the types of mistakes that failing students make, patterns emerge that can point to weaknesses or gaps in the initial instruction.
Essential Question
What patterns can we identify from the student mistakes?
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 47
• Measure the accuracy of the assessment—Through a careful item analysis of the assessment, a team can determine the validity of each test question. Over time, this will build a team’s capacity to create better assessments.
Essential Question
How can we improve this assessment?
• Plan and target interventions—The ultimate goal of any PLC is to ensure high levels of learning for all students. If a team uses common assessments to identify students in need of additional help, determine effective and ineffective instructional practices, and measure the validity of the assessment, then they should have the information needed to plan and implement targeted interventions to assist the students that need help.
Essential Question
What interventions are needed to provide failed students additional time and support?
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 48
Classroom Performance Summary Report
Science7: Genetics Unit Test
Classroom Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced 0.00% 0.00% 6.67% 13.33% 80.00%
Student Name Number Correct Percent Correct Student 1 30100% Student 2 29 96.67% Student 3 13 43.33% Student 4 30100% Student 5 19 63.33% Student 6 30100% Student 7 2790% Student 8 28 93.33% Student 9 25 83.33% Student 10 25 83.33% Student 11 30100% Student 12 30100% Student 13 25 83.33% Student 14 30100% Student 15 30100% Averages: 26.2 87.33% Solution Tree Press
Student Name Number Correct Percent Correct LS 2.d LS 2.c LS 2.a LS 2.b LS 2.e Student 1 30100% 100% 100%100%100%100% Student 2 29 96.67% 100% 67%100%100%100% Student 3 13 43.33% 33% 0% 100%100%100% Student 4 30100% 100% 100%100%100%100% Student 5 19 63.33% 33% 33%100%100%100% Student 6 30100% 100% 100%100%100%100% Student 7 2790% 100% 100%100%100%100% Student 8 28 93.33% 67% 67%100%100%100% Student 9 25 83.33% 67% 100%100%100%100% Student 10 25 83.33% 100% 33%100%100%100% Student 11 30100% 100% 100%100%100%100% Student12 30 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Student 13 25 83.33% 33% 67%100%100%100% Student 14 30100% 100% 100%100%100%100% Student 15 30100% 100% 100%100%100%100% Averages: 26.2 87.33% 82% 78% 100% 97% 100% Teacher A Teacher B Teacher C Teacher D Teacher E LS2.d 82% 89%90%90% 79% 86% LS2.c 100% 75%80%82% 71% 82% LS2.a 100%100%100%100% 73% 95% LS2.b 97% 93%96%100% 82% 94% LS2.e 100%83%86%91% 80% 88% Class Averages: 96% 91% 90% 88% 77% 89% Solution Tree Press
SPECIAL EDUCATION TESTING
Student Study Team
LEVEL 3: INTENSIVE PROGRAM
• Intensive core support
• Intensive math support
• Intensive responsibility support
• Mandatory tutorial
• Mandatory homework help
• Student contracts
MoreIntensive MoreTargeted
• Intensive reading instruction
Evaluation of student progress every 3 weeks
LEVEL 2: SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM
• Double-block math
• Newcomer ELD
• AVID
• Sheltered classes
• Teacher change
• Zero-period PE
• Honors/Accelerated classes
Student identification by teacher recommendation every 3 weeks
LEVEL 1: CORE PROGRAM
Support for All Students
• Open tutorial period (Tues./Thurs.)
• Lunch/after-school homework help
• Quarterly student goal-setting
• Sixth-grade mentor program
• Sixth-grade study-skills class
• Late bus
• Online grade access
School Structures
• Safe and orderly campus
• “REAL Wildcat” expectations
• Weekly collaboration
• Common team prep periods
• Student exploration opportunities
Core Curriculum
• All classes meet/exceed state standards
• Schoolwide and team SMART goals
• Identified essential standards for every course
• Universal access to electives
• Common assessments for all essential standards
• Schoolwide recognition programs
• Leveled reading groups
Pioneer Middle School’s Pyramid Response to Intervention
From Pyramid Response to Intervention: RTI, Professional Learning Communities, and How to Respond When Kids Don’t Learn (Buffum, Mattos, & Weber, 2008).
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 51
Pioneer Middle School’s Pyramid Response to Interventions
Pyramid Level Intervention
Supplemental
Mandatory Tutorial
Targeted students are required to attend weekly tutorial sessions. Students are assigned to area(s) of need based on teacher referral.
Mandatory Homework Help
Targeted students are required to attend lunch and/or after‐school homework help sessions.
Targeted Students Intensity Contract Requirements
Failed learners and intentional nonlearners, all subjects
Intentional nonlearners, all subjects
Twice weekly, 27 minutes per session
Targeted students assigned 1–10 times per week, depending on need
Lunch HW Help: 25 minutes daily
After‐School HW Help: 60 minutes daily
Studentswill be promoted from the intervention once all grades are satisfactory, based upon the teacher referral process
Studentswill be promoted from the intervention once all grades are satisfactory, based upon the teacher referral process
Studentswill be promoted from the intervention once they demonstrate the ability to independently attend assigned interventions Solution Tree Press
Escorted Homework Help
Targeted students are escorted by a staff member to assigned lunch and/or after‐school homework help sessions.
Students failing to attend assigned mandatory support
Targeted students escorted 1–10 times per week, depending on need
Pyramid Level Intervention
Supplemental (continued_
Parent Contact/Progress Reports
The parents or guardians of every student referred into the pyramid will be contacted, and provided a progress report of their child’s current academic progress and areas of concern.
Fall/Spring AtRisk Conferences
Conferences involving parents, teachers, and students are held regarding students in danger of retention and/or failing to respond to interventions. An improvement plan is created.
OneonOne Mentor
Targeted students assigned a one‐on‐one student mentor. Mentors can provide academic peer tutoring and/or assistance with peer acceptance.
New Student Buddies
Students new to Pioneer are assigned student “buddies” to help with transition and to learn the “Wildcat Way.”
DoubleBlock Math Classes
Two‐period math class meets the same curriculum, scope, sequence, and timeline as the equivalent one‐period, grade‐level math class. The additional time provides the teacher the opportunity to utilize different instructional practices, teach prerequisite skills, and provide additional time and support for students to master essential standards.
Targeted Students Intensity Contract Requirements
All students referred to pyramid
Every 3–4 weeks Studentswill be promoted from the intervention once all grades are satisfactory, based upon the teacher referral process
Students at risk of retention and/or failing to respond to interventions
October and MarchStudentswill be promoted from the intervention once interventions are successful
Failed learners, intentional nonlearners, and/or students with peer or social concerns
As needed Successful remediation of targeted concern
New studentsAs needed N/A
Failed learners in math
Daily, two periodsStudentswill be promoted oncethe teacher determines that they can perform successfully in the equivalent one‐period course
Solution Tree Press
Supplemental (continued)
Newcomer ELD
Class provides intensive English language development (ELD) to targeted students.
AVID ©
College‐focused, elective course designed to support targeted students’ access to rigorous coursework. Class teaches college or career planning, study skills, and tutorial support of college‐prep curriculum.
Sheltered Classes
Science and/or core classes in which clusters of language learning (EL) students with similar language needs are assigned. Teacher is trained to use EL instructional practices. Additionally, peer tutors who speak the cluster students’ native language are assigned to the class to assist.
Teacher Change
Transfer targets student to same course, with a different teacher.
Students not fluent in conversational English. (CELDT level 1 & 2)
High‐ability, low‐achieving students
Daily, three periodsStudentswill be promoted once the teacher determines that they can perform successfully in sheltered and/or standard courses
Daily, one period N/A
English language learner students transitioning from newcomer class
Studentsin need of a different instructional style and/or a new start
Daily, one to three periods, as needed
Studentswill be promoted once the teacher determines that they can perform successfully in standard courses
As needed N/A
Pyramid Level Intervention Targeted Students Intensity Contract Requirements
Solution Tree Press
Supplemental (continued)
ZeroPeriod PE
Students assigned to mandatory academic support electives and/or double‐block math classes qualify to take their required Physical Education class before school, thus allowing them to take a student‐choice elective during the school day.
Honors or Accelerated Classes
Students in a mandatory, academic support elective and/or double block math As needed Studentswill be promoted once they are no longer assigned to a mandatory, academic elective and/or double block math
Students who have demonstrated advanced mastery of grade‐level essential standards can qualify for placement in honors/accelerated coursework in math, core, and science. Students whohave demonstrated advanced mastery of grade‐level essential standards Each semester N/A
Intensive
Intensive Core Support (ICS)
Mandatory elective course designed to support targeted students’ grade‐level core class (language arts and social studies). Focus of class is to preteach core essential standards, review prerequisite skills needed to master core essential standards, and provide extended time to learn core essential standards.
Failed learners in language arts & social studies
Daily, one period To be promoted, studentsmust demonstrate mastery of grade‐level core essential standards, as well as the ability to learn future core essential standards without intensive support
Pyramid Level Intervention Targeted Students Intensity Contract Requirements
Solution Tree Press
Intensive (continued)
Intensive Math Support (IMS)
Mandatory elective course designed to support targeted students’ grade‐level math class. Focus of class is to preteach grade‐level math essential standards, review prerequisite skills needed to master grade‐level math essential standards, and provide extended time to learn grade‐level math essential standards.
Intensive Responsibility Support (IRS)
Mandatory elective course designed to require intentional nonlearners to complete all assignments and demonstrate effective study skills.
Intensive Reading Instruction (IRI)
Mandatory elective course designed to increase targeted students’ reading proficiency to grade level. Focus of class is to preteach core essential standards, review prerequisite skills needed to master core essential standards, and provide extended time to learn core essential standards.
Failed learners in math
Intentional nonlearners
Daily, one period To be promoted,studentsmust demonstrate mastery of grade‐level math essential standards, as well as the ability to learn future grade level math essential standards without intensive support
Failed learners reading at least two years below grade level
Daily, one period To be promoted, studentsmust have at least a 70% in all classes, have completed all assignments, have recorded assignments properly for at least three weeks, and have demonstrated satisfactory attendance
Daily, one period To be promoted, studentsmust demonstrate ability to read at or above grade level
Pyramid Level Intervention
Intensity
Targeted Students
Contract Requirements
Tree Press
Solution
The Pioneer Team
Commitment * Community * Collaboration
Tutorial Directions
Overview
• Tutorial sessions can be used to reteach essential standards, offer pyramid support, provide homework help, make‐up assignments, conference with students, offer enrichment and extra‐curricular opportunities, and so on
• Any student can be required to attend a specific tutorial session. Binder reminders and tutorial stamps will be used to hold student’s accountable
• Pyramid of Intervention students will be required to attend tutorial
• Each departmental team should offer at least one “Open Session” for homework/assignment help
• Students not required to attend tutorial will earn the privilege to attend an “open” tutorial session, study in the library, attend “enrichment” opportunities, or earn an extended snack break
How It Works
• With 3 minutes left in Period 2, we will make a PA announcement to transition to Tutorial. At this time, all students should take out their Binder Reminders.
• Please start by releasing any student that has a “Required Tutorial” stamp in his/her Binder Reminder.
• Instruct required students to line‐up outside the door of their required classroom. Additionally, they are to report directly to their required class—no stopping at lockers, restrooms, and so on.
• Next, any student who does not have their Binder Reminder will be required to report directly to the back of the MPR for required Study Hall.
• Once the required tutorial students are confirmed at their required locations, we will make an announcement for Period 2 teachers to release the students who are not required to attend a tutorial session. Please do not release these students until we make the announcement.
• Please check Binder Reminders at the door to make sure that each student has earned this option.
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 57
• Also, please reminder these students that they have three minutes get to get to an “Open Tutorial” offering. They may not “roam” from offering to offering…they must select one and stay.
• If you have any questions, please call the office.
Weekly Tutorial Priority Schedule
Tuesday
Thursday
Week “A” Core PE/Electives
Week “B” Math Science
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 58
Pioneer Tutorial Schedule
Tuesday, October 9th (Priority—Math)
Thursday, October 11th (Priority—Science)
Any student may attend an “Open” tutorial. To attend a “Closed” tutorial, you must have “Tutorial Required” stamped in your Binder Reminder and/or prior teacher approval.
Teacher Room Open/Closed Subject Grade Aguilar 602 Open Study Hall for Maan’s Students Spelling Lesson #2 Test Make‐Up 7 Amsbary 504 Open 6th Core Tutorial 6 Arneson 303 Open 6th Grade Earth Science Help 6 Badraun 603 Open Study Hall for Prell’s Students Spelling Lesson #3 Test Make‐Up 7 Bell/Abrahams 502 Open 6th Core Make‐Up 6 Billings 702 Open 8th Grade Core: Enrichment 8 Cope MPR Open Drama/Chorus Help 6, 7, 8 Dearborn 703 Closed 8th Core Homework Help 8 Delange Track Closed Mile Run Make‐Up 6, 7, 8 Fischer Band Room Open Band/Orchestra 6, 7, 8 Fuggitti 403 Open Clothing/Foods 7,8 Hamamura 503 Open Preposition Review/Make‐Up 6 Harkin 405 Open Pre‐Algebra Help 7 Hingst 706 Open Tues/Algebra Thurs/ Geometry 7, 8 Holmes 704 Closed 8th Core Homework Help 8 Kaahaaina 407 Open 7th Grade Life Science Help 7 Kozuch 115 Open Study Hall 6,7,8 Kridner MPR Closed Pyramid of Intervention 6, 7, 8 Larson 802 Open 7th Grade Life Science Help 7 Leon Closed 6th Exploratory Language/French 6 & 8 © 2010 Solution Tree Press 59
Teacher Room Open/Closed Subject Grade Lippert 505 Open Grammar Review 6 Macias 402 Closed Spanish IA 7, 8 Martin 806 Closed Tues/Algebra Thurs/ Geometry 7,8 Mattos 801 Lab Open Internet Research/AR Tests 6, 7, 8 McCargar Fitness Room Closed Fitness Log Instruction Make‐Up 6, 7, 8 Meyers 901 Open Math 6 6 Miranda 701 Closed 8th Core Writing Conference 8 Mittleman 902 Open 8th Core Homework Help 8 Moore Library Open Study Hall 6, 7, 8 Noonan 605 Open Study Hall 6,7,8 Ocegera 501 Open 6th Core Make‐Up 6 Payne, Mr. 121 Open Computers/Video Help 6, 7, 8 Payne, Mrs. 101 Open Math 6/PreAlgebra Help 6, 7 Polston 301 Open 6th Grade Earth Science Help 6 Prell 601 Open Study Hall for Aguilar Spelling Lession #1 Test Make Up 7 Randall 506 Open 6th Core Make‐Up 6 Sanchez 705 Open Spanish I/IB 8 Schaer 804 Open Pre Algebra 6,7,8 Shafer 408 Open 8th Grade Physical Science 8 Smith/Egan Plaza Open Study Time/Extended Snack 6, 7, 8 Spiak 401 Open Art/Yearbook 6, 7, 8 Stoerger 805 Closed Algebra & Test Retake 7,8 Thomas 404 Closed Make‐Up Science Labs 8 VanHerde Track Closed Mile Run Make‐Up 6, 7, 8 Welch 803 Closed 6th Grade Pre‐Algebra Help 6 © 2010 Solution Tree Press 60
Evaluating Site Intervention Program Effectiveness
Essential Questions
Urgent
• Do we have a sense of urgency when implementing this intervention?
Directive
• Are targeted students “required” to attend or participate?
Timely
• How often are students identified for this program? How often do we evaluate progress?
• Will this intervention provide extended learning time and multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate mastery?
Targeted
• What is the intended outcome of this intervention?
• Which students should be targeted for participation?
• Will it provide targeted, differentiated, research-based instruction?
Administered by Trained Professionals
• Who will teach or implement this intervention?
• Do the instructors have the training and/or resources necessary for success?
Systematic
• How do we ensure that all students who need this intervention are identified and receive this support?
• How will students move into and out of the program?
• How will we know if the intervention is working?
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 61
Evaluating Site Intervention Program Effectiveness
Program Strengths
Focus Intervention
in Comparison to Essential Characteristics
Program Concerns
in Comparison to Essential Characteristics
Desired Outcome Alignment Steps
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 62
Intentional Nonlearners (Won’ts)
Failed Learners (Can’ts)
Level Interventions Tier II Intensive Level Interventions Tier III
Targeting Interventions Supplemental
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 63
PRTI Essential Standard Plan Protocol
The activity helps teams or schools create a PRTI process. The purpose is to ensure that a group of students master a specific, targeted essential standard. The steps are:
1. Identify the Targeted Standard—Using the format and essential questions from the activity, Identifying Essential Standards (page 43), identify the essential standard to be learned. To work best, you should identify a high-leverage, essential standard.
2. Universal Screening: Answer the following questions and record your responses in the appropriate box.
a. What skills or concepts related to the target standard should be measured prior to core instruction?
b. Who will administer the assessment?
c. When will the assessment be administered?
d. What assessment will be used?
e. Once the assessment has been administered, what information was gained to help guide core instruction and preventive interventions?
3. Prior Skills Needed—Answer the following questions and record your responses in the appropriate box.
a. What prior skills are needed by a student to master the targeted standard? (These skills can be measured using the universal screening tool.)
b. For students lacking in prerequisite skills: How and when will students learn these skills before focusing on the targeted standard?
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 64
c. When will educators administer assessments?
d. What assessment will measure student mastery of the prior skills?
e. What research-based practices will be used to teach the prior skills?
4. Tier 1 Core Instruction—Answer the following questions and record your responses in the appropriate box.
a. What skills or concepts related to the target standard will be taught during the Tier 1 core instruction?
b. Who will teach the core instruction?
c. When will the core instruction be taught?
d. What formative common assessments will be used to measure student progress during core instruction?
e. What research-based instructional practices will be used to teach the core instruction?
5. Tier 2 Supplemental Interventions—Answer the following questions and record your responses in the appropriate boxes.
a. What interventions will be provided to intentional nonlearners and failed learners who did not demonstrate mastery after the Tier 1 core instruction?
b. Who will teach the interventions?
c. When will the interventions be offered?
d. What assessments will be used to monitor student progress in each intervention?
e. What research-based instructional practices will be used for failed learners?
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 65
6. Tier 3 Intensive Interventions—Answer the following questions and record your responses in the appropriate boxes.
a. What interventions will be provided to intentional nonlearners and failed learners who did not demonstrate mastery after Tier 2 supplemental interventions?
b. Who will teach the interventions?
c. When will the interventions be offered?
d. What assessments will be used to monitor student progress in each intervention?
e. What research-based instructional practices will be used for failed learners?
Helpful Hint: Record individual interventions on sticky notes. It is easy to move them on the chart while discussing possibilities.
© 2010 Solution Tree Press 66
PRTI Essential Standard Plan
Grade Level: _______ Subject: _________________ Team Members: _________________________________________________
Target Essential Skill/Standard: _______________
1. Universal Screening Administered By Administered When Assessment Tool Assessment Findings:
Prior Skills Needed (Prevention)
Tier 1 Core Instruction (Goal: 75%+ Proficient)
Solution Tree Press
Tier 2 Supplemental Interventions (Core-Plus)
Failed Learners:
Taught by Taught When Assessment Tool Research-Based Instructional Practices To Be Used
Taught by Taught When Assessment Tool (Progress Monitoring)
Research-Based Instructional Practices To Be Used
Taught by Taught When Assessment Tool (Progress Monitoring)
Research-Based Instructional Practices To Be Used
Intentional Nonlearners:
Tier 3 Intensive Interventions Taught by Taught When Assessment Tool (Progress Monitoring)
Failed Learners:
Intentional Nonlearners:
Research-Based Instructional Practices To Be Used
Universal Screening
Decision Protocols
Tier 1 to Tier 2
Response to Intervention
Diagnostic Assessments
Progress Monitoring
Learning CPR
Intentional Nonlearners:
Pyramid Response to Intervention
Tier 2 to Tier 3
Solution Tree Press
Failed Learners:
Tier 3 to Special Education
Focus on Learning
Critical Steps to Success
Creating a PLC Foundation
Collaborative Culture
Focus on Results
Pyramid Response to Intervention
Decision Protocol Essential Questions:
1. Who: Who needs to be part of the collaborative, problem-solving team(s) to identify student in need of additional time and support?
2. Frequency: How often will the team(s) meet?
3. Monitoring: Who will monitor each student’s progress? What tools (assessments) will be used?
4. Criteria: How much growth is enough? How long will we try the intervention before considering changing interventions?
Decision Protocol: Tier 1 to Tier 2
Who:
Frequency:
Solution Tree Press
Monitoring:
Criteria:
Decision Protocol: Tier 3 to Special Education
Special
Who:
Criteria:
Frequency:
Who:
Decision Protocol: Tier 2 to Tier 3
Frequency:
Tier 2 Supplemental Program
Monitoring:
Criteria:
Intensive
Tier 3
Program
Decision Protocol
Education
Testing
Core Program
Protocol
Tier 1
Decision
Screening & Diagnostic Assessments
Decision Protocol Universal