The problem (then, now) was not a lack of voices but of listeners. - Katherine Boo
voice.. (print, mics, et al)
perhaps tech could/should be less about *augmenting because somewhere/somehow we got to a point of regulatory exclusionism.. ie: we insist on permission training funding peer review approval publisher translation hoop jumping et al to funnel censor oppress quiet..
*if it ever would have worked
too many voices
There's really no such thing as the 'voiceless'. There are only the deliberately silenced, or the preferably unheard. - Arundhati Roy
listen
perhaps tech could/should be more about augmenting ing.. because today we do the have means to listen to all the voices.. without any strings pre-reqs judgement agenda raised-eye-brow et al
The challenges that face us as a human family are so great/difficult we are not in a position to discount anyone. - Deeyah Khan
unheard.. silenced..
listening beyond words..in order to hear all the words and every other means of voice
ie: as we approach the limit of idiosyncratic jargon ness..we realize communication is ..never finished/complete...
to disengage from insisting everyone get educated/schooled/degreed publish a book pen a paper find/pitch a pitch whatever.. in order to be heard
to Springstein/mentor ness ..and all the hours spent learning w/o credit..and all the ones who don't get on stage James Rhodes (@JRhodesPianist) tweeted at 5:20 AM - 21 Feb 2017 : Indescribable amounts of love for this https://t.co/tHqAHQWwbL? (http://twitter.com/JRhodesPianist/status/834015038524506112?s =17)
to suicide ness ..and all the hours spent in pain..and all the civilizingness of killing More People Die from Suicide Than From Wars, Natural Disasters Combined https://t.co/UBhu5y2lcT Original Tweet: https://twitter.com/JasonSilva/status/833722734781808641
perhaps the need to augment us is..
less about any of us being..
and more about our tendency/voluntary-compliance to be..
that
via
e
v
e
r
y
d a y as the day
[aka: not part\ial.. for (blank)’s sake‌]