HYDROGEN AND FUTURE FUELS
WHERE DO YOU PUT
FIVE MILLION TONNES
OF HYDROGEN?
by Dr Dennis Van Puyvelde, Head of Gas, Energy Networks Australia The development of a domestic and export hydrogen market in Australia is a key focus of the Federal Government’s Low Emissions Technology Statement. One of the challenges of decarbonising gas is how large volumes of alternatives like hydrogen can be stored to provide the same level of energy security.
O
ne of the main advantages of gas infrastructure is its ability to store vast amounts of energy. Australia has developed 275PJ of natural gas storage, which represents more than the combined annual gas consumption for households and businesses1. This storage helps balance the daily supply of natural gas with fluctuating demand throughout the day, and more importantly, allows seasonal variations in heating demand to be met. This storage is the equivalent of almost six billion household batteries, or around 240 batteries for each Australian2. That’s a lot of energy storage. As we transition to hydrogen, it is important to understand how much storage capacity would be needed to provide the same level of energy security and whether geological storage can be used. A joint project between Future Fuels CRC (FFCRC) and CSIRO completed an assessment of underground hydrogen storage (UHS) opportunities in Australia. The aim of the assessment was to estimate the scale of the potential underground storage capacity of hydrogen in sites that are broadly suitable – but not to rank sites from worst to best, which would require further work. The scale of the storage challenges helps paint the picture. A total storage capacity of just over 600PJ (about five million tonnes) was estimated. This was made up of 300PJ for supporting the gas/hydrogen network, 300PJ to support hydrogen exports and between 1.3 and 1.6PJ3 of hydrogen to support the electricity network if hydrogen is used instead of batteries and/or pumped hydro. The four main geological storage options for UHS are salt caverns, depleted oil and gas reservoirs, aquifers, and hard rock caverns. Depleted gas reservoirs and saline aquifers are geologically similar. Salt caverns Salt caverns can be created in various ways within salt domes or salt deposits by leaching out large cavities through the injection of
40
March 2022 ISSUE 17
water. The salt surrounding the cavern is of very low permeability and a very effective barrier to gas leakage. Europe has an abundance of salt deposits, so it has focused on using salt caverns as an option for UHS. Salt caverns are already used for storing hydrogen for the petrochemical industry.
Depleted oil and gas reservoirs Depleted gas fields have been the preferred options for underground storage of natural gas. These fields are easy to develop and can utilise existing infrastructure (e.g. wells, pipelines). They have also demonstrated containment as they have trapped natural gas over long periods of time. Like gas storage, UHS requires a site with adequate storage capacity, injectivity, and safe containment in the form of an impermeable caprock. Repurposing existing gas storage sites to hydrogen will require assessments of the characteristics and may also require some modification of infrastructure. Saline aquifers In regions where the above formations are not available, saline aquifers can be developed for gas storage. The formation should have similar properties as depleted gas reservoirs, such as requiring a trapping structure and having adequate storage capacity and permeability to be able to inject and withdraw hydrogen. Hard rock caverns Abandoned mines have been canvassed as an option for UHS. These hard rock areas occur in places where there are no depleted gas fields or saline aquifers. Compressed air storage and CO2 storage have also been proposed for abandoned mines but to date, there are no examples of UHS in these mines. New engineered caverns can also be built instead of repurposing abandoned mines.
www.energymagazine.com.au
