policymakers. However, in the previously discussed questions about value, the shift away from instrumental outcomes as metrics of value, towards more holistic community development values, routed through people and place, opens a way to evidence the experience and outcomes of taking part in new ways that move beyond the evidence/experience divide. As such, when 82% suggested that the project evidences changes in people’s health and wellbeing, it is possible that this is not as tied to instrumental impacts of music as health, such as was observed in the interviews. Instead, the responses and discussions within the online event more broadly indicate that these changes may be more holistically understood as situated experiences that contribute to the health and wellbeing of people and place. However, understanding how to communicate this as evidence of the project’s value within policymaking contexts remains in need of attention and critique. •
This connected strongly to the sectoral perceptions of health. 70% think that the sector they work in influences how they understand health, despite not viewing the music-health paradox as important, which in the interviews was recognised as having a role in how participants positioned value. This also connected to the knowledgeexchange findings from the interviews,
where partner-practitioners spoke about how their collaborations together, as a new way of working, was helping them to learn more about the different roles of their partners, the sector that they work within, and how these sectors understand and work towards challenging health inequalities in Morecambe. Furthermore, these sectoral perceptions of health also require attention in relation to the strategic role of practitioners, particularly music leaders in the project, and the aforementioned issue of separating out policy and practice and who has responsibility for this within the design and development of the project. Partner-practitioners reflexive questions As we thought through the ideas of third-space as a negotiated process of learning with each other, we invited research partner-practitioners to share the questions they felt needed addressing, regarding the project’s future sustainability. These focused predominantly towards the music sessions themselves and what the decision-making processes within and around the project were. Particularly, how this related to the project’s value as part of healthy living. This connected to our analysis of partner-practitioner perceptions of the carriers to participation in Music for Health in Morecambe. Thinking through the data drawn through the project so far, we themed these as:
“...partner-practitioners spoke about how their collaborations together, as a new way of working, was helping them to learn more about the different roles of their partners, the sector that they work within, and how these sectors understand and work towards challenging health inequalities in Morecambe.”
27
