CINCINNATI UPTOWN INNOVATION CORRIDOR
Project: Transportation Hub, Pedestrian Bridge Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, United States Designer: Morgan Raman
CINCINNATI UPTOWN INNOVATION CORRIDOR Project: Transportation Hub, Pedestrian Bridge Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
02 Midwestern United States is projected to attract and generate high travel demands throughout the country and to serve as a corridor for the establishment of a multimodal transport hub connecting major metropolitan cities. In 2015, the US Department of Transportation launched the Smart City Challenge — a program to use emerging technologies to create an integrated, first-of-itskind smart transportation system geared toward the future of urban transport. The creation of the Cincinnati Uptown Corridor represents the first step in upending this program to upgrade this midwestern city into a major transportation hub of multimodal transportation options for the future rapid, explosive development of the city.
Cincinnati Uptown Innovation Corridor | Transportation Hub, Pedestrian Bridge Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Outline Uptown Cincinnati, located in the Avondale neighborhood is the largest center for economic growth and urban development in the region outside the Central Business District of downtown Cincinnati. The Uptown Innovation Corridor is envisioned as centered near the new highway interchange at I-71 and MLK Boulevard. This location is projected to attract and generate high travel demands throughout the district, and to serve as a corridor for the establishment of a multimodal transport hub connecting major metropolitan cities in the midwestern
US. In 2015, the US Department of Transportation (USDoT) launched the Smart City Challenge — a program to use emerging technologies to create an integrated, first-of-its-kind smart transportation system geared toward the future of urban transport. This project represents the conceptual design of a transporation hub in the Uptown Corridor to demonstrate infrastructure readiness for the future in an area experiencing unprecedented growth and urban expansion to make Cincinnati a center to connect with various other metropolitan cities.
74
71 ng Rd
75
Readi
196
200 OHIO KENTUCKY
Upto
204
Martin Luther K
OHIO KENTUCKY
471
71
OHIO
RIVER 0 10 20
75
LEGEND
50
100
feet
]Major highways ]Major roads
]Minor roads Paths
State boundary Neighborhood boundary Railway tracks
Conto
Water
COUNTRY-STATE
(counter-clockwise from top right) Country-scale map to showing geographic context of the project location. State-scale map showing metropolitan locational context of the project site County-scale map showing project location based on the context of city border demarcations. City-scale map showing location of the project site based on neighborhood context. Urban density map showing location of the project site based on the context of population-based strategic location primacy, site access, and demand. Neighborhood-scale map showing project site based on locational context. Street-scale map showing project site based on vehicular/pedestrian/zoning context.
United States of America State of Ohio Hamilton County STATE-COUNTY
The State of Ohio Hamilton County City of Cincinnati COUNTY-CITY
188
Whittier St.
Hamilton County City of Cincinnati Avondale Neighborhood
192
own Corridor Site 196
CITY-NEIGHBORHOOD
King Dr.
71
City of Cincinnati Avondale Neighborhood Project Location
contour intervals in metres
ours (metres)
Existing buildings
r bodies
Featured Landscape
5
Precedent Study | WTC Transportation Hub, New York - Santiago Calatrava This transporation hub by Santiago Calatrava is located to the east of the former World Trade Center Twin Towers. As a major transport hub to replace the Port Authority Trans-Hudson rail
system, the this unique building was used as a precedent to explore the parametric design of its cross-sectional structural elements. A Grasshopper script was used in Rhino to achieve the
7
1
2
3
4 5 6
1. Purlin 2. Transition 3. Rafter 4. Arch 5. Upper Portal 6. Lower Portal
modulated repetition of the cross-sectional ribs to explore the to its exactness in reality, but to generate its close likeness and complex composition of the structure leading the architectural to explore the implications of its tectonic development using form. The objective of this study was not to replicate the building visualization, lighting, and physics in the Unreal Engine.
An illustration of the WTC transportation Hub, whose constructed technical cross-section varies from this representation, shows the repetitive arrangement of the purlins through the variability of the transition developing a unique tectonic relationship in the derivation/ deduction of the overall architectural form.
Design Concept | Dynamics of motion in nature In nature, we see many examples of physical energy transport, which can be understood as the basic actions of “attract,” “collect,” and “distribute.” In a hurricane, the motion of the storm moves inward to a point of complete calm while simultaneously distributing rain, wind, and energy in its outer arms. Rain-bearing
clouds are drawn into the center in a circular motion before being flung out again. An ice dancer executing a spin draws their arms into their body to accelerate the speed at which they turn, increasing the expression of kinetic energy; to release that energy as potential, they must once again open their arms to slow
13 Ballet
Attract
Collect
Figure skating
Distribute
the speed. Iron filings align themselves to the direction of the magnetic field but cannot approach the central pole.
Collect
Attract
space for Cincinnatians and as such will include a variety of multiuse platforms. This is a fundamentally different approach to transportation from the model in which transport is intended to In the future of transportation in Cincinnati and other urban help users pass through a space. This concept will cause users centers it is expected that population density will increase and to gather in, pause, and then continue and by doing so, changes public transportation will become more prevalent, possibly even the way in which transportation is viewed. It is no longer “basic” ubiquitous. The design of the transport center can help drive or “utilitarian” but is associated with leisure, convenience, and this conversation and by using strategies found in nature. The luxury. intent is that the transport hub will serve as a central gathering
Form Iterations Using the concept of collection and distribution, explorations of form at hierarchical levels were sought to determine the best way to allocate and orient the architecture around a central core as a conglomeration of quadrant areas that appear to be attracted toward the central core by also have their own character of dynamic propagation around it. 1a
1b
1c
1d
2a
2b
2c
2d
Site - existing features
Site - design status
Site - area Plan View
SW Isometric View
1. Terrarium/Bus Stand
2. Retail
3. Mixed Retail + Office
4. Commercial/Bldg Infra
5. Rail Transport/Commercial
Statistics of allocated form elements
8%
Overall gross area fractions of each level based on intended programmatic use.
20.8%
LEVEL
6
59.9 Rail Transport
5
5
73.5 Commercial 76.4 Mixed Retail + Office
4 3
62.1 Retail 66.8 Bus Transport
2 29.4 Terrarium 10
4
16.9%
20%
0
4b
18.1%
16.3%
1
4a
Hierarchy
20
30
40
50
AREA (SF) x 1000
60
70
80
Plan view of assembled building levels
d
d
4c
5a
15
1e
1f
1g
1h
1i
1j
LEVEL 1
Terrarium/Bus Stand/Retail 2e
2f
2g
2h
2i
2j
LEVEL 2
Retail 3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
3h
3i
3j
3k
3l
LEVEL 3
Mixed Retail/Office/ Parking Connection 4d
4e
4f
4g
4h
4i
LEVEL 4
Commercial + Building Infrastructure 5b
5c
5d
5e
5f
5g
LEVEL 5
High Speed Rail/ Commercial
Gaze Point
(top left) (top right) (above)
Concept of visual gaze points on a screen. Focal range of the eyetracker camera to ascertain gaze points Gaze points of 15 different users on image stills of the transport hub digital model overlooking the pedestrian bridge to a parking buiding.
(above right) (opposite)
Gaze points of an image stills of the digital model as viewed from the parking building into the transport hub. Gaze points of the plan view of the site with abstracted building model to enumerate visual interest in the geometric tectonics of the model.
Visual Analysis | Eye-tracking, pedestrian bridge For this project, eye-tracking research using a tracking device was images of the conceptual architectural form. By creating a pattern used to obtain detailed information about onlooker behaviors and of near-infrared light on the eyes to monitor gaze point, the device preferences from fifteen different users, looking at high resolution provides data that gives unique insights into human behavior
17
LEGEND Bee Swarm: recorded points of intense gaze Clusters: Average area of visual interest
Heat Maps: Color-contoured results of degree of visual interest. Intense gaze (red) to least gaze(green).
and generates perception-based conditions for the architectural data were used in three different formats to interpret human form derived from the visual interaction, providing a platform visual cognitive response to the images. This data was used to to develop additional architectural design innovations. These determine the bridge location and its tectonic features.
Simultaneous view of the transportation hub showing all levels with allocated high-level programs and high-speed rail entry/exit.
S 42 ) RD. (U DIN G R EA UPTOW
N LOO P (N
EW)
(above, from top) Simultaneous view of the transportation hub showing all levels with allocated high-level programs and high-speed rail entry/exit. Heat maps showing areas of elevated interest based on eyetracking analysis of preliminary digital models. Allocated elements of terrarium in the centre of the building and a pedestrian bridge connection to a park-and-ride multilevel parking garage. (right) Satellite view of project site and geometric design of new loop roads for vehicular access to building. The conceptual digital model is super-imposed to scale to show the close relationship of the building to the site and its context. High-speed rail line not shown for clarity.
DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING D
Aerial image credit: Bing Maps
Strategic Plan | Building : Site : Urban Context The elements that integrate the purpose of the transportation hub people/visitors at a neighborhood scale, but also at varying scales to the overall Uptown Corridor development are carefully chosen as demonstrated in the site analysis. The building seamlessly such that the building anchors itself to the location not only to integrates with the existing transportation infrastructure to attract
WHITTIER ST. (IMPROVED) NE R. ( KD
PAR
W)
DRIVE
21
Proposed automobile bridge exit ramp for direct access to parking garage from Interstate 71 for park-n-drive users. Parking garage for building users, local parking, and highspeed rail travelers. Pedestrian bridge connection between transport hub and parking garage for direct access to park-n-drive users. Terrarium Future Development
commuters and travellers to encourage and facilitate national for local bus transportation. The pedestrian bridge shown here mass transportation needs of the future with a high-speed rail was designed in greater detail for entry into the 2018-19 ACSAsystem, which is integrated into the building along with facilities AISC design competition.
1
4 5 2
2 3
varies 1. Upper Flange 2. Cantilever 3. Girder
4. Tension Connector (to cables) 5. Stiffener (handrail mount) 6. Brace (handrail)
6
23
N
A RAM
25
N
A RAM
27
End of Document
The Cincinnati Uptown Corridor Transportation Hub by Morgan Raman Click here to go to the beginning of this Portfolio.