d r o w e r o F F
or more than 25 years the Honda CBR Fireb blad de has bee en the benchmark big-bore sportsbik ke for a generation of motorcycle riders. Developed in the late 1980s, when sportssbikes sbikes sbi were fast, fat and heavy, Honda’s CBR90 00RR R FireBlade turned race-replica motorcycle desiign on itss head head. Weight was pared back to 185 kilos, ma ass was centralised and the focus was on agility throu ugh the corners, not sheer po ower in a straight line. The 893cc engine was mated to a sha arp-steering 16-in nch front wheel and a chassis which could d easily hand dle the 110-120bhp the motor delivered. On release in 1992 the CBR900RR became the yardstick for all larrge-capacity sportsbikes and it was largely down to one man – the machine’s maverick designer Tadao Baba – who was insistent that a sports bike should be fast and agile. Over the years the Blade spawned a host off imiitators, but it wasn’’t untiil Yamah ha’’s YZF-R R 1 in 1998 that the big CBR was finally matched d and beaten.
Acknowledgements
Big thanks to Yuko Sugeta who helped with the original interviews with Tadao Baba way back in 1998/99. Thank you to Stuart Barker for help with both the Isle of Man TT exploits of the FireBlade and its World Superbike results and story too. Thank you as well to the likes of Dave Hancock, Bob McMillan and Phillip McCallen as well as many from Honda UK, Honda Europe and American Honda, big thanks to ex-Honda UK legend Scott Grimsdall. Thanks also to all the journalists who helped with quotes and images (seen in the original Haynes book and this latest updated for Mortons Media) and they are: Roland Brown, Andy Findlay, James Wright and Sue Ward from Double Red Bike Magazine: Martin Child, Steve Westlake and Olly Duke. Performance Bikes: Rob Gray, Trevor Franklin. Motor Cycle News: Chris Moss, Marc Potter.
Succe essive models though have kept the bike at the sharp end, through 918cc, 929cc and 954cc verssions: each of which bore the hallmark of Baba-san. Fo or 2004 the machine truly enttered the litre-class with th he Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade. The capital ‘B’ was dropped in honour of th he retiring Baba-san, but the ante was upped, with an all-n new angular styling and under-sseat exhaust pipe. Further new versions came along over the years, including a major update in 2008 through to the latest version for the 2017 model year. Out on the tracks the Blade had a slow start, due to capacity rules in the various racing classes but even early on it would win the USA’s Formula Xtreme title and do well in production racing, including at the Isle of Man TT races until the 1000cc model of the Blade could finally compete in World Superbikes, taking the Fireblade’s first world title in 2007 with James Toseland. Even today, after a quarter of a century and 13 or more mod dell generatiions th he story off th he Hond da CBR Fireblade continues on ro oad and track…
SuperBike Magazine: Warren Pole, John Cantlie, Alex Hearn, Dan Harris and latterly Alan Dowds and John ‘Captain Knuckles’ Hogan. Young Machine magazine: Satoshi Kogure. Moto Magazine: Vassilis Karachilous. Australian Motorcycle News: the late, great Ken Wootton. Ride It Magazine, South Africa. Kiwi Rider, New Zealand: Jonathan Bentman and Ben Wilkins. Motor Cyclist: Mitch Boehm and the late, great Greg McQuide. American RoadRacing magazine: Dean Adams. Thanks also to Kevin Erion of Erion Racing. Other thanks go to those quoted from various motorcycle publications which also include RiDE, Two Wheels Only and many others. The journalists I’d like to thank include: Niall Mackenzie, Jim ‘Bulla’ Moore, Simon Hargreaves, Matt Hull, Emma Franklin, Ben Cope.
Picture acknowledgements
The biggest of thanks must go to Roland Brown for raiding his archives and then donating most of his fee to Riders for Health/Two Wheels for Life: what a gentleman… Secondly thanks to Graeme Brown/2Snap for the excellent WSB shots and Valerio Piccini. Thanks to James Wright and Sue Ward from Double Red, Mortons Archive especially Jonathan ‘The Force’ Schofield, Erion Racing and Ken Vree, Honda UK, and big thanks to Honda R&D in Japan for reproducing the original model illustrations at no cost whatsoever.
Bibliography
World Superbikes – the first 15 years (By Julian Ryder) Haynes Great Bikes – the Honda FireBlade (By Rob Simmonds)
Fireblade Firebllade 03
s t n e t n o C 06 22 32 42 52 64 80 86 92 96 108 116
04
Chapter 1: Chapter 2: Chapter 3: Chapter 4: Chapter 5: Chapter 6: Chapter 7: Chapter 8: Chapter 9: Chapter 10: Chapter 11: Chapter 12:
Fireblade
Forging the FireBlade FireBlade Feedback Tech Talk – Early Blades Blade Blunted? The Millennium Blade Early Blade racing and the TT Baba’s final Blade Blade goes 1000cc Blade Specials and special owners Blade racing part 2 and UK World Superbike racing Boom to bust and back – 2008-2017
6
22
Author BERTIE SIMMONDS Design SEAN PHILLIPS, ATG-MEDIA.COM
FRONT COVER Design by Holly Furness
Publishing director DAN SAVAGE Publisher STEVE O’HARA Group Key Accounts Manager STEFF WOODHOUSE swoodhouse@mortons.co.uk 01507 529452 / 07786 334330 Reprographics JONATHAN SCHOFIELD, PAUL FINCHAM AND ANGIE SISESTEAN Marketing manager CHARLOTTE PARK Commercial director NIGEL HOLE Published by MORTONS MEDIA GROUP LTD, MEDIA CENTRE, MORTON WAY, HORNCASTLE, LINCOLNSHIRE LN9 6JR TEL. 01507 529529 ISBN: 978-1-911276-56-2 PRINTED BY: WILLIAM GIBBONS AND SONS, WOLVERHAMPTON © 2018 Mortons Media Group Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage retrieval system without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
MEDIA GROUP LTD
32
52
108
42
80
116
Fireblade 05
e h t g n i g For
e d a l B e r Fi Big sports bikes had become stale: they were big, heavy and almost clumsy creatures. A new Honda machine was about to change all that.
T
esting, testing, testing: it’s almost never-ending. This is Suzuka race circuit and it’s 1989. This legendary Japanese circuit that has echoed to the sounds and seen the sights of legendary Formula 1 car events and 500cc Grand Prix races now reverberates to a more solitary sound. The sound is unmistakably a four-stroke; it’s clearly a four-cylinder machine of 700-900cc or so of capacity, but the crude sand-cast metal parts, movable engine mounts, strange tank shape, fairing and chassis parts of indeterminable origin and overall shoddy finish do not tell you that this machine is an early pre-production version of a bike that will become a new byword for street motorcycle performance. Occasionally the single machine is joined on track by one or two other machines. These are much sleeker, more polished, the finished items no less. These are the current crop of litre-class sports bikes: Suzuki’s GSX-R1100, Yamaha’s FZR1000 EXUP, Honda’s own CBR1000F and Kawasaki’s blisteringly-fast ZZ-R1100. Compared to its peers, this development Honda looks ugly and yet feels purposeful. Every so often this grotesque machine pulls into the pits and stops in a garage. Almost immediately the rider is swamped by technicians wearing the ‘flying wing’ motif of the mighty Honda corporation. They interrogate the rider about engine performance, handling and braking: everything is noted down. Engine position, suspension set-up, then the rider is asked how the motor felt, what were the tyres like? Any scary moments? Did the seat feel comfy? Everything and then some: still buzzing on the adrenalin of riding the challenging and scary Suzuka circuit, the test rider answers the questions as best he can. Changes are made and the bike accelerates out of the pit-lane and goes back out on to the track. Security is tight. There aren’t any cameras and certainly no smart phones to instantly leak spy pictures to the internet.
06
Fireblade
ABOVE: The bike it would become: the finished FireBlade at the 1992 launch with Sean Emmett on board. Years of development would lead to this… Fireblade 07
FOORGING THE FIREBLADE
ABOVE: This was what the Blade could have become: the elusive CBR750RR, based heavily on the 400RR. Th hat bike burning up the track back in the late 1980s is an early ancestor of the Honda CBR900RR FireBlade and the later CBR1000RR Fireblade and over the next 25 years it will become the machine by which all other sports bikes are to be measured, but let’s start at the beginning and check out this little fellow. One of the technicians isn’t wearing any overalls; he’s in leathers. He’s Tadao Baba – chief engineer for Honda Research and Development. This is his first bike as project leader and the scuffs on his leathers tell you that he takes his work very seriously indeed. It’s fair to say that – for a Japanese man and Honda executive – Baba-san is a maverick. You’ll spot him in the pits sitting on a large fuel drum, puffing away at one of his 20-a-day cigarettes. You’ll see him out on track riding hard – and fast – and then crashing when he pushes just that little too far. But Baba-san has been around the block a few times and in a time of 80s excess where bigger is better and bigger and faster is better still, he has a plan. “Bikes at the time in the 1980s were very fast. WHOOSSH,” Baba mimes with a smile on his face, making his hand shoot upwards, like a rocket. “But I felt they never turned like a race bike, there was no ‘flickflack,’” he again holds his hand up to show what he means, this time bringing it down in a chopping motion then mimicking a bike flicking through a chicane as he makes his hand move from the vertical to the left then quickly back upright and swiftly down to the right. “You see, I wanted a bike that would be good into the corners, which produced good power and had good brakes.” He adds: “The CBR900RR made its debut in 1992, but it took us more than three years to reach that point. “At that time, the Japanese market was full of race-replicas, such as NSR250 two-strokes and CBR400RR four-strokes while in Europe the power war had started with the Kawasaki ZX-10, GSX-R1100, and our CBR1000F. Up until then we called these bikes ‘super sport’, but, 08
Fireblade
I thought ‘wait a minute, are these big and heavy bikes really ‘superr sport?’ I thought that going down a straight at high speed doesn’tt mean ‘super sport.’ As it is a sport bike, it must be sporty. The performance must be fun, easy and quick to control. “A sport bike should be controlled freely as to the rider’s wish. In this aspect, all those big monsters were not good enough to be called a sport bike. Yes, they were fast, but, heavy and to my mind they were quite dull. We realised that we should create a completely new, enjoyable world for sport bike lovers. We knew we must go back to the first place and start again. We wanted to give riders something over which they had ‘total control.’” Total control: these two words would come back again and again as what became the Honda FireBlade was developed over the next quarter of a century, but what of Honda’s existing big-inch sports bike of the time? Initially the CBR1000 was marketed as a ‘super-sport’ bike. But since its release in 1987 it had transformed itself from a cutting-edge sports machine into a more laid back sports tourer. Baba-san explains: “As the CBR1000’s development proceeded, we had to think of practical aspects, such as riding long distance on an autobahn comfortably, taking a passenger on the pillion seat and so on. Then, it became more like a touring bike, but with sporting pretensions. We wanted to keep it a bike that people could use on twisty roads and sweeping corners, but its ever increasing weight made it impossible to make it a real sports bike. So, from those ideals came the start of the concept of the CBR900RR FireBlade.” At the start of the FireBlade story then, it was all about-face as the impetus for the machine came from research and development rather than the marketing department. Initially the marketing men would find some new area to exploit and brief the R&D team to make a product that was suitable – not so with the new CBR-RR.
ABOVE: The new model CBR900 wasn’t an ‘F’ but a full-on ‘RR’ racereplica, as shown on this marketing diagram.
ABOVE: Early development sketches hinted at the race-oriented nature of the bike…
At the earliest stages of the development, the leader of the project was Yoichi Oguma. Oguma-san was from Honda’s racing division – Honda Racing Company or simply ‘HRC’. This showed you where the driving force for this project came from, but – thankfully for us – this machine wasn’t going to be designed as a sports-production or ‘homologation special’ as the final capacity was not going to be suitable for production racing rules of the time. After just six months of driving the project forward, Baba-san took over and this was to be his first time in overall charge of a project. By this time it was to be a no-holds barred super sports machine, not with the ‘F’ road bike suffix, but the ‘RR’ race designation. “At this time,” recalls Baba-san, “it was still before even an egg of the FireBlade had been made! We had only a very rough idea of what we wanted and very little design had been done, so the first step was g to refine the idea and decide the machine layy-out. It was a veryy exciting appointment for me at the time. I knew the project would become very
important for Honda. So I was highly motivated to make this machine a complete success. Of course I was nervous! But I was pretty confident, too, as I knew my strong points and weak points from my experiences at Honda up until then. I love riding an out-and-out sportsbike, and I love to feel satisfied when I can control it as I want to. I knew my strong lust for conquest would lead the project in the right direction.” For Baba-san himself, this was the beginning of arguments, stress and sleepless nights as he strove to make a bike with plenty of power and light weight – this final fact being what he felt was the real key to the project. “I was happy to get this project – very happy, but the development life of the CBR900RR was not always so cheerful. I suffered a lot: we all on the development team suffered a lot! Many times we got very, very stressed out and often worked long hours through the night to achieve our goals.” Obviouslyy, Baba’s inexp perience in leading g a whole projject team made the task more of a challenge, but he felt he knew what he wanted
“Oguma-san from HRC initially led the project, this showed the direction. Not a road-going ‘F’ but a full-blooded ‘RR’ race-replica.”
BELOW: Later, more detailed sketches showed the DNA of the original bike we know and love today.
Fireblade 09
FORGING THE FIREBLADE
ABOVE: Honda’s CBR1000F was a good sp ports-tourer – but no out-and-out sp ports machine. from each individual in the team and the contributions they could make to the final product. “Most of the engineers were younger than I was,” he remembers, “but, they all had different backgrounds to be the particular specialists on chassis, engine, suspension or whatever. I respected their thoughts and ideas and always listened to them. I understood that my work was to gather their best ideas and to bring them together as a whole product. A good engine doesn’t sell a bike. Nor does a good chassis, you have to bring these great ideas into a whole that must gel together: that’s the secret.” Professional conflict with other members of the team cropped up from time to time, as (understandably) long nights and a high stress environment took its toll. “Rumours began to circulate,” smiles Baba. “These rumours were that the young engineers would complain that when it came to cutting the weight of a component, ‘Baba-san never says yes.’ Apparently the young engineers used to call me ‘Hotoke no Baba’ or Buddha Baba in English, maybe because I always thought I was right,” he laughs. “Despite that, I could be like a thunderstorm when I got angry. Maybe, some of them were afraid of me – maybe they still are? It’s because I can never let myself compromise – and we couldn’t compromise on the weight of the CBR. I guess I am pretty stubborn! I think aging has made me milder, but others may not agree.” Also, after years in a test position where he could tell engineers what was good or bad about their product, for Baba the boot was now on the other foot and he had to listen to what the test team said about his machine and sometimes this made things difficult. “Before, as a tester, I used to shout at the engineers when they made me ride a dangerous test bike. ‘How could you let me ride such trash?’ I would say, but, suddenly, there was no more shouting.” At the time the full specification for the machine that would become the FireBlade was still not pinned down. At first, the FireBlade project was most definitely a 750cc acrossthe-frame four-cylinder – despite initial denials that it was always going to be a new cubic capacity class of motorcycle. Pictures later discovered would show a motorcycle closely aping the look of the CBR400RR TriArm. “Ah yes first the FireBlade was a 750,” recalls Baba. “This was what we made at first, but then we thought ‘we already have a VFR750, why not make it a 1000?’ But then to make the FireBlade 1000cc would
put it against the CBR1000F. Instead we thought we would make a new class of motorcycle: something unique. This is what we decided to do.” At the second Honda FireBlade Day in 2008 (or should that be Fireblade – as the bike lost the capital B as it went to a full litre-spec in 2004) Baba-san sat with me and explained how he and his team came up with the specific capacity of the original model FireBlade. “Okay, so why 893cc? Look at this,” Baba-san was sketching out a profile picture of a sports bike – the CBR750RR. “We literally took the original measurements of the CBR750RR: wheelbase, castor, trail, everything and then looked at the motor, what could we do with it to make it better? We realised that if we kept the bore but stroked the motor we would get 893cc – and that’s why it became that cubic capacity. We found that the 750 had good top-end power, but with 893cc we also had good torque. This was a big advantage for us.” And this is what helped give the FireBlade its real advantage both on track and street: many of the test riders would get off the FireBlade mule and complain that it didn’t feel that quick compared to the other machines, only to find that the stopwatch told a different story. “Our main aim was that – first of all – we wanted to build a big sports bike which was actually lighter than a 600cc model. Then, to gain the right stability for the machine, the chassis dimensions and riding position were fixed during our extensive testing. So, at the end of all this we find that there is a limited space for the engine. As I mentioned, with the space we had left we thought we could go for something bigger than 750cc hence we managed to get an 893cc powerplant. “We really wanted a motor that could push this bike to around 161mph (260km/h) – that would be enough! From this data we could find exactly what maximum power we would need for the bike to get to this speed and from there what the displacement of the motor would have to be. That turned out to be 893cc, stroking that original motor. Obviously in later years we would up the displacement to more than 900cc. Like the drop in weight, we found we could squeeze more from the powerplant also. “But at the beginning we chose the layout of the best machine from a number of different options, they were not so different as the direction was the same and the ideal point was the same: optimum
“I always thought I was right. I could be like a thunderstorm when I got angry. But I couldn’t compromise with the CBR900RR.”
10
Fireblade
power with as little weight as possible. We had to decide where to draw the line, where we stopped scrutinizing each individual part. It was a big hurdle to go over at first, but with subsequent models of the original 900cc FireBlade we managed to mature the product little-by-little.”
DEVELOPMENT GOES GLOBAL
It was early in the test schedule e in 1989 when Dave Hancock from Honda UK became involved in th he project. He was one of three European n
test riders, the others being Bernard Rigoni from Honda France and Klaus Bescher from Honda Germany, who would test Honda’s latest creations in their varying forms throughout the test programme for their suitability in the European market. Honda USA and Japan had their own testers, mainly for reasons that many models for those parts of the world were pretty much for those markets only, such as the 400 four-stroke class in Japan and the big cruiser market in the USA.
ABOVE AND BELOW: Both the Yamaha FZR1000 Genesis and later EXUP showed the way for orchestrated chassiss and engine technology in a sportsbike.
Fireblade 11
FORGING THE FIREBLADE “I was one of those test riders who was on the early version of the bike at Suzuka in 1989,” recalls Dave. “We had two days with this new bike. At the time they had just decided on the 900cc displaccement. I’d ridden the 750 version earlier, even though the Japanese later denied categorically that they actually had such a machine!! Also o at this time it was fitted with a 17in front wheel as oppose ed to the 16in wheel which the production machine would later use.
ABOVE AND BELOW: Suzuki’s GSX-R1100L L and Kaw wasaki ZZ-R110 00 went more for the power and sports-toure er route.
12
Fireblade
“It wasn’t the prettiest thing on two wheels, but then aga ain not many test bikes were e. The chassis was a bit of a mish-massh of movea able engine mountss, sand cast bits and pieces and a swin ngarm that, I thiink, came from a CBR1000F. The tank also was nothing that you could really recognizze, either. The engineers would experim ment with different shapes and sizzes in a bid to get something with the right shape for yourr legs and the right amount of fuel and the correct weight distribution. “You’d come into the pits and the engineers would want to know everything. Ho ow the motor felt, suspension, the lot. Even if the bike didn’t look like much – and sometimes these prre-production development machines really looked pretty disturbin ng – it was surprising just how good even the ese early machines felt.” Certain motorcycling fashions of the time over in Europe led to the testers wanting small changes made to the design of the bike, even at this early stage. Hancock explains: “We all told d Baba-san that the bike really needed upside-down (inverted) front forks. At the time the fa ashion was for upside downers, as most race ma achines were using them, but Baba was insistent. ‘They weigh too mu uch,’ he would tell us. He was always emp phasizing g the problems of having too much weigh ht or having g mass and weight in the completely wron ng place. That’s parrt of the reason whyy the bike had no rear hugger coverring the back wheel and they made sure it didn’t need a steering dam mper on the road because that would simply add too much weight.” At every stage Baba and the de evelopment team wanted to weigh up whether a part really needed to be on the bike. Fo or the FireBlade development team, the best partss of a bike were the ones they could do without – hence keeping the weight down.